Re: nginx gunicorn

2011-12-19 Thread pixelfields
Thanks a lot,
but ... this not solved my problem. I increase worker_processes to 2,
but during test I still have processor overload 98% - 100%.

regards

Dusan Simek

On Dec 19, 10:59 am, kenneth gonsalves  wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 09:03 +0100, Dusan Simek wrote:
> > worker_processes  1;
>
> worker_processes  2 or more;
> --
> regards
> Kenneth Gonsalves

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



code revision short job

2012-01-03 Thread pixelfields
Hi,
I'm loooking for anybody who can review application code in easy app
based on django 1.3 and postgres.

Thanks

Dusan Simek

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: code revision short job

2012-01-03 Thread pixelfields
Problem is that an app is very slow on ab benchmark, approximately
14-16 requests per second (with caching on).
We need full code revision and based on this revision code possible
optimization and setup on production server.

If you need more information, please send me your requirements.

Dusan Simek

On Jan 3, 10:19 am, Satyajit Sarangi 
wrote:
> Little more details.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:43 PM, pixelfields  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm loooking for anybody who can review application code in easy app
> > based on django 1.3 and postgres.
>
> > Thanks
>
> > Dusan Simek
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Django users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> *Satyajit Sarangi*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.



Re: code revision short job

2012-01-04 Thread pixelfields
Sure I am using debug toolbar.
All queries are cached by django cache machine, otherwise I try to use
johnny cache, but with similary result. Debug toolbar actually show me
only 2 sql queries in 3 ms (queries storing referrer, agent and utm
params for traffic analyzing).

Has anybody experiences with django cache machine?

Dusan

On Jan 3, 3:12 pm, Sid  wrote:
> Have you tried running Django-debug-toolbar to see how SQL queries are
> being piled up.
>
> -Sidhttp://www.sidmitra.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.