Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regarding: (Dnsmasq-discuss) localise-queries on ipv6 server does not work with ipv4-only hosts
> On 17 Jul 2021, at 01:32, f...@gmx.de wrote: > > > > Am 16.07.2021 um 13:42 schrieb Geert Stappers: >> ... > All your messages are not helpfull and off topic. > > Please consider to use twitter or Facebook in the future I agree. I have long bitten my tongue on the antics of Geert from when he first appeared on this list in 2017 even to the extent of unsubscribing. I know others have done so too. As has been said on this list already "Can you go find another hobby or somewhere else to troll? I have yet to see any kind of usefulness to your belittling users and their questions. And the cutesy changing of your name along with the witty only to you signatures are quite draining.” Yes, appearing as ‘Monthly Posting’ or ‘Yes’ or ‘Feed Back’ or ‘Web Search’ is real cute. The sheer number of posts and displayed attitude come across as “I’m the moderator of this list” when there is no such thing. I wish there were, for surely this annoying turd that simply won’t flush would be long gone. Whilst the intention might have been to increase the signal to noise ratio on this list, quite the opposite has been achieved. Kevin gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regarding: (Dnsmasq-discuss) localise-queries on ipv6 server does not work with ipv4-only hosts
On 7/17/2021 1:52 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: On 17 Jul 2021, at 01:32, f...@gmx.de wrote: Am 16.07.2021 um 13:42 schrieb Geert Stappers: ... All your messages are not helpfull and off topic. Please consider to use twitter or Facebook in the future I agree. I have long bitten my tongue on the antics of Geert from when he first appeared on this list in 2017 even to the extent of unsubscribing. I know others have done so too. As has been said on this list already "Can you go find another hobby or somewhere else to troll? I have yet to see any kind of usefulness to your belittling users and their questions. And the cutesy changing of your name along with the witty only to you signatures are quite draining.” Yes, appearing as ‘Monthly Posting’ or ‘Yes’ or ‘Feed Back’ or ‘Web Search’ is real cute. The sheer number of posts and displayed attitude come across as “I’m the moderator of this list” when there is no such thing. I wish there were, for surely this annoying turd that simply won’t flush would be long gone. Whilst the intention might have been to increase the signal to noise ratio on this list, quite the opposite has been achieved. Sadly, 'Geert Stappers' is also doing the same kind of things on the Debian lists. -- John Doe ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regarding: (Dnsmasq-discuss) localise-queries on ipv6 server does not work with ipv4-only hosts
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 02:15:53PM +0200, john doe wrote: > On 7/17/2021 1:52 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > On 17 Jul 2021, at 01:32, f...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Am 16.07.2021 um 13:42 schrieb Geert Stappers: > > > > ... > > > All your messages are not helpfull and off topic. > > > > > > > I agree. I have long bitten my tongue on the antics of Geert from > > when he first appeared on this list in 2017 even to the extent of > > unsubscribing. I know others have done so too. As has been said on > > this list already "Can you go find another hobby or somewhere else > > to troll? I have yet to see any kind of usefulness to your belittling > > users and their questions. And the cutesy changing of your name along > > with the witty only to you signatures are quite draining.” Yes, > > appearing as ‘Monthly Posting’ or ‘Yes’ or ‘Feed Back’ > > or ‘Web Search’ is real cute. The sheer number of posts and > > displayed attitude come across as “I’m the moderator of this > > list” when there is no such thing. I wish there were, for surely > > this annoying turd that simply won’t flush would be long gone. > > Whilst the intention might have been to increase the signal to noise > > ratio on this list, quite the opposite has been achieved. > > > > Sadly, 'Geert Stappers' is also doing the same kind of things on the > Debian lists. > I agree should ignore more. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] localise-queries on ipv6 server does not work with ipv4-only hosts
Am 16.07.2021 um 10:53 schrieb Dominik DL6ER:
localise-queries
Return answers to DNS queries from /etc/hosts and --interface-name
and --dynamic-host which DEPENDS ON THE INTERFACE over which the query
was received.
I don't see into the code, but if the "interface" really means "ip address
bound on local interface", it would explain this behaviour.
On 16.07.21 12:00, f...@gmx.de wrote:
My "interface" has an ipv4 and an ipv6!
And im requesting BY ipv6 an ipv4 (as the host has no ipv6) at an interface
which is in 1 of the subnets of the returned host.
If this should not be supported ("bug") the manpage should be fixed and
the word "interface" avoided.
Currently this facility is limited to IPv4.
Yes, im asking for an ipv4
perhaps it by ipv4 it means not only ipv4 addresses, but also requests
received over ipv4. Which should be fair to assume as it's not specified in
more detail.
What you request would be adding an interface-dependent address lookup:
is there any suitable IPv4 address on the same interface. However,a few
things need to be clarified in this case: how to handle multiple IPv4
addresses on the same interface each of which having a valid record? It
is just not possible to localize queries in the same way when it is not
clear which IPv4 subnet the client is in.
- Dnsmasq know the incomming/destination ip of the request.
- At daemon start it build and list with interfaces+all its ipV 4+6
- And if an ipv4 sould be returned by ipv6 this list is first used.
In case it still fails (many subnets at 1 interfce) it could the old
"return all" method be used
I dont know dnsmasq source code, but it sound not so hard
Meybe the source does NOT contain code for this, and I guess the obvious
answer to this would be "patches welcome".
For the multi-subnets exists a workaround to make it fully working:
assign only 1 IPv4 per IF and move the other IPv4s to "eth0:n"
since you are talking abot requests received over ipv6, this looks like
rather useless advice.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
