Re: [DNG] Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread Jaromil

hi William,

thanks for your message :) its encouraging to read you.

plus funny to read Devuan turning almost into a DonJuan :^D

On Sat, 13 Jan 2018, William C Vaughan wrote:

>From the perspective of a retired programmer/analyst, now
>dilletante, you Dejuan folks are on the precipice of success. See
>the forest over the trees, get your message out as an upstream
>solution to Linux in the enterprise - from servers to employee
>desktop/laptop solutions, there is no reason that systemd-free
>Linux alternatives can’t supplant the Red Hat, etc., cabal. They
>have MONEY, and that buys them exposure. My former employer, a
>major university, has bought Red Hat support hook, line, and
>sinker. You guys aren’t even on the radar.

I very much agree with you, we have an opportunity and we should seize
it "soonish". In most EU and US based organisations I believe
enterprise-level ICT contracts will expire around 2019 and 2020 and
will need to be renovated or may be changed. If we are consolidated by
then, have a reasonable amount of money to reinvest in Devuan for
entreprise level services (a 10% of the donations going to Debian
would be enough to get started) and perhaps have our own
certification... we can play the game at the table with these giants
and be a palatable investment for people with old money who understand
how fast tables can flip in ICT.

There are also more sources of investment that can help us stand on
our feet: sponsorships as well institutional projects that Dyne.org is
doing and that are based on Devuan (see i.e. DECODEproject.eu)

However *now* we must concentrate on quality and details, because our
(still limited, as you say) audience doesn't cares about marketing
speech, but about details and perfectionism. That's what we are doing
and that's also what puts us an inch above all those saying you can
use Debian without systemd and then "take care of the small details".

After ASCII we need all to get out there and talk about Devuan to the
people who can help it grow and likely also make a gain in doing so. I
am confident this will work, we actually had already an amazing
coverage all considered.  Here in Amsterdam we are creating this year
a limited responsibility company that may be able to provide some
degree of entreprise level service to customers and some of its shares
will be available to new aligned investors.

We'll see. And certifications, again, I think they are quite important
and there is nothing holding us from making a no-nonsense
certification course in ... good'ol UNIX minimalism :^)

ciao
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Which is Free, Which is Open Source, is there any difference?

2018-01-13 Thread marc
Regarding a new category and the proposed term:

> Obfuscationware.
> 
> New name for a new type of software that wasn't thought of a couple
> decades ago: Otherwise free software with the intent and effect to
> lessen our freedom to use our (other) software.
> 
> I repeat: SystemD doesn't fit into current categories in the Free
> Software spectrum.

I wouldn't just place it in a new category - I would
add a new dimension. So there isn't just a closed-source to free
axis, but also how (and here I am not sure of the words yet)
community integrated or random coder accessible it is.

Now it is much easier to see the world just along a single line.
Heck, many politicians try to trick people into that: Its either left
or right but nothing else (why not also up-down, forward-backward ?).
But the real world has many dimensions (maybe 11 in space time alone)...

So code on the user-hostile end of this new axis has one
or more of the following of symptoms:

1  * It rejects user-contributed patches outright (EWONTFIX)
2  * It bakes in policies - doesn't allow users to set their own
3  * It adds gratuitous changes, moves unnecessarily fast and deprecates
 working, useful code
4  * The investment needed to get up to speed makes it hard for people
 not working full-time on it to contribute
5x * The design objectives and configuration defaults suggest that it is 
 not written with the best interest of its users and contributers in 
 mind

(There are other obstacles like certifications, membership fees,
NDAs, citizenship, etc which might be deployed in future, but aren't
common in the software that I care about yet).

I think I can not only place systemd on that end, but also
GNOME and many of the web-related protocols and implementations.
Firefox has been particularly disappointing.

So what words do we use for this axis ? Hackability, forkeability ?
Contributer-hostile ? Actually there might be some words for points
1-5x needed too. I favour "churny" for point 3...

regards

marc
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Fosdem

2018-01-13 Thread Antony Stone
Hi.

I'm just wondering whether the Devuan project will have any presence at 
https://fosdem.org/2018/ to let people know about progress (or even 
existence)?

Antony.

-- 
3 logicians walk into a bar. The bartender asks "Do you all want a drink?"
The first logician says "I don't know."
The second logician says "I don't know."
The third logician says "Yes!"

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Controlling screen brightness

2018-01-13 Thread Didier Kryn

Le 13/01/2018 à 03:12, Gregory Nowak a écrit :

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:20:06AM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:

     The brightness is controlled through 3 files in
/sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight, named actual_brightness, brightness
and max_brightness.

     The brightness can be controlled by writing to these files. But these
files do not exist if xfce4-power-manager isn't installed. So it seems I
need this package (or an equivalent in another DE) to be able to set a
decent brightness.

