Re: [fpc-pascal] Enabling FPC_HAS_FEATURE_CONSOLEIO

2008-07-29 Thread leledumbo 



Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> 
> Can you use variants?
> 
No, it requires objfpc support which I don't have yet (see my other post
about  FPC_HAS_FEATURE_HEAP). What if I declare fpc_write_text_shortstr with
the same signature as the one in text.inc?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Enabling-FPC_HAS_FEATURE_CONSOLEIO-tp18686657p18706616.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

[fpc-pascal] fpimage font

2008-07-29 Thread Mattias Gärtner 
What is the status of the freetype font support of fpimage?

I tried the following:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Developing_with_Graphics#Drawing_without_LCL

which runs fine under 32bit, but under 64 bit I get an AV:

GNU gdb 6.8-debian
[...]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7f5d83a92f14 in FT_Get_Glyph () from /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x7f5d83a92f14 in FT_Get_Glyph () from /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
#1  0x00488b70 in
FREETYPE_TFONTMANAGER_$__CREATEGLYPH$CHAR$$PMGRGLYPH ()
#2  0x7f5d83f05220 in ?? ()
#3  0x0054 in ?? ()
#4  0x7f5d83efd2e0 in ?? ()
#5  0x001e in ?? ()
#6  0x7fff8bf18c20 in ?? ()
#7  0x00488c11 in
FREETYPE_TFONTMANAGER_$__GETGLYPH$CHAR$$PMGRGLYPH () #8
0x0003 in ?? () #9  0x0014 in ?? ()
#10 0x0014 in ?? ()
#11 0x in ?? ()

Should I debug it, or am I misusing fpimage fonts?

Mattias

___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpimage font

2008-07-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt 


On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Mattias Gärtner wrote:

> What is the status of the freetype font support of fpimage?

It works as far as I know ?

> I tried the following:
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Developing_with_Graphics#Drawing_without_LCL
> 
> which runs fine under 32bit, but under 64 bit I get an AV:
> 
> GNU gdb 6.8-debian
> [...]
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x7f5d83a92f14 in FT_Get_Glyph () from /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x7f5d83a92f14 in FT_Get_Glyph () from /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
> #1  0x00488b70 in
> FREETYPE_TFONTMANAGER_$__CREATEGLYPH$CHAR$$PMGRGLYPH ()
> #2  0x7f5d83f05220 in ?? ()
> #3  0x0054 in ?? ()
> #4  0x7f5d83efd2e0 in ?? ()
> #5  0x001e in ?? ()
> #6  0x7fff8bf18c20 in ?? ()
> #7  0x00488c11 in
> FREETYPE_TFONTMANAGER_$__GETGLYPH$CHAR$$PMGRGLYPH () #8
> 0x0003 in ?? () #9  0x0014 in ?? ()
> #10 0x0014 in ?? ()
> #11 0x in ?? ()
> 
> Should I debug it, or am I misusing fpimage fonts?

I think some debugging is in order here ?

Michael.___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Enabling FPC_HAS_FEATURE_CONSOLEIO

2008-07-29 Thread Micha Nelissen 
leledumbo wrote:
> This is very inconvenient. Moreover, assertions needs it. My first attempt,
> is to comment out {$undef FPC_HAS_FEATURE_CONSOLEIO} in my system.pas. But
> then, FPC argues about Unknown compilerproc "fpc_write_text_shortstr". I
> found it in text.inc, but it's only included if FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO is
> defined. Knowing that I don't yet have any file system driver, I guess it's
> impossible to reach my goal by defining it.
> What's the correct way?

Can you undefine FPC_HAS_FEATURE_TEXTIO as well?

In the end, you have nothing left :-). Or is this the point?

What's the goal?

Micha
___
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal