Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] No module name gnuradio

2005-10-30 Thread w9ya
Uh , one quick comment;

Updates are also available for free. The best place to get concise info is
likely to be the #Mandriva irc channel at irc.freenode.net .

Vy 73;

Bob
w9ya

> Dear Eric:
>
> As usual, Eric, you are extremely kind and helpful; thank you.  You give
> me  inspiration to push on!
>
> At 10:48 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
>>On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:23:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >  No one said which desktop to take,
>> > so I picked kde.
>>
>>Good choice.   It's one of the two distributions I use every day. FWIW
>> I also use KDE.
>
> Glad to know that KDE is OK!
>
>>With Mandrake 10.1, I believe that there are only *three* things that
>> didn't come with the distribution that you would have needed to build.
>> Even fewer with SuSE 9.3 Pro.
>>
>>These would have been cppunit, FFTW and SDCC.
>
> Actually, I bought the Mandrake 10.1 official CDs from imageindustries
> on  Ebay.  As you know from my previous post where you helped me, I had
> to  update automake, too, since mine was 1.4-p6 and yours was 1.8.5.
> This was  the reason for many compile failures.
>
>> > As an example of  the various problems, fftw did not compile at the
>> beginning, but after
>> > several tries and stopping the use of "make distclean", I got it to
>> compile.
>>
>>The README in gnuradio-core contains the magic required for FFTW, e.g.,
>>
>> (2)  FFTW 3.0 or laterhttp://www.fftw.org
>>
>> IMPORTANT!!!  When building FFTW, you MUST use the --enable-single
>> and --enable-shared configure options.  This builds the single
>> precision floating point version which we use.  You should also
>> use either the --enable-3dnow or --enable-sse options if you're on
>> an Athlon or Pentium respectively.
>
> I was using these configure options from the beginning, but since my
> machine is an Athlon, I had to use a different switch (enable-k7)
> instead  of enable-sse.  This was not hard to figure out.
>
>>FYI, I just confirmed that fftw-3.0.1.tar.gz builds perfectly out of
>> the box.
>>
>>   ./configure --enable-single --enable-shared --enable-sse
>>   make
>>   make install
>>
>>
>>Out of curiosity, where did you ever get the idea that "make
>>distclean" was a good idea?
>
> To answer your question: in frustration with the failed attempts, I
> tried  "make distclean"  because it was listed in the README text from
> fftw:
>
> Quoting from
> http://www.fftw.org/fftw3_doc/Installation-on-Unix.html#Installation-on-Unix
>
> "Section 8.1:
>
> This will build the uniprocessor complex and real transform libraries
> along  with the test programs. (We recommend that you use GNU make if it
> is  available; on some systems it is called gmake.) The "make install"
> command  installs the fftw and rfftw libraries in standard places, and
> typically  requires root privileges (unless you specify a different
> install directory  with the --prefix flag to configure). You can also
> type "make check" to put  the FFTW test programs through their paces. If
> you have problems during  configuration or compilation, you may want to
> run "make distclean" before  trying again; this ensures that you don't
> have any stale files left over  from previous compilation attempts."
>
> Sounded good to me; but as usual, there is only one way to do it right;
> many ways to screw up!
>
>
>>Not true.  Having /usr/local/bin in your PATH goes a long way.
>
> Duh - should have known this.
>
>
>>Also not true.  I'm using whatever came with Mandrake 10.1 and
>>SuSE 9.3.  A quick check shows that Mandrake 10.1 ships with 1.8.5 and
>> 1.4.
>
> See above.  Not with the Mandrake I got; perhaps buying CDs from the web
>  was my error.
>
>
>>Have you tried Mandrake's graphical "Software Management" tool?
>
> One issue is that Mandrake is really no more anyway.  If you get
> "Mandrake  10.1 Official" CDs like I did, you cannot update them unless
> you pay a fee  to get upgrades from the new company, now called
> Mandriva.  Because I  wanted security fixes, I did pay the fee for the
> update service.   However,  the automatic Mandrake software updates fail
> because these update programs  point to the wrong URLs.  I fixed this on
> my own by finding a new rpm for  the "rpmdrake" program, which gave me
> access to the proper update site for  patches to the OS.   I would
> suggest that you recommend to people to really  buy &q

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] MPAA at it again.

2005-11-04 Thread w9ya
Here, here:

I vote we bring up the "stupid" part for another vote.

Not So Anonymous

P.S guess who said this:

"Hide your women and children, congress is in session."

> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:39:04AM -0500, Krzysztof Kamieniecki wrote:
>>
>> Coincidentally I am moving into Congress Meehan's district this month.
>> He is on the "Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual
>> Property"
>> http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=3 which
>> will be holding a hearing on the evil ANALOG Hole.
>>
>> I spoke to one of his aids, told him this bill was stupid and that I
>> oppose it.
>>
>> I urge everybody who has a congress critter on that commitee to call
>> them.
>
> My Congresscritter is Joe Barton, chairman of the House Commerce
> Commitee which oversees telecommunications at the federal level
> including the FCC. Being a typical worthless Republican, his
> constituents can't even get 20th century telephone service much less
> broadband (I'm 500 feet from an SBC fiber box installed about 1998).
>
> You don't have enough money to buy your Congresscritter's vote so stupid
> will prevail.
>
>
> --
> LRK
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>




___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] d_usb_data_rate

2006-01-19 Thread w9ya
Stuff We All Get = SWAG

i.e. Handouts

Vy 73;

Bob
w9ya


> SWAG -- basically a guess.   See
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag (usage 2)
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill
>
>
> At 06:56 PM 1/18/2006, David R. Palchak wrote:
>
>>  <>
>>  The comment on the
>>line simply says "// SWAG".  What does this comment mean?
>><...>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>David Palchak
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio





___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio