[Ffc] verbose output
The FFC man pages says: -d, --debug Debug mode, more output is printed. Conflicts with -s. The description sounds to me like it should be '-v, --verbose' The current flag is confusing when we have '-O' for code optimisation. Garth ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ffc] verbose output
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > The FFC man pages says: > > -d, --debug > Debug mode, more output is printed. Conflicts with -s. > > The description sounds to me like it should be '-v, --verbose' The > current flag is confusing when we have '-O' for code optimisation. > > Garth Yes, -v might be a better choice, but how is it especially confusing when -O is used? -- Anders signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ffc] verbose output
On 03/05/10 13:22, Anders Logg wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: The FFC man pages says: -d, --debug Debug mode, more output is printed. Conflicts with -s. The description sounds to me like it should be '-v, --verbose' The current flag is confusing when we have '-O' for code optimisation. Garth Yes, -v might be a better choice, but how is it especially confusing when -O is used? Because 'debug' and 'optimise' are like brother and sister - both should relate to the code (like for gcc). A perfect valid choice would be '-d -O' - it is unclear if it's debug or optimise or both? Garth -- Anders ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Ffc] auto representation
The auto representation with FFC seems to be working pretty well, with the exception of higher-order Lagrange when FErari is installed. It's unbearably slow. Could this be easily tweaked? Garth ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ffc] verbose output
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:28:11PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > On 03/05/10 13:22, Anders Logg wrote: > >On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >>The FFC man pages says: > >> > >>-d, --debug > >> Debug mode, more output is printed. Conflicts with -s. > >> > >>The description sounds to me like it should be '-v, --verbose' The > >>current flag is confusing when we have '-O' for code optimisation. > >> > >>Garth > > > >Yes, -v might be a better choice, but how is it especially confusing > >when -O is used? > > > > Because 'debug' and 'optimise' are like brother and sister - both > should relate to the code (like for gcc). A perfect valid choice > would be '-d -O' - it is unclear if it's debug or optimise or both? > > Garth ok, I see. Let's change it. -- Anders signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ffc] auto representation
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:29:41PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > The auto representation with FFC seems to be working pretty well, > with the exception of higher-order Lagrange when FErari is > installed. It's unbearably slow. Could this be easily tweaked? > > Garth I don't think so, not without a rewrite of FErari. But it might be possible to put in an arbitrary upper bound for when to select FErari over quadrature. -- Anders signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Ffc] auto representation
On 03/05/10 13:43, Anders Logg wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:29:41PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: The auto representation with FFC seems to be working pretty well, with the exception of higher-order Lagrange when FErari is installed. It's unbearably slow. Could this be easily tweaked? Garth I don't think so, not without a rewrite of FErari. OK. I've removed FErari (after about 40 min and still not having compiled Poisson P5). Garth But it might be possible to put in an arbitrary upper bound for when to select FErari over quadrature. -- Anders ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
