[Evolution] Evo 2.8, new IMAP code & new vertical split-view

2006-10-01 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi,

I have installed Evo 2.8 on my desktop and laptop (debian & ubuntu)
since a few days, and I have a quick comments to do:

- on the desktop (big 24" screen) the vertical split-view is really
better. I don't use the 2-lines-per-message presentation, but otherwise
this (long-awaited) change is really welcome.

- on the laptop, the IMAP code has never been particularly good but in
2.6 it was really awful to the point of being unusable: Evo was
constantly refreshing its IMAP folders. In 2.8 it works well and I'm not
forced to use the webmail anymore.

There are still little weirdnesses in 2.8 (e.g. no more selected message
after pressing DEL) but overall I like it. Thanks a lot guys !

Xav

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Junk mail and spamd

2006-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 14:12 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 21:46 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 11:34 +0200, Hans van der Merwe wrote:
> > > I have all the junk mail stuff active and have been marking spam for the
> > > last 2 months now, but still most of the spam comes through.
> > > Loads of the stuff is from the same place, so filtering should not be a
> > > problem.
> > 
> > Same here, and my Bayes db is almost 2 years old.  I must have marked
> > at least 50 to almost a 100 with "hilburn" in the subject line and they 
> > still get through.  I am running a experiment right now, I cleared out
> > the junk folder.  I am not marking any message as "Junk", I move it to 
> > a Spam folder I created.  And then I am letting Spamassassin mark the
> > messages that are determined to be junk.  Right now there are 276 in the
> > Junk folder and 227 that I moved to the temp Spam folder.  I have emails
> > forwarded from work to my home server and some of them have the "SPAM"
> > subject re-write and they still don't get marked as spam.
> > 
> 
> This is ultimately why I moved to bogofilter over spamassassin as my
> mail filtering setup.  We (Gentoo) optionally patch bogofilter in place
> of spamassassin as the spam filter plugin, because you cannot have more
> than one spam filter plugin at a time.  The patch for 2.7/2.8 is
> available here if people are interested:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dang/evolution-2.7.3-bf-junk.patch.gz
> 
> I've been using it for over a year and a half now, and it has a much
> much better hit rate than spamassassin had, it is much quicker to
> filter, and I don't periodically have to killall spamd.  I know there's
> at least one other bogofilter plugin floating around out there.
> 
> Daniel

I have noticed also that spamassassin does not filter in two systems I
run either. What are the points to tweak for it in Linux (SUSE 10.1)?

Is there also a bogofilter patch for Evolution 2.6.0 (SUSE 10.1)? Can
more than one spam filter be used in conjunction to one another; what
the one does not get another may. How are updates done for bogofilter
under YaST, and is there some central database of other junk mails found
by filters that can be incorporated into my filter?

Are there other alternatives to spamassassin and bogofilter, that work
similarly to a virus scanner that gets updated for recognised mails by
other users? Such a system was started by Cloudmark, which used to be
free but went commercial.

:-)
Al

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Evo 2.8, new IMAP code & new vertical split-view

2006-10-01 Thread Ritesh Khadgaray
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 13:02 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have installed Evo 2.8 on my desktop and laptop (debian & ubuntu)
> since a few days, and I have a quick comments to do:
> 
> - on the desktop (big 24" screen) the vertical split-view is really
> better. I don't use the 2-lines-per-message presentation, but otherwise
> this (long-awaited) change is really welcome.
> 
> - on the laptop, the IMAP code has never been particularly good but in
> 2.6 it was really awful to the point of being unusable: Evo was
> constantly refreshing its IMAP folders. In 2.8 it works well and I'm not
> forced to use the webmail anymore.
faster and very usable.
and crashes a lot less :)

> 
> There are still little weirdnesses in 2.8 (e.g. no more selected message
> after pressing DEL) but overall I like it. Thanks a lot guys !

Add the inability to shutdown evolution strangeness .
Not easily reproducible .
/me pulling my hair out from my bald head


> 
>   Xav
> 
> ___
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
-- 
Ritesh Khadgaray
LinuX N Stuff
Ph: +919822394463
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] How to shrink mbox ?

2006-10-01 Thread Carsten Zerbst
Hello, 

my Inbox (Display) usually contains less than 50 emails, 
but the mbox file contains ~5000 emails. The Properties on the Inbox
says the same. How could I force evolution to remove all emails not
displayed from the mbox ? A simple ctrl-e is obviously not the
answer ...

Thanks, Carsten 

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] No Beep, No Copy

2006-10-01 Thread John Abbott




I am using Evo 2.6.0 with SLED 10    and I have more tweaks in this supposed stable version than the Open SuSE 10.1 version. 

  1. The beep on new mail does not function
  
  2. moving to play this sound on arrival does not work - except when I move the mail from the inbox to a folder on some computers

  3. If I send mail and almost immediately shut down the program crashes.

  4. highlight, copy and paste into a new window does not work


I am running Evolution 2.6.0 on HP Pavilion a822n's, Acer Ferrari 4000's and a couple of Toshiba laptops.  These failure modes are consistent across all the network.

John

  


___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Junk mail and spamd

2006-10-01 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have noticed also that spamassassin does not filter in two systems I
> run either. What are the points to tweak for it in Linux (SUSE 10.1)?

Unfortunately, because of the way that junk filters are built for evo,
the only option right now is to patch the source and build from source.

> Is there also a bogofilter patch for Evolution 2.6.0 (SUSE 10.1)? 

Gentoo has one:
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/evolution-2.5.5.1-bf-junk.tar.bz2

I don't actually use Suse.

> Can
> more than one spam filter be used in conjunction to one another; what
> the one does not get another may. How are updates done for bogofilter
> under YaST, and is there some central database of other junk mails found
> by filters that can be incorporated into my filter?

No, bogofilter keeps a wordlist for each account.  It learns the same
way spamassassin does, by clicking junk and not-junk.

> Are there other alternatives to spamassassin and bogofilter, that work
> similarly to a virus scanner that gets updated for recognised mails by
> other users? Such a system was started by Cloudmark, which used to be
> free but went commercial.

There are tons of spam filters, but all work like either bogofilter or
spamassassin, as far as I know.  I'm not aware of any other junk plugins
for evo.

Daniel


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list