Re: [Evolution] Phishing [was Re: Suppressing Tool Tips]

2021-04-11 Thread Mark Stanton
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 14:17 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I recently received the following two messages
> from t...@prost-net.de addressed to me directly and not via the list. My
> mail filter put them into my evolution folder and, on finding them
> there, I unwisely read them.  It appears that someone is using the list
> to get addresses for phishing.  Be forewarned!
> 

That's interesting. I, too, got those. Fortunately I didn't reply.

Mark


___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Phishing [was Re: Suppressing Tool Tips]

2021-04-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 10:53 +0100, Mark Stanton wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 14:17 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > I recently received the following two messages
> > from t...@prost-net.de addressed to me directly and not via the
> > list. My
> > mail filter put them into my evolution folder and, on finding them
> > there, I unwisely read them.  It appears that someone is using the
> > list
> > to get addresses for phishing.  Be forewarned!
> > 
> 
> That's interesting. I, too, got those. Fortunately I didn't reply.

The owner of t...@prost-net.de notified the moderators a few days ago
and the address was blocked from posting to the list, but as the
spammer has obviously harvested addresses from the list itself (not
difficult) there's nothing we can do to prevent them sending direct
mail.

Just be careful of mail ostensibly coming from that address.

poc

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Update to 3.40.0 changed view

2021-04-11 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing
> views, at least an update should check, if a button already exists,
> instead of adding a duplicate.

Hi,
the update doesn't do any such thing. The .ui files are versioned,
user's custom file is used only if its version is the same or higher
than the one provided by the installation. The .ui file is not merged
with the one in the installation, there's always used only one of them.
I do not know what you've exactly done, but the change for [1] also
bumped the corresponding .ui file version, thus if you'd use that file,
then you will not notice any change, except of reposition of the item
on the toolbar.

In other words, there was no "hack" done, there is no problem with
the 3.40.0 in this regard.
Bye,
Milan

[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/847

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list