Hmmm, are you sure? I have a text only install of devuan Jessie on an
external usb drive (no GUI at all), and these files do exist for me on
that install when I use it on my laptop.


    Probably I made a mistake. Now, after removing xfce4-power-manager, 
xfce4-power-manager-data and xfce4-power-manager-plugins, the 3 files 
are still there.


        Thanks.

                                        Didier


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Fosdem

2018-01-13 Thread Jaromil
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018, Antony Stone wrote:

> Hi.  I'm just wondering whether the Devuan project will have any
> presence at https://fosdem.org/2018/ to let people know about
> progress (or even existence)?

we have a low-key presence which was facilitated by Loic Dachary, to
whom I'm very grateful. it is not about Devuan per-se, but
heads.dyne.org (our amnesiac live-cd derivative) and will be presented
by parazyd. I'll try to be there as well.

ciao


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread aitor_czr

Hi William,

On 13/01/18 01:18, William C Vaughan wrote:

Lurker here.


[cut]


Following this stuff for a couple of years, playing with Dejuan


The right term is DevJuan :)

and its downstream variants with some success, some failures, but 
always interesting. I’m very empathetic to Steve Litt’s feelings on 
the systemd stuff, and am particularly inspired to reply to the latest 
missive on the possibility that Red Hat’s darling Mr. Poettering is 
primarily motivated to make Red Hat Enterprise lots of money in 
offering paid support of systemd Linux operations. As per politics, 
religion, educational prerogatives, and historical perspectives as 
officially endorsed, in the case of Linux and systemd, FOLLOW THE 
MONEY TRAIL. That nearly always works in tracing the sources of derision.


[cut]



From the perspective of a retired programmer/analyst, now dilletante, 
you Dejuan folks are on the precipice of success.


Again, the right term is DevJuan (in spanish)

See the forest over the trees, get your message out as an upstream 
solution to Linux in the enterprise - from servers to employee 
desktop/laptop solutions, there is no reason that systemd-free Linux 
alternatives can’t supplant the Red Hat, etc., cabal. They have MONEY, 
and that buys them exposure. My former employer, a major university, 
has bought Red Hat support hook, line, and sinker. You guys aren’t 
even on the radar.  I only am aware of your position and offerings as 
an old fart hobbyist with time to explore. I wish you well. How can 
you compete with the power that is money that propagates Red Hat, 
Canonical, et al? That’s your main dilima right now, perhaps on the 
threshold of eclipsing your system development tasks.


Cheers.
--
Move from rim to hub; know the wheel. - 


Cheers,

  Aitor.



___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Backup plans: was Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 07:40:42 +
KatolaZ  wrote:

> I don't see how what I said could make you considering getting back to
> Debian, TBH :) It's very good to have backup plans, but choosing
> Devuan is about going *forward*, not backward. YMMV though.

The only reason I could imagine to go back from Devuan to Debian would
be to avail ones self of SystemD.

> 
> My personal distro backup plan (i.e., what I would do if Devuan would
> not work fine for me at any given point in the future) consists in
> putting some more effort in making Devuan work better. And then a bit
> more effort, if needed. And then a bit more, if that was not
> enough. And then a bit more, if required. And then a bit more. And so
> on :)

In my opinion, the preceding paragraph expresses a Primary Plan, not a
backup plan. Most grassroots projects: Projects not funded or managed
by some soulless conglomerate handing out developerships as career
perks, consist of developers who use the software so often and so hard
that they can't afford for the software to be anything but the best. I
know that's how everyone in the VimOutliner project felt (and I think
still feels, regardless of the \\ ridiculosity.

I'd list plan B's something like this:

* Void Linux

* OpenBSD now has hardware assisted virtual machines and is a great and
  stable "Linux".

* Funtoo is still OpenRC, and is committed to never use System-D. You
  can add runit, daemontools-encore or s6 to OpenRC to obtain project
  supervision/respawning, if you'd like. At this point in time, Gentoo's
  a little too "reach across the isle" to suit my taste, and I have a
  feeling Gentoo will soon default to System-D. 

* Manjaro is still very tweakable to remove System-D and replace with
  sysvinit,  after which sysvinit can easily be replaced by runit, s6,
  Epoch, Busybox Init (talk to Karl Hammar for tips), or several others.

* I've heard that there are now sans-systemD versions of Arch. Given
  that once upon a time Arch prided itself as being very close to the
  metal, a sans-systemD Arch would be a wonderful machine.

For the Devuan user, these are definitely *plan Bs*. Only two aren't
rolling releases, and one of those doesn't even use the Linux kernel.
I've tried them all, and I think all of them are "more difficult" than
Devuan. Funtoo is a serious time committment: Source compilation isn't
instant. 

But if someday some sort of bad people take over the Devuan project,
there are alternatives.

