review swap: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting

2011-11-21 Thread Ismael Olea
Looking for a swap reviewer

I think it's a non complex review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066
Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-rpms/chromaprint.spec
SRPM URL:
http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-rpms/chromaprint-0.5-2.fc15.src.rpm

A deeply related review is pending in RPM Fusion if interested too:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: review swap: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting

2011-11-21 Thread Ismael Olea
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Nikos Roussos  wrote:


> Here is mine for review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754698
>

deal!

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

best practices packaging web applications

2011-03-01 Thread Ismael Olea

Hi all:

I'm studing the packaging of a non trivial web application, mostly based
on php+js+mysql. I've review the wiki looking for policies and other
staff and this is everything I got:


http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Web_Applications
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP

and


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JavaScript_libraries_packaging_guideline_draft


Do you know if I'm missing some relevant information or policies?

And, what «best practices» would you recommend to review, at least in
the form of current packages? I'm considering zarafa, xinha and
wordpress.

Thanks.

-- 
Ismael Olea 
Planeta OLEA



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: best practices packaging web applications

2011-03-02 Thread Ismael Olea
>
>
>
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Adam Williamson  wrote:

In addition to all that's been mentioned so far, I'd actually recommend
> a quick look at the Mandriva web app policy:
> http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Policies/Web_Applications . Obviously it
> doesn't apply in its entirety to Fedora, but a lot of it does, it's
> well-written and gives a good overview of the theory behind packaging
>

this is preciselly the info I were looking for


> web apps properly. Maybe we should even adapt it for Fedora.
>

I'll consider it too.

---8<---

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Jon Ciesla  wrote:

>
Fedora, including drupal, moodle, gallery2, and wordpress.  First off,


drupal and moodle are significative good examples I missed: good tip!


Thanks both :-)

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review swaps

2014-08-17 Thread Ismael Olea
The upgraded OmegaT requires new (java) dependencies. They are not very
complex:

   - gnudiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127879
   - jsap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127894
   - rundoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130755
   - snip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130756

Thanks in advance.

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Mono3.4 in Fedora 21, or troll?

2014-08-20 Thread Ismael Olea
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Christopher Meng 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can someone tell me the status of the mono 3.4 proposal? I contacted chkr
> last year and he said it's a big task. He didn't say anything about the
> feature although the mono package is obsolete already. And I don't know why
> 3.4 was proposed by a stranger this year again(someone is not even a
> packager yet with no communication to the development).
>
Claudio did it because he was interested and anybody more was too.

He maintains a copr repo:

   - http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/elsupergomez/mono/
   - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_3.4


I should have helped him but I couldn't plan the needed time. My fault.


-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Mono3.4 in Fedora 21, or troll?

2014-08-20 Thread Ismael Olea
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Claudio Rodrigo 
wrote:

> I need help to became packager, I talk with Xavier Lamien to sponsor me.
> But he is busy.
> I want see mono 3.4 in fedora officially. It is a great goal.
> Additional I was father last week.
>

Congratulations!!!


> Anyone who want help to complete this proposal, will be welcome.
>

I tried to do the formal review for hamekoz-tiempos but last spec didn't
build to me: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084190#c14

I'm still open to do this.
-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Package review requests related with pdfmod

2012-07-03 Thread Ismael Olea
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ismael Olea 
Date: Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Subject: Package review requests
To: Fedora-Mono 



Hi:

I adopted this packages and need the peer reviews:

   - pdfmod: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552
   - poppler-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834551 (dep
   for pdfmod)
   - hyena https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834548 (dep for
   pdfmod and banshee)


Volunteers?

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/



-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fwd: Package review requests related with pdfmod

2012-07-17 Thread Ismael Olea
Hi:

pdfmod is just one package of distance to get into F18 since the two
dependencies are now approved.

Someone want to review it?

-- Forwarded message --
From: Ismael Olea 
Date: Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:16 PM
Subject: Package review requests related with pdfmod
To: Development discussions related to Fedora 




-- Forwarded message --
From: Ismael Olea 
Date: Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Subject: Package review requests
To: Fedora-Mono 



Hi:

I adopted this packages and need the peer reviews:

   - pdfmod: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834552
   - poppler-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834551 (dep
   for pdfmod)
   - hyena https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834548 (dep for
   pdfmod and banshee)


Volunteers?

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/



-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/



-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-08 Thread Ismael Olea
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jon Ciesla  wrote:

> swing-layout -- Natural layout for Swing panels
>

I'll take this since is a dep of Omegat.

FAS name: olea

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

review swap: SVNKit

2012-11-25 Thread Ismael Olea
Anyone interested in a review swaping? Here is mine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[heads up] Abiword

2013-05-23 Thread Ismael Olea
Hi:

While fixing sugar-write[1] I needed to update Abiword/libabiword to recent
versions[2]. I made this using a bunch of patches from SugarLabs, with
special interests in the gtk3 and instrospection ones.

I've made an experimental build[3] which looks promising but would like
others give it a try.

Thanks.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962238
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605573
[3] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5411912
-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: icedtea-web installed and enabled by default in Fedora 19

2013-06-18 Thread Ismael Olea
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:


>  > We cannot really remove installed packages after the release, so I'm
> > wondering if we still can fix this prior to release.
>
> We could, I suppose. What do people think? (It's just one line in comps.)
>

When I needed a java plugin (particularly for some government websites) I
always should got to install the Sun/Oracle one. In those cases icedtea-web
has been 100% useless to me :-/

My 2¢

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: icedtea-web installed and enabled by default in Fedora 19

2013-06-19 Thread Ismael Olea
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram  wrote:

>
> The plugin used to be problematic before but have you tried it recently?


Maybe a year ago or so.


>  Do file a bug report if there are still issues


thanks for the tip.

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Geting back a package to a previous version

2014-11-16 Thread Ismael Olea
Hi:

I need to get back to htmlparser 1.5 (from current 1.6 one) due a bug with
OmegaT[1]. OmegaT is the only package requiring htmlparser (checked with
repoquery) so I assume the change is safe.

My only doubt is what is the better practice to do this. I'm supposing I
should increase the Epoch. Is this the correct one?

Thanks in advance.


[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/omegat/mailman/message/32783657/
-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Geting back a package to a previous version

2014-11-17 Thread Ismael Olea
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Kalev Lember  wrote:

> Yes


Thanks!


-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaning few java packages

2014-01-10 Thread Ismael Olea
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:

>
> * sqljet - dependency of svnkit which was dependency(disabled now due to
> build problems with svnkit) of eclipse-subclipse


I've just taken sqljet (as a dependency of OmegaT) before reading this.
Which build problem svnkit has? It's another BR for OmegaT.

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaning few java packages

2014-01-10 Thread Ismael Olea
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:


> > I've just taken sqljet (as a dependency of OmegaT) before reading this.
> Which
> > build problem svnkit has? It's another BR for OmegaT.
>
>
> So svnkit was fine for java usage but not for being used in
> eclipse-subclipse.


thaks for the info :)

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: This update's test gating status has been changed to, 'greenwave_failed'.

2019-12-24 Thread Ismael Olea
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:44 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon 
wrote:


>
> It likely was. Bodhi called greenwave to ask about a status of the builds
> in an
> update, greenwave calls Koji for more information, that calls returned an
> error.
> Greenwave's request returns an error as well.
> Bodhi is not able to distinguish where the error is coming from and thus
> set the
> status to "greenwave_failed".
>

So, this mean Bodhi will reject to move the package to updates or not? :-?

It's happening to me too[1].

[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d9a4a2d770

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora in GNOME Online Accountes

2019-09-18 Thread Ismael Olea
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:21 AM Felipe Borges  wrote:


The "Fedora" account is just a branded Kerberos account. By adding a
Fedora account in GNOME Online Accounts you would get automatically
signed on whenever you'd need to enter your FAS credentials.


Love it.

