[Orgmode] Latex Export

2010-10-16 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi,

I'm using emacs version 22.2.1 on a Fedora Core 9 machine. I'm new to  
org-mode and am interested in using it to write LaTeX documents/Beamer  
presentations. When I load the export dispatcher with Cc Ce, however, I do  
not have the "l" option for LaTeX export; I only have the following:



[t] insert the export option template
[v] limit export to visible part of outline tree

[a] export as ASCII
[h] export as HTML
[b] export as HTML and browse immediately
[x] export as XOXO

[i] export current file as iCalendar file
[I] export all agenda files as iCalendar files
[c] export agenda files into combined iCalendar file

[F] publish current file
[P] publish current project
[X] publish... (project will be prompted for)
[A] publish all projects


Is there something that I need to turn on in my .emacs file or an  
additional module that needs to be installed to have access to the LaTeX  
exporter?


Chris
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [Orgmode] Latex Export

2010-10-16 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Nick,

It does not export anything. The message window displays: "No command  
associated with key l"


Chris

On Oct 16, 2010 1:54pm, Nick Dokos  wrote:

chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:





> Hi,



>


> I'm using emacs version 22.2.1 on a Fedora Core 9 machine. I'm new to  
org-mode and am interested in using it to write LaTeX documents/Beamer


> presentations. When I load the export dispatcher with Cc Ce, however, I  
do not have the "l" option for LaTeX export; I only have the following:



>



> [t] insert the export option template



> [v] limit export to visible part of outline tree



>



> [a] export as ASCII



> [h] export as HTML



> [b] export as HTML and browse immediately



> [x] export as XOXO



>



> [i] export current file as iCalendar file



> [I] export all agenda files as iCalendar files



> [c] export agenda files into combined iCalendar file



>



> [F] publish current file



> [P] publish current project



> [X] publish... (project will be prompted for)



> [A] publish all projects



>


> Is there something that I need to turn on in my .emacs file or an  
additional module that needs to be installed to have access to the LaTeX  
exporter?



>




Not that I know of. What happens if you press l in any case? If it does  
export


to latex then it would seem to be some sort of display problem perhaps  
(lots


of weasel words here but I can't help it). If there is some error, then  
post



the error.





Nick


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [Orgmode] Latex Export

2010-10-16 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Thomas,

This may be as it is the version that comes with Emacs 22.2.1 - is there an  
easy way to check the org-mode version?


Chris

On Oct 16, 2010 2:40pm, "Thomas S. Dye"  wrote:

Aloha Chris,





Perhaps you have an older version of org-mode?





All the best,



Tom





On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:10 AM, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:






Hi Nick,




It does not export anything. The message window displays: "No command  
associated with key l"





Chris





On Oct 16, 2010 1:54pm, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:



> chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:



>



>



>



> > Hi,



>



> >



>


> > I'm using emacs version 22.2.1 on a Fedora Core 9 machine. I'm new to  
org-mode and am interested in using it to write LaTeX documents/Beamer



>


> > presentations. When I load the export dispatcher with Cc Ce, however,  
I do not have the "l" option for LaTeX export; I only have the following:



>



> >



>



> > [t] insert the export option template



>



> > [v] limit export to visible part of outline tree



>



> >



>



> > [a] export as ASCII



>



> > [h] export as HTML



>



> > [b] export as HTML and browse immediately



>



> > [x] export as XOXO



>



> >



>



> > [i] export current file as iCalendar file



>



> > [I] export all agenda files as iCalendar files



>



> > [c] export agenda files into combined iCalendar file



>



> >



>



> > [F] publish current file



>



> > [P] publish current project



>



> > [X] publish... (project will be prompted for)



>



> > [A] publish all projects



>



> >



>


> > Is there something that I need to turn on in my .emacs file or an  
additional module that needs to be installed to have access to the LaTeX  
exporter?



>



> >



>



>



>


> Not that I know of. What happens if you press l in any case? If it does  
export



>


> to latex then it would seem to be some sort of display problem perhaps  
(lots



>


> of weasel words here but I can't help it). If there is some error, then  
post



>



> the error.



>



>



>



> Nick



>___



Emacs-orgmode mailing list



Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.



Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org



http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: Re: [Orgmode] Latex Export

2010-10-16 Thread chris . m . malone

Sorry, I just checked the version: 4.67c

Chris

On Oct 16, 2010 2:48pm, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Thomas,


This may be as it is the version that comes with Emacs 22.2.1 - is there  
an easy way to check the org-mode version?



Chris



On Oct 16, 2010 2:40pm, "Thomas S. Dye" t...@tsdye.com> wrote:
> Aloha Chris,
>
>
>
> Perhaps you have an older version of org-mode?
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:10 AM, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi Nick,
>
>
>
> It does not export anything. The message window displays: "No command  
associated with key l"

>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2010 1:54pm, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:
>
> > chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > I'm using emacs version 22.2.1 on a Fedora Core 9 machine. I'm new  
to org-mode and am interested in using it to write LaTeX documents/Beamer

>
> >
>
> > > presentations. When I load the export dispatcher with Cc Ce,  
however, I do not have the "l" option for LaTeX export; I only have the  
following:

>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > [t] insert the export option template
>
> >
>
> > > [v] limit export to visible part of outline tree
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > [a] export as ASCII
>
> >
>
> > > [h] export as HTML
>
> >
>
> > > [b] export as HTML and browse immediately
>
> >
>
> > > [x] export as XOXO
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > [i] export current file as iCalendar file
>
> >
>
> > > [I] export all agenda files as iCalendar files
>
> >
>
> > > [c] export agenda files into combined iCalendar file
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > [F] publish current file
>
> >
>
> > > [P] publish current project
>
> >
>
> > > [X] publish... (project will be prompted for)
>
> >
>
> > > [A] publish all projects
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Is there something that I need to turn on in my .emacs file or an  
additional module that needs to be installed to have access to the LaTeX  
exporter?

>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Not that I know of. What happens if you press l in any case? If it  
does export

>
> >
>
> > to latex then it would seem to be some sort of display problem  
perhaps (lots

>
> >
>
> > of weasel words here but I can't help it). If there is some error,  
then post

>
> >
>
> > the error.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Nick
>
> >___
>
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
>
>
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: Re: Re: [Orgmode] Latex Export

2010-10-16 Thread chris . m . malone

Which seems old...I'll try and update it. Thanks for the help.

Chris

On Oct 16, 2010 2:51pm, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:

Sorry, I just checked the version: 4.67c



Chris



On Oct 16, 2010 2:48pm, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> This may be as it is the version that comes with Emacs 22.2.1 - is  
there an easy way to check the org-mode version?

>
> Chris
>
> On Oct 16, 2010 2:40pm, "Thomas S. Dye" t...@tsdye.com> wrote:
> > Aloha Chris,
> >
> >
> >
> > Perhaps you have an older version of org-mode?
> >
> >
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:10 AM, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> >
> >
> > It does not export anything. The message window displays: "No command  
associated with key l"

> >
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 16, 2010 1:54pm, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Hi,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > I'm using emacs version 22.2.1 on a Fedora Core 9 machine. I'm  
new to org-mode and am interested in using it to write LaTeX  
documents/Beamer

> >
> > >
> >
> > > > presentations. When I load the export dispatcher with Cc Ce,  
however, I do not have the "l" option for LaTeX export; I only have the  
following:

> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [t] insert the export option template
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [v] limit export to visible part of outline tree
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [a] export as ASCII
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [h] export as HTML
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [b] export as HTML and browse immediately
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [x] export as XOXO
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [i] export current file as iCalendar file
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [I] export all agenda files as iCalendar files
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [c] export agenda files into combined iCalendar file
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [F] publish current file
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [P] publish current project
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [X] publish... (project will be prompted for)
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > [A] publish all projects
> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > Is there something that I need to turn on in my .emacs file or an  
additional module that needs to be installed to have access to the LaTeX  
exporter?

