Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)
Hi folks, I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3. Would anyone like to swap reviews please? - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663: rust-google-cloud-auth - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668: rust-google-cloud-storage - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375: rust-taskchampion -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F42 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI Partitioning (System-Wide)
On 16. 09. 24 17:29, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 3:03 PM Jiri Konecny wrote: On 12. 09. 24 19:04, Andre Robatino wrote: I always clean install each new version of Fedora using the Workstation LIve, and preserve the data in /home. After reading this, I looked at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home and saw that it now specifically says not to use the Workstation Live on 41+. Does this mean that the only way to preserve /home when clean installing 41 will be to use a different medium? Hi, no, we are working on supporting re-installation with preserving your /home subvolume. I had a problem after my latest installation but I don't remember what, and did just that. I initially didn't expect this option to show up so I had already "wasted" time backing up my home directory and during the re-installation I was immediately offered to create a new root subvolume and keep the existing home. I'm using the Xfce spin. Dridi Xfce isn't using Web UI but I'm definitely happy how this went :) Note: you should always backup your data before installation Best Regards, Jirka -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3. > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663: > rust-google-cloud-auth > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668: > rust-google-cloud-storage > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375: > rust-taskchampion Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard? If they did, I'd have reviewed them already. Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 12:35:21 GMT, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3. > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? > > > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663: > > rust-google-cloud-auth > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668: > > rust-google-cloud-storage > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375: > > rust-taskchampion > > Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard? > If they did, I'd have reviewed them already. I'm not sure. I don't see anything in the reviews that pops out to me. Does the dashboard take the fedora-review-service build status into account perhaps? These wouldn't build before because they depended on packages that were also in review (the ones you had previously reviewed :)). -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)
On 2024/09/17 12:35, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3. Would anyone like to swap reviews please? -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663: rust-google-cloud-auth -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668: rust-google-cloud-storage -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375: rust-taskchampion Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard? If they did, I'd have reviewed them already. Looks like the commits do not have a `rhbz#...` mesage and the bodhi updates do not reference it for closure. I usually use `fbrnch import` which makes sure the message is formatted accordingly. Fabio-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rust review swaps (for Taskwarrior 3 update)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:43 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 12:35:21 GMT, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I have a few rust packages that need to be reviewed for Taskwarrior v3. > > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? > > > > > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307663: > > > rust-google-cloud-auth > > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307668: > > > rust-google-cloud-storage > > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309375: > > > rust-taskchampion > > > > Why don't these show up on the "Reviewable" package review dashboard? > > If they did, I'd have reviewed them already. > > I'm not sure. I don't see anything in the reviews that pops out to > me. Does the dashboard take the fedora-review-service build status into > account perhaps? These wouldn't build before because they depended on > packages that were also in review (the ones you had previously reviewed :)). Yeah, I see now why. They're blocked by bugs that are not CLOSED, even though the packages were already imported. Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Request for help for packaging new potential Workstation default apps
Hey folks, The Fedora Workstation WG is considering replacing several preloaded apps with alternatives: * Rhythmbox -> (gnome-music + Decibels[1]) or Amberol[2] * Evince -> Papers[3] * Totem -> Showtime[4] Of these apps, only Papers has a currently active package review[5]. The Fedora Workstation WG would like some help from interested Fedora Workstation users to contribute to the success of the Fedora Workstation offering by packaging these applications in Fedora. Members of the Working Group can help review packaging by anyone who takes this on to package the applications in a manner consistent with the Fedora packaging guidelines and general practices. If anyone is interested, please let us know and we can work out arrangements to assist new contributors. :) [1]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Incubator/decibels (TypeScript) [2]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/amberol (Rust) [3]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Incubator/papers (C + Rust) [4]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Incubator/showtime (Python) [5]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Request for help for packaging new potential Workstation default apps
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 1:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey folks, > > The Fedora Workstation WG is considering replacing several preloaded > apps with alternatives: > > * Rhythmbox -> (gnome-music + Decibels[1]) or Amberol[2] > * Evince -> Papers[3] > * Totem -> Showtime[4] > > Of these apps, only Papers has a currently active package review[5]. > The Fedora Workstation WG would like some help from interested Fedora > Workstation users to contribute to the success of the Fedora > Workstation offering by packaging these applications in Fedora. > Members of the Working Group can help review packaging by anyone who > takes this on to package the applications in a manner consistent with > the Fedora packaging guidelines and general practices. > > If anyone is interested, please let us know and we can work out > arrangements to assist new contributors. :) I can help with Rust packaging (Amberol) if needed. I already maintain the Rust bindings for GStreamer and GTK4 so I might as well. Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Request for help for packaging new potential Workstation default apps
On Tue, Sep 17 2024 at 07:19:23 AM -04:00:00, Neal Gompa wrote: Amberol[2] I've been using Amberol as my primary audio player for half a year, and I don't think it's a good choice. I would focus on Decibels. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[CoreOS] Fedora CoreOS rebasing to Fedora Linux 40
The Fedora Linux 41 beta was released today[[1]]. The Fedora CoreOS `next` stream has been rebased and is currently rolling out. This is a preview of what is coming to the `testing` and `stable` streams when Fedora Linux 41 is released in the coming months. For more information about Fedora 41, see the Fedora Project’s list of official Changes[[2]] and the Fedora CoreOS analysis of each Change[[3]]. The following changes require attention: - In Fedora 41 CoreOS is dropping Wi-Fi firmware packages that were split into subpackages of linux-firmware[[4]]. If you are currently using Wi-Fi, see the documentation for how to keep it enabled[[5]]. - Composefs is now enabled by default[[6]]. Pay special attention to the known issues[[7]]. - In systemd v256 cgroups v1 support was disabled. If you've opted out of the cgroups v2 migration in the past, your system will fail to boot after upgrading. - moby-engine/Docker was updated in Fedora from version 24 to version 27. Please see the notes[[8]] with each release of moby and also the deprecated/removed features page[[9]] to see if there is any noteworthy changes for your use cases. Please test out the `next` stream and report any issues in our issue tracker[[10]]! The Fedora CoreOS Team [1]: https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-linux-41-beta/ [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/41/ChangeSet [3]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1714 [4]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1575 [5]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/sysconfig-enabling-wifi/ [6]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/composefs/ [7]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/composefs/#_known_issues [8]: https://github.com/moby/moby/releases [9]: https://github.com/docker/cli/blob/master/docs/deprecated.md [10]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora CoreOS next stream rebased to Fedora Linux 41 beta
The Fedora Linux 41 beta was released today[[1]]. The Fedora CoreOS `next` stream has been rebased and is currently rolling out. This is a preview of what is coming to the `testing` and `stable` streams when Fedora Linux 41 is released in the coming months. For more information about Fedora 41, see the Fedora Project’s list of official Changes[[2]] and the Fedora CoreOS analysis of each Change[[3]]. The following changes require attention: - In Fedora 41 CoreOS is dropping Wi-Fi firmware packages that were split into subpackages of linux-firmware[[4]]. If you are currently using Wi-Fi, see the documentation for how to keep it enabled[[5]]. - Composefs is now enabled by default[[6]]. Pay special attention to the known issues[[7]]. - In systemd v256 cgroups v1 support was disabled. If you've opted out of the cgroups v2 migration in the past, your system will fail to boot after upgrading. - moby-engine/Docker was updated in Fedora from version 24 to version 27. Please see the notes[[8]] with each release of moby and also the deprecated/removed features page[[9]] to see if there is any noteworthy changes for your use cases. Please test out the `next` stream and report any issues in our issue tracker[[10]]! The Fedora CoreOS Team [1]: https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-linux-41-beta/ [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/41/ChangeSet [3]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1714 [4]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1575 [5]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/sysconfig-enabling-wifi/ [6]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/composefs/ [7]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/composefs/#_known_issues [8]: https://github.com/moby/moby/releases [9]: https://github.com/docker/cli/blob/master/docs/deprecated.md [10]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora eln compose report: 20240917.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240916.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20240917.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 196 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 79.50 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.04 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 52.58 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: xsetroot-1.1.2-11.eln141 Summary: Root window parameter setting utility for X RPMs:xsetroot Size:79.50 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: adwaita-icon-theme-47.0-1.eln143 Old package: adwaita-icon-theme-47~beta-1.eln142 Summary: Adwaita icon theme RPMs: adwaita-cursor-theme adwaita-icon-theme adwaita-icon-theme-devel Size: 742.19 KiB Size change: -7 B Changelog: * Mon Sep 16 2024 nmontero - 47.0-1 - Update to 47.0 Package: anaconda-42.3-1.eln143 Old package: anaconda-42.2-1.eln142 Summary: Graphical system installer RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel Size: 16.59 MiB Size change: -9.06 KiB Changelog: * Tue Sep 17 2024 Packit - 42.3-1 - Fix scheduling actions in reclaim space dialog (#2311936) (vtrefny) Package: armadillo-12.8.1-4.eln143 Old package: armadillo-12.8.1-4.eln142 Summary: Fast C++ matrix library with syntax similar to MATLAB and Octave RPMs: armadillo Size: 60.43 KiB Size change: -2.05 KiB Package: azure-cli-2.64.0-1.eln143 Old package: azure-cli-2.62.0-2.eln142 Summary: Microsoft Azure Command-Line Tools RPMs: azure-cli python3-azure-cli-core python3-azure-cli-telemetry Size: 13.60 MiB Size change: 49.99 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 16 2024 Jeremy Cline - 2.63.0-1 - Update to v2.63.0 * Mon Sep 16 2024 Jeremy Cline - 2.64.0-1 - Update to v2.64.0 Package: bind-32:9.18.28-3.eln143 Old package: bind-32:9.18.26-1.eln140 Summary: The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) server RPMs: bind bind-chroot bind-devel bind-dnssec-utils bind-doc bind-libs bind-utils Dropped RPMs: bind-license Size: 12.38 MiB Size change: 42.17 KiB Changelog: * Tue Jul 09 2024 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek - 32:9.18.26-2 - Rebuilt for the bin-sbin merge * Wed Jul 17 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 32:9.18.26-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 26 2024 Jonathan Wright - 32:9.18.28-1 - update to 9.18.28 rhbz#2299467 - Fixes CVE-2024-4076 - Fixes CVE-2024-1975 - Fixes CVE-2024-1737 - Fixes CVE-2024-0760 * Wed Jul 31 2024 Petr Menk - 32:9.18.28-2 - Conflict explicitly with more bind subpackages - Merge license subpackage into libs - Add optional QUERYTRACE feature - Make relative documentation links * Wed Jul 31 2024 Petr Menk - 32:9.18.28-3 - Drop PostgreSQL dependencies not used by DLZ anymore Package: bluedevil-6.1.90-1.eln142 Old package: bluedevil-6.1.5-1.eln142 Summary: Bluetooth stack for KDE RPMs: bluedevil Size: 1.95 MiB Size change: 57.18 KiB Changelog: * Thu Sep 12 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.90-1 - 6.1.90 Package: breeze-gtk-6.1.90-1.eln142 Old package: breeze-gtk-6.1.5-1.eln142 Summary: Breeze widget theme for GTK RPMs: breeze-gtk-common Size: 314.86 KiB Size change: -76 B Changelog: * Thu Sep 12 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.90-1 - 6.1.90 Package: ceph-2:19.1.1-0.2.eln142 Old package: ceph-2:19.1.0-0.2.eln142 Summary: User space components of the Ceph file system RPMs: librados-devel librados2 libradospp-devel librbd-devel librbd1 Size: 27.08 MiB Size change: 249.05 KiB Changelog: * Thu Aug 29 2024 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY - 2:19.1.1-0.1 - ceph-19.1.1 RC * Thu Sep 05 2024 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY - 2:19.1.1-0.2 - ceph-19.1.1, revert ppc64le asm change from rawhide rhbz#23093208 Package: composefs-1.0.6-1.eln142 Old package: composefs-1.0.4-2.eln142 Summary: Tools to handle creating and mounting composefs images RPMs: composefs composefs-libs Size: 548.95 KiB Size change: 13.95 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 16 2024 Colin Walters - 1.0.6-1 - https://github.com/containers/composefs/releases/tag/v1.0.6 Package: extra-cmake-modules-6.6.0-1.eln143 Old package: extra-cmake-modules-6.5.0-1.eln142 Summary: Additional modules for CMake build system RPMs: extra-cmake-modules Size: 199.70 KiB Size change: 211 B Changelog: * Wed Aug 28 2024 Miroslav Such?? - 6.5.0-2 - convert license to SPDX * Fri Sep 13 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.5.0-3 - Add upstream patch * Mon Sep
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for fab (Fabian Affolter)
On 04-09-2024 23:48, Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel wrote: It looks like Fabian was active on python-yarl in July of this year[3], so I hope that everything is well and contact will be possible. Fabian merged both my PRs for python-graphql-core, yesterday. In the past, when I saw a PR not being acted on within a week or two, I followed up by a mail to the maintainers alias and usually Fabian responded by acting on my PR within a fortnight. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 41 compose report: 20240917.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-41-20240916.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240917.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 75 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 3.23 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 7.41 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Server_KVM qcow2 ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-41-20240917.n.0.ppc64le.qcow2 Image: LXQt live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-41-20240917.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite ociarchive x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/images/Fedora-Kinoite-41.20240916.n.0.ociarchive Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-41-20240916.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: bluedevil-6.1.5-1.fc41 Old package: bluedevil-6.1.4-1.fc41 Summary: Bluetooth stack for KDE RPMs: bluedevil Size: 3.20 MiB Size change: 45.90 KiB Changelog: * Tue Sep 10 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.5-1 - 6.1.5 Package: breeze-gtk-6.1.5-1.fc41 Old package: breeze-gtk-6.1.4-1.fc41 Summary: Breeze widget theme for GTK RPMs: breeze-gtk breeze-gtk-common breeze-gtk-gtk2 breeze-gtk-gtk3 breeze-gtk-gtk4 Size: 402.89 KiB Size change: -51 B Changelog: * Tue Sep 10 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.5-1 - 6.1.5 Package: flatpak-kcm-6.1.5-1.fc41 Old package: flatpak-kcm-6.1.4-1.fc41 Summary: Flatpak Permissions Management KCM RPMs: flatpak-kcm Size: 845.91 KiB Size change: -128 B Changelog: * Tue Sep 10 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.5-1 - 6.1.5 Package: gcc-14.2.1-3.fc41 Old package: gcc-14.2.1-1.fc41 Summary: Various compilers (C, C++, Objective-C, ...) RPMs: cpp gcc gcc-c++ gcc-gdb-plugin gcc-gdc gcc-gfortran gcc-gm2 gcc-gnat gcc-go gcc-objc gcc-objc++ gcc-offload-amdgcn gcc-offload-nvptx gcc-plugin-annobin gcc-plugin-devel libasan libasan-static libatomic libatomic-static libgcc libgccjit libgccjit-devel libgfortran libgfortran-static libgm2 libgm2-static libgnat libgnat-devel libgnat-static libgo libgo-devel libgo-static libgomp libgomp-offload-amdgcn libgomp-offload-nvptx libgphobos libgphobos-static libhwasan libhwasan-static libitm libitm-devel libitm-static liblsan liblsan-static libobjc libquadmath libquadmath-devel libquadmath-static libstdc++ libstdc++-devel libstdc++-docs libstdc++-static libtsan libtsan-static libubsan libubsan-static Size: 999.59 MiB Size change: -175.12 KiB Changelog: * Thu Sep 05 2024 Jakub Jelinek 14.2.1-2 - update from releases/gcc-14 branch - PRs c++/88313, c++/112288, c++/115296, c++/115656, c++/116071, c++/116219, c++/116223, c++/116327, c++/116384, fortran/108889, fortran/116530, libstdc++/113663, libstdc++/116038, libstdc++/116381, libstdc++/116549, lto/116361, target/85624, target/112108, target/113384, target/115464, target/116007, target/116033, target/116043, target/116174, target/116189, target/116287, target/116295, target/116390, target/116407, target/116512, testsuite/70150, tree-optimization/113281, tree-optimization/116156, tree-optimization/116224, tree-optimization/116501 - add hint #34 to aarch64 sanitizer asm stubs if -mbranch-protection=standard (#2306353) * Thu Sep 12 2024 Jakub Jelinek 14.2.1-3 - update from releases/gcc-14 branch - PRs c++/116276, c++/116320, c++/116449, c++/116567, c++/116606, c++/116636, ipa/116410, libstdc++/116159, libstdc++/116641, lto/116614, target/116617 - backport x86_64 va_arg fix (PR target/116621) Package: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-59-2.fc41 Old package: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-58-2.20240307git03a7412.fc41 Summary: AppIndicator/KStatusNotifierItem support for GNOME Shell RPMs: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator Size: 74.16 KiB Size change: 2.03 KiB Changelog: * Tue Aug 06 2024 Packit - 59-1 - Update to 59 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2303279 * Fri Sep 13 2024 Artem Polishchuk - 59-2 - build: Drop commit tag Package: grub2-breeze-theme-6.1.5-1.fc41 Old package: grub2-breeze-theme-6.1.4-1.fc41 Summary: Breeze theme for GRUB RPMs: grub2-breeze-theme Size: 4.67 MiB Size change: 120 B Changelog: * Tue Sep 10 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.5-1 - 6.1.5 Package: kactivitymanagerd-6.1.5-1.fc41 Old package: kactivitymanagerd-6.1.4-1.fc41 Summary: Plasma service to manage user's activities RPMs: kactivitymanagerd Size: 1.57 MiB Size change: 792 B Changelog: * Tue Sep 10 2024 Marc Deop i Argem?? - 6.1.5-1 - 6.1.5 Package: kcm_wacomtablet-6.1.5-1.fc4
Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)
Thanks a lot, i've no idea to do that for myself for MATE desktop. So please go a head. Wolfgang -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 16:32, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > > However, we should still consider the effect this will have on > > developers that build software on Fedora — they will also have to > > specify -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t > > really see that impact until 41 releases. > > Yup, exactly. This is only a bad outcome and will be seen (correctly) by > upstream projects as Fedora shipping a broken OpenSSL when we start > wasting their time with people filing "I couldn't build on Fedora" bug > reports. Or those reports just come straight to us and we have to say "yes we know, but we're not going to fix it", like this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312672 > The time Fedora maintainers have spent on this is a sunk cost, doing > nothing is clearly inferior to all other options. At minimum we should > ship F41 with openssl-devel Requires: openssl-engine-devel again. > (Having OpenSSL #define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE properly is > by far my preferred option) It's fixed in rawhide now, but are we still against fixing it for F41? Affected Fedora packages might have been fixed, but people build other software on Fedora that isn't already packaged and built in koji. I'll add a workaround in boost-devel if the decision is still that openssl shouldn't fix it in F41. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Old Style Dependency Generators
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:49:55 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I believe that the new dependency generators were introduced by RPM 4.9.0: > > https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0 > > Introduced into guidelines 13 year ago: > > https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/76 > > RHEL 7 shipped with RPM 4.11 and is already EOL for a few months. > > Based on the above, is it really false positive? Is there any value in > such conditional? As the old dependency filtering is applied only for RHEL > 8 according to the conditionals in the spec file, you could ask the EPEL maintainer who has added them. It is not for me to decide whether to remove them. This is Fedora devel list, not an EPEL list. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240917.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240916.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240917.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:12 Upgraded packages: 332 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 659.37 KiB Size of dropped packages:6.85 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 3.00 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -88.41 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Server_KVM qcow2 ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-Rawhide-20240917.n.1.ppc64le.qcow2 = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Onyx ociarchive x86_64 Path: Onyx/x86_64/images/Fedora-Onyx-Rawhide.20240916.n.0.ociarchive = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: aribb24-1.0.3^20160216git5e9be27-1.fc42 Summary: A library for ARIB STD-B24 RPMs:aribb24 aribb24-devel Size:257.81 KiB Package: ittapi-3.25.3-1.fc42 Summary: Intel Instrumentation and Tracing Technology and Just-In-Time API RPMs:ittapi ittapi-devel Size:84.31 KiB Package: neon2sse-0.0^20240908git5042318-1.fc42 Summary: Library intended to simplify ARM->IA32 porting RPMs:neon2sse-devel Size:85.20 KiB Package: perl-Auth-Yubikey_WebClient-4.02-1.fc42 Summary: Authenticating the Yubikey against the Yubico Web API RPMs:perl-Auth-Yubikey_WebClient Size:15.09 KiB Package: rust-calloop0.12-0.12.4-1.fc42 Summary: Callback-based event loop RPMs:rust-calloop0.12+async-task-devel rust-calloop0.12+block_on-devel rust-calloop0.12+default-devel rust-calloop0.12+executor-devel rust-calloop0.12+futures-io-devel rust-calloop0.12+nix-devel rust-calloop0.12+pin-utils-devel rust-calloop0.12+signals-devel rust-calloop0.12-devel Size:127.04 KiB Package: rust-minicbor-0.25.1-1.fc42 Summary: Small CBOR codec suitable for no_std environments RPMs:rust-minicbor+alloc-devel rust-minicbor+default-devel rust-minicbor+derive-devel rust-minicbor+full-devel rust-minicbor+half-devel rust-minicbor+minicbor-derive-devel rust-minicbor+std-devel rust-minicbor-devel Size:89.92 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: ghc-x509-1.7.7-8.fc41 Summary: X509 reader and writer RPMs:ghc-x509 ghc-x509-devel ghc-x509-doc ghc-x509-prof Size:4.15 MiB Package: ghc-x509-store-1.6.9-10.fc41 Summary: X.509 collection accessing and storing methods RPMs:ghc-x509-store ghc-x509-store-devel ghc-x509-store-doc ghc-x509-store-prof Size:628.27 KiB Package: ghc-x509-system-1.6.7-10.fc41 Summary: Handle per-operating-system X.509 accessors and storage RPMs:ghc-x509-system ghc-x509-system-devel ghc-x509-system-doc ghc-x509-system-prof Size:310.10 KiB Package: ghc-x509-validation-1.6.12-10.fc41 Summary: X.509 Certificate and CRL validation RPMs:ghc-x509-validation ghc-x509-validation-devel ghc-x509-validation-doc ghc-x509-validation-prof Size:1.06 MiB Package: python-zdaemon-4.2.0-29.fc41 Summary: Python Daemon Process Control Library RPMs:python3-zdaemon Size:112.24 KiB Package: rust-benfred-read-process-memory-0.2.1-9.fc41 Summary: Read memory from another process RPMs:rust-benfred-read-process-memory+default-devel rust-benfred-read-process-memory-devel Size:24.59 KiB Package: rust-gstreamer-editing-services-0.23.0-1.fc42 Summary: Rust bindings for GStreamer Editing Services RPMs:rust-gstreamer-editing-services+default-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services+serde-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services+v1_16-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services+v1_18-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services+v1_20-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services+v1_22-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services+v1_24-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services-devel Size:158.47 KiB Package: rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22-0.22.7-1.fc42 Summary: Rust bindings for GStreamer Editing Services RPMs:rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+default-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+serde-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+v1_16-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+v1_18-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+v1_20-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+v1_22-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22+v1_24-devel rust-gstreamer-editing-services0.22-devel Size:148.18 KiB Package: rust-gstreamer-player-0.23.0-1.fc42 Summary: Rust bindings for GStreamer Player library RPMs:rust-gstreamer-player+default-devel rust-gstreamer-player+v1_16-devel rust-gstreamer-player+v1_18-devel rust-gstreamer-player+v1_20-devel rust-gstreamer-player+v1_22-devel rust-gstreamer-player+v1_24-devel rust-gstreamer-player-devel Size:113.09 KiB Package: rust-gstreamer-player0.22-0.22.6-1.fc42 Summary: Rust bindings for GStreamer Player library RPMs:rust-gstreamer-player0.22+default-devel rust-gstreamer-player0.22+v1_16-devel rust-gstreamer-player0.22+v1_18-devel rust-gstreamer-player0.22+v1_20-devel rust-gstreamer-player0.22+v1_22-devel rust-gstreamer-player0.22+v1_24-devel rust-gstreamer-player0.22-de
Re: Fedora LXC Images server?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 11:48 AM Athos Ribeiro wrote: > Have you tried https://images.lxd.canonical.com/? > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/new-lxd-image-server-available-images-lxd-canonical-com/43824 > may help here :) Thank you! Yes - I found the same answer from you, and from replies on reddit. I'll be working my way through how well Fedora works in the ChromeOS context. Let's see where it goes! cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff - don't be distracted~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff by shiny stuff -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
