[DNG] Tried Debian Stretch with systemd out of constrainsts
Hi, Thanks for the links. The https://github.com/Ho-Ro/Hantek6022API is a promising resource. My USB oscilloscope is the version succeeding Hantek6022. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67
I tried running i2pd on my recently upgraded Beowulf instance but found it errors out looking for libboost 1.62.0 libraries, which libboostx.xx-dev appears to be an automatic install. Should I expect any problems rolling libboost1.67.0 back to 1.62.0. A quick search reveals that trying to install both versions is a bad idea. So I won't do that, or ask about it ;) ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67
On 1/12/20 8:40 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > I tried running i2pd on my recently upgraded Beowulf instance but found > it errors out looking for libboost 1.62.0 libraries, which > libboostx.xx-dev appears to be an automatic install. > > Should I expect any problems rolling libboost1.67.0 back to 1.62.0. A > quick search reveals that trying to install both versions is a bad > idea. So I won't do that, or ask about it ;) > What version of i2pd is installed? The versions in beowulf and ceres depend on libboost 1.67.0. If one of those is asking for 1.62 then something is wrong with the package. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67
Oh I see, I'm on 2.29.0 but it is locally compiled and not installed. I guess if I were to compile the same version again in Beowulf (since it's the latest) it would pickup the correct version...? On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 20:59 -0500, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 1/12/20 8:40 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > > I tried running i2pd on my recently upgraded Beowulf instance but > > found > > it errors out looking for libboost 1.62.0 libraries, which > > libboostx.xx-dev appears to be an automatic install. > > > > Should I expect any problems rolling libboost1.67.0 back to 1.62.0. > > A > > quick search reveals that trying to install both versions is a > > bad > > idea. So I won't do that, or ask about it ;) > > > > What version of i2pd is installed? The versions in beowulf and ceres > depend on libboost 1.67.0. If one of those is asking for 1.62 then > something is wrong with the package. > > > ___ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67
On 1/12/20 9:19 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > Oh I see, I'm on 2.29.0 but it is locally compiled and not installed. I > guess if I were to compile the same version again in Beowulf (since > it's the latest) it would pickup the correct version...? > If you install i2pd 2.23.0-1 from beowulf, you will automatically get the right libraries. And yeah, if you compile 2.29 in beowulf, it should work. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Beowulf, I2Pd, libboost 1.62 vs 1.67
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 21:51 -0500, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 1/12/20 9:19 PM, 'smee via Dng wrote: > > Oh I see, I'm on 2.29.0 but it is locally compiled and not > > installed. I > > guess if I were to compile the same version again in Beowulf (since > > it's the latest) it would pickup the correct version...? > > > > If you install i2pd 2.23.0-1 from beowulf, you will automatically get > the > right libraries. And yeah, if you compile 2.29 in beowulf, it should > work. Aah thanks fsmithred ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Ascii/Beowulf nonfree firmware
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:05:25AM -0700, 'smee via Dng wrote: > I powered off, removed and replaced the battery, and booted up again > and wifi works fine still. So it appears the nonfree firmware wasn't > needed for anything on my install, at least so far. By comparison, the wifi in my Thinkpad T420 requires the non-free firmware: iwlwifi :03:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6205 AGN, REV=0xB0 -- Mason Loring Bliss ma...@blisses.orgEwige Blumenkraft! (if awake 'sleep (aref #(sleep dream) (random 2))) -- Hamlet, Act III, Scene I signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
