Re: [DNG] [DN Offlist G] netman GIT project

2015-09-16 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi Aitor,

Try this command:

fpc  -MObjFPC -Scghi -Tlinux -vewnhi -Filib/x86_64-linux
-Fl/opt/gnome/lib
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/lcl/units/x86_64-linux/gtk2
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/lcl/units/x86_64-linux
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/components/lazutils/lib/x86_64-linux
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/packager/units/x86_64-linux -Fu.
-FUlib/x86_64-linux -l -dLCL -dLCLgtk2 netman.lpr

Edward

On 21/07/2019, aitor_czr  wrote:
> Lazbuild doen't exit as a package, but it would be more appropiate
> fp-compiler (freepascal) than lazarus.
>
> Aitor.
>
> On 16/09/15 05:51, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> Hi Aitor,
>>
>> Lazarus IDE may not be a hard dependency as it can be avoided by
>> directly building netman using lazbuild.
>>
>> The version number should appropriately be 0.1.0 as this is the first
>> version and still needs maturation to become proper version 1.0
>>
>> Edward
>>
>> On 15/09/2015, aitor_czr  wrote:
>>> >The only error hurled by lintian is:
>>> >
>>> >"Could not find a profile matching "{VENDOR}/main" for vendor
>>> > devuan
>>> >at /usr/bin/lintian line 979."
>>> >
>>> >On the other hand, what about the number version of the package?
>>> >
>>> >0.1.0 ??
>>> >
>>> >1.0 ??
>>> >
>>> >Aitor.
>>> >
>>> >On 15/09/15 15:30, aitor_czr wrote:
 >>I think that the dependencies of netman are the following:
 >>
 >>Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), gcc, lazarus, dh-python,
 >>python-all-dev
 >>"netman-gui" deps -> netman-backend, libatk1.0-0, libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0,
 >>libglib2.0-0, libpango-1.0-0, libx11-6
 >>"netman-backend" deps -> libc-bin
 >>
 >>Aitor.
 >>
> >>>   Now i must to hit with the correct dependencies. All the rest is
> >>>   done. So, now i need some time to build it into a chroot jail
> >>> using
> >>>   pbuilder, etc..
>
>
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] [DN Offlist G] netman GIT project

2015-09-16 Thread aitor_czr

Thanks Edward, i will try it.

I am considering locating  netman-backend in the following path:

"/usr/lib/netman/0.1.0/"

doing after that the following simbolic links:

# ln -s  /usr/lib/netman/0.1.0/netman-backend  /etc/alternatives/

# ln -s  /etc/alternatives/netman-backend  /usr/bin/



What do you think about it?

Aitor.

On 16/09/15 09:55, Edward Bartolo wrote:

Hi Aitor,

Try this command:

fpc  -MObjFPC -Scghi -Tlinux -vewnhi -Filib/x86_64-linux
-Fl/opt/gnome/lib
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/lcl/units/x86_64-linux/gtk2
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/lcl/units/x86_64-linux
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/components/lazutils/lib/x86_64-linux
-Fu/usr/lib/lazarus/1.2.4/packager/units/x86_64-linux -Fu.
-FUlib/x86_64-linux -l -dLCL -dLCLgtk2 netman.lpr

Edward

On 21/07/2019, aitor_czr  wrote:

>Lazbuild doen't exit as a package, but it would be more appropiate
>fp-compiler (freepascal) than lazarus.
>
>Aitor.
>
>On 16/09/15 05:51, Edward Bartolo wrote:

>>Hi Aitor,
>>
>>Lazarus IDE may not be a hard dependency as it can be avoided by
>>directly building netman using lazbuild.
>>
>>The version number should appropriately be 0.1.0 as this is the first
>>version and still needs maturation to become proper version 1.0
>>
>>Edward
>>
>>On 15/09/2015, aitor_czr   wrote:

>>> >The only error hurled by lintian is:
>>> >
>>> >"Could not find a profile matching "{VENDOR}/main" for vendor
>>> >devuan
>>> >at /usr/bin/lintian line 979."
>>> >
>>> >On the other hand, what about the number version of the package?
>>> >
>>> >0.1.0 ??
>>> >
>>> >1.0 ??
>>> >
>>> >Aitor.
>>> >
>>> >On 15/09/15 15:30, aitor_czr wrote:

 >>I think that the dependencies of netman are the following:
 >>
 >>Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), gcc, lazarus, dh-python,
 >>python-all-dev
 >>"netman-gui" deps -> netman-backend, libatk1.0-0, libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0,
 >>libglib2.0-0, libpango-1.0-0, libx11-6
 >>"netman-backend" deps -> libc-bin
 >>
 >>Aitor.
 >>

> >>>   Now i must to hit with the correct dependencies. All the rest is
> >>>   done. So, now i need some time to build it into a chroot jail
> >>>using
> >>>   pbuilder, etc..


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] test

2015-09-16 Thread Marlon Nunes

test 1 2 test test.

--
Stop slacking you lazy bum!
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] test

2015-09-16 Thread tilt!

On 09/16/2015 01:42 PM, Marlon Nunes wrote:

test 1 2 test test.


:)

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] report: upgrade Debian Wheezy to Devuan Jessie

2015-09-16 Thread Rob Owens
This test is on a non-gui system.  

'apt-get update'

'apt-get upgrade'

'apt-get remove libsystemd-login0'  # Not sure why this was installed 
on my Wheezy system.  This operation also removed dbus.

'wget 
http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/d/devuan-baseconf/devuan-baseconf_0.6.4+devuan3_all.deb'

'dpkg -i devuan-baseconf_0.6.4+devuan3_all.deb'

enter 'jessie' in place of the default value of 'ceres'

remove debian sources from /etc/apt/sources.list (if this is a 
required step, why not have the devuan-baseconf deb comment out 
these sources?)

'apt-get update'

'apt-get install devuan-keyring'

'apt-get update'

'apt-get upgrade'

'apt-get update' -- just to be sure

'apt-get dist-upgrade'  # db5.1-util is kept back.  Many new
packages are installed, including dbus, samba, and qemu-kvm.

'aptitude search ~i | grep systemd' shows libsystemd0 is 
installed, which was not present on my Wheezy system.  I 
understand this is relatively benign, but I'm reporting it
to be complete.

The machine boots without errors, and 'lsb_release -a' shows
that I am running Devuan.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng