On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Sarah wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 14:28, Theo10011 wrote:
>>
>> Adding video-taped interviews is the next step. Imagine articles about
>> the Second World War containing video interviews by Wikipedians of
>> people who lived through certain parts of it. There is no inherent POV
>> issue there, so long as we observe NPOV, just as we do with text.
>> Primary sources are already allowed, so long as used descriptively and
>> not interpreted.
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>> ___
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
> I had no idea we were so liberal about original research/primary sources
> from the countless hours I spent in #wikipedia-en-help telling new users why
> their cited references were rejected. Well, now we can finally have those
> thousands of articles about cure-alls and diet-pills, and penis-enlargement
> exercises, since the manufacturer's own research would satisfy those
> standards.
I'm not sure how this is related to the multimedia and images question? Will
having multimedia illustrating an article mean that we have more cure-alls and
diet-pills articles? Or is this a slippery-slope argument?
>
> Now I wonder who I can cite for this picture of Bigfoot(allegedly) I found
> somewhere.
>
> Theo
> _______
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Heather Ford
Ethnographer: Ushahidi / SwiftRiver
http://ushahidi.com | http://swiftly.org
@hfordsa on Twitter
http://hblog.org
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
