Re: [Dovecot] Debian packages for dovecot 1.1.x

2009-01-09 Thread Jules M

Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:


Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using  
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",  
I've set up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use  
under lenny.

http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/


Sorry I'm retarded; I meant to say these packages are for use under  
etch aka the current "stable". Carry on.


~Seth


Hi Seth,
thanks you for the work.
However are you absolutley positive these .debs are built for the  
current stable Debian 4.0 "etch"?

Just tried to install them on a etch vm (openvz). They dont install.
The errors indicates the packages are actually build against "lenny"  
aka unstable.


All on my test environment:
# cat /etc/debian_version
4.0

# uname -r
2.6.18-12-fza-686-bigmem

# dpkg -i dovecot-common_1.1.2-1_i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected package dovecot-common.
(Reading database ... 55337 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking dovecot-common (from dovecot-common_1.1.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of dovecot-common:
 dovecot-common depends on libc6 (>= 2.7-1); however:
  Version of libc6 on system is 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8.
 dovecot-common depends on libkrb53 (>= 1.6.dfsg.2); however:
  Version of libkrb53 on system is 1.4.4-7etch6.
 dovecot-common depends on libldap-2.4-2 (>= 2.4.7); however:
  Package libldap-2.4-2 is not installed.
 dovecot-common depends on libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1); however:
  Version of libpam0g on system is 0.79-5.
 dovecot-common depends on libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.5.9); however:
  Version of libsqlite3-0 on system is 3.3.8-1.1.
 dovecot-common depends on libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8f-5); however:
  Version of libssl0.9.8 on system is 0.9.8c-4etch3.
 dovecot-common depends on zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg); however:
  Version of zlib1g on system is 1:1.2.3-13.
dpkg: error processing dovecot-common (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 dovecot-common

# apt-cache policy libc6
libc6:
  Installed: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8
  Candidate: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8
  Version table:
 *** 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8 0
990 http://ftp2.de.debian.org etch/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

I even tried a force install, but that come back with a nasty error.
# dpkg --force depends -i dovecot-common_1.1.2-1_i386.deb
...
/usr/sbin/dovecot: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found  
(required by /usr/sbin/dovecot)
/usr/sbin/dovecot: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found  
(required by /usr/sbin/dovecot)


regards jules





Re: [Dovecot] Debian packages for dovecot 1.1.x

2009-01-09 Thread Jules M

Am 09.01.2009 um 17:03 schrieb Seth Mattinen:


Jules M wrote:

Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:

Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for  
using such horribly out of date versions just because they run  
"stable", I've set up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x  
rebuilds for use under lenny.

http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/


Sorry I'm retarded; I meant to say these packages are for use  
under etch aka the current "stable". Carry on.


~Seth

Hi Seth,
thanks you for the work.
However are you absolutley positive these .debs are built for the  
current stable Debian 4.0 "etch"?

Just tried to install them on a etch vm (openvz). They dont install.
The errors indicates the packages are actually build against  
"lenny" aka unstable.

All on my test environment:
# cat /etc/debian_version
4.0
# uname -r
2.6.18-12-fza-686-bigmem


My mistake; the i368 versions are different than the amd64 versions  
(I use 64 bit systems, so the 64 bit packages are be OK). I don't  
have a proper build host for i386 handy at the moment.


~Seth


Nevermind. I was able to build v1.1.8 for i368 from the "experimental"  
sources against "etch" myself now.
Had to use dpkg-buildpackage -d to circumvent the dependency on a  
newer drac-dev, not available in etch.


They install ok, have to test them now.

jules