Re: [Evolution] How-to transfer evolution-2 mail base toevolution-3.4 ?
Le jeudi 13 décembre 2012 à 10:11 -0500, Matthew Barnes a écrit : [...] > the mbox->Maildir conversion was > broken in 3.4.1. It got fixed in 3.4.4 [1], but doesn't sound like that > will do Bruno any good now. > As a follow-up to my previous e-mail : 1) I've got a strange "#evolution" folder in my new folder list. Any advice on the best way to remove it ? 2) all the mailbox files are available in ~/.local/share/evolution/mail/local. Can I run the "mb2md" script that can be found on the internet ? Bruno. <> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] How-to transfer evolution-2 mail base toevolution-3.4 ?
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 17:23 +0100, Bruno PIGUET wrote: > Can I run the "mb2md" script that can be found on the internet ? The question is as answerable as asking you "Can you tell me if I can trust the shop around my corner?". ;) andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] bus error causing crashes
Dear Evolution folks, using Debian Sid/unstable with Evolution 3.4.4 (but happened since 3.4.x), wanting to reply to some message, Evolution often crashes due to a »bus error«. Does somebody experience something similar? I could not find a bug report about that yet, so I wonder if I should create one. Or is this fixed in newer versions or unrelated to Evolution? Thanks, Paul signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] What to do with short polemic praising Evolution?
There's a short 1,900-word (two-page) polemic called "The Joys of the Command Line," which is aimed at Windows users and describes the advantages of runlevel 3 by featuring Evolution as an Outlook 2010 equivalent that can be launched from the command line in a highly flexible and full-featured way. Who on the Evolution Team (or elsewhere) would be interested in acquiring such a document under a GPL? (As an aside, I've observed that both Fedora 17 Xfce and Debian 6.0.6 use Evolution as the default email client in their base installs. That's a bit like both the Tea Party and the Communist Party endorsing the same candidate for election. High praise indeed!) Mike ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] What to do with short polemic praising Evolution?
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:39 -0500, Miki Kocic wrote: > There's a short 1,900-word (two-page) polemic called "The Joys of the > Command Line," Where? > Who on the Evolution Team (or elsewhere) would be interested > in acquiring such a document under a GPL? What do you mean by "acquire" in this content? Also, documents are normally under GFDL or CC licenses. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] What to do with short polemic praising Evolution?
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:39 -0500, Miki Kocic wrote: > There's a short 1,900-word (two-page) polemic called "The Joys of the > Command Line," which is aimed at Windows users and describes the > advantages of runlevel 3 by featuring Evolution as an Outlook 2010 > equivalent that can be launched from the command line in a highly > flexible and full-featured way. Who on the Evolution Team (or elsewhere) > would be interested in acquiring such a document under a GPL? Eh? Launching Evolution, or just Evolution 'components' from the command line is well documented; in the documentation. (!!!) evolution --express evolution --component tasks evolution --disable-preview --component mail But, aside, I think these command-line-RULEZ type screeds (and they tend to be little else) don't really contribute anything substantive to the conversation. They certainly aren't going to win over any users - not like improved applications, closed bugs, and better documentation will. And Evolution isn't Outlook 2010, and Outlook 2010 isn't Evolution. Each is itself. Open Source applications being pitched as stand-ins for proprietary / commercial applications is a well traveled road to nowhere. > (As an aside, I've observed that both Fedora 17 Xfce and Debian 6.0.6 > use Evolution as the default email client in their base installs. That's > a bit like both the Tea Party and the Communist Party endorsing the same > candidate for election. High praise indeed!) It is the primary client, and collaboration component, of GNOME 3. So it seems natural to me. It integrates with other applications in a way that has no competitor. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]
ping! On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 13:47 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 00:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > Have you run Evolution with debugging enabled on this newly installed > > > > computer? Does it show any errors or problems? > > > > > > Not yet, will try that. > > The only debug flag from the man page says: >--debug=FILE > Send the debugging output of all components to FILE. > > Is that how debugging is enabled? What about verbosity levels? > > Attached is a heavily edited diff of strace (diff -u imap.out imap > +local.out) for a imap account enabled, and imap+local spool enabled. > Nothing immediate I can see here, maybe you do. Perhaps I removed too > much information by mistake, but the log files were 12Mb+ large. > ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] bus error causing crashes
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:40 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Evolution folks, > using Debian Sid/unstable with Evolution 3.4.4 (but happened since > 3.4.x), wanting to reply to some message, Evolution often crashes due to > a »bus error«. Does somebody experience something similar? I think that is a euphamism for a segmentation fault. For it to mean anything you almost certainly need to have it drop core so you can get a backtrace. > I could not find a bug report about that yet, so I wonder if I should > create one. Or is this fixed in newer versions or unrelated to > Evolution? It is quite possibly very specific to your install; those kinds of errors can be triggered by lots of subtle things. -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] bus error causing crashes
> > using Debian Sid/unstable with Evolution 3.4.4 (but happened since > > 3.4.x), wanting to reply to some message, Evolution often crashes due to > > a »bus error«. Does somebody experience something similar? > > I think that is a euphamism for a segmentation fault. No, they are different things - a seg fault is when a program attempts to access a memory segment it doesn't own and a bus error is when a program attempts to access memory beyond the capabilities of the machine. Both are caused by similar things, such as dereferencing invalid pointers, but bus errors sometimes point to hardware problems. P. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: local mail spool still unaccessible with evo 3.4.4.-1]
> ping! My upstream mail provider was bouncing messages ... > On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 13:47 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 00:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > > Have you run Evolution with debugging enabled on this newly installed > > > > > computer? Does it show any errors or problems? > > > > > > > > Not yet, will try that. > > > > The only debug flag from the man page says: > >--debug=FILE > > Send the debugging output of all components to FILE. > > > > Is that how debugging is enabled? What about verbosity levels? No, that's not how to enable debugging. The information you need is on the page at http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/bugs.shtml Basically you start evolution using the command line CAMEL_DEBUG=all evolution > > > > Attached is a heavily edited diff of strace (diff -u imap.out imap > > +local.out) for a imap account enabled, and imap+local spool enabled. > > Nothing immediate I can see here, maybe you do. Perhaps I removed too > > much information by mistake, but the log files were 12Mb+ large. > > I don't think the strace is much use in this form - the diff takes out all information on what the file handles refer to. Try the debug options first. P. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
