[DNSOP] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.
Hi there, We believe that "Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors" ( draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors/ ) is ready for WGLC. We believe we have incorporated all comments, and that the document has received significant review. W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.
At Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:39:26 -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: > We believe that "Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors" > ( draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors/ > ) is ready for WGLC. > > We believe we have incorporated all comments, and that the document > has received significant review. Just for a quick check: I've made some comments on an earlier version of the draft: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg12614.html and, as far as I remember I've not seen any response to it. I'm lazily skipping to check if they are somehow addressed in the latest version right now - please kindly and simply say so if that's the case. It would also be appreciated if I missed any response to the comments or my comments were just silently dismissed. -- JINMEI, Tatuya ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Re: [DNSOP] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:06 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:39:26 -0400, > Warren Kumari wrote: > >> We believe that "Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors" >> ( draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors - >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors/ >> ) is ready for WGLC. >> >> We believe we have incorporated all comments Doh! Apologies, I thought that one of the other authors had incorporated all comments up till end of 2014. >> , and that the document >> has received significant review. > > Just for a quick check: I've made some comments on an earlier version > of the draft: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg12614.html > I will address these immediately. > and, as far as I remember I've not seen any response to it. I'm > lazily skipping to check if they are somehow addressed in the latest > version right now - please kindly and simply say so if that's the > case. It would also be appreciated if I missed any response to the > comments or my comments were just silently dismissed. > Silently *missed*, not silently dismissed. Apologies again, will fix. W > -- > JINMEI, Tatuya -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
