Re: [PATCH] Fortran: no size check passing NULL() without MOLD argument [PR55978]
Hi Harald, This is completely fine - if you haven't committed, please do so. Thanks Paul On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 17:32, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Dear all, > > here's a simple and obvious patch for a rejects-valid case when > we pass a NULL() actual to an optional dummy for variants where > there is no MOLD argument and it is also not required. > > The testcase is an extended version of PR55978 comment#16 > and cross-checked with Intel and NAG. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > I intend to commit soon unless there are objections. > > Thanks, > Harald > >
Invalid "dg-do run" in the testsuite (with 2 blanks)
Dear all, I noticed by chance that we have quite a lot of improperly specified do-do directives in the testsuite. % grep "dg-do run" gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ -rl|wc -l 83 Note that with two blanks instead of just one a testcase does not get executed. Does anybody want to earn the honors to change the directives and check for "fallout" in the testsuite? Cheers, Harald
gfortran wiki
Dear all, the gfortran wiki (https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran) seems to have been neglected for quite some time. Given that the release of gcc 14.1 is to be expected in the near future, do we want to bring the wiki pages it up-to-date? Cheers, Harald
Re: Invalid "dg-do run" in the testsuite (with 2 blanks)
On 3/24/24 1:19 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear all, I noticed by chance that we have quite a lot of improperly specified do-do directives in the testsuite. % grep "dg-do run" gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ -rl|wc -l 83 Note that with two blanks instead of just one a testcase does not get executed. Does anybody want to earn the honors to change the directives and check for "fallout" in the testsuite? Cheers, Harald I will do this for the betterment of the order of all good people. I need the therapy after beating my head against a wall last week eating separators. :) Cheers, Jerry -
Re: Invalid "dg-do run" in the testsuite (with 2 blanks)
On 3/24/24 1:19 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear all, I noticed by chance that we have quite a lot of improperly specified do-do directives in the testsuite. % grep "dg-do run" gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ -rl|wc -l 83 Note that with two blanks instead of just one a testcase does not get executed. Does anybody want to earn the honors to change the directives and check for "fallout" in the testsuite? Cheers, Harald One failure after fixing all the spaces ( sed is our friend ). FAIL: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_1.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "_gfortran_matmul" 0 Jerry -