> >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Not that I know of. What happens if you press l in any case? If it  
does export

> >
> > >
> >
> > > to latex then it would seem to be some sort of display problem  
perhaps (lots

> >
> > >
> >
> > > of weasel words here but I can't help it). If there is some error,  
then post

> >
> > >
> >
> > > the error.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Nick
> >
> > >___
> >
> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> >
> > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> >
> > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> >
> >
> >
> >
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] org-export-latex-classes issue

2010-10-20 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi,

I'ma n00b to Lisp and org-mode so please forgive me if the answer is  
obvious. I'm using version 7.01h of org-mode.


I'm trying to set up a custom Latex class to use for preparing a document.  
Some Google searching showed that I need to add this class to the  
org-export-latex-classes symbol. I tried to do this in my .emacs file, for  
example following what is listed at  
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.php by adding the  
following to my .emacs file:


(add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
'("article"
"\\documentclass{article}"
("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")))


I know that org-export-latex-default-class is already set to "article" but  
this example already shows that something is wrong. When I load emacs the  
debugger complains that org-export-latex-classes is an empty list:


Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable org-export-latex-classes)
add-to-list(org-export-latex-classes ("article" "\\documentclass{article}"  
("$

eval-buffer(# nil "/home/cmalone/.emacs" nil t) ; Reading at$
load-with-code-conversion("/home/cmalone/.emacs" "/home/cmalone/.emacs" tt)
load("~/.emacs" tt)
#[nil "^H\205\276^@ \306=\203...@\307^h\310q\202a^@ \311=\20...@\312\307\31$
command-line()
normal-top-level()

As far as I can tell, org-export-latex-classes is set to nil in  
org-latex.el, but this isn't loaded until the export dispatcher calls  
org-export-as-latex. Is this correct? Coincidentally, if I export to latex,  
the appropriate .tex file is created without issue.


My original goal was to setup a custom Latex class - I have tried in the  
same manner as that used above for the "article" class and the debugger  
produces the same result. However, when I attempt to export to latex I get  
the error that my custom class isn't in the org-export-latex-classes list,  
presumably because of the failure in loading the .emacs file.


Any advice?

Chris
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Tilde in URL not exported to latex

2010-10-20 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Stephen,

I recently experienced this issue while adding a reference in a beamer  
presentation using org-mode. It isn't elegant, but my workaround was to use  
\sim instead of the tilde character, at least for what is actually  
displayed in the document - you will still need to use tilde for the actual  
URL link.


Chris


On Oct 20, 2010 3:02pm, Stephen Eglen  wrote:

With the following file (a.tex):









* Intro





This is an example file that I would like to export



Note that the URL has a tilde in it.





http://www.stat.uni-muenchen.de/~leisch/Sweave/FAQ.html











When I do "Cc Ce d" in this buffer, the latex -> pdf exporter displays



a pdf, but I see that the tilde in the URL appears above the following



character (l). If I click on the link it works just fine and takes me



to the page.





In the tex file, I see it has been exported as:





\href{http://www.stat.uni-muenchen.de/~leisch/Sweave/FAQ.html}



{http://www.stat.uni-muenchen.de/\~leisch/Sweave/FAQ.html}





(my line breaking added). Is the above expected behaviour? Do I have to



mark up my URLs differently? Org mode recognises it as a url, judging



by the font locking.









I often use url to format URLs, ie this works just fine:



\url{http://www.stat.uni-muenchen.de/~leisch/Sweave/FAQ.html}





Thanks, Stephen





___



Emacs-orgmode mailing list



Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.



Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org



http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] mailto links broken in HTML export

2010-11-08 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi,

I'm trying to use org-mode to export to HTML with the inclusion of some  
email addresses. For example, I have something like


- please send an email to ([[mailto:some...@someplace][someone@someplace]])

but upon export this gets mangled into thinking it is a "file:" directive  
because the HTML looks like:


- please send an email to (href="some...@someplace">some...@someplace)


In other words, the "mailto:"; gets dropped in the export. I'm currently  
using org-mode version 7.01h with GNU Emacs 22.2.1. This issue is similar  
to the post found here:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg29376.html but to be  
honest I didn't fully understand how the problem was fixed in the patch.


Chris
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] TYPO in manual for =:noweb= header argument

2010-12-05 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi,

In section 14.8.2.10 of the online manual [[  
http://orgmode.org/manual/noweb.html#noweb ] [here]] the third item in the  
list should begin with =tangle= instead of =yes=.


Chris
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [Orgmode] Worg down?

2010-12-12 Thread chris . m . malone

I had the same problem, but it appears fixed now.

On Dec 12, 2010 8:02pm, Nick Dokos  wrote:

Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com> wrote:





> Going to worg at 19:50 EST produced an "internal server error" from



> two machines on my network.



>





Same thing here.





Nick





> The "is it just me" site says it is, in fact, just me, but it only



> tests the domain, not any subdirectories.



>



> Jeff



>





___



Emacs-orgmode mailing list



Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.



Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org



http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [Orgmode] Re: A python module for orgmode files

2010-12-14 Thread chris . m . malone

On Dec 14, 2010 8:47am, Rainer M Krug  wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-



Hash: SHA1





On 12/14/2010 02:34 PM, Jonathan BISSON wrote:



> Jeff Horn gmail.com> writes:



>



>> I think what Chris was referring to is the fact that you can write



>> literate programs using org-mode and org-babel. You can mix



>> documentation and code, and then run some nifty functions that



>> separate them out. The advantage, of course, is that your source is



>> self-documenting.



>>


> Yes, but an org file with babel is not python native. So I needed for  
one



> of my projects an orgmode translator that is totally python native.



> org-babel is nice for orgfiles doing computations but not for software



> development.





What about tangling? When you tangle your org file, you get a source



file for that language.




Tangling is what I had in mind for my comment. It seems like an easy way to  
have literate programming...


Chris
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [Orgmode] [BEAMER] make text fit in a slide

2011-01-20 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Andrea,

I stand corrected - you are getting a lot of useful information here! :-)

Chris

On Jan 20, 2011 4:21am, Eric S Fraga  wrote:

iem...@gmail.com writes:





> Hi Andrea,



>



> I use the following line to allow frame breaks



>



> #+BIND: org-beamer-frame-default-options "[allowframebreaks]"





and, on a slide per slide basis, you can set options using the



BEAMER_envargs property (easiest to do using column view if you have



defined columns as per the tutorial on Worg, for instance). For



example:





--88---



*** A full slide



:PROPERTIES:



:BEAMER_envargs: [shrink]



:END:





Content here





*** A very long slide



:PROPERTIES:



:BEAMER_envargs: [allowframebreaks]



:END:





Some more content here.





--88---





--



: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1



: using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.223.g71650)





___



Emacs-orgmode mailing list



Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.



Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org



http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [O] Org-mode as a replacement for LaTeX (was: Fwd: Exporting latex without preamble)

2011-06-30 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Tom,

I've seen many of the examples you've added to the mailing list and worg. I  
also enjoy using Org-mode for writing my own documents and webpages -  
currently I'm using it to write my Ph.D. dissertation.


I'm curious how you work on Org-mode papers for publication with  
collaborators? In particular, do all of your collaborators know and use  
Org-mode themselves? Our current method is just to use ordinary LaTeX files  
in a CVS repository for collaboration. I think it would be difficult to get  
my collaborators to all use Org-mode - even though they all use emacs.  
Org-mode has quite a bit of a learning curve that they probably don't have  
the time or patience to learn currently.


Chris

On Jun 30, 2011 2:35am, "Thomas S. Dye"  wrote:

Aloha Karl,





I agree that AucTeX is awesome. I use it every day at work with much



pleasure.





I've been using Org-mode with the goal of creating reproducible



research, where the LaTeX output is just one part of the package. In my



case, this is something that requires Org-mode for its ability to pass



results between code blocks written in different languages. I can't do



these things in AucTeX.





At first, like you, I was suspicious of adding a layer between me and



LaTeX. I was impatient with figuring out how to make the little things



work right. I'm still not able to control LaTeX as finely as I'd like



from within Org-mode, but I've managed to close the gap sufficiently



that my last four publications were authored completely with Org-mode.



The one I'm working on now is Org-mode, too. I'm really liking it as an



authoring environment.





All the best,



Tom







Karl Voit writes:





> * Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com> wrote:



>> Aloha Rafael,



>



> Sorry, I thought you might as well be interested in my point of



> view.



>



> First: I am pretty new to Org-mode but I am using LaTeX a while now



> and I am even teaching LaTeX to motivated beginners.



>



>> Is there a reason not to have everything in one .org file? I find


>> Org-mode's ability to fold on headlines and to edit subtrees in  
indirect



>> buffers very convenient, even for long documents. For my work, that



>> functionality has replaced LaTeX \include files.



>



> I did not follow the thread here but I do think I get the idea that



> you want to replace LaTeX with Org-mode and generate a PDF via



> LaTeX/PDF-export functionality of Org-mode.



>



> On the one hand, I do agree that (simple) PDF documents are written



> very easily with Org-mode. But on the other hand you are going to



> add just another layer. This means that you probably end up wanting



> this LaTeX feature in Org-mode, that other handy LaTeX feature too



> and so forth.



>



> In my point of view, if you leave the basic stuff, you should stick



> to LaTeX. And I do have good news to you: You are very fortune



> because Emacs does have the IMHO most advanced editor support for



> LaTeX: AucTeX (with all of its extensions like preview-latex and



> RefTeX).



>



> I plan to use Org-mode as an outline tool for larger documents,



> where the basic structure evolves, keywords are moved from one part



> to the other. But before I start to write the detailed document



> content, I move to AucTeX, having the great possibilities for



> writing documents that end up being great PDFs.



>



> But this is just my point of view.





--



Thomas S. Dye



http://www.tsdye.com






[O] Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords

2011-10-21 Thread chris . m . malone
I've invited you to be an owner of the Google Moderator series "Org-mode  
Standardized Code Block Keywords". You can view and edit this series at  
http://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=ffe1e




Re: Re: [Orgmode] Two questions about using a =#+begin_src emacs-lisp= block

2011-02-22 Thread chris . m . malone

On Feb 22, 2011 1:06pm, Eric Schulte  wrote:

Chris Malone chris.m.mal...@gmail.com> writes:





> Ok, this is still perplexing me, as I have a new version from git and I



> still get the error. The following is complete list (sorry for the long



> email!) of what I have done:



>



> * Get a fresh copy of =org-mode= from git and byte-compile:



>



> #+begin_src: sh



> cd ~/install/org-mode



> mkdir new_git_clone



> cd new_git_clone



> git clone git://orgmode.org/org-mode.git



> cd org-mode; make &> make.out


> ln -s ~/install/org-mode/new_git_clone/org-mode  
~/install/org-mode/current



> #+end_src



>





if you are worried that you don't have the correct version of Org-mode



installed you can check the output of the `org-version' function. Mine



reads





"Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.510.g1e35)"




RIght - I was worried that I had possibly changed a lisp file that could be  
causing the error, so I wanted a fresh copy.



>



> During the =make= process, I noticed quite a few warnings. An example is



> below (for a complete copy of =make.out=, see



> http://astro.sunysb.edu/cmalone/nolink/make.out



[...]



> Are such warnings normal?



>





yes, these are normal compiler warnings which are generally cleaned up



before releases but shouldn't have any negative impact on the behavior



of Org-mode




Ok, good to know.