How could bad people take over Devuan? I don't know, and I hope it
never happens. But history tells us it's possible. At the turn of the
century, Red Hat was absolutely committed to free software and making
the best conceivable operating system. Debian was a no-corporation
champion of free software, with strong ties to FSF, and was trusted
absolutely by the larger GNU/Linux community. Back in 2000, Debian was
EVERYBODY's Plan B, because we all knew Debian would always be alive and
always be completely trustworthy.

> Nothing can stop a determined community from setting itself free.

I agree, and once wrote about that phenomenon:

http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200110/200110.htm#_linuxlog
 
SteveT

Steve Litt
January 2018 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother?
http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Backup plans: was Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread Michael Siegel
Am 13.01.2018 um 18:02 schrieb Steve Litt:

[snip]

> * OpenBSD now has hardware assisted virtual machines and is a great
> and stable "Linux".

sed 's/Linux/Unix-like OS/'

Also, there's a considerable (non-technical) difference between what
GNU+Linux distributions like Devuan on the one side and OpenBSD on the
other consider free software. Linux is being released under the terms of
the GPLv2, OpenBSD isn't. In fact, OpenBSD is anti-GPL:

"The GNU Public License and licenses modeled on it impose the
restriction that source code must be distributed or made available for
all works that are derivatives of the GNU copyrighted code.

While this may superficially look like a noble strategy, it is a
condition that is typically unacceptable for commercial use of software.
So in practice, it usually ends up hindering free sharing and reuse of
code and ideas rather than encouraging it. As a consequence, no
additional software bound by the GPL terms will be considered for
inclusion into the OpenBSD base system.

For historical reasons, the OpenBSD base system still includes the
following GPL-licensed components: the GNU compiler collection (GCC)
with supporting binutils and libraries, GNU CVS, GNU texinfo, the
mkhybrid file system creation tool, and the readline library.
Replacement by equivalent, more freely licensed tools is a long-term
desideratum."

(https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html)

> * I've heard that there are now sans-systemD versions of Arch. Given 
> that once upon a time Arch prided itself as being very close to the 
> metal, a sans-systemD Arch would be a wonderful machine.
> 
> For the Devuan user, these are definitely *plan Bs*. Only two aren't 
> rolling releases, and one of those doesn't even use the Linux
> kernel. I've tried them all, and I think all of them are "more
> difficult" than Devuan. Funtoo is a serious time committment: Source
> compilation isn't instant.

Apparently, the canonical list of F/OSS operating systems without
SystemD is at:
http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page#Free_and_Open-Source_.28FOSS.29_operating_systemswithout_systemd_in_the_default_installation

[snip]


Best,

msi

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Suspend

2018-01-13 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

I have a rather strange behavior recently with suspend.

I usually suspend all my laptops to ram. I have two laptops, one with
custom kernel (4.14.12) and one with the usual ascii kernel
4.14.0-3-686-pae (now). Both are ascii and both are 32bit.

Since few weeks, the laptop with the distribution kernel shows a strange
behaviour. When I send it to sleep, it starts enabling the xscreensaver
(I use wdm and fvwm) then kills the X so I get the wdm login dialog. Now
the system stays up with the sleeping LED blink. Nothing more happens
now, I can login; even via ssh; and do stuff.

But when I do a reboot or halt at that point, the system goes to sleep
instantly. When I wake it up again, it does perform the reboot/system
halt.

The other laptop with my own kernel works fine. So I suspect that one of
the latest kernel updates did something that prevent a clean suspend.

Any one an idea?

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1
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=c9y0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Jaromil (jaro...@dyne.org):

> plus funny to read Devuan turning almost into a DonJuan :^D

I look forward to quoting Don Giovanni's servant Leporello about Devuan 
adoptions:

  In Italia seicento e quaranta;
  In Alemagna, duecento e trentuna;
  Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna;
  Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre.

Well, it's a start.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgC3GGxF1E0
(It's the second verse, carefully ripped out of context by yr. humble
servant.)

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Backup plans: was Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Michael Siegel (m...@malbolge.net):

> Am 13.01.2018 um 18:02 schrieb Steve Litt:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > * OpenBSD now has hardware assisted virtual machines and is a great
> > and stable "Linux".
> 
> sed 's/Linux/Unix-like OS/'
> 
> Also, there's a considerable (non-technical) difference between what
> GNU+Linux distributions like Devuan on the one side and OpenBSD on the
> other consider free software. Linux is being released under the terms of
> the GPLv2, OpenBSD isn't. In fact, OpenBSD is anti-GPL:

You might as well save your (figurative) breath.  It turns out, Steve
wasn't attempting a serious discussion of what is free and what is open
source as proclaimed in his subject header.  He was just recycling his
standard polemic and attempting to make it look like that other discussion.

-- 
Cheers, « Le doute n'est pas une état bien agréable, mais
Rick Moen   l'assurance est un état ridicule. »  ("Doubt is not 
r...@linuxmafia.com a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.')
McQ! (4x80)   -- Voltaire 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread aitor_czr


On 13/01/18 22:59, Rick Moen wrote:

Quoting Jaromil (jaro...@dyne.org):


plus funny to read Devuan turning almost into a DonJuan :^D

I look forward to quoting Don Giovanni's servant Leporello about Devuan
adoptions:

   In Italia seicento e quaranta;
   In Alemagna, duecento e trentuna;
   Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna;
   Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd56A8HH0HE


Well, it's a start.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgC3GGxF1E0
(It's the second verse, carefully ripped out of context by yr. humble
servant.)



___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Backup plans: was Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread KatolaZ
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 12:02:22PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:

[cut]

> > 
> > My personal distro backup plan (i.e., what I would do if Devuan would
> > not work fine for me at any given point in the future) consists in
> > putting some more effort in making Devuan work better. And then a bit
> > more effort, if needed. And then a bit more, if that was not
> > enough. And then a bit more, if required. And then a bit more. And so
> > on :)
> 
> In my opinion, the preceding paragraph expresses a Primary Plan, not a
> backup plan

[cut]

The bet ingredient for a successful "Primary Plan" is to assume that
there is no backup plan, an act accordingly ;)

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Backup plans: was Which is free, which is open source, et al.

2018-01-13 Thread KatolaZ
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:30:29PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 12:02:22PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> 
> [cut]
> 
> > > 
> > > My personal distro backup plan (i.e., what I would do if Devuan would
> > > not work fine for me at any given point in the future) consists in
> > > putting some more effort in making Devuan work better. And then a bit
> > > more effort, if needed. And then a bit more, if that was not
> > > enough. And then a bit more, if required. And then a bit more. And so
> > > on :)
> > 
> > In my opinion, the preceding paragraph expresses a Primary Plan, not a
> > backup plan
> 
> [cut]
> 
> The bet ingredient for a successful "Primary Plan" is to assume that
> there is no backup plan, an act accordingly ;)
> 

s/bet /best /
s/an act/and act/

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Suspend

2018-01-13 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:51:39PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> I have a rather strange behavior recently with suspend.
> 
> I usually suspend all my laptops to ram. I have two laptops, one with
> custom kernel (4.14.12) and one with the usual ascii kernel
> 4.14.0-3-686-pae (now). Both are ascii and both are 32bit.

While not nice, this is to be expected -- no one in the kernel community
really cares about machines this ancient; they at most get boot-tested,
usually even in an emulator, with such details as suspend receiving almost
no effort.

And, in the recent KPTI (Meltdown, Spectre) massive workfest, I recall just
a single remark about 32-bit x86, which pretty much said that there are no
fixes for these issues, and mitigating them is not on anyone's priority. 
(Someone brought by some old Red Hat's 4G/4G patchset, but it wouldn't be
enough even if forward-ported.)

But, what is your reason to run a _laptop_ this old?  I expect these to be
barely functional.


On the other hand, it is possible you're running a modern machine, just in
32-bit mode.  This is not really supported: you may run 32-bit _userspace_
but with a 64-bit kernel.

And suspend support in general, well, tends to be spotty.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the
⠈⠳⣄ sky.  Your cat demands food.  The priority should be obvious...
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Suspend

2018-01-13 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:17:46AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> 
> And, in the recent KPTI (Meltdown, Spectre) massive workfest, I recall just
> a single remark about 32-bit x86, which pretty much said that there are no
> fixes for these issues, and mitigating them is not on anyone's priority. 
> (Someone brought by some old Red Hat's 4G/4G patchset, but it wouldn't be
> enough even if forward-ported.)

Do any 32-bit machines do speculative execution?

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Suspend

2018-01-13 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:06:34PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:17:46AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > 
> > And, in the recent KPTI (Meltdown, Spectre) massive workfest, I recall just
> > a single remark about 32-bit x86, which pretty much said that there are no
> > fixes for these issues, and mitigating them is not on anyone's priority. 
> > (Someone brought by some old Red Hat's 4G/4G patchset, but it wouldn't be
> > enough even if forward-ported.)
> 
> Do any 32-bit machines do speculative execution?

On x86?  The almost-true rule is: if you can run Stretch/Ascii on it, it's
speculative.  Exceptions are first-generation Atoms, and possibly some
obscure non-Intel/AMD manufacturers.  P5 was in-order, but Jessie is the
last release supporting it.

I'm not well-versed in CPU zoology, but I believe neither Quark nor Knights
Ferry support any general-purpose OS.


On the other hand, the Pinebook currently sitting on my desk is 64-bit yet
doesn't do speculation.  Not x86, though.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the
⠈⠳⣄ sky.  Your cat demands food.  The priority should be obvious...
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng