Re: nitter equivalent for telegram

[V F]

Hmmm...

> I believe, it would be more productive to ask something more specific —
> namely, what do you what to achieve.
>

Lets say I would like to see if my question was asked and solved
cannot as it is at

https://t.me/phhtreble


>> Many communities get locked behind it and I cannot access anything.
>
> Locked behind what?  If you have not access to a certain ‘community’ (i. e.

https://t.me/phhtreble

> resource), how do you expect a third-party useragent to help you with that?
>
just like nitter or bibliogram.

> As for (b), many various SaaSʼes exist out there, including some
> Telegram-related, but I found it inappropriate to advertise them here.

Then do not type here!


>
> As for (a), I have never heard of one, and I am not surprised of that for
> the following reason.  https://twitter.com is a modern ‘webapp’ written in a
> clean client-server manner, so writing Nitter was a task of writing
> alternative frontend for undocumented yet pretty stable API.  While
> https://t.me is implemented in a more old-school fashion (it is rather akin
> to ), which on the one hand makes it perfectly
> usable without running ad-hoc javascripts in your browser, but on the other
> hand makes writing a client for it an unpleasant task, that requires parsing
> an output for humans.
>
> There is quite a few free clients for non-anonymous Telegram interface,
> though, including the official one.
>
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All
participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:
https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct

Re: nitter equivalent for telegram

[Michael Kesper]

Hi all,

On 16.06.20 11:37, V F wrote:
> Hmmm...
> 
>> I believe, it would be more productive to ask something more specific —
>> namely, what do you what to achieve.
>>
> 
> Lets say I would like to see if my question was asked and solved
> cannot as it is at
> 
> https://t.me/phhtreble
> 
> 
>>> Many communities get locked behind it and I cannot access anything.
>>
>> Locked behind what?  If you have not access to a certain ‘community’ (i. e.
> 
> https://t.me/phhtreble
> 
>> resource), how do you expect a third-party useragent to help you with that?
>>
> just like nitter or bibliogram.
> 
>> As for (b), many various SaaSʼes exist out there, including some
>> Telegram-related, but I found it inappropriate to advertise them here.
> 
> Then do not type here!

Please calm down.

This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All
participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:
https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct

Best
Michael



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All
participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:
https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct

Re: nitter equivalent for telegram

[Dmitry Alexandrov]

V F  wrote:
> Hmmm...

Indeed.

>>> Many communities get locked behind it and I cannot access anything.
>>
>> Locked behind what?  If you have not access to a certain ‘community’ (i. e.
>
> https://t.me/phhtreble

Yes, it seems [0] to be exactly the case, that this ‘community’ is not readable 
anonymously.

[0] https://t.me/s/phhtreble

>> how do you expect a third-party useragent to help you with that?
>>
> just like nitter

Nitter wonʼt help you with that.  Itʼs just a client for Twitter, not a magic 
wand that circumvent any access restriction.

> or bibliogram.

I am not familiar with Bibliogram.  If it provides you with a shared account, 
like, for instance, Aurora Store [1] does for Google Play, then it could help, 
of course; and what youʼve really meant to ask is: “Where can I get a shared 
credentials for Telegram?”.

I have never investigated this question: itʼs quite easy to get a temporary 
phone number instead, and sign up for Telegram by yourself.  And, perhaps, to 
share you credentials afterwards to help others. ;-)

[1] https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.aurora.store


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfe.org
https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All
participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:
https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct