[Bug 44549] New: "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 Bug #: 44549 Summary: "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450 Classification: Unclassified Product: DRI Version: XOrg CVS Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: DRM/Radeon AssignedTo: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: ebisch...@nerim.net linux kernel : 3.2.0 libdrm-radeon1 : 2.4.29 xserver-xorg-video-radeon : 6.14.99 motherboard : ASUS M2A-VM HDMI (*no* VIA chipset) Graphics card : msi R5450 with 1 Gb onboard RAM memory size : 4 Gb Description : when booting, the message "Ring buffer test failed" appears in dmesg log. A a consequence, the software rasterizer is chosen, and after X is started, there is no 3D acceleration. Workaround : when I add "mem=3G" to the kernel parameters, the message disappears, and I get 3D acceleration. Of course, 1 Gb of RAM memory is lost for the applications. (log files will get attached to this bug report) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #1 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 03:45:18 PST --- It's very similar to the problem described in http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1105.2/03496.html Nevertheless, it's not exactly the same hardware conditions, and the radeon driver patch that did solve that problem does not work for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44536] [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Pedretti 2012-01-07 03:51:35 PST --- That's fair. But would be eventually possible to improve it to get max performance on both games? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #2 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:23:14 PST --- Created attachment 55245 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55245 cat /proc/cmdline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #3 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:24:01 PST --- Created attachment 55246 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55246 cat /proc/meminfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #4 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:24:30 UTC --- Created attachment 55247 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55247 dmesg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #5 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:25:04 UTC --- Created attachment 55248 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55248 glxinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #6 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:25:29 UTC --- Created attachment 55249 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55249 lspci -v -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #7 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:25:57 PST --- Created attachment 55250 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55250 uname -a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #8 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:45:33 PST --- Ouch, I just realized there was a "nomodeset" option left from an old test. I'll see if that changes anything to the dmesg etc. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #9 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:57:32 PST --- Created attachment 55257 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55257 correct version of dmesg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #10 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:58:18 PST --- Created attachment 55258 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55258 correct version of cat /proc/cmdline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #11 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 05:00:16 PST --- Rebooted with correct kernel parameters and attached corresponding versions of dmesg and cat /proc/cmdline. The other files do not change significantly. Sorry for the mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[PATCH] drm/omap: updates for DSS fifomerge API changes
From: Rob Clark
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
Greg, this patch updates omapdrm for fifomerge related API changes in
omapdss, and would be needed so that omapdrm still compiles after these
changes (which are in linux-next) hit Linus's tree. This applies on
top of "drm/omap: multiplanar and YUV support" patch.
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c |2 +-
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h |6 ++
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 33 -
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
index 3cee04e..17ca163 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int omap_crtc_mode_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
struct omap_crtc *omap_crtc = to_omap_crtc(crtc);
struct drm_plane *plane = omap_crtc->plane;
- return plane->funcs->update_plane(plane, crtc, crtc->fb,
+ return omap_plane_mode_set(plane, crtc, crtc->fb,
0, 0, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay,
x << 16, y << 16,
mode->hdisplay << 16, mode->vdisplay << 16);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
index 48f6fce..61fe022 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ struct drm_plane *omap_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct omap_overlay *ovl, unsigned int possible_crtcs,
bool priv);
int omap_plane_dpms(struct drm_plane *plane, int mode);
+int omap_plane_mode_set(struct drm_plane *plane,
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
+ int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
+ unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
+ uint32_t src_x, uint32_t src_y,
+ uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h);
struct drm_encoder *omap_encoder_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
index 66eed75..9790912 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int commit(struct drm_plane *plane)
}
}
- if (info->enabled) {
+ if (ovl->is_enabled(ovl)) {
omap_framebuffer_flush(plane->fb, info->pos_x, info->pos_y,
info->out_width, info->out_height);
}
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void update_manager(struct drm_plane *plane)
}
if (ovl->manager != mgr) {
- bool enabled = omap_plane->info.enabled;
+ bool enabled = ovl->is_enabled(ovl);
/* don't switch things around with enabled overlays: */
if (enabled)
@@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ static void update_scanout(struct drm_plane *plane)
