https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809989
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgrul...@redhat.com,
||ngomp...@gmail.com,
||rdie...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #2)
> We may need to make sure some steps to proceed:
>
> 1. Whether Noto fonts is really satisfied for quality.
>
> There was a case that native speaker says it is not better than blah blah
> blah. we need to figure out rather than trusting the acceptance in other
> platforms fanatically. of course we could try according to them. but as a
> reference.
>
We had even more complaints on Fedora KDE when we *didn't* use Noto. We have
been using Noto for *everything* by default since Plasma 5.21 for consistency
and coverage and people generally like it.
> 2. We can't use a font properly without locale, except applications has own
> support to configure fonts per script-based like some browsers does.
>
> We need to make sure if corresponding locale is available in glibc.
>
> 3. Then also we need orthography file for that to categorize lang coverage
> in fontconfig
These seem like things we should already have regardless of backing fonts...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
___
fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-bugs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
