Re: [DNG] Vote for/against netman name change

2016-02-06 Thread info at smallinnovations.nl



On 2016-02-04 07:03, Edward Bartolo wrote:

>
>Do you agree to renaming netman?


YES

and netbarx is a sound name for such usefull peace of software.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 22:46:59 -0500, Hendrik wrote in message 
<20160206034659.ga23...@topoi.pooq.com>:

> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:38:10PM -0500, fsmithred wrote:
> > On 02/05/2016 08:48 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
> > > Didier Kryn wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The ability to brick the motherboard is brand new. Therefore
> > >> admins should be seriously protected and warned against this
> > >> eventuality, at least until it percolates into the general
> > >> culture.
> > > 
> > > IIUC, this means malware will now be able to not only
> > > erase, but to render its targets unbootable.
> > > Also creating a new hardware recovery business. 
> > > It seems somewhat bleak. Am I overreacting?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Go with the flow, dude. It's worth the risk of malware for the
> > benefit of having your vendor push firmware updates whenever they
> > want. (Did I get that right?)
> > 
> > Actually, I think you're underreacting. I would edit your statement
> > to say, "...render its targets unbootable or worse." Malware
> > authors and others who might have bad intentions for your hardware
> > generally want it to keep working.
> 
> Perhaps not in warfare.

..against whom?

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:46:21 +0100, aitor_czr wrote in message 
<56b5425d.6020...@gnuinos.org>:

> On 02/05/2016 07:18 PM, Go Linux  wrote:
> > Every name I came up with was already in multiple use.  I also
> > thought of netbarx which is completely unique.  Kinda like it
> > actually.
> >
> > golinux
> 
> IMO, netbarx is the best choice :)
> 
>   Aitor.

..it's immune to "netbarf"? ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Clarke Sideroad
On 02/05/2016 09:38 PM, fsmithred wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 08:48 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
>> Didier Kryn wrote:
>>> The ability to brick the motherboard is brand new. Therefore admins
>>> should be seriously protected and warned against this eventuality, at least
>>> until it percolates into the general culture.
>> IIUC, this means malware will now be able to not only
>> erase, but to render its targets unbootable.
>> Also creating a new hardware recovery business. 
>> It seems somewhat bleak. Am I overreacting?
>>
>>
> Go with the flow, dude. It's worth the risk of malware for the benefit of
> having your vendor push firmware updates whenever they want. (Did I get
> that right?)
>
> Actually, I think you're underreacting. I would edit your statement to
> say, "...render its targets unbootable or worse." Malware authors and
> others who might have bad intentions for your hardware generally want it
> to keep working.
>
>
Yes I understand the EFI is a dandy place to conceal stuff if you want
it to survive to next boot and not be disadvantaged by _most_ hard drive
cleaning games.
Leaving it RW from the OS is just extra convenient for installation, how
nice.
Probably gets the NSA stamp of approval.

Clarke



 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Didier Kryn

Le 06/02/2016 13:32, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 22:46:59 -0500, Hendrik wrote in message
<20160206034659.ga23...@topoi.pooq.com>:


On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:38:10PM -0500, fsmithred wrote:

On 02/05/2016 08:48 PM, Joel Roth wrote:

Didier Kryn wrote:

 The ability to brick the motherboard is brand new. Therefore
admins should be seriously protected and warned against this
eventuality, at least until it percolates into the general
culture.

IIUC, this means malware will now be able to not only
erase, but to render its targets unbootable.
Also creating a new hardware recovery business.
It seems somewhat bleak. Am I overreacting?



Go with the flow, dude. It's worth the risk of malware for the
benefit of having your vendor push firmware updates whenever they
want. (Did I get that right?)

Actually, I think you're underreacting. I would edit your statement
to say, "...render its targets unbootable or worse." Malware
authors and others who might have bad intentions for your hardware
generally want it to keep working.

Perhaps not in warfare.

..against whom?



Apple against Linux

Systemd against Freedom of choice

Crapware against good software

Pick your preferred :D

Didier


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Go Linux
Is it true that /sys/firmware/efi is also mounted rw under sysvinit?  Apologies 
if I missed the answer to this question in this long thread.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-06 Thread dev1fanboy
So I am trying to build transmission-daemon without systemd, was just testing 
this locally and run into an issue. It can be built without systemd but 
transmission-gtk will no longer start downloading torrents.

I think it is down to this error which appears when running transmission-gtk in 
a terminal:

** (transmission-gtk:32682): WARNING **: Error retrieving accessibility bus 
address: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service files

Can anyone suggest a way to solve this, or provide a patch? If so I'll try to 
get it working for jessie and put it on the gitlab. 

Cheers,

chillfan
-- 
Take back your privacy. Switch to www.StartMail.com
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Steve Litt  writes:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:33:44 +0100 Didier Kryn  wrote:
>
>>  People have always expected rm -rf / to destroy the OS. They
>> also know that, from the keyboard, with root priviledge, they can
>> destroy the partition table of the disk. All this is repairable by
>> the admin her/himself.
>> 
>>  The ability to brick the motherboard is brand new. 
>
> Not only brand new, but an entirely new level of consequence. 
>
> With excellent backups, rm -rf / or even dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda1 is
> correctable with a few hours of work, on the premises, with only
> resources on the premises.

A somewhat seriously wrong conception about the relation between / (the
root of the filesystem name tree) and /dev/sda1 (some partition of a
mass storage device) seems to exist here. The reality is "there is none"
unless the system happens to be configured such that /dev/sda1 is
mounted as / and nothing else has been integrated into the filesystem
namespace. But usually, this won't be the case and a number of devices/
partitions and virtual filesystems providing various features will
collectively provide 'named objects' which can be manipulated using the
filesystem API. The current list can be displayed with

cat /proc/mounts

,
| For historical reasons, the mount command also maintains a list of
| mounted filesystems in the file /etc/mtab which it displays when
| executed without arguments. But the current /etc/mtab doesn't
| necessarily reflect reality, eg, because / is mounted r/o or because the
| current / came into being via chroot.
`

Each of the mounted filesystems provides a set of methods implementing
the filesystem syscalls for this kind of filesystem and there are no
restriction regarding what these method might do. Eg, one could create a
filesystem where deleting a file named Richard causes an immediate
ACPI poweroff. There's also a Filesystem In Userspace (FUSE) facility
which enables arbitrary applications to implement filesystem syscalls.

"Invoke unlink/ rmdir methods for all named objects currently visible in
the filesystem namespace" is something very much different from
"fill a disk partition with zeroes" and doing this without knowing what
these unlink/ rmdir methods will end up doing is just recklessly trying
one's luck.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Simon Hobson  writes:
> Rainer Weikusat  wrote:
>> But "the hardware" didn't "break". Certain vendor-supplied software
>> reportedly ceases to function if certain EFI variables are deleted.
>
> That is the sort of linguistic gymnastics that vendors use to get out
> of accepting responsibility for stuff. I think most people would
> equate with "it used to work", "X happened", "it now doesn't work" as
> being "X broke it". It no longer works, it's broken. Using linguistic
> gymnastics to try and call it something else doesn't change the
> fundamental fact that "it no longer works, therefore it's broken".

That's (AFAIK) a factually accurate description and not 'linguistic
gymnastics' and the final effect of this, namely, perfectly working
hardware is rendered unusable because of unsafe software implementation
practices, is IMHO rather more damning than "the hardware's broken" as
physical things are affected by wear and tear while software isn't.

It also avoids a Daily Mail style "Using Linux can brick your hardware!"
statement. That's not really wrong but nevertheless rather removed from
the actual situation.

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Didier Kryn

Le 06/02/2016 17:19, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :

Steve Litt  writes:

>On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:33:44 +0100 Didier Kryn  wrote:
>

>>  People have always expected rm -rf / to destroy the OS. They
>>also know that, from the keyboard, with root priviledge, they can
>>destroy the partition table of the disk. All this is repairable by
>>the admin her/himself.
>>
>>  The ability to brick the motherboard is brand new.

>
>Not only brand new, but an entirely new level of consequence.
>
>With excellent backups, rm -rf / or even dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda1 is
>correctable with a few hours of work, on the premises, with only
>resources on the premises.

A somewhat seriously wrong conception about the relation between / (the
root of the filesystem name tree) and /dev/sda1 (some partition of a
mass storage device) seems to exist here.


Sure Rainer, admins with a little of experience know that. This was 
just a partial enumeration of simple actions able to destroy an 
installed OS.


You are right to insist on the  BIG difference between these two 
actions and the fact that rm -rf is much more destructive than 
reformatting /. However, the main danger of rm -rf, up to now, was 
typically its potential to wipe out /home. None of the pseudofilesystem 
represented a danger. Experienced people running this command would just 
unmount any filesystem they would like to preserve and would never have 
thought of this new, well hidden, danger.


Didier

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:19:07 +
Rainer Weikusat  wrote:

> Steve Litt  writes:
[clip]
> > With excellent backups, rm -rf / or even dd if=/dev/zero
> > of=/dev/sda1 is correctable with a few hours of work, on the
> > premises, with only resources on the premises.  
> 
> A somewhat seriously wrong conception about the relation between /
> (the root of the filesystem name tree) and /dev/sda1 (some partition
> of a mass storage device) seems to exist here. The reality is "there
> is none" unless the system happens to be configured such
> that /dev/sda1 is mounted as / 

Come on, Rainer, it's obvious your last sentence is assumed in my
statement. What, did I have to completely specify it just to make the
obvious point that wiping the root dir's device is correctable from a
good backup?

SteveT

Steve Litt 
February 2016 featured book: The Key to Everyday Excellence
http://www.troubleshooters.com/key
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Vote for/against netman name change

2016-02-06 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi,

It is amusing to be exposed to so much appreciation of genuine users
and trolls alike. Yes, I bark quite a lot: Bow wow, ww,
grr! Wuff, wu.

However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
like a lord. Sorry for acting like this, but working for the cause of
open source software is essentially helping those who cannot afford
expensive software and expensive hardware. Yes, I know what I am
saying dissonates a lot with what the modern capitalistist world
professes, but I believe firmly in world of cooperation instead of
savage competion. The lesser gifted are no subhuman beings. They
deserve a world that helps them instead of one that punishes them for
not being gifted.

What I did, is to help, and I am satisfied of being trolled for it and
sometimes abused.

Thanks for your understanding.

Edward
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi,

It is amusing to be exposed to so much appreciation of genuine users
and trolls alike. Yes, I bark quite a lot: Bow wow, ww,
grr! Wuff, wu.

However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
like a lord. Sorry for acting like this, but working for the cause of
open source software is essentially helping those who cannot afford
expensive software and expensive hardware. Yes, I know what I am
saying dissonates a lot with what the modern capitalist world
professes, but I believe firmly in a world of cooperation instead of
savage competion. The lesser gifted are no subhuman beings. They
deserve a world that helps them instead of one that punishes them for
not being gifted.

What I did, is to help, and I am satisfied of being trolled for it and
sometimes abused.

Thanks for your understanding.

Edward
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Steve Litt  writes:
> Rainer Weikusat  wrote:
>
>> Steve Litt  writes:
> [clip]
>> > With excellent backups, rm -rf / or even dd if=/dev/zero
>> > of=/dev/sda1 is correctable with a few hours of work, on the
>> > premises, with only resources on the premises.  
>> 
>> A somewhat seriously wrong conception about the relation between /
>> (the root of the filesystem name tree) and /dev/sda1 (some partition
>> of a mass storage device) seems to exist here. The reality is "there
>> is none" unless the system happens to be configured such
>> that /dev/sda1 is mounted as / 
>
> Come on, Rainer, it's obvious your last sentence is assumed in my
> statement.

My sentence continued with

,
| and nothing else has been integrated into the filesystem
| namespace.
`

which obviously wasn't the situation you were writing about as
'deleteing EFI variables' at least requires the efivarfs filesystem to
be mounted.

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Go Linux
On Sat, 2/6/16, Edward Bartolo  wrote:

 Subject: Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.
 To: "dng" 
 Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016, 11:30 AM
 
Hi,

It is amusing to be exposed to so much appreciation of genuine users
and trolls alike. Yes, I bark quite a lot: Bow wow, ww,
grr! Wuff, wu.

However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
like a lord. Sorry for acting like this, but working for the cause of
open source software is essentially helping those who cannot afford
expensive software and expensive hardware. Yes, I know what I am
saying dissonates a lot with what the modern capitalist world
professes, but I believe firmly in a world of cooperation instead of
savage competion. The lesser gifted are no subhuman beings. They
deserve a world that helps them instead of one that punishes them for
not being gifted.

What I did, is to help, and I am satisfied of being trolled for it and
sometimes abused.

Thanks for your understanding.

Edward



Good grief.  You are NOT barx.  So how can using that combination of letters be 
naming something after 'yourself'.  In fact you are not even Edward Bartolo.  
You are a collection of physical and mental phenomena. The act of naming is 
merely a convenient convention but in reality has no substance.  Such strong 
identification with the 'self' is a deep, dark pit . . .

golinux
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Peter Olson
> On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo  wrote:
> 
  [snip]
> However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
> after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself

I would nominate netservant as the name, but alas, it has already been taken.

It seems to me that focusing on 'net' is a red herring.  The name doesn't really
have to map to the function.  The name should be memorable once it is
discovered, which includes punning.  That encourages word-of-mouth propagation.

I suggest people look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_butlers
for some ideas.

Peter Olson
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Edward Bartolo
Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
change the name of the project.

Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!

On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:
>> On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo  wrote:
>>
>   [snip]
>> However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
>> after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
>
> I would nominate netservant as the name, but alas, it has already been
> taken.
>
> It seems to me that focusing on 'net' is a red herring.  The name doesn't
> really
> have to map to the function.  The name should be memorable once it is
> discovered, which includes punning.  That encourages word-of-mouth
> propagation.
>
> I suggest people look at
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_butlers
> for some ideas.
>
> Peter Olson
>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi All,

PUNNING will not be accepted. Those who want to use it, they can use
it to name their offspring and family members!!

I have had enough. Filter this rubbish!

Edward

On 06/02/2016, Edward Bartolo  wrote:
> Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> change the name of the project.
>
> Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
>
> On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:
>>> On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo  wrote:
>>>
>>   [snip]
>>> However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
>>> after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
>>
>> I would nominate netservant as the name, but alas, it has already been
>> taken.
>>
>> It seems to me that focusing on 'net' is a red herring.  The name doesn't
>> really
>> have to map to the function.  The name should be memorable once it is
>> discovered, which includes punning.  That encourages word-of-mouth
>> propagation.
>>
>> I suggest people look at
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_butlers
>> for some ideas.
>>
>> Peter Olson
>>
>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Vote for/against netman name change

2016-02-06 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi All,

PUNNING will not be accepted. Those who want to use it, they can use
it to name their offspring and family members!!

I have had enough. Filter this rubbish!

Edward

On 06/02/2016, Edward Bartolo  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is amusing to be exposed to so much appreciation of genuine users
> and trolls alike. Yes, I bark quite a lot: Bow wow, ww,
> grr! Wuff, wu.
>
> However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
> after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
> like a lord. Sorry for acting like this, but working for the cause of
> open source software is essentially helping those who cannot afford
> expensive software and expensive hardware. Yes, I know what I am
> saying dissonates a lot with what the modern capitalistist world
> professes, but I believe firmly in world of cooperation instead of
> savage competion. The lesser gifted are no subhuman beings. They
> deserve a world that helps them instead of one that punishes them for
> not being gifted.
>
> What I did, is to help, and I am satisfied of being trolled for it and
> sometimes abused.
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
>
> Edward
>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Definitely OT!! Re: Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 12:14 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:19:07 +
> Rainer Weikusat  wrote:
> 
> > Steve Litt  writes:
> [clip]

> Come on, Rainer, it's obvious your last sentence is assumed in my
> statement. What, did I have to completely specify it just to make the
> obvious point that wiping the root dir's device is correctable from a
> good backup?

Hello, can you please stop this very OT thread. This list is about
development of Devuan, nothing else. If you want to discuss these
matters please join #debianfork channel, where this kind of discussions
belong. And BTW: How many packages have you (meaning all on this list)
volunteered to maintain?? Seems like Daniel Reurich is the (almost)
only person working on the development of upcoming the Devuan beta.

No offense Steve I just happened to jump in here.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 19:03 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> change the name of the project.
> 
> Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
> 
> On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:
> > > On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo 
> > > wrote:

Please Edward, Peter is no scumbag. Read what he suggests instead. And
calm down!
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Go Linux
On Sat, 2/6/16, Edward Bartolo  wrote:

 Subject: Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.
 To: "dng" 
 Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016, 12:06 PM
 
 Hi All,

PUNNING will not be accepted. Those who want to use it, they can use
it to name their offspring and family members!!

I have had enough. Filter this rubbish!

Edward

On 06/02/2016, Edward Bartolo  wrote:
> Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> change the name of the project.
>
> Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
>
> On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:
>>> On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo  wrote:
>>>
>>   [snip]
>>> However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
>>> after myself. I am a servant here, therefore I cannot consider myself
>>
>> I would nominate netservant as the name, but alas, it has already been
>> taken.
>>
>> It seems to me that focusing on 'net' is a red herring.  The name doesn't
>> really
>> have to map to the function.  The name should be memorable once it is
>> discovered, which includes punning.  That encourages word-of-mouth
>> propagation.
>>
>> I suggest people look at
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_butlers
>> for some ideas.
>>
>> Peter Olson
>>
>




Predictably, wrong thinking and self-identification leads to anger.  Yawn. 
Human history in a nutshell.  All the technology of our 'evolved' species 
doesn't change that fact that we are still looking through the wrong end of the 
periscope . . .

golinux
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread KatolaZ
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 06:21:23PM +, Go Linux wrote:

[cut]

> 
> 
> 
> 
> Predictably, wrong thinking and self-identification leads to anger.  Yawn. 
> Human history in a nutshell.  All the technology of our 'evolved' species 
> doesn't change that fact that we are still looking through the wrong end of 
> the periscope . . .
> 

+1

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ]
[ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ]
[ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ]
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread KatolaZ
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:03:12PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> change the name of the project.
> 
> Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
> 

If you had read his email, instead of just throwing insults to him,
you would have realised that Peter was not throwing any pun at you. 

Since the choice of this bloody name is just yours, I don't get why
you are making all this fuss about asking people what they think, and
letting they believe that you are really interested in their
opinion. 

Go name whatever you want as you like, but please stop pretending that
you care about what others have to say, because it is obvious that you
don't give a shit.

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ]
[ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ]
[ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ]
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Dng Digest, Vol 17, Issue 34

2016-02-06 Thread David Harrison

On 06/02/2016 18:27, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:

I have had enough. Filter this rubbish!


Amen, Edward. Let's start by filtering those rants.

You asked a question and people, some of whom have given you a lot of 
useful advice over recent months, were good enough to answer you. You 
disagree with some of the answers. That's life. Please leave it there, 
or go kick your tin can somewhere else. It's tiresome.


The signal to noise ratio on this list is getting out of hand.

David H



___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:19:07PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> 
> Each of the mounted filesystems provides a set of methods implementing
> the filesystem syscalls for this kind of filesystem and there are no
> restriction regarding what these method might do. Eg, one could create a
> filesystem where deleting a file named Richard causes an immediate
> ACPI poweroff. There's also a Filesystem In Userspace (FUSE) facility
> which enables arbitrary applications to implement filesystem syscalls.
> 
> "Invoke unlink/ rmdir methods for all named objects currently visible in
> the filesystem namespace" is something very much different from
> "fill a disk partition with zeroes" and doing this without knowing what
> these unlink/ rmdir methods will end up doing is just recklessly trying
> one's luck.

The situation is more explicit in the modern filenamespace-based OS's
like Plan 9 and Inferno.

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] writable efi

2016-02-06 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:37:05PM +, Go Linux wrote:
> Is it true that /sys/firmware/efi is also mounted rw under sysvinit?  
> Apologies if I missed the answer to this question in this long thread.

Not on my nonefi devuan jessie alpha2 system.
Anyone have an efi jessie to report on?

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 06:30:38PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It is amusing to be exposed to so much appreciation of genuine users
> and trolls alike. Yes, I bark quite a lot: Bow wow, ww,
> grr! Wuff, wu.
> 
> However, my ethical principles do not permit me to name the project
> after myself.

What I like about the name netbarx is that it is unique.
I think you'd have a hard time finding another project called barx.

I'm really tired, when soneone talks about a project called, say,
squid, and wondering what it is, trying to find it in google and
finding nothing but articles on cephalopoda.

A good name should be pronouncble and unique.  netman is pronouncable
bbut not unique.

-- hendrik 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] writable efi

2016-02-06 Thread Go Linux
On Sat, 2/6/16, Hendrik Boom  wrote:

 Subject: [DNG] writable efi
 To: dng@lists.dyne.org
 Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016, 1:26 PM
 
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:37:05PM +, Go Linux wrote:

> Is it true that /sys/firmware/efi is also mounted rw under sysvinit?  
> Apologies if I missed the answer to this question in this long thread.


Not on my nonefi devuan jessie alpha2 system.
Anyone have an efi jessie to report on?

-- hendrik




/sys/firmware/ and everything in it is mounted rw on my Gigabyte legacy board 
with Devuan installed.

golinux
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] writable efi

2016-02-06 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:36:15PM +, Go Linux wrote:
> On Sat, 2/6/16, Hendrik Boom  wrote:
> 
>  Subject: [DNG] writable efi
>  To: dng@lists.dyne.org
>  Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016, 1:26 PM
>  
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:37:05PM +, Go Linux wrote:
> 
> > Is it true that /sys/firmware/efi is also mounted rw under sysvinit?  
> > Apologies if I missed the answer to this question in this long thread.
> 
> 
> Not on my nonefi devuan jessie alpha2 system.
> Anyone have an efi jessie to report on?
> 
> -- hendrik
> 
> 
> 
> 
> /sys/firmware/ and everything in it is mounted rw on my Gigabyte legacy board 
> with Devuan installed.

That's true on my non=efi system, too, but it has no /sys/firmware/efi.

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Definitely OT!! Re: Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Rainer Weikusat

[...]

> And BTW: How many packages have you (meaning all on this list)
> volunteered to maintain??

As far as I can tell, the "official standpoint" of 'Devuan' in this
respect is 'no help wanted'. At least, no question for that I saw on
this list, including my own, has ever received an answer.

So, whom are you assaulting for what?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Definitely OT!! Re: Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Rainer Weikusat  writes:
> [...]
>
>> And BTW: How many packages have you (meaning all on this list)
>> volunteered to maintain??
>
> As far as I can tell, the "official standpoint" of 'Devuan' in this
> respect is 'no help wanted'. At least, no question for that I saw on
> this list, including my own, has ever received an answer.
>
> So, whom are you assaulting for what?

And while we're at that, can you please produce some reference which
backs up your claim that technical discussions about features of
Linux-based systems must not happen on this list?

The ones I found were

,
| If you want to participate in community debates, join the online web
| forum or the old-school DNG discussion mailinglist also available via
| Gmane.
`
https://devuan.org/

,
| On the 18 October 2014 the Veteran Unix Admins have released a
| communication: Shall we fork Debian?
| 
| DNG is the name of the first mailinglist after the debianfork
| declaration.
`
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

and

,
| open discussion space
| 
| [...]
| 
| dng - Debian is not GNOME first discussion list 
`
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/splash/index.en.html

These are all rather generic. Also,

,
| Our mailing lists are interactive and all subscribers can write. We
| debate new software releases, events, projects, roadmaps in a friendly
| environment with good humour and cyberfreaks hanging around.
`
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Definitely OT!! Re: Bad UEFI: was Systemd at work: rm -rf EFI

2016-02-06 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 21:07 +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > And BTW: How many packages have you (meaning all on this list)
> > volunteered to maintain??
> 
> As far as I can tell, the "official standpoint" of 'Devuan' in this
> respect is 'no help wanted'. At least, no question for that I saw on
> this list, including my own, has ever received an answer.
> 
> So, whom are you assaulting for what?

Iv'e never seen a statement like 'no help wanted', where did you see
that? I'm not assaulting anybody at all. How many packages have you
adopted so far?

Really longing for the Devuan beta. Daniel go-go-go! (And when you (the
project) have updated the instructions for how to adopt Debian
packages, I'll be with you, for sure :) Only responsible for one
package so far.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread aitor_czr

Hi Edward,

On 02/06/2016 07:27 PM, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:

On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 19:03 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:

>Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
>change the name of the project.
>
>Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
>
>On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:

> > >On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo
> > >wrote:

Please Edward, Peter is no scumbag. Read what he suggests instead. And
calm down!


Peter Olson is not offending you. I don't understand your anger.

  Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 19:18:29 +0100, Svante wrote in message 
<1454782709.2888.49.ca...@gmail.com>:

> On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 19:03 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> > Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> > change the name of the project.
> > 
> > Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
> > 
> > On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:
> > > > On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward Bartolo
> > > >  wrote:
> 
> Please Edward, Peter is no scumbag. Read what he suggests instead. And
> calm down!

..also, I just wanted to point out how easily your netbarx name 
is abused, it only takes "getting one letter wrong", such cheap 
attacks will happen "just because", because they are so easy to 
do, and because the other side appears to need such political etc 
victories to compensate for the absence of their techological etc 
performance merit.


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] writable efi

2016-02-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 15:36:26 -0500, Hendrik wrote in message 
<20160206203626.gf5...@topoi.pooq.com>:

> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:36:15PM +, Go Linux wrote:
> > On Sat, 2/6/16, Hendrik Boom  wrote:
> > 
> >  Subject: [DNG] writable efi
> >  To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> >  Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016, 1:26 PM
> >  
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:37:05PM +, Go Linux wrote:
> > 
> > > Is it true that /sys/firmware/efi is also mounted rw under
> > > sysvinit?  Apologies if I missed the answer to this question in
> > > this long thread.
> > 
> > 
> > Not on my nonefi devuan jessie alpha2 system.
> > Anyone have an efi jessie to report on?
> > 
> > -- hendrik
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > /sys/firmware/ and everything in it is mounted rw on my Gigabyte
> > legacy board with Devuan installed.
> 
> That's true on my non=efi system, too, but it has
> no /sys/firmware/efi.

..can an efi board set up with legacy boot and running e.g. sys-v,
be tricked into bricking itself e.g. by reading an "ad" flash movie 
off a web site and writing it into a new bad /sys/firmware/efi and 
then "try" a kexec reboot?  Etc?

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 01:27:26 +0100, aitor_czr wrote in message 
<56b68f6e.4090...@gnuinos.org>:

> Hi Edward,
> 
> On 02/06/2016 07:27 PM, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 19:03 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> >> >Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> >> >change the name of the project.
> >> >
> >> >Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
> >> >
> >> >On 06/02/2016, Peter Olson  wrote:
>  > > >On February 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM Edward
>  > > >Bartolo wrote:
> > Please Edward, Peter is no scumbag. Read what he suggests instead.
> > And calm down!
> 
> Peter Olson is not offending you. I don't understand your anger.
> 
>Aitor.

..he may have taken offence from my comment on the name, 
which he may have interpreted as "netbark", I never meant 
to offend him or anyone else here. 

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Change netman into another name.

2016-02-06 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:26:16AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 01:27:26 +0100, aitor_czr wrote:
> > On 02/06/2016 07:27 PM, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 19:03 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> > >> >Whether you like it, systemd TROLL or NOT, it is me who can only
> > >> >change the name of the project.
> > >> >
> > >> >Keep punning for your family members, SCUMBAG!!!
> > >> >
> > > Please Edward, Peter is no scumbag. Read what he suggests instead.
> > > And calm down!
> > 
> > Peter Olson is not offending you. I don't understand your anger.
> 
> ..he may have taken offence from my comment on the name, 
> which he may have interpreted as "netbark", I never meant 
> to offend him or anyone else here. 

The offence is right, as instead of referring to useless creatures we should
pay homage to the Master Species instead and name netman "netmeow".  

But really, it's getting ridiculous.

-- 
A tit a day keeps the vet away.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] transmission-daemon package

2016-02-06 Thread shraptor

On 2016-02-06 17:18, dev1fanboy wrote:

So I am trying to build transmission-daemon without systemd, was just
testing this locally and run into an issue. It can be built without
systemd but transmission-gtk will no longer start downloading
torrents.

I think it is down to this error which appears when running
transmission-gtk in a terminal:

** (transmission-gtk:32682): WARNING **: Error retrieving
accessibility bus address: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown:
The name
org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service files


I am on Arch derivative and I can tell for certain that transmission-gtk
works without systemd or libsystemd

I am using the original package for transmission-gtk on Arch Linux
However I have dbus compiled without systemd that is not default on 
Arch.


I think you should rather look on dbus than transmission.

Hope this helps even if we're not exactly on the same dist

Best regards

Scoob



Can anyone suggest a way to solve this, or provide a patch? If so I'll
try to get it working for jessie and put it on the gitlab.

Cheers,

chillfan

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng