Taking ownership of haddock

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hello,
I intend to take ownership of haddock package. It is required for one other
package(leksah, an IDE for Haskell) that I am planning to submit.

-- 
Lakshmi Narasimhan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[HEADS UP]Upgrading ghc-hslogger to 1.1.5 in rawhide

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I will be updating ghc-hslogger to 1.1.5.

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

ghc-hslogger - License change from LGPLv2 to BSD

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

License of ghc-hslogger has changed from LGPLv2 to BSD.

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Status] - Fedora Haskell SIG

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

1) gtk2hs updates available on rawhide (0.12.1)
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739876

2) ghc-rpm-macros related bug on f14,f15 fixed. New builds of haskell
packages should have the correct rpm hash information from now on

3) Pending reviews requiring owners

ghc-wai - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 (need by yesod)
ghc-Agda - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710031 (needed by
Agda package)

There are other reviews that require owners and haven't been mentioned
above. If you have reviews that need an owner, please send an email to the
list.

Thanks
-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Status] - Fedora Haskell SIG

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

This mail was intended for Haskell SIG list. Sorry for the  devel wide mail.

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:25 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com <
lakshminaras2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1) gtk2hs updates available on rawhide (0.12.1)
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739876
>
> 2) ghc-rpm-macros related bug on f14,f15 fixed. New builds of haskell
> packages should have the correct rpm hash information from now on
>
> 3) Pending reviews requiring owners
>
> ghc-wai - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 (need by
> yesod)
> ghc-Agda - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710031 (needed by
> Agda package)
>
> There are other reviews that require owners and haven't been mentioned
> above. If you have reviews that need an owner, please send an email to the
> list.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Regards
> Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review Request!

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I have taken starcal.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:

> Hi all,
> I have 3 review requests waiting for someone to take over for about 2
> months. Unfortunately, currently I cannot offer  review swaps, but I
> hope some of you will take them :P
>
> These are the review requests:
> os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
> URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442
> (This can be used to generate Grub menu entries automatically, and
> should be relatively easy to review (IMHO))
>
> starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
> URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133
>
> Saaghar - A Cross-Platform Persian Poetry Software
> URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678634
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Hedayat
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Swap reviews: Askbot & friends

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I have taken python-coffin and django-kombu

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram  wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have been working on packaging Askbot (demo at http://askbot.org) and
> it's many dependencies with the hope of eventually getting a instance
> running in Fedora Infrastructure.  It is written in Python and Django.
> Except for Askbot itself which would require a more detailed review,
> everything else should be fairly easy.   Thanks
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Askbot
>
> django-keyedcache - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697492
>
> django-robots -  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696516
>
> django-countries - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696485
>
> django-celery -  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697483
>
> django-kombu - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696527
>
> python-coffin - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699335
>
> askbot  - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699336
>
> Rahul
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: review swap for picolisp

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hello,

I have a Haskell package for review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151

Here is the packaging draft
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell that lists and
explains the macros used

I am taking up picolisp for review.

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There is a package that I'm willing for a review swap, picolisp - a
> Lisp interpreter
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda
> http://about.me/callkalpa
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Taking ownership of xcftools

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

This package is needed by phatch
-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora Studio

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hi
I can take up jmeters ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789251 )

I have xcftools for review. This package was recently deprecated and I am
reviving it for phatch. Here is the review request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789660

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Brendan Jones
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a dream ... that one day we will have a Fedora Audio spin. At the
> moment most Fedora audio users rely heavily on the Planet CCRMA repository
> for many of their audio packages. Fernando has has spent countless hours
> maintaining this repository (thanks!) but If any kind of Studio/audio spin
> is going to be realized we need to move the bulk of these packages into
> mainline Fedora.
>
> There is no proposal as yet for this spin, as there is still so much work
> to be done. I would be very surprised if this could be completed by F18 -
> however there are also some really exciting developments in the Linux audio
> world, whose releases should really coincide with this effort here
> (Ardour3/Ingen/SuperCollider).
>
> Below is a list of some of the packages that I've submitted for review and
> would be more than happy to swap - this is just a beginning there are many
> more to come. Maintainers/co-maintainers are more than welcome / actively
> encouraged.
>
> Also listed are packages pertaining to the new LV2 stack - an exciting
> opensource audio framework that is proving to be a shining light in the
> future of Linux audio.
>
> CCRMA
> 788718 clalsadrv - An ALSA driver C++ library (most of the following
> depend on this one)
> 789255 ebumeter  - Loudness measurement according to
>   EBU-R128
> 789251 jmeters   - Multichannel audio level meter
> 789249 jkmeter   - Horizontal or vertical bar-graph audio
>   levels meter
> 789240 freqtweak - Realtime audio frequency spectral
>   manipulation
> 789059 jaaa  - JACK and ALSA Audio Analyzer
> 789055 japa  - JACK and ALSA Perceptual Analyser
> 789385 ambdec- an ambiosonics decoder
> 789390 aeolus- aeolus organ synthesizer
> 789391 aeolus-stops - aeolus presets
>
> LV2
> 788717 lv2-ir- An LV2 impulse response reverb plugin
> 784605 lv2-instance-access
> - An LV2 audio plug-in extension (part of the spec)
> 783825 suil  - A lightweight C library for loading and wrapping
>   LV2 plugin UIs
> 789386 lilv  - An LV2 Resource Description Framework Library
>
> My packages awaiting review can be found here [1]
>
> cheers
>
> Brendan
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**buglist.cgi?query_format=**
> advanced&classification=**Fedora&product=Fedora&**
> component=Package%20Review&**bug_status=NEW&emailreporter1=**
> 1&emailtype1=substring&email1=**brendan.jones.it%40gmail.com
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

gnome-guitar in f14?

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hello,
There is no gnome-guitar package in f14. Previous releases do have it. Any
reasons why it has not been rebuilt for f14?

Thanks,

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gnome-guitar in f14?

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I would like to take up gnome-guitar package.
The last update happened in October 2009. According to the wiki, it would be
necessary to submit the package for re-review.  Please confirm whether my
understanding is correct.

Thanks


On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, François Cami  wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
> > There is no gnome-guitar package in f14. Previous releases do have it.
> Any
> > reasons why it has not been rebuilt for f14?
>
> Because it was orphaned and no one picked it up.
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140539.html
>
> See also https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-guitar
>
> Cheers
>
> François
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaned chm2pdf

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hi,
I can take it up.

Thanks

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Kushal Das  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just orphaned chm2pdf, it is a converter from chm format to pdf
> format. Any one interested can pick it up.
>
> Kushal
>
> --
> http://fedoraproject.org
> http://kushaldas.in
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review Swaps

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hello Peter,
I have one gnome-guitar (gtk mono based) at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018

I will take erlang-ebloom and erlang-skerl .

Thanks

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov  wrote:

> Hello All!
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are
> Erlang-related):
>
> * erlang-ebloom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652616
> * erlang-skerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652648
> * erlang-luke https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652585
> * erlang-webmachine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652546
>
> All of these packages seems to be in a good shape, so it won't be so
> difficult to review them.
>
> --
> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review swap: 665877, 663244, 670701

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I am taking ghc-ansi-terminal

Here is mine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=ghc-process-leksah

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine:
>
> * freeDiameter: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665877
>
> * CUnit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244
>
> * ghc-ansi-terminal: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670701
>
> Regards,
>
> SK
>
> --
> Shakthi Kannan
> http://www.shakthimaan.com
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Haskell packaging questions

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Hi Andrew,

Please have a look at the review template here
[1]. Some
items from the Package review guidelines which do not apply are
marked [NA].

The cabal2spec program generates the template for the .spec file from the
.cabal file. Then the packager modifies certain values and thats about it.
The macros used in the template come from /etc/rpm/macros.ghc. There are
cases were there is a need to add some files not picked by the macros and
that has been done. Eg
[2]

For haskell packaging/review related queries ,  you could also mail to
fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com  or ask at #fedora-haskell .

-Thanks

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Andrew McNabb  wrote:

> I recently came across an issue in a package review where I would
> appreciate guidance.  In particular, I have never dealt with Haskell
> packages before, and I haven't been able to find enough detail in the
> Haskell Packaging Guidelines to answer my questions:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Haskell
>
> It seems that there's a tool called cabal2spec that autogenerates spec
> files for Haskell programs.  However, the spec files that it outputs are
> a little unusual.
>
> The spec file I'm reviewing has no %package sections and no %files
> sections.  Instead, there is a reference to a "%{?ghc_lib_package}"
> macro that implicitly defines the package and two subpackages.  The
> Haskell Packaging Guidelines don't seem to describe how all of the magic
> works, so I'm not quite sure what standards I'm supposed to use in my
> review.  Here's a link to the package request:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662258
>
> It looks like other Haskell libraries are packaged in a similar way, but
> it's enough different from most packages that the Package Review
> Guidelines don't seem to cleanly apply.  I would appreciate advice on
> how to proceed.  Thanks.
>
> --
> Andrew McNabb
> http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
> PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

Oops. A mistake. Apologies. Would update the summary next time there is a
upstream update.

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> >New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> > Haskell process-leksah library
>
> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
> summary?  Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and
> notice that a summary such as that is pretty much completely useless?
>
>  - J<
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning phatch

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I can take ownership.

Thanks
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Nicoleau Fabien
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning "phatch" (photo batch processor).
>
> I think I'm not the good maintener for it. First, I'm not using it
> anymore, and it's written in python, a language I don't know enought to
> help resolving bugs.
>
> Some bugs are open, related to an incompatibility with pyexiv2. It's
> reported upstream and will be fixed in further releases.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabien Nicoleau
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning packages

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I will take griffith and stow

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Vivek Shah  wrote:

> Hi,
>I have orphaned a few packages owing to lack of time and non-usage.
>
> 1. struts
> 2. griffith
> 3. xqf
> 4. gquilt
> 5. quilt
> 6. stow
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Vivek
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: emacspeak: hearing for a new owner

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I will take it.

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jens Petersen  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> For a long time - well since pre-Fedora history ;) -
> I have maintained the emacspeak package
> (see https://code.google.com/p/emacspeak/).
>
> In the past I generally found time to update it for
> each Fedora release (it is not really much work)
> but I don't actually use it myself at all or have
> the hardware to test (ever) so I think it would be
> better if someone else interested would take over
> the package.  Or maybe noone really uses it in Fedora?
> (I just updated it in rawhide for the first time since
> end of 2008 without a single bug report!  oops - did anyone notice? :)
> and also just added it to URM now so hopefully it can be kept
> more up to date.
>
> So does anyone use it?  Is anyone keen to maintain it?
> I can still help to maintain it a bit longer but if noone is
> really using it maybe better to orphan?
>
> I would appreciate a CC if you reply since I sometimes
> miss devel list.
>
> Thanks, Jens
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Claiming ownership of python-chm

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I am taking ownership of python-chm. This package is needed for chm2pdf.

-- 
Regards
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Releasing ownership

[lakshminaras2...@gmail.com]

I am releasing ownership of the following packages due to lack of time
chm2pdf -- A tool to convert CHM files to PDF files
emacs-slime -- The superior lisp interaction mode for emacsgnome-guitar --
A small suite of applications for the guitaristgriffith -- Media collection
managerphatch -- Photo batch processorpython-chm -- Python package for CHM
files handlingstow -- Manage the installation of software packages from
sourcexcftools -- Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF
files
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel