Re: [Evolution] Duplicate e-Mails - Evolution keeps collecting duplicates
Go to the folder with the duplicates you want removed. Select all messages( Folder> Select all messages). Click right (mouse on folder): Remove duplicates is the 3rd entry from the bottom. Joep On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 00:39 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > it is a topic I expect to have been around before. I keep getting > duplicate e-Mails with Evolution 2.12.0 on OpenSUSE 10.3. Every now and > then it asks all the account passwords again, then collects all the > mails again. I keep the mails on the server to be able to roam and get > my mails from various PC's and places. > > Another problem, how do you get rid of the duplicates in Evo??? In > Kontact-KMail it is a treat to tidy up the mailbox of duplicates. For M$ > outlook there are some apps also. There was a plugin for Evo (perhaps > that mentioned by Joep Blom (Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:42:26 +0200), but I > never got it to work. It would be a great help ... > > TIA > > :-) > Al > > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Problem with `search folders'
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:30 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 20:24 +0100, Barrie Stott wrote: > > Many thanks for the reply, Patrick. > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:04 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:24 +0100, Barrie Stott wrote: > > > > I'm reasonably new to evolution and am having a problem with search > > > > folders. > > > > > > > > As you will have seen, my email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I > > > > want to arrange that all messages from(to) me to(from) an address ending > > > > with zen.co.uk (but not [EMAIL PROTECTED] itself) are in search > > > > folder: zen. I guessed at the the scheme rule wehre I'm searching for > > > > `ends with': > > > > > > > > (and "zen.co.uk" (not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")) > > > > > > > > I could find no relevant information in the Evolution manual so I'd be > > > > very grateful for some help. > > > > > > What's wrong with specifying both rules when creating the Search Folder, > > > making sure they are both applied? No need to write in Scheme. > > The actual thing I want is: > > (SENDER ends with [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND > > RECEIVER ends with zen.co.uk AND > > RECEIVER does not end with [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > OR > > (RECEIVER ends with [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND > > SENDER ends with zen.co.uk AND > > SENDER does not end with [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Unfortunately, the overriding way of connecting is a choice between: > > 'if any criteria are met' => all conditions ORed together > > `if all criteria are met' => all conditions ANDed together > > So create two rules, each with the subcriteria anded together. If the > first rule doesn't fire, the second one will be tried, otherwise not > (make sure to stop processing if the first rule fires). Can't say I've > ever done something this complex, but in theory it should work. With my version of Evolution I can select "stop processing" only with "Message filtering", not with "Search folders". I've managed to sort things out though by use of a couple of dummy search folders. tmp-zen-in gets all requisite incoming messages by AND-ing together a sequence of conditions and tmp-zen-out gets the outgoing ones in a similar way; the search folder zen is just the union of the two temporary folders (obtained by searching for "." in Sender with input from the 2 tmp-* folders). It works and can be extended to more complex conditions The only fly in the ointment is that I have a couple of search folders that I'd rather not see all the time since they are simply scaffolding. > > > That's why I tried scheme. > > > > > > Almost as an aside, you will notice the faulty spelling `wehre' instead > > > > of `where' above. Can I invoke some spelling checker and, if so, how? > > > > > > Edit->Check Spelling (or F7) in the Composer invokes a spell checker. > > > You need to have gnome-spell installed. > > > > I've looked and don't have Edit => Check Spelling in either Evolution or > > its Composer. > > Do you have at least one language selected under > Preferences->Composer->Spell Checking? When you wrote, Patrick. I had no dictionaries at all for spell checking. That is now changed and the checker is working. I'm most grateful for all the assistance. Barrie. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Problem with `search folders'
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 13:05 +0100, Barrie Stott wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:30 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 20:24 +0100, Barrie Stott wrote: > > > Many thanks for the reply, Patrick. > > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:04 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:24 +0100, Barrie Stott wrote: > > > > > I'm reasonably new to evolution and am having a problem with search > > > > > folders. > > > > > > > > > > As you will have seen, my email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I > > > > > want to arrange that all messages from(to) me to(from) an address > > > > > ending > > > > > with zen.co.uk (but not [EMAIL PROTECTED] itself) are in search > > > > > folder: zen. I guessed at the the scheme rule wehre I'm searching for > > > > > `ends with': > > > > > > > > > > (and "zen.co.uk" (not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")) > > > > > > > > > > I could find no relevant information in the Evolution manual so I'd be > > > > > very grateful for some help. > > > > > > > > What's wrong with specifying both rules when creating the Search Folder, > > > > making sure they are both applied? No need to write in Scheme. > > > The actual thing I want is: > > > (SENDER ends with [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND > > >RECEIVER ends with zen.co.uk AND > > >RECEIVER does not end with [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > OR > > > (RECEIVER ends with [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND > > >SENDER ends with zen.co.uk AND > > >SENDER does not end with [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > Unfortunately, the overriding way of connecting is a choice between: > > > 'if any criteria are met' => all conditions ORed together > > > `if all criteria are met' => all conditions ANDed together > > > > So create two rules, each with the subcriteria anded together. If the > > first rule doesn't fire, the second one will be tried, otherwise not > > (make sure to stop processing if the first rule fires). Can't say I've > > ever done something this complex, but in theory it should work. > With my version of Evolution I can select "stop processing" only with > "Message filtering", not with "Search folders". Yes, you're right. My mistake. Filters have actions associated with them, whereas search folders don't. > I've managed to sort things out though by use of a couple of dummy > search folders. tmp-zen-in gets all requisite incoming messages by > AND-ing together a sequence of conditions and tmp-zen-out gets the > outgoing ones in a similar way; the search folder zen is just the union > of the two temporary folders (obtained by searching for "." in Sender > with input from the 2 tmp-* folders). It works and can be extended to > more complex conditions The only fly in the ointment is that I have a > couple of search folders that I'd rather not see all the time since they > are simply scaffolding. > > > > > > That's why I tried scheme. > > > > > > > > Almost as an aside, you will notice the faulty spelling `wehre' > > > > > instead > > > > > of `where' above. Can I invoke some spelling checker and, if so, how? > > > > > > > > Edit->Check Spelling (or F7) in the Composer invokes a spell checker. > > > > You need to have gnome-spell installed. > > > > > > I've looked and don't have Edit => Check Spelling in either Evolution or > > > its Composer. > > > > Do you have at least one language selected under > > Preferences->Composer->Spell Checking? > When you wrote, Patrick. I had no dictionaries at all for spell > checking. That is now changed and the checker is working. > > I'm most grateful for all the assistance. Glad you managed to get it working. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution-exchange 2.12 will not authentic toExchange2003
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:05 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote: > I have tried the user name alone and with the windows domain in this > format: > > domain\username Try just the user name without the domain. I have been using 2.12 with kubuntu gutsy for over a month now without exchange problems. In fact, the exchange connection is much improved over previous versions, both in speed and stability (the previous version locked up when searching the global address list, and frequently lost its connection to the server). -- Art Alexion Resources for Human Development, Inc. 215-951-0300 x3075 4700 Wissahickon Ave. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Philadelphia, PA 19144www.rhd.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Duplicate e-Mails - Evolution keepscollectingduplicates
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 18:39 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > it is a topic I expect to have been around before. I keep getting > duplicate e-Mails with Evolution 2.12.0 on OpenSUSE 10.3. Every now > and > then it asks all the account passwords again, then collects all the > mails again. I keep the mails on the server to be able to roam and get > my mails from various PC's and places. Perhaps the problems are unique to openSuse 10.3. I've been using Evo 2.12 with Kubuntu Gutsy without these or the aforementioned exchange problems for over a month now. At work, I am using SLED 10.1 which uses Evo 2.6, also without the problems. Did the opensuse packages come with distro-specific "tweaks"? -- Art Alexion Resources for Human Development, Inc. 215-951-0300 x3075 4700 Wissahickon Ave. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Philadelphia, PA 19144www.rhd.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution-exchange 2.12 will not authentic to Exchange 2003
Hi Jim, On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 18:07 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote: > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 19:36 +0200, Robin Meijboom wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:05 -0400, Jim Mckean wrote: > > > Just upgraded my opensuse laptop to 10.3, which pulled Evo to 2.12. I > > > like it, but my exchange account no longer works. At first, everything > > > appeared to be empty in the account. So I deleted it and tried to > > > re-configure. I cannot get past the authentication step in the exchange > > > account setup wizard. > > > > > > I have tried the user name alone and with the windows domain in this > > > format: > > > > > > domain\username > > > > > > I use this format for the OWA URL: http://exchange.corporate.com > > > > > > The error is a simple "Could not authenticate, Check username and > > > password." > > > > > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > > > > > > Assuming that you did check your username and password...? :) How about > > the encryption thing? Is it possible that the exchange requires some > > sort of encryption that you did not select? That's the only thing I can > > imagine right now, but I am still using evo 2.10 and I don't use > > Exchange, so it might very well be not the correct answer :) > > > > > Yes, I did check and confirmed that the server was up, and that HR had > not disabled my account (can't be to careful) > > As far the encryption goes, there does not appear to be any options in > the setup wizard, at least not in the first couple of steps I can get > to. > Can you just check https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304802 ? May be you are hitting the same issue. HTH, V. Varadhan ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] (re)setting preferences from config files
given Evo crashes every time I try edit-preferences (eg http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485311) is it possible to edit a file manually such that a disabled a/c is re-enabled? thanks, Michael ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] imap and automatic filtering
Is there anything I can do to make automatic filtering /not/ be super flaky when using imap? It seems that sometimes, only a few of my filters get applied to INBOX, and sometimes non of them. So I have to do the manual select-messages,-select-menu-apply-filters dance all the time. I /do/ have the appropriate "Apply fitlers to new messages in INBOX on this server" checkbox checked under Receiving Options. My inbox used to be pop, and things worked find there. Also, I sometimes have two evolution clients running at the same time (one at home, on at work). Could this be causing the messages to not *seem* like new messages to evolution (even though they are marked as unread)? Thanks, Gary ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] imap and automatic filtering
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:19 -0600, gary jefferson wrote: > Also, I sometimes have two evolution clients running at the same time > (one at home, on at work). Could this be causing the messages to not > *seem* like new messages to evolution (even though they are marked as > unread)? This may be exactly the problem. It would be more helpful if you mentioned what version of Evo you're using and what operating system/version you're running it on. Evo's IMAP support is pretty sub-optimal in this situation, because it doesn't push back attribute changes to the IMAP server unless you exit Evo or go into offline mode before you leave for work or home (IIRC). Unfortunately, offline mode is flaky in Exchange; if I go offline then back online my calendar does not notify me of appointments anymore and new mail does not appear in my summary window; I have to exit/restart Evo. But if I leave them both running then my spam filtering is flaky and messages I've marked as deleted in one instance don't appear as deleted in the other instance. I don't do a lot of filtering on my IMAP mailbox (at the moment) but I'm sure I'd have similar issues if I did. I can understand that they don't want Evo pushing back for every minor tweak of the local data, but it should do something more intelligent than what it currently does. What I'd love to see is for Evo to push outstanding attribute changes to the server after it's been idle for some amount of time, like 5 minutes or so. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.us "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Two questions from an Evolution new user
Hello! This is my first post as I am new to Evolution. So far, I am very impressed with it. I have two questions though: 1. It seems that filters I have assigned to run automatically on an exchange connection don't always run; they seldom do actually. Is that a known bug currently? 2. Is there a away that I can group my mails in a folder based on the sender or even better, the date the mail was received ? This is so far the only thing I would change in the setup. ex: Received Today: (Header row in the table) mail 1 mail 2... Yesterday ... Last week ... etc. Thanks! Daniel ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] imap and automatic filtering
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:19 -0600, gary jefferson wrote: > Is there anything I can do to make automatic filtering /not/ be super > flaky when using imap? It seems that sometimes, only a few of my > filters get applied to INBOX, and sometimes non of them. So I have to > do the manual select-messages,-select-menu-apply-filters dance all the > time. > > I /do/ have the appropriate "Apply fitlers to new messages in INBOX on > this server" checkbox checked under Receiving Options. > > My inbox used to be pop, and things worked find there. > > Also, I sometimes have two evolution clients running at the same time > (one at home, on at work). Could this be causing the messages to not > *seem* like new messages to evolution (even though they are marked as > unread)? Definitely. IMAP is not designed to support multiclient coherence in this sense, i.e. the first Evo instance to filter the message will implicitly mark it as "seen" (i.e. not new) so the second instance will ignore it. The only solution is to close your office session (or go offline) when you go home, and vice versa. poc PS This of course also applies to any other clients that might be reading your IMAP store. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] imap and automatic filtering
Le lundi 15 octobre 2007 à 14:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : > Definitely. IMAP is not designed to support multiclient coherence in > this sense, i.e. the first Evo instance to filter the message will > implicitly mark it as "seen" (i.e. not new) so the second instance will > ignore it. The only solution is to close your office session (or go > offline) when you go home, and vice versa Going offline is not the same thing as closing evo: in the first case it "forgets" to reread the status of already received mails. It's a bug in evo. Xav ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] problems with coolkey smart card and OWA account
I wanted to add, under certificates, it shows all the certificates from the smart card, just as it does in firefox. why is authentication then failing when it works with the same user/pass in firefox? On 10/14/07, John H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1.I can use evolution to check regular OWA accounts > 2.I can check OWA with coolkey with firefox at https://www.foo.bar.gov > 3.I CANNOT check the https://www.foo.bar.gov site with OWA support in > evolution. > > Evolution prompts me for my PIN, as I seem to have coolkey being used > by it, when I click "preferences" in evolution. I then go to add a > new OWA account, but when I click "authenticate," despite putting the > same user/pass from firefox, it says invalid user/pass. > > What to do? I know that in firefox if I allow it to prompt me, there > are two certificates on the smart card(only one works), is perhaps > evolution choosing that one on accident? Can I get evolution to > prompt which cert I want to use? > > This is an F7 machine. > > Thanks for help > ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] imap and automatic filtering
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 20:50 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Le lundi 15 octobre 2007 à 14:43 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : > > Definitely. IMAP is not designed to support multiclient coherence in > > this sense, i.e. the first Evo instance to filter the message will > > implicitly mark it as "seen" (i.e. not new) so the second instance will > > ignore it. The only solution is to close your office session (or go > > offline) when you go home, and vice versa > > Going offline is not the same thing as closing evo: in the first case it > "forgets" to reread the status of already received mails. > It's a bug in evo. Charming, I didn't know that (I don't use offline mode). I suppose a workaround would be to switch folders after going online again. AFAIK that causes Evo to sync up again. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] imap and automatic filtering
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:01 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > What I'd love to see is for Evo to push outstanding attribute changes > to > the server after it's been idle for some amount of time, like 5 > minutes > or so. If you have enabled "Automatically check after N minutes", the changes will be synced. -- Sankar P Harver's Law: A drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts Novell, Inc. Software for the Open Enterprise™ http://www.novell.com ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
