[PATCH] staging: rts5208: Fixed checkpath warning.

2019-08-30 Thread Prakhar Sinha
This patch solves the following checkpatch.pl's message in 
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:397.

WARNING: line over 80 characters
+   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_END | 
RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;

Signed-off-by: Prakhar Sinha 
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c 
b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c
index 8277d7895608..3fc83875fe7c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c
@@ -394,7 +394,8 @@ static int rtsx_transfer_sglist_adma_partial(struct 
rtsx_chip *chip, u8 card,
*index = *index + 1;
}
if ((i == (sg_cnt - 1)) || !resid)
-   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_END | 
RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;
+   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_END | 
+RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;
else
option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;
 
-- 
2.20.1

___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


[PATCH v2] staging: rts5208: Fixed checkpath warning.

2019-08-30 Thread Prakhar Sinha
This patch solves the following checkpatch.pl's message in 
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:397.

WARNING: line over 80 characters
+   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_END | 
RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;

Signed-off-by: Prakhar Sinha 
---
Changes in v2:
  - Re-structured assignment to solve checkpath.pl's warning.

 drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c | 7 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c 
b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c
index 8277d7895608..e61bc7c6ac33 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c
@@ -393,10 +393,9 @@ static int rtsx_transfer_sglist_adma_partial(struct 
rtsx_chip *chip, u8 card,
*offset = 0;
*index = *index + 1;
}
-   if ((i == (sg_cnt - 1)) || !resid)
-   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_END | 
RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;
-   else
-   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;
+   option = RTSX_SG_VALID | RTSX_SG_TRANS_DATA;
+   if ((i == sg_cnt - 1) || !resid)
+   option |= RTSX_SG_END;
 
rtsx_add_sg_tbl(chip, (u32)addr, (u32)len, option);
 
-- 
2.20.1

___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


[PATCH] staging: rts5208: Fixed checkpatch warning.

2019-08-31 Thread Prakhar Sinha
This patch solves the following checkpatch.pl's messages in
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4517: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4517:
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &=
~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4518: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4518:
+   goto
sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4522: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4522:
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
SD_SDR_RST);

Signed-off-by: Prakhar Sinha 
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 26 --
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
index a06045344301..7d6f2c56e740 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
@@ -4505,22 +4505,20 @@ int sd_execute_write_data(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct 
rtsx_chip *chip)
 
dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "sd_lock_state = 0x%x, 
sd_card->sd_lock_status = 0x%x\n",
sd_lock_state, sd_card->sd_lock_status);
-   if (sd_lock_state ^ (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED)) {
+   if (sd_lock_state ^ (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED))
sd_card->sd_lock_notify = 1;
-   if (sd_lock_state &&
-   (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCK_1BIT_MODE)) {
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status |= (
-   SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);
-   if (CHK_SD(sd_card)) {
-   retval = reset_sd(chip);
-   if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= 
~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);
-   goto 
sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
-   }
-   }
-
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | 
SD_SDR_RST);
+   if ((sd_lock_state & !(sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED)) &&
+   (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCK_1BIT_MODE)) {
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status |= (SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+   SD_SDR_RST);
+   if (CHK_SD(sd_card) &&
+   reset_sd(chip) != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+SD_SDR_RST);
+   goto sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
}
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+SD_SDR_RST);
}
}
 
-- 
2.20.1

___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


[PATCH] staging: rts5208: Modified nested if blocks.

2019-09-03 Thread Prakhar Sinha
This patch solves the following checkpatch.pl's messages in
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4517: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4517:
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &=
~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4518: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4518:
+   goto
sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4522: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4522:
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
SD_SDR_RST);

Signed-off-by: Prakhar Sinha 
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 26 --
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
index a06045344301..7d6f2c56e740 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
@@ -4505,22 +4505,20 @@ int sd_execute_write_data(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct 
rtsx_chip *chip)
 
dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "sd_lock_state = 0x%x, 
sd_card->sd_lock_status = 0x%x\n",
sd_lock_state, sd_card->sd_lock_status);
-   if (sd_lock_state ^ (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED)) {
+   if (sd_lock_state ^ (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED))
sd_card->sd_lock_notify = 1;
-   if (sd_lock_state &&
-   (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCK_1BIT_MODE)) {
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status |= (
-   SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);
-   if (CHK_SD(sd_card)) {
-   retval = reset_sd(chip);
-   if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= 
~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);
-   goto 
sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
-   }
-   }
-
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | 
SD_SDR_RST);
+   if ((sd_lock_state & !(sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED)) &&
+   (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCK_1BIT_MODE)) {
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status |= (SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+   SD_SDR_RST);
+   if (CHK_SD(sd_card) &&
+   reset_sd(chip) != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+SD_SDR_RST);
+   goto sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
}
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+SD_SDR_RST);
}
}
 
-- 
2.20.1

___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


[PATCH] staging: rts5208: Fix 80 char warning by re-structuring if-blocks.

2019-09-04 Thread Prakhar Sinha
This patch solves the following checkpatch.pl's messages in
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4517: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4517:
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= 
~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4518: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4518:
+   goto 
sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;

WARNING: line over 80 characters
4522: FILE: drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:4522:
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | 
SD_SDR_RST);

Signed-off-by: Prakhar Sinha 
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 26 --
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
index a06045344301..7d6f2c56e740 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
@@ -4505,22 +4505,20 @@ int sd_execute_write_data(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct 
rtsx_chip *chip)
 
dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "sd_lock_state = 0x%x, 
sd_card->sd_lock_status = 0x%x\n",
sd_lock_state, sd_card->sd_lock_status);
-   if (sd_lock_state ^ (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED)) {
+   if (sd_lock_state ^ (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED))
sd_card->sd_lock_notify = 1;
-   if (sd_lock_state &&
-   (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCK_1BIT_MODE)) {
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status |= (
-   SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);
-   if (CHK_SD(sd_card)) {
-   retval = reset_sd(chip);
-   if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= 
~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | SD_SDR_RST);
-   goto 
sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
-   }
-   }
-
-   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON | 
SD_SDR_RST);
+   if ((sd_lock_state & !(sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCKED)) &&
+   (sd_card->sd_lock_status & SD_LOCK_1BIT_MODE)) {
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status |= (SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+   SD_SDR_RST);
+   if (CHK_SD(sd_card) &&
+   reset_sd(chip) != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+SD_SDR_RST);
+   goto sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
}
+   sd_card->sd_lock_status &= ~(SD_UNLOCK_POW_ON |
+SD_SDR_RST);
}
}
 
-- 
2.20.1

___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel