[Bug 91294] [R7 370] DPM and power profile change crash the system

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91294

--- Comment #5 from Elia Argentieri  ---
Created attachment 117048
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117048&action=edit
Fix by adding a line to si_dpm_quirk_list

Adding this line made my card work with DPM enabled, but I'm not sure about
mclk value. This card is supposed to have a 5600 MHz video memory according to
MSI's site. However Catalyst reports a frequency of 1400 MHz. Tomorrow, I'll
play with this values.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/44a599ee/attachment.html>


[Bug 91294] [R7 370] DPM and power profile change crash the system

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91294

Tobias Droste  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=76490

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/91694c0e/attachment.html>


[Bug 76490] Hang during boot when DPM is on (R9 270X)

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76490

Tobias Droste  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=91294

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/b3a214c5/attachment.html>


[Bug 91302] radeon.audio=1 causes weird issues with 7950

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91302

Bug ID: 91302
   Summary: radeon.audio=1 causes weird issues with 7950
   Product: DRI
   Version: XOrg git
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: DRM/Radeon
  Assignee: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: contrib at kliznoe.com

When I have radeon.audio set to 1, My displayport audio output is deeper then
normal and my hdmi screen becomes blurry and has a pink line to the left of it.
This doesn't happen when radeon.audio is set to 0 or in Windows.

OS : Arch Linux with Gnome3 and xf86-video-ati-git from the AUR

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/0005189c/attachment-0001.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

Bug ID: 91305
   Summary: When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon :01:00.0:
ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec
   Product: Mesa
   Version: 10.6
  Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Drivers/Gallium/radeonsi
  Assignee: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: devurandom at gmx.net
QA Contact: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org

Created attachment 117050
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117050&action=edit
screenshot

I ran `john --test=0 --verbosity=5` from
JohnTheRipper at d8cb9ce98acd26bd917dff4cbb54bdc14b7133f9, which made X crash.

I was dropped to VT1, where the messages "radeon :01:00.0: ring 0 stalled
for more than ...msec" and "radeon :00:01.0: ring 3 stalled for more than
...msec" where flashing by. Afterwards messages of failed tests were logged
(typewrote from attached screenshot):
```
AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=00:01.0 domain=0x
address=0x00041145c040 flags=0x0050]
[drm:cik_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 1 test failed
(scratch(0x3010C)=0xCAFEDEAD)
[drm:cik_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 2 test failed
(scratch(0x3010C)=0xCAFEDEAD)
[drm:cik_sdma_ring_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: ring 4 test failed
(0xCAFEDEAD)
[drm:cik_resume [radeon]] *ERROR* cik startup failed on resume
radeon :00:01.0: ring 0 stalled for more than 10281msec
[drm:cik_ib_test [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: fence wait failed (-35).
[drm:radeon_ib_ring_tests [radeon]] *ERROR* radeon: failed testing IB on GFX
ring (-35).
```

Since dmesg did not log these errors and journald is not accessible via
journalctl ATM ("Error was encountered while opening journal files: Invalid
argument"), I sadly cannot give you more accurate logs than the typewrote
screenshot.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/373d1a26/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #1 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Created attachment 117051
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117051&action=edit
dmesg

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/2bfe2cc9/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #2 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Created attachment 117052
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117052&action=edit
Xorg.0.log

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/fcc01e49/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #3 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Created attachment 117053
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117053&action=edit
Last lines of output from: john --test=0 --verbosity=5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/3ab1dfc8/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #4 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Created attachment 117054
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117054&action=edit
Linux kernel config

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/6d5e0f1b/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #5 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Created attachment 117055
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117055&action=edit
lspci -v

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/8cb781ba/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #6 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Created attachment 117056
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117056&action=edit
emerge --info media-libs/mesa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/5ce3cecf/attachment-0001.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

--- Comment #7 from Dennis Schridde  ---
Please note that I have 2 GPUs (Redwood and Kaveri) and Mesa at version 10.6.1.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/f9857ebb/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

Dennis Schridde  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=81896

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/255c900e/attachment.html>


[Bug 81896] GPU reset when running some "John the Ripper" (+ jumbo patch, from Git) OpenCL tests

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81896

Dennis Schridde  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/f1b4dacc/attachment.html>


[Bug 91305] When running JTR OpenCL tests: radeon 0000:01:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than ...msec

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91305

Dennis Schridde  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #117050|text/plain  |image/jpeg
  mime type||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/c0d58897/attachment.html>


[PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Add pipe level Gamma correction for CHV/BSW

2015-07-11 Thread Malladi, Kausal
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 04:53 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:01:44AM +0530, Kausal Malladi wrote:
>> CHV/BSW platform supports various Gamma correction modes, which are:
>> 1. Legacy 8-bit mode
>> 2. 10-bit CGM (Color Gamut Mapping) mode
>>
>> This patch does the following:
>> 1. Adds the core function to program Gamma correction values for CHV/BSW
>> platform
>> 2. Adds Gamma correction macros/defines
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma 
>> Signed-off-by: Kausal Malladi 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h|  10 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c|   6 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c | 154 
>> +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.h |  12 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h   |   2 +
>>   5 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 313b1f9..36672e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -7900,4 +7900,14 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>>   #define _PALETTE_A (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0xa000)
>>   #define _PALETTE_B (dev_priv->info.display_mmio_offset + 0xa800)
>>   
>> +/* Color Management */
>> +#define PIPEA_CGM_CONTROL   (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x67A00)
>> +#define PIPEA_CGM_GAMMA_MIN (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x67000)
>> +#define CGM_OFFSET  0x2000
>> +#define GAMMA_OFFSET0x2000
>> +#define _PIPE_CGM_CONTROL(pipe) \
>> +(PIPEA_CGM_CONTROL + (pipe * CGM_OFFSET))
>> +#define _PIPE_GAMMA_BASE(pipe) \
>> +(PIPEA_CGM_GAMMA_MIN + (pipe * GAMMA_OFFSET))
>> +
>>   #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
>> index d2674a6..21f0ac2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c
>> @@ -473,6 +473,12 @@ int intel_crtc_atomic_set_property(struct drm_crtc 
>> *crtc,
>> struct drm_property *property,
>> uint64_t val)
>>   {
>> +struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
>> +struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
>> +
>> +if (property == config->prop_palette_after_ctm)
>> +return intel_color_manager_set_gamma(dev, &crtc->base, val);
>> +
> I think we discussed this on a previous iteration of the patch series,
> but .atomic_set_property() isn't supposed to actually update the
> hardware at all itself (as you're doing here); it's only supposed to
> update the 'state' parameter that was passed here.  Further down the
> atomic pipeline the driver will decide whether it really wants to
> program any of the state or not and then the CRTC's atomic commit
> function should program the registers according to whatever value is set
> in the state object.
Thanks Matt for your suggestions offline. We will implement it this way 
in our next set of patches.
>
>>  DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unknown crtc property '%s'\n", property->name);
>>  return -EINVAL;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>> index 71b4c05..84cc3e47 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,160 @@
>>   
>>   #include "intel_color_manager.h"
>>   
>> +int chv_set_gamma(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t blob_id,
>> +  struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> +{
>> +struct drm_palette *gamma_data;
>> +struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> +struct drm_property_blob *blob;
>> +struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
>> +u32 cgm_control_reg = 0;
>> +u32 cgm_gamma_reg = 0;
>> +u32 reg, val;
>> +enum pipe pipe;
>> +u16 red, green, blue;
>> +u32 count = 0;
>> +struct drm_r32g32b32 *correction_values = NULL;
>> +u32 num_samples;
>> +u32 word;
>> +u32 palette;
>> +int ret = 0, length;
>> +
>> +blob = drm_property_lookup_blob(dev, blob_id);
>> +if (!blob) {
>> +DRM_ERROR("Invalid Blob ID\n");
>> +return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +gamma_data = (struct drm_palette *)blob->data;
> Do we need to validate that the blob we receive is of the expected size
> or does something in the DRM core's blob handling take care of that for
> us?  We don't want userspace to be able to trigger a panic by passing a
> smaller than expected blob here.
Yes, it was an oversight.
>
>
>> +
>> +if (gamma_data->version != CHV_GAMMA_DATA_STRUCT_VERSION) {
>> +DRM_ERROR("Invalid Gamma Data struct version\n");
>> +return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>> +num_samples = gamma_data->palette_num_samples;
>> +length = num_samples * sizeof(struct drm_r32g32b32);
>> +
>> +if

[PATCH] nul-terminate readlink result

2015-07-11 Thread Tobias Stoeckmann
readlink by itself does not guarantee that its result is properly
nul-terminated. Setting the last byte of the buffer to '\0' fixes
this issue.
---
 libkms/linux.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/libkms/linux.c b/libkms/linux.c
index 4d47148..667d37c 100644
--- a/libkms/linux.c
+++ b/libkms/linux.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ linux_name_from_sysfs(int fd, char **out)

if (readlink(path, link, PATH_SIZE) < 0)
return -EINVAL;
+   link[PATH_SIZE] = '\0';

/* link looks something like this: ../../../bus/pci/drivers/intel */
slash_name = strrchr(link, '/');
-- 
2.4.5



[PATCH v7 1/4] drm/layerscape: Add Freescale DCU DRM driver

2015-07-11 Thread Paul Bolle
A question and a nit follow.

On vr, 2015-07-10 at 19:17 +0800, Jianwei Wang wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_drv.c

> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:fsl-dcu-drm");

Question: this appears to be only useful if there's a corresponding
struct platform_device. That is, a platform_device with a "fsl-dcu-drm"
.name. It will fire off a "MODALIAS=platform:fsl-dcu-drm" uevent when
it's created.

I couldn't find this corresponding platform_device. Does it exist? Or is
this alias needed for some other reason?

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_drv.h

> +#define DRIVER_NAME  "fsl-dcu-drm"

Nit: I don't think DRIVER_NAME is actually used anywhere.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle


[Bug 91308] Tonga UVD not working with GL_NV_vdpau_interop

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91308

Bug ID: 91308
   Summary: Tonga UVD not working with GL_NV_vdpau_interop
   Product: DRI
   Version: DRI git
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: DRM/AMDgpu
  Assignee: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: adf.lists at gmail.com

UVD seems OK generally on Tonga (barring apparently being in low power) but not
with GL_NV_vdpau_interop.

Tested with kodi and mpv.

kodi says -

ERROR: VDPAU::COutput error mapping surface
DEBUG: CLinuxRendererGL::GetPlaneTextureSize - invalid size 0x0 - 0

mpv -

[vo/opengl] after rendering: OpenGL error INVALID_OPERATION.

glxinfo shows GL_NV_vdpau_interop present.

mesa is of course agd5f, with some llvm build fixes plus a minor modification I
made to advertise level 52 (as ffmpeg cli at least does check).

I'll attach my diff against agd5f mesa just in case I obviously messed up!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/4d4360cc/attachment.html>


[Bug 91308] Tonga UVD not working with GL_NV_vdpau_interop

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91308

--- Comment #1 from Andy Furniss  ---
Created attachment 117060
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=117060&action=edit
my diff against agd5f/mesa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/b3957419/attachment.html>


[PATCH] drm/atomic: fix null dereference

2015-07-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
We are checking the size of e->event but we were doing it when e is
known to be NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
index acebd16..51d3a85 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
@@ -1311,7 +1311,6 @@ static struct drm_pending_vblank_event 
*create_vblank_event(
e = kzalloc(sizeof *e, GFP_KERNEL);
if (e == NULL) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
-   file_priv->event_space += sizeof e->event;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
goto out;
}
-- 
1.8.1.2



[PATCH] drm/atomic: fix null dereference

2015-07-11 Thread Rob Clark
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
 wrote:
> We are checking the size of e->event but we were doing it when e is
> known to be NULL.

nak, this will leak event_space..  since it is a sizeof, it isn't
actually deref'ing e, but rather just using the static type info, so
it's ok (although perhaps funny looking)

BR,
-R


> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index acebd16..51d3a85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -1311,7 +1311,6 @@ static struct drm_pending_vblank_event 
> *create_vblank_event(
> e = kzalloc(sizeof *e, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (e == NULL) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> -   file_priv->event_space += sizeof e->event;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Bug 91268] R6xx freezes with kernel 3.17 and up

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91268

--- Comment #1 from Kajzer  ---
Quote from another thread where this bug initially started :

(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #273)
> Please run a kernel built from commit
> 77497f2735ad6e29c55475e15e9790dbfa2c2ef8 (the commit before
> 02376d8282b88f07d0716da6155094c8760b1a13) for at least a few days to make
> sure it doesn't happen with that.

After few days I can safely say that this kernel runs great, I had no hangs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/64173e66/attachment.html>


[Bug 91302] radeon.audio=1 causes weird issues with 7950

2015-07-11 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91302

--- Comment #1 from Max Qia  ---
Seems like the bug has been there awhile
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=160515

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150711/20a6f882/attachment.html>


[PATCH 01/18] drm/gem: rip out drm vma accounting for gem mmaps

2015-07-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:32:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Doesn't really add anything which can't be figured out through
> proc files. And more clearly separates the new gem mmap handling
> code from the old drm maps mmap handling code, which is surely a
> good thing.
> 
> Cc:  Martin Peres 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter 

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson 

Long have I wanted vmalist dead.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 02/12] device: property: find dependencies of a firmware node

2015-07-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, July 10, 2015 03:14:38 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 2 July 2015 at 02:02, Rafael J. Wysocki  wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:40:57 AM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> Adds API that allows callers to find out what other firmware nodes a
> >> node depends on.
> >>
> >> Implementors of bindings documentation can register callbacks that
> >> return the dependencies of a node.
> >>
> >> Dependency information can be used to change the order in which devices
> >> are probed, or to print a warning when a device node is going to be
> >> probed without all its dependencies fulfilled.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso 
> >
> > I'd like to see a description of the new API in English in the changelog.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Allow bindings implementations register a function instead of using
> >>   class callbacks, as not only subsystems implement firmware bindings.
> >>
> >>  drivers/base/property.c  | 91 
> >> 
> >>  include/linux/fwnode.h   |  5 +++
> >>  include/linux/property.h | 12 +++
> >>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> >> index 8ead1ba..9d38ede 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> >> @@ -19,7 +19,13 @@
> >>  #include 
> >>  #include 
> >>
> >
> > Please add a comment describing this structure.  In particular, what it is
> > supposed to be used for and how it is supposed to be used.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >> +struct dependency_parser {
> >> + struct list_head parser;
> >
> > I'd rather call this "list_node" or something like that.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >> + void (*func)(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, struct list_head *deps);
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  static bool fwnode_match_enable = false;
> >> +static LIST_HEAD(dependency_parsers);
> >>
> >>  /**
> >>   * device_add_property_set - Add a collection of properties to a device 
> >> object.
> >> @@ -553,6 +559,27 @@ bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> >>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_dma_is_coherent);
> >>
> >>  /**
> >> + * fwnode_add_dependency - add firmware node to the passed dependency list
> >> + * @fwnode: Firmware node to add to dependency list
> >> + * @list: Dependency list to add the fwnode to
> >> + */
> >> +void fwnode_add_dependency(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> >> +struct list_head *list)
> >> +{
> >> + struct fwnode_dependency *dep;
> >> +
> >> + dep = kzalloc(sizeof(*dep), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!dep)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dependency);
> >> + dep->fwnode = fwnode;
> >> +
> >> + list_add_tail(&dep->dependency, list);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_add_dependency);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >>   * fwnode_get_parent - return the parent node of a device node
> >>   * @fwnode: Device node to find the parent node of
> >>   */
> >> @@ -600,6 +627,70 @@ bool fwnode_is_compatible(struct fwnode_handle 
> >> *fwnode, const char *compatible)
> >>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_is_compatible);
> >>
> >>  /**
> >> + * fwnode_add_dependency_parser - register dependency parser
> >> + * @func: Function that will be called to find out dependencies of a node
> >> + *
> >> + * Registers a callback that will be called when collecting the 
> >> dependencies
> >> + * of a firmware node. The callback should inspect the properties of the 
> >> node
> >> + * and call fwnode_add_dependency() for each dependency it recognizes, 
> >> from
> >> + * the bindings documentation.
> >> + */
> >> +void fwnode_add_dependency_parser(
> >> + void (*func)(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, struct list_head *deps))
> >> +{
> >> + struct dependency_parser *parser;
> >> +
> >> + parser = kzalloc(sizeof(*parser), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!parser)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&parser->parser);
> >> + parser->func = func;
> >> +
> >> + list_add_tail(&parser->parser, &dependency_parsers);
> >
> > We're modifying a global list here.  Any locking needed?  RCU?  Whatever?
> 
> Oops.
> 
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_add_dependency_parser);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * fwnode_remove_dependency_parser - unregister dependency parser
> >> + * @func: Function that was to be called to find out dependencies of a 
> >> node
> >> + */
> >> +void fwnode_remove_dependency_parser(
> >> + void (*func)(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, struct list_head *deps))
> >> +{
> >> + struct dependency_parser *parser, *tmp;
> >> +
> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(parser, tmp, &dependency_parsers, parser) {
> >> + if (parser->func == func) {
> >> + list_del(&parser->parser);
> >> + kfree(parser);
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_remove_dependency_parser);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * fwnode_get_dependencies - find out what dependencies a