Re: [fpc-pascal] windows 32bit cross to 64 ?

2010-08-10 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi guys,

I took the liberty to add the summary of this thread to the following wiki
page.

  http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Cross_compiling#Win32_To_Win64


Regards,
  - Graeme -

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


[fpc-pascal] fpdoc tag syntax question

2010-08-10 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi,

I read the fpdoc documentation, and think I understand it correctly, but
would just like to confirm.

For fpGUI's class documentation, it uses a single 'fpgui' package in the
fpdoc command line, covering all the units documented.

When one XML description file references another description file in the
same package, do I need to use the link format as
   #..

or will the following suffice?

   .

The reason I ask. If I use the latter, then my links are not resolved
correctly in the fpdoc output. This is why I believe I need to always add
the # in front of all links that don't reference a identifier
in the same unit.  Maybe the fpdoc documentation could be enhanced to state
this fact more clearly.

If my assumption is wrong, then I found another bug in fpdoc, or in the
linear output writer code.

eg:
  docs for 'fpg_base.pas'
   TfpgColor

  docs for 'fpg_main':
   Some help content with a link to TfpgColor. If I write it as
 then the output generated by fpdoc
   tries to find fpg_main.TfpgColor - which results in a broken link.
   I have to specify the link as
   

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc tag syntax question

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:


Hi,

I read the fpdoc documentation, and think I understand it correctly, but
would just like to confirm.

For fpGUI's class documentation, it uses a single 'fpgui' package in the
fpdoc command line, covering all the units documented.

When one XML description file references another description file in the
same package, do I need to use the link format as
  #..

or will the following suffice?

  .


In one package, . should be enough in the description 
text.

In 'short' tags, however, something goes wrong when creating TOC pages that
use this tag, and the resolving goes wrong; so there 
#..

is needed.


The reason I ask. If I use the latter, then my links are not resolved
correctly in the fpdoc output. This is why I believe I need to always add
the # in front of all links that don't reference a identifier
in the same unit.  Maybe the fpdoc documentation could be enhanced to state
this fact more clearly.

If my assumption is wrong, then I found another bug in fpdoc, or in the
linear output writer code.


It is a bug, but I haven't gotten around to investigate it seriously.
I did some half-hearted attempts, but it obviously wasn't easily fixable.

Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


Re: [fpc-pascal] fpdoc tag syntax question

2010-08-10 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Op 2010-08-10 14:37, Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:
> 
> In one package, . should be enough in the description 
> text.
> 
> In 'short' tags, however, something goes wrong when creating TOC pages that
> use this tag, and the resolving goes wrong; so there 
> #..
> is needed.


I can confirm that this bug occurs in the  tag as well, and happens
in both the New IPF and LaTeX output writers. So it's not an IPF output
writer issue.

[ fpg_main.xml ]---
...

  Convert a color to RGB values of that color
  . Not all TfpgColor values are in RGB format. For
example you are "named" colors too. eg: clWindowBackground

...
--


--[ fpgui.latex ]---
...
% fpgColorToRGB
\subsection{fpgColorToRGB}
\label{fpgui:fpgmain:fpgcolortorgb}
\index{fpgColorToRGB}
\begin{FPCList}
\Synopsis
Convert a color to RGB values of that color\Declaration

\begin{verbatim}
function fpgColorToRGB(col: TfpgColor) : TfpgColor
\end{verbatim}
\Visibility
default
\Description
Convert a color to RGB values of that color. Not all TfpgColor
(\pageref{fpgui:fpgmain}) values are in RGB format. For example you are
"named" colors too. eg: clWindowBackground\end{FPCList}
% fpgDeleteFirstMessage
...
---


As you can see the \pageref is trying to referencing TfpgColor in
fpgui.fpgmain when in fact it is defined in fpg_base.pas


Adding the #fpgui. to the front of the link in the XML file, then it
generates the correct \pageref link.




% fpgColorToRGB
\subsection{fpgColorToRGB}
\label{fpgui:fpgmain:fpgcolortorgb}
\index{fpgColorToRGB}
\begin{FPCList}
\Synopsis
Convert a color to RGB values of that color\Declaration

\begin{verbatim}
function fpgColorToRGB(col: TfpgColor) : TfpgColor
\end{verbatim}
\Visibility
default
\Description
Convert a color to RGB values of that color. Not all TfpgColor
(\pageref{fpgui:fpgbase:tfpgcolor}) values are in RGB format. For example
you are "named" colors too. eg: clWindowBackground\end{FPCList}
% fpgDeleteFirstMessage





I'll report this in Mantis.



Regards,
  - Graeme -

-- 
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal