date:20120108

[fpc-pascal] Re: Supported FPC revision to compile jvmbackend port

2012-01-08 Thread leledumbo

> The same as always: the latest release. As of January 1st, 2012, that means
2.6.0

OK, I finally have a reason to use stable release...

--
View this message in context: 
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Supported-FPC-revision-to-compile-jvmbackend-port-tp5127717p5129054.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPCUnit without Lazarus

2012-01-08 Thread Rainer Stratmann

Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
> I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
> to install with: "sudo dpkg -i *". It fails, so: "sudo apt-get install -f".

> ...

> ...

> ...

This was already some time discussed here and in my opinion this is the 
bottleneck of working with freepascal on linux.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FPCUnit without Lazarus

2012-01-08 Thread Luciano de Souza

Now, I understand. FPCUnit and FPCRegistry do not have LCL dependences.
What depends on LCL is the runner called Console Runner. This name make
me confused!

I ahve alredy read the documentation, but I could not understand.
Perhaps, perhaps my weak english... Well, the fact is that everything is
now OK.

When I read the documentation I didn't understand the runner was a
separated executable: an application built specially to test my program.

I thought all the code needed to test my program would be in my test
unit. I was able to create, to register the tests, but not to run then.
I was searching something to run in FPCUnit and FPCRegister. All the
code required to run my test would be in the initialization of my test
unit. When compiling my application I would do:

program MyApp;
uses
MyUnit,
{$ifdef tst}
MyUnitTest;
{$endif}

And I call: fpc MyApp.pas -dtest. According to this idea, the runner
would be my own application called with certain commandline options.

Yes, in my first reading, I do not understand it. Now I can see the
adopted model is best. I don't need to mix the code of my application
with test code. "{$ifdef ...}" is not required.

In brief, all my problem was that I could understand that I have a
runner and I will need to compile it each time I create a new project.

Solved my interpretation issues, now I am coming back to the tests.

Thank you very much for the attention!

Regards,

Luciano

Em 08-01-2012 00:14, leledumbo escreveu:

FPCUnit is part of FCL and it doesn't require LCL. Of course if you install
via packages under Lazarus components folder, it would depend on Lazarus
parts (e.g, LCL), esp. for the runner. Open
fpc/packages/fcl-fpcunit/src/demo for a pure FPC example. Or
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/file/n5128730/fpcunit.pdf
here for the documentation.

--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/FPCUnit-without-Lazarus-tp5128696p5128730.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPCUnit without Lazarus

2012-01-08 Thread Luciano de Souza

Perhaps, the issue has no a happy end for all, but for me, that don't 
use Lazarus and I won't have to do it due FPCUnit, everything is 
fortunatelly OK. It would be unconfortable to install many megabytes to 
use almost nothing. Now, I am happy with Freepascal.

In the future, it's not impossible that I need FileUtils and Clipboard. But
 When it comes, I will think about. Until there, FPC is complete for me.

Em 08-01-2012 10:06, Rainer Stratmann escreveu:

Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:

I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
to install with: "sudo dpkg -i *". It fails, so: "sudo apt-get install -f".
...
...
...

This was already some time discussed here and in my opinion this is the
bottleneck of working with freepascal on linux.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FPCUnit without Lazarus

2012-01-08 Thread Marco van de Voort

In our previous episode, Luciano de Souza said:
> Now, I understand. FPCUnit and FPCRegistry do not have LCL dependences. 
> What depends on LCL is the runner called Console Runner. This name make 
> me confused!

In package/fcl-fpcunit/src/demo/consolerunner

there is a runner that is not LCL dependent?

If you go there and do a 

fpc -Fu../../exampletests testrunner

it will compile.
 
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FPCUnit without Lazarus

2012-01-08 Thread Sven Barth

The unit consoletestrunner from $lazarusdir/components/fpcunit/console
might still be useful to you, because it allows writting the testresults
to the console. The unit has NO dependencies to the LCL, so you can
simply copy it and compile it along with your tests. Normally you use it
like this (I have not tested it and thus I'm just guessing based on the
unit's code):

program mytestrunner;

uses
consoletestrunner, // this is the unit copied from Lazarus
testunit1, // these are your test units
testunit2;

begin
with TTestRunner.Create do
try
Run;
finally
Free;
end;
end;

Your tests then register themselves to the testsuite in the
initialization section of their unit.

Regards,
Sven

On 08.01.2012 13:13, Luciano de Souza wrote: