audio/video software

2014-03-08 Thread LM
I apologize in advance if this is the wrong list to post to.  I tried
posting/asking through the fedora-join mailing list and got no
response at all.

I'm doing some research for an article on patent unencumbered Open
Source software at:
https://schoolforge.net/wiki/index.php?title=Patents_and_Open_Source

Is anyone currently working on software that fits this category?  For
example, I've been looking at the source code for
xine-lib-1.1.21-pruned.tar.xz.  It hasn't been updated in a while and
a newer version of xine in source control and Sourceforge has support
for webm and some other useful formats.  Is anyone looking into adding
webm support to the pruned version of xine?  I think I have the
pruning script pretty much updated for the latest version of the
library.  Still working through some patches to get the library to
compile without the patent encumbered code.  (Latest version is more
dependent on ffmpeg and related libraries than the previous version
was, but it should build without it with some patching.)  Is anyone
else working on a project along these lines?  Also couldn't a library
like smpeg be useful for playing certain types of videos if mp3 code
was pruned?  Just wondering if there are any developers working on
these sorts of projects or related ones for Fedora.  It would be nice
to compare notes and possibly share patches/scripts.

If anyone has other resources or projects or documentation they can
recommend for the wiki article, suggestions would be very much
appreciated.  I'm sure they'd be of help to educators concerned with
these issues.  Thanks.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: audio/video software

2014-03-09 Thread LM
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>xine-lib 1.2 depends on a library that is part of FFmpeg (libavutil) for
>everything, and thus it was decided to retire xine-lib in Fedora entirely.
>It is now shipped only in RPM Fusion. (We decided that it was not worth
>trying to split FFmpeg into pieces and package libavutil separately from
>libavcodec, which definitely cannot go into Fedora.)

Good to know.  Thanks for the information.  I'm still planning on
giving it a shot to remove the ffmpeg pieces or at least attempt to
backport webm and some other support to an earlier version.  Don't
know if the xine project will accept the patches if I get the latest
version working with an option to turn off/remove ffmpeg support, but
the project certainly looks doable.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: audio/video software

2014-03-10 Thread LM
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>Please search the list archives before proposing such a thing.

I apologize if I've offended you, but I have every intention of
continuing with the project.  I simply asked what the status of a
patent unencumbered version of libxine was on Fedora on behalf of an
educational project I'm working with.  The educational project is not
Fedora based.  It's for educators everywhere using a variety of
systems (Linux, Mac, Windows).  I think it's an admirable goal to
encourage Open Source in education.  However, if one can't legally
create videos or play them back without running into legal issues, how
does one encourage schools to use Open Source and non-proprietary
formats?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct