Re: [Evolution] can't install evolution-data-server-1.8.1
Thanks you for your answer ! However, I can't install these packages because there don't exist on the Debian Sarge Stable. Is is possible to install them from the sources ? Matthew Barnes a écrit : > On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 22:30 +0200, Hulin Thibaud wrote: >> In a second time, I begin the compile with a "make", but that don't >> works. I obtain this : >> >> e-msgport.c:39:18: nspr.h: No such file or directory > > > > Hulin, > > Make sure you have the libnss3-dev and libnspr4-dev packages installed > and then try compiling again. This is a bug in Evolution. > > See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356774 > > Matthew Barnes > > > > > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Separating multiple mail accounts
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 11:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello together! > > I am using Evolution 2.6.1 under Ubuntu Dapper. Is it possible to separate > the e-mail accounts like in Thundebird? I would like to have an inbox, an > outbox etc. for every mail account. Any ideas? > > Thank you very much! tough luck with pop :( you will need to use imap, or exchange/groupwise/hula account? workaround is to use filters to moves mails from a particular account to another folder. -- Ritesh Khadgaray LinuX N Stuff Ph: +919822394463 Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Sorting of messages
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 10:03 -0500, David Berg wrote: > I'm just moving from using gmail's web interface to evolution. I have > most things set up in a way that work for me but I've yet to find a way > of sorting that I like. Maybe someone here can help me? > > What I'd ultimately like for sorting is this: with messages fully > threaded, I want them sorted by the date of the most recently received > message within a thread. Very similar to the way gmail does it only > with full threading instead of their simplified conversation view. Even > better would be to have branches without new messages collapsed but I > expect this would be a feature request. do let me know, if you have figured this out :) > > Thanks > > --Dave > > > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list -- Ritesh Khadgaray LinuX N Stuff Ph: +919822394463 Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Exporting contact address book to another computer/operating system
hi liz, Am Dienstag, den 10.10.2006, 22:20 +0100 schrieb liz meyer: > I have happily been using Evolution for some time on my old computer - > in Linux - and have afairly large contact list I no need to export to a > laptop running windows XP (not my choice - constraints of my swimming > club). what is the easiest way to do it? file > save address book as vcard. after that, feel free to send it to yourself. :-) cheers, andre -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed! http://www.iomc.de signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] can't install evolution-data-server-1.8.1
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 09:24 +0200, Hulin Thibaud wrote:
Thanks you for your answer !
However, I can't install these packages because there don't exist on the
Debian Sarge Stable. Is is possible to install them from the sources ?
Sure, you can install those libraries from source, although I'd recommend just grabbing the packages from Testing ("Etch") instead.
Also be prepared to have to upgrade GTK+, GLib, and possibly some other libraries that Evolution depends on. Evolution's configure script checks that you *have* the required libraries, but doesn't check whether they're a recent enough version to successfully compile. That's another bug, I'm afraid.
Good luck!
Matthew Barnes
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Slow link debug
Im running Evolution 2.6.0 with Exchange-Connector (from SUSE 10.1 installs) It runs semi fine when Im directly (LAN) connected to the server. But when trying from a 4k/s link its horrible. Random crashes, sync issues between Evol and Connector, reayyy sllloo, constant refreshing of folders etc. Anyone out there seeing the same issues over a slow link? E-Mail disclaimer: http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Import Assistant greyed out
Hi, I've just decided to try Evolution after using Thunderbird for some time. I've grabbed my mbox file from TB and made a copy, making sure my user owns the file. I then fire up Evolution and start the Import Assistant. I choose "Import a single file" and click next, but on the next screen, the "file type" drop-down menu is greyed out and so is the Forward button. So I choose my "inbox" file but can't proceed any further. Sorry if this has been covered but I've searched the list and couldn't find anything explaining why this might be. Cheers... ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Deleting attachments
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 12:40 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:53 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:33 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 14:29 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:42 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:56 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > > AFAIK, no there isn't, but it would be nice. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No doubt purists will object that this constitutes modifying the > > > > message > > > > > > > (and invalidating any digital signatures it might have). I still > > > > think > > > > > > > it would be a Good Thing (TM) though. > > > > > > > > > > > > it's also not possible to do for all mail store types. > > > > > > > > > > It's possible with mbox and IMAP. > > > > > > > > oh really? please elaborate :) > > > > > > Existence proof: IMP (widely used IMAP webmail client) does it. > > > > The IMAP protocol does not provide any way of doing this. IMP must go > > behind the IMAP server's back, which is something a client cannot do. > > I've done some testing with IMP to see exactly what it does. It's fairly > simple: IMP gets the message MIME structure from the server (the IMAP > protocol provides for this) and then creates a new message with a short > comment substituted for the deleted attachment. It then creates a new > message on the server (using IMAP APPEND I think, just as Evo does with > Post New Message to Folder and presumably Save Draft) and deletes the > old one. The new message is identical to the old one (same headers, > Message-ID etc.) except for a new UUID. > > It does not "go behind the IMAP server's back". As a followup to this topic, I just noticed the following draft RFC of a proposed IMAP extension to allow the construction a new message on the IMAP server using parts of an old message: http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/IDs/draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt AFAIK no current IMAP server supports this extension directly, but I guess it's evidence that there's some demand for it. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Delete POP mail?
Is it possible to get Evolution to delete mail from my POP server when I have deleted/moved it from my Inbox? I have 3 computers, and would like *important* mail on any/all. but I would like the mail that I just read and delete not to show up on the other machines. Thanks. Lawrence M. Fox, DVM DABVP River Grove (Chicago), IL USA "The enemy is fear. We think it is hate; but, it is fear..Gandhi" ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Deleting attachments
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 16:15 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 12:40 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:53 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:33 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 14:29 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:42 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:56 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > > > AFAIK, no there isn't, but it would be nice. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No doubt purists will object that this constitutes modifying the > > > > > message > > > > > > > > (and invalidating any digital signatures it might have). I still > > > > > think > > > > > > > > it would be a Good Thing (TM) though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's also not possible to do for all mail store types. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's possible with mbox and IMAP. > > > > > > > > > > oh really? please elaborate :) > > > > > > > > Existence proof: IMP (widely used IMAP webmail client) does it. > > > > > > The IMAP protocol does not provide any way of doing this. IMP must go > > > behind the IMAP server's back, which is something a client cannot do. > > > > I've done some testing with IMP to see exactly what it does. It's fairly > > simple: IMP gets the message MIME structure from the server (the IMAP > > protocol provides for this) and then creates a new message with a short > > comment substituted for the deleted attachment. It then creates a new > > message on the server (using IMAP APPEND I think, just as Evo does with > > Post New Message to Folder and presumably Save Draft) and deletes the > > old one. The new message is identical to the old one (same headers, > > Message-ID etc.) except for a new UUID. > > > > It does not "go behind the IMAP server's back". > > As a followup to this topic, I just noticed the following draft RFC of a > proposed IMAP extension to allow the construction a new message on the > IMAP server using parts of an old message: > > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/IDs/draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt > > AFAIK no current IMAP server supports this extension directly, but I > guess it's evidence that there's some demand for it. Actually it seems the Cyrus 2.3 series does support this (and I'll now stop replying to my own posts on the subject :-) poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