>



> * Make sure my =.emacs= file is pointing to the correct location



> Here is a copy of the =org-mode=-relevant sections of my =.emacs= file:



>



[...]



>



> * Attempt an export of the =org-mode= file found here:



> http://astro.sunysb.edu/cmalone/nolink/python_class_lstings.org



>





One thing to note here, is that for your emacs-lisp block to work on



export, you need to change this





#+begin_src emacs-lisp :exports both



(buffer-file-name)



#+end_src





to this





#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var file-name=(buffer-file-name) :exports both



file-name



#+end_src





because only header arguments are guaranteed to be evaluated in the



original org-mode buffer during export.




Again, thanks for pointing this out earlier. I hadn't changed it for the  
example, because the error was not associated with whether or not the  
actual =emacs-lisp= code returned anything meaningful.





That said I was able to export your example file (without the change



above) to html. When exporting to latex I ran into an issue, the



problem here is that the LaTeX exporter *requires* at least one



headline. It explicitly export the pre-first-headline and



post-first-headline portions of the Org-mode buffer separately. When



there is no headline, and the buffer contains code blocks, then they are



exported *twice*, which causes the error you mentioned, because after



the first pass of the code-block export, the results in the file are not



valid for another pass of the exporter.





If you place a "* " before the "Let's start this..." line, then the



errors should disappear.





Hope this helps.





Best -- Eric


That fixed it! Sorry for the trouble for something that seems so minor!  
Thanks again.


Chris
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [Orgmode] Beamer export questions/suggestions

2011-02-23 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Eric,

Thanks for that useful bit of info!

Chris
On Feb 23, 2011 11:47am, Eric S Fraga  wrote:

Chris Malone chris.m.mal...@gmail.com> writes:





> Hi Derek,



>



> Re your first question:



>



> One simple, albeit somewhat hackish way of achieving this would be to


> utilize =org-mode='s #+begin_beamer ... #+end_beamer syntax with  
=beamer='s



> frame option =plain= For example:





You don't need to do this. You can pass options to frames using the



BEAMER_envargs property:





#+begin_src org



** A plain slide



:PROPERTIES:



:BEAMER_envargs: [plain]



:END:



- a list



- with few entries



- but more than I thought



#+end_src





I use this all the time for options such as shrink and allowframebreaks.





--



: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1



: using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.528.gd457)


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: Re: [O] Illiterate programming question

2011-03-30 Thread chris . m . malone
You could probably hack something up with a shell source code block that  
uses sed to find and display text between two delimiters, and then dump the  
results to the org-mode file.


On Mar 30, 2011 5:44pm, Robert Goldman  wrote:

On 3/30/11 Mar 30 -4:33 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:



> Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info> wrote:



>



>> I would like to do the opposite of literate programming (hence the



>> subject line!):



>>



>> I would like to pull into my org file snippets from a code file. I know



>> that org-mode will let me import /entire/ source code files. Is there



>> some way to say "Import the region of this file between these two



>> delimiters?"



>>



>> If not, do you think it would be hard to add this feature? I already



>> have the snappy name, after all!



>>



>



> I don't really understand: can't you cut and paste?





Yes, but if I cut and paste the text of the code that I am describing



may change out from under my text. If I import the code, it stays in



sync (at least when the document is exported).





Honestly, I was tempted to do the literate programming thing with babel,



but was concerned that it might not work well as a multiple-author thing



(I would be writing the document, but someone else might be modifying



the code and might find org-babel confusing).



>


> And what do you mean that "org-mode will let me import /entire/ source  
code


> files"? Is this a facility other than insert-file? Or are you talking  
about



> the #+INCLUDE mechanism?





Yes, I was talking about #+INCLUDE. I was really wondering if there



mightn't be something like





#+INCLUDE ~/myfile.lisp :from "(defun sample-function" :to "; end



sample-function"





[sorry --- that's word-wrapped to further obscurity.]





cheers,



r






Re: [O] Collapse LaTeX source before start of main document?

