Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:47 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> >>> The problem with delivering this to a user's mailbox via an MTA is that >>> in the typical case it doesn't result in the user noticing anything >>> until they've logged in as root and find out that the "you have new >>> mail" message actually means "Your RAID is fucked" and not just "Here's >> >> In the typical case users do not use RAID. And how does this change >> with the new not MTA feauture? And in case a RAID is used, how is the >> user notified when the RAID is broken? > > How are they notified now? By default the local mta delivers > everything to root because there's no way to know what user is going > to exisit. How many people check the local root users mail. So for > desktop it should be a notification to the screen, for a server it > would need to be configured anyway for smart relay hosts and real > users to send it to. So its currently broken as it standard. This > change is not going to make that any better or worse. > Not really related to the original discussion, but perhaps firstboot could be amended to add an alias when the first user is created such that they receive root's mail? > Peter > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Dealing with circular BuildRequires?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Petr Pisar writes: >> On 2011-10-05, Tom Lane wrote: >>> For example, cairo BuildRequires: librsvg2-devel, and librsvg2 >>> BuildRequires: cairo-devel, so there is no order in which I can rebuild >>> them. How the heck did we get into such a situation, and what should >>> I do about it? Neither specfile appears to have any provision for >>> bootstrapping. > >> We had similar problem when upgrading Perl to 5.14. > >> First, we choosed dependecy-ordered builds which stopped after >> rebuilding about one thousand packages. Then we hit circular >> dependencies blocking remaining eight hunderds packages. > > What exactly did you do for "dependency-ordered builds"? What I could > really use right now is a tool that would sort the package list into > dependency order for me, and point to where there are circularities. > I'd like to think that wheel has been invented already ... > > regards, tom lane The nearest I can think of is smock.pl, which has a '--dryrun' option providing the dependency order information. There's some information about it here: http://www.bioinformatics.org/wiki/R-repo/setup_for_build Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)
BEDToolsverdurin 60 weeks ago This has an annoying 'shrank by one' debuginfo problem and further problems on 32-bit with recent GCC, but it is building on x86_64 now. A bug has been filed regarding the problems and I'm pursuing them upstream. Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