if (ret) {
dev_err(plane->dev->dev,
"could not pin fb: %d\n", ret);
- omap_plane->info.enabled = false;
+ omap_plane_dpms(plane, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
+ return;
}
omap_framebuffer_update_scanout(plane->fb,
@@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ static void update_scanout(struct drm_plane *plane)
info->screen_width);
}
-static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
+int omap_plane_mode_set(struct drm_plane *plane,
struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
@@ -195,7 +196,6 @@ static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
src_w = src_w >> 16;
src_h = src_h >> 16;
- omap_plane->info.enabled = true;
omap_plane->info.pos_x = crtc_x;
omap_plane->info.pos_y = crtc_y;
omap_plane->info.out_width = crtc_w;
@@ -214,11 +214,22 @@ static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
update_scanout(plane);
update_manager(plane);
- commit(plane);
return 0;
}
+static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
+ int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
+ unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
+ uint32_t src_x, uint32_t src_y,
+ uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h)
+{
+ omap_plane_mode_set(plane, crtc, fb, crtc_x, crtc_y, crtc_w, crtc_h,
+ src_x, src_y, src_w, src_h);
+ return omap_plane_dpms(plane, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
+}
+
static int omap_plane_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
{
return omap_plane_dpms(plane, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
@@ -236,18 +247,22 @@ static void omap_plane_destroy(struct drm_plane *plane)
int omap_plane_dpms(struct drm_plane *plane, int mode)
{
struct omap_plane *omap_pl
Re: [ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.30
This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox: http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check On Jan 6, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > Here's a new release, featuring updated i915_drm.h for gen7 transform > feedback, and intel_decode.c as a library API instead of being copied > around between our various driver components. > > Chris Wilson (2): > intel: Reset vma list upon purge > tests/gem_flink: Check for MASTER before proceeding > > Eric Anholt (18): > intel: Import intel_decode.c from intel-gpu-tools. > intel: Make intel_chipset handle devid directly. > intel: intel: Add IS_GEN[567] macros. > intel: Reformat intel_decode.c from intel-gpu-tools using Lindent. > intel: Minor style tweaks after Lindent. > intel: Get intel_decode.c minimally building. > intel: Fix Wsigned-compare warnings (soon to be enabled). > intel: Fix a ton of signed vs unsigned and const char *warnings > intel: Add printflike warnings for instr_out. > intel: Fix printf format warnings for intel_decode. > intel: Remove c99ish variable declarations. > intel: Turn on normal warnings for intel_decode.c build. > intel: Disable unused decode_logic_op(). > intel: Add an interface for setting the output file for decode. > intel: Add a regression test program for intel_decode.c. > intel: Add regression tests for batch decode. > intel: Update for new i915_drm.h defines. > configure: Bump version for 2.4.30 > > Jesse Barnes (1): > libdrm: update drm headers from kernel, including new overlay ioctls & > structs > > Johannes Obermayr (1): > intel/intel_decode.c: Remove #include "intel_decode.h". > > git tag: 2.4.30 > > http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > MD5: 9f57a68b2c0836b55ebcbc241f6ca175 libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > SHA1: 5ba36a0bcbacbe67e6a2e0d5318ed9455da59bbc libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > SHA256: cacea9c157ec824ad278a06f4910659b2f3ae69686518ece8d6967843cddcd56 > libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > > http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > MD5: cd790fb761a83125eceb64162d7d5ce5 libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > SHA1: 148936f0c0f83d016c584245493b975d42bd359a libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > SHA256: a64e63a2af08bcab835e758048611cf61c7183dc7e829cad9dceba859245b4bc > libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > > ___ > xorg-announce mailing list > xorg-annou...@lists.x.org > http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-announce ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44523] nexuiz perf regression since u_vbuf: implement another upload codepath which unrolls indices
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44523 Marek Olšák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Marek Olšák 2012-01-07 12:31:30 PST --- Fixed by 2bdf93449a0b00145fabdd3f7866acbafa18e734. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44365] Textures aligned/move wrongly in planeshift game
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44365 Mark changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #5 from Mark 2012-01-07 15:59:37 PST --- I tested HEAD again to see if any performance enhancements were around, and this problem was back, i did a few git bisects and found this commit. e1ff84371c0e8c58297611f95ec1e2cb5d5acaa4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.30
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:22:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox: > http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check It make checks fine here, on 32 and 64. Not sure what's up. pgpvxFc5HfvHt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44568] New: Half-Life 1 engine has poor fps is large areas
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44568 Bug #: 44568 Summary: Half-Life 1 engine has poor fps is large areas Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/Gallium/r600 AssignedTo: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: toni.sp...@iki.fi Created attachment 55280 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55280 Slow GLTrace I've been following the fps of this engine for a few years, pre-gallium and lately gallium. There is a noticable fps drop in maps that contain water or a lot of models. Normally, a fps drop from 100 to ~15 happens in action situations with smoke, other players, water etc. Taken that the engine is over 10 years old, is using standard OpenGL and it runs very fine at 100fps on windows, my guesstimate is that it is using some unoptimized GL path. Attached slow gltrace is from viewing an area where my fps in 800x600 resolution is around 56 with a lot of models on the screen and the fast trace is from a map that doesn't have that drop at all when nothing is happening. The traces are around from the same period of time but the fast trace went at ~25 fps and the slow at ~5 fps when it was logged. Both traces start and end with the game menu but only briefly. Would appreciate if someone could finally take a shot at fixing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44568] Half-Life 1 engine has poor fps is large areas
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44568 --- Comment #1 from Toni Spets 2012-01-07 23:56:10 PST --- Created attachment 55281 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55281 Fast GLTrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 44549] New: "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 Bug #: 44549 Summary: "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450 Classification: Unclassified Product: DRI Version: XOrg CVS Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: DRM/Radeon AssignedTo: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: ebischoff at nerim.net linux kernel : 3.2.0 libdrm-radeon1 : 2.4.29 xserver-xorg-video-radeon : 6.14.99 motherboard : ASUS M2A-VM HDMI (*no* VIA chipset) Graphics card : msi R5450 with 1 Gb onboard RAM memory size : 4 Gb Description : when booting, the message "Ring buffer test failed" appears in dmesg log. A a consequence, the software rasterizer is chosen, and after X is started, there is no 3D acceleration. Workaround : when I add "mem=3G" to the kernel parameters, the message disappears, and I get 3D acceleration. Of course, 1 Gb of RAM memory is lost for the applications. (log files will get attached to this bug report) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #1 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 03:45:18 PST --- It's very similar to the problem described in http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1105.2/03496.html Nevertheless, it's not exactly the same hardware conditions, and the radeon driver patch that did solve that problem does not work for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44536] [r300g] bisected - performance regression on 0ad
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Pedretti 2012-01-07 03:51:35 PST --- That's fair. But would be eventually possible to improve it to get max performance on both games? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #2 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:23:14 PST --- Created attachment 55245 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55245 cat /proc/cmdline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #3 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:24:01 PST --- Created attachment 55246 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55246 cat /proc/meminfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #4 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:24:30 UTC --- Created attachment 55247 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55247 dmesg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #5 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:25:04 UTC --- Created attachment 55248 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55248 glxinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #6 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:25:29 UTC --- Created attachment 55249 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55249 lspci -v -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #7 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:25:57 PST --- Created attachment 55250 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55250 uname -a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #8 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:45:33 PST --- Ouch, I just realized there was a "nomodeset" option left from an old test. I'll see if that changes anything to the dmesg etc. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #9 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:57:32 PST --- Created attachment 55257 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55257 correct version of dmesg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #10 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 04:58:18 PST --- Created attachment 55258 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55258 correct version of cat /proc/cmdline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44549] "Ring buffer test failed" on Radeon 5450
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44549 --- Comment #11 from Eric Bischoff 2012-01-07 05:00:16 PST --- Rebooted with correct kernel parameters and attached corresponding versions of dmesg and cat /proc/cmdline. The other files do not change significantly. Sorry for the mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[PATCH] drm/omap: updates for DSS fifomerge API changes
From: Rob Clark
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
Greg, this patch updates omapdrm for fifomerge related API changes in
omapdss, and would be needed so that omapdrm still compiles after these
changes (which are in linux-next) hit Linus's tree. This applies on
top of "drm/omap: multiplanar and YUV support" patch.
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c |2 +-
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h |6 ++
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 33 -
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
index 3cee04e..17ca163 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int omap_crtc_mode_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
struct omap_crtc *omap_crtc = to_omap_crtc(crtc);
struct drm_plane *plane = omap_crtc->plane;
- return plane->funcs->update_plane(plane, crtc, crtc->fb,
+ return omap_plane_mode_set(plane, crtc, crtc->fb,
0, 0, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay,
x << 16, y << 16,
mode->hdisplay << 16, mode->vdisplay << 16);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
index 48f6fce..61fe022 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ struct drm_plane *omap_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct omap_overlay *ovl, unsigned int possible_crtcs,
bool priv);
int omap_plane_dpms(struct drm_plane *plane, int mode);
+int omap_plane_mode_set(struct drm_plane *plane,
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
+ int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
+ unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
+ uint32_t src_x, uint32_t src_y,
+ uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h);
struct drm_encoder *omap_encoder_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
index 66eed75..9790912 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int commit(struct drm_plane *plane)
}
}
- if (info->enabled) {
+ if (ovl->is_enabled(ovl)) {
omap_framebuffer_flush(plane->fb, info->pos_x, info->pos_y,
info->out_width, info->out_height);
}
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void update_manager(struct drm_plane *plane)
}
if (ovl->manager != mgr) {
- bool enabled = omap_plane->info.enabled;
+ bool enabled = ovl->is_enabled(ovl);
/* don't switch things around with enabled overlays: */
if (enabled)
@@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ static void update_scanout(struct drm_plane *plane)
if (ret) {
dev_err(plane->dev->dev,
"could not pin fb: %d\n", ret);
- omap_plane->info.enabled = false;
+ omap_plane_dpms(plane, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
+ return;
}
omap_framebuffer_update_scanout(plane->fb,
@@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ static void update_scanout(struct drm_plane *plane)
info->screen_width);
}
-static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
+int omap_plane_mode_set(struct drm_plane *plane,
struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
@@ -195,7 +196,6 @@ static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
src_w = src_w >> 16;
src_h = src_h >> 16;
- omap_plane->info.enabled = true;
omap_plane->info.pos_x = crtc_x;
omap_plane->info.pos_y = crtc_y;
omap_plane->info.out_width = crtc_w;
@@ -214,11 +214,22 @@ static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
update_scanout(plane);
update_manager(plane);
- commit(plane);
return 0;
}
+static int omap_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
+ int crtc_x, int crtc_y,
+ unsigned int crtc_w, unsigned int crtc_h,
+ uint32_t src_x, uint32_t src_y,
+ uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h)
+{
+ omap_plane_mode_set(plane, crtc, fb, crtc_x, crtc_y, crtc_w, crtc_h,
+ src_x, src_y, src_w, src_h);
+ return omap_plane_dpms(plane, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
+}
+
static int omap_plane_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
{
return omap_plane_dpms(plane, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
@@ -236,18 +247,22 @@ static void omap_plane_destroy(struct drm_plane *plane)
int omap_plane_dpms(struct drm_plane *plane, int mode)
{
struct omap_plane *omap_plane = to_om
[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.30
This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox: http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check On Jan 6, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > Here's a new release, featuring updated i915_drm.h for gen7 transform > feedback, and intel_decode.c as a library API instead of being copied > around between our various driver components. > > Chris Wilson (2): > intel: Reset vma list upon purge > tests/gem_flink: Check for MASTER before proceeding > > Eric Anholt (18): > intel: Import intel_decode.c from intel-gpu-tools. > intel: Make intel_chipset handle devid directly. > intel: intel: Add IS_GEN[567] macros. > intel: Reformat intel_decode.c from intel-gpu-tools using Lindent. > intel: Minor style tweaks after Lindent. > intel: Get intel_decode.c minimally building. > intel: Fix Wsigned-compare warnings (soon to be enabled). > intel: Fix a ton of signed vs unsigned and const char *warnings > intel: Add printflike warnings for instr_out. > intel: Fix printf format warnings for intel_decode. > intel: Remove c99ish variable declarations. > intel: Turn on normal warnings for intel_decode.c build. > intel: Disable unused decode_logic_op(). > intel: Add an interface for setting the output file for decode. > intel: Add a regression test program for intel_decode.c. > intel: Add regression tests for batch decode. > intel: Update for new i915_drm.h defines. > configure: Bump version for 2.4.30 > > Jesse Barnes (1): > libdrm: update drm headers from kernel, including new overlay ioctls & > structs > > Johannes Obermayr (1): > intel/intel_decode.c: Remove #include "intel_decode.h". > > git tag: 2.4.30 > > http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > MD5: 9f57a68b2c0836b55ebcbc241f6ca175 libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > SHA1: 5ba36a0bcbacbe67e6a2e0d5318ed9455da59bbc libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > SHA256: cacea9c157ec824ad278a06f4910659b2f3ae69686518ece8d6967843cddcd56 > libdrm-2.4.30.tar.bz2 > > http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > MD5: cd790fb761a83125eceb64162d7d5ce5 libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > SHA1: 148936f0c0f83d016c584245493b975d42bd359a libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > SHA256: a64e63a2af08bcab835e758048611cf61c7183dc7e829cad9dceba859245b4bc > libdrm-2.4.30.tar.gz > > ___ > xorg-announce mailing list > xorg-announce at lists.x.org > http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-announce
[Bug 44523] nexuiz perf regression since u_vbuf: implement another upload codepath which unrolls indices
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44523 Marek Ol??k changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Marek Ol??k 2012-01-07 12:31:30 PST --- Fixed by 2bdf93449a0b00145fabdd3f7866acbafa18e734. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 44365] Textures aligned/move wrongly in planeshift game
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44365 Mark changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #5 from Mark 2012-01-07 15:59:37 PST --- I tested HEAD again to see if any performance enhancements were around, and this problem was back, i did a few git bisects and found this commit. e1ff84371c0e8c58297611f95ec1e2cb5d5acaa4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.30
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:22:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox: > http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check It make checks fine here, on 32 and 64. Not sure what's up. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120107/20aa9733/attachment.pgp>