2011-05-05 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Suvayu,

I think Matt's lisp code /should/ work for doing exactly what we are  
talking about, but for some reason I can't get it to work with LaTeX export.


Anyway, good luck on your defense!

Chris

On May 5, 2011 1:37pm, Suvayu Ali  wrote:

Hello Chris,





Sorry for the delay, had to attend a meeting.





On Thu, 5 May 2011 11:37:41 -0400



Chris Malone chris.m.mal...@gmail.com> wrote:





> Hi Suvayu,



>



> Thanks for sharing your use case - I'm interested in a few more



> details:



>



> > For example for my appendix and bibliography I use the following:



> >



> > #+INCLUDE: thesis-appendix.org :minlevel 1





[...]





>



> Would this #+INCLUDE line come within the last chapter headline? In



> other words did you have something like



>



> #+INCLUDE: frontmatter.org



> * Chapter 1



> 



> * Chapter 2



> ...



> * Last Chapter



> 



> #+INCLUDE: thesis-appendix.org :minlevel 1



> .



> .



> .



> \bibliography{master}



>



> With this, it seems that all of the appendix/backmatter gets folded



> into the last chapter heading. That is sort of the way I'm thinking



> of working my thesis, but it seems sub-optimal.



>





Yes that is correct. It folds into the last chapter, and I too find this



sub-optimal. If there was a way to specify certain headlines were



"special" and needed to be exported according to the sub-tree



properties, that would be ideal. Although I haven't looked into it, I'm



afraid it would require some lisp intervention.





That said, I just found a possible workaround. If you put the appendix



and bibliography and friends under the Footnotes headline, it somewhat



replicates the behaviour I would like to have. Something like this:





* Footnotes





[fn:1] footnote 1



[fn:2] footnote 2







#+INCLUDE: thesis-appendix.org :minlevel 1





#+LaTeX: \backmatter



#+LaTeX: \newpage



#+LaTeX: \addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{\bibname}





#+LaTeX: \bibliographystyle{plain}



#+LaTeX: \bibliography{master}







After my thesis defence I might actually get around to attempting to



deal with this in lisp. Would be a good learning excercise. :)





> Chris





--



Suvayu





Open source is the future. It sets us free.






Re: [O] How to highlight the LaTeX fragments inside orgmode

2011-06-21 Thread chris . m . malone

Hi Xin,

I have the following line in my .emacs file:

(setq org-confirm-babel-evaluate nil)


This, I think, turns off asking for evaluation for all languages. Not sure  
if it can be done on a language specific basis or not.

Chris
On Jun 21, 2011 4:56pm, Xin Shi  wrote:

Thanks. Maybe it's just not working here.




Also, I got this question every time:




Evaluate this latex code block on your system? (y or n)



Are there anyway to turn accept all?





Xin







On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:



Xin Shi shixin...@gmail.com> wrote:





>



> However, I noticed something else is broken with the ob-latex:



>


> The Cc Ce d (export to PDF and open the PDF file) is no longer working.  
Maybe a bug in 7.5?



>






Works fine here: Org-mode version 7.5 (baseline.324.ga0bc.dirty)





Nick








Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results

2011-06-23 Thread chris . m . malone
I have been following this thread with interest. When I export Eric's  
babelcall.org, the result of the octave calculation is =nil= in both cases.  
Is this the expected behaviour? I can confirm Nicolas' observations as well.


Chris
On Jun 23, 2011 9:49am, Nicolas Goaziou  wrote:

Hello,





Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:





> For completeness, I've attached a file which shows that it *can* work



> but also that it confuses the export of lists (Nicolas?) if the inline



> code is in a list item.





I see no difference between the paragraph and the list item: in both



cases, the table doesn't appear, as it has been moved right after the



headline by `org-export-blocks-preprocess' during export.





Are we observing the same phenomenon?





Regards,





--



Nicolas Goaziou