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Fwd: Retiring OmegaT and considerations about its dependencies

2018-01-04 Thread Ismael Olea
Just reporting these actions:

Retired package:

   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/OmegaT/

Orphaned packages:

   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vldocking
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/svnkit/
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sqljet/
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnudiff/
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequence-library/
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/htmlparser/

Transfered main admin packages:

   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/snip/
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jsap/
   - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rundoc


FYI

-- Forwarded message --
From: Ismael Olea 
Date: Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:41 PM
Subject: Retiring OmegaT and considerations about its dependencies
To: Discussion list for java related Fedora development <
java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org>



Hi all:

I delayed this for time enough. It's impossible to me to keep updated OmegaT
in Fedora. Their development rhythm is pretty nice but they are adding
frequent new dependencies and I can't make the effort to add them to
Fedora. The good part is I'm working in the Flatpak approach which is less
strict with dependencies and is multidistro too so Fedora users will get an
alternative in the coming weeks.. Retiring OmegaT bring to discuss what to
do with the dependencies which I honestly prefer to abandon.

This is the situation:

Packages to retire:

   - OmegaT, for the explained reasons (last version in Fedora: 2.6.3, last
   version upstream: 3.6.0/4.1.3)
   - svnkit, only used by OmegaT and broken in the current Fedora version
   - sqljet, only required by OmegaT and svnkit, broken in Fedora too
   - sequence-library, only required by svnkit and broken too

OmegaT exclusive dependencies to be orphaned/retired:

   - gnudfif
   - htmlparser
   - vldocking

OmegaT dependencies I want to delegate bc used by other package:

   - jsap, used by java-wakeonlan

Actions:

   - Since I supposed there would be no interest on them I'll retire OmegaT,
   svnkit, sqljet and sequence-library
   - I'm gladly transfer maintenance of gnudiff, htmlparser and vldocking
   to anyone interest, so I'm going to orphan them
   - This message is cc:'d to Leamas, the maintainer of java-wakeonlan to
   offer him the ownership, if he declines I'll orphan it too.


I'm open to your feedback, if any.

Thanks!

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/



-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

2018-03-12 Thread Ismael Olea
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Farhad Mohammadi Majd  wrote:

> Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories
> metadata is maximum 10MB,
>  while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing
> Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it took 20+58MB for
> two official repositories!
>
> It is really too high, why there is such difference? why don't optimize it
> and fix this problem?
>
>
In my experience, not sure if related with the described issue, I have
configured >20 repos on my laptop (12Gb RAM and several of them just one
app related) and not only dnf consumes lots of memory but gnome-software
RAM consumption grow so immense it gets unusable and stucks the machine.

Just reporting.

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


About retiring OmegaT from Fedora

2017-08-17 Thread Ismael Olea
Hi all:

My first important package in Fedora was OmegaT[1]. AFAIK is the best FLOSS
computer aid translator tool available. With the time OmegaT has been
enjoying a very active development with a significant (to me) handicap: new
releases adds new features with new dependencies on java libraries not
available in Fedora. As you perfectly know, updating the package requires
to add each one of those libraries as new packages. But I can't find the
time for such that effort. That's the reason the last Fedora version is
2.6.3 and the lasts at upstream are 3.6.0 / 4.1.2.

So, I give up. I want to retire the package from Fedora because I'm sure I
will not be able to update it anymore.

I'll wait some days waiting someone expressing their interest on taking
ownership. Otherwise I'll start the retirement process.


Yours.


[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/OmegaT

PS: OTOH I plan to publish OmegaT as a flatpak package via Flathub. Seems
to me it would be a lot easier to maintain that way. I'm aware Flathub is
out of the scope of Fedora :-/

-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: About retiring OmegaT from Fedora

2017-08-24 Thread Ismael Olea
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz 
wrote:


>
> Then you should orphan it.  If nobody takes it up, then it will be
> automatically retired.
>

I thought about it, but it's so hard to update it seems to me to better
retire and reduce the noise :-m


-- 

Ismael Olea

http://olea.org/diario/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org