Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back
Hello, 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960 Long story short: RPM has moved to sequoia, sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies, Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit DSA key, Google Chrome was not installable => F38 blocker. Back at the time, it's been hastily "resolved" by relaxing RPM security through crypto-policies just enough to tolerate that Google signature: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878 https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/merge_requests/129 Since then it has been brought to my attention that Google has now added a 4096 bit RSA key https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/ (EB4C 1BFD 4F04 2F6D DDCC EC91 7721 F63B D38B 4796) Because of that, I'd like to revert that RPM policy relaxation https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/commit/a12f7b20638be8f872ad1995c7d2edce41c227b5 in (f39) rawhide and align RPM security with the rest of the policy. Thoughts / feedback? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Automate your Fedora package maintenance using Packit
Thank you everyone for your responses! I have a few updates for you that made it to production this morning as part of our weekly release cycle: * Thanks to Ankur Sinha, the pull requests created by Packit now have a clear list of tasks/reminders to check in the description. (E.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ogr/pull-request/479) * If you are not comfortable with lookaside uploads before the review, you can newly set `upload_sources` to `false` and Packit won't do the upload. The downside is, of course, the reduced benefit of the automation since you need to do this yourself and the failed CI builds. The default behaviour is preserved to not break the workflow of the existing users but it's clearly mentioned in the onboarding guide (https://packit.dev/docs/fedora-releases-guide#upload-archive-to-lookaside-cache). František On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 7:07 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 16:02 +0200, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > Thanks Dan and Daniel for the responses. You both are right. For our > > defence, this is always setup by an existing Fedora user (=human). > > > > I can't speak of rel-eng (and honestly don't know) how problematic > > this "physical removal" on request is. > > We can at least promote the licence check more > > and provide instructions on what to do if something does not fulfil the > > rules. > > (E.g. as a part of the issue Ankur created and mentioned > > (https://github.com/packit/packit/issues/2035)) > > > > Does anyone have any realistic solution (or an improvement) to this > > for Packit itself? > > > > We can also stop uploading the source to the lookaside cache (or make > > it configurable), > > but the benefit of such automation is significantly reduced. > > To be honest it seems a little unfair to 'pick on' Packit about this. > > practically speaking, we do not somehow enforce that every packager > does a thorough license review of every new upstream version of > everything they package before uploading it to the lookaside. We do not > really have any protections against packagers running scratch builds > with unredistributable content. Ultimately, we are trusting packagers > to do this right. > > Packit is intended for folks/teams who are both upstream maintainers > and downstream packagers. Such folks should already be aware of the > licensing of the upstream and able to address any issues with it. They > likely already pull new releases of their project downstream as a > matter of course. Automating it doesn't really seem like it's exposing > us to any radical increase in potential licensing problems. > -- > Adam Williamson (he/him/his) > Fedora QA > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > Hello, > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960 > Long story short: > RPM has moved to sequoia, > sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies, > Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit DSA key, > Google Chrome was not installable => F38 blocker. > Back at the time, it's been hastily "resolved" > by relaxing RPM security through crypto-policies > just enough to tolerate that Google signature: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878 > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/merge_requests/129 > > Since then it has been brought to my attention that > Google has now added a 4096 bit RSA key > https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/ > (EB4C 1BFD 4F04 2F6D DDCC EC91 7721 F63B D38B 4796) > > Because of that, I'd like to revert that RPM policy relaxation > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/commit/a12f7b20638be8f872ad1995c7d2edce41c227b5 > in (f39) rawhide and align RPM security with the rest of the policy. Correction, f40 rawhide. > Thoughts / feedback? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Automate your Fedora package maintenance using Packit
Am Di., 19. Sept. 2023 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Frantisek Lachman : > > Thank you everyone for your responses! > > I have a few updates for you that made it to production this morning > as part of our weekly release cycle: > > * Thanks to Ankur Sinha, the pull requests created by Packit now have > a clear list of tasks/reminders to check in the description. (E.g. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ogr/pull-request/479) Thanks! Maybe add: "check the autogenerated changelog" ;-) (I know 479 was not merged, but the diff looks funny.) Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back
Dne 19. 09. 23 v 11:19 Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): Because of that, I'd like to revert that RPM policy relaxation https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/commit/a12f7b20638be8f872ad1995c7d2edce41c227b5 in (f39) rawhide and align RPM security with the rest of the policy. Thoughts / feedback? You can try to load the keys from this collection under the tightened policy: https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys/ -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230919.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230918.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230919.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 96 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.91 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 9.24 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 9.69 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230919.n.0.iso Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230919.n.0.iso Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230919.n.0.iso Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230919.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230918.n.0.iso Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230918.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: rust-libcst_derive-0.1.0-1.fc40 Summary: Proc macro helpers for libcst RPMs:rust-libcst_derive+default-devel rust-libcst_derive-devel Size:24.91 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: archlinux-keyring-20230918-1.fc40 Old package: archlinux-keyring-20230821-2.fc40 Summary: GPG keys used by Arch distribution to sign packages RPMs: archlinux-keyring Size: 1.15 MiB Size change: 1.85 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 18 2023 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek - 20230918-1 - Version 20230918 (rhbz#2239389) Package: binaryen-116-1.fc40 Old package: binaryen-111-1.fc38 Summary: Compiler and toolchain infrastructure library for WebAssembly RPMs: binaryen Size: 13.10 MiB Size change: 1.49 MiB Changelog: * Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 111-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 111-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jul 27 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski 116-1 - update to 116 (#2169040) - drop obsolete patches - work around/fix test failures Package: cargo2rpm-0.1.8-1.fc40 Old package: cargo2rpm-0.1.7-1.fc39 Summary: Translation layer between cargo and RPM RPMs: cargo2rpm Size: 168.02 KiB Size change: 1.54 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 18 2023 Fabio Valentini - 0.1.8-1 - Update to version 0.1.8; Fixes RHBZ#2239513 Package: chromium-117.0.5938.88-1.fc40 Old package: chromium-117.0.5938.62-1.fc40 Summary: A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use RPMs: chromedriver chromium chromium-common chromium-headless Size: 264.18 MiB Size change: 100.52 KiB Changelog: * Sun Sep 17 2023 Than Ngo - 117.0.5938.88-1 - update to 117.0.5938.88 Package: container-selinux-2:2.222.0-1.fc40 Old package: container-selinux-2:2.221.1-1.fc40 Summary: SELinux policies for container runtimes RPMs: container-selinux Size: 54.62 KiB Size change: -327 B Changelog: * Sun Sep 17 2023 Packit - 2:2.222.0-1 - [packit] 2.222.0 upstream release Package: dnf5-5.1.4-1.fc40 Old package: dnf5-5.1.2-1.fc40 Summary: Command-line package manager RPMs: dnf5 dnf5-devel dnf5-plugins dnf5daemon-client dnf5daemon-server libdnf5 libdnf5-cli libdnf5-cli-devel libdnf5-devel libdnf5-plugin-actions perl-libdnf5 perl-libdnf5-cli python3-libdnf5 python3-libdnf5-cli python3-libdnf5-python-plugins-loader ruby-libdnf5 ruby-libdnf5-cli Size: 27.91 MiB Size change: 384.50 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 18 2023 Packit - 5.1.4-1 - Fix Builds on i386 - Print error if unsupported architecture used - argument_parser: New error class for invalid value - Allow obsoletion of protected packages - Add support for repository configuration in /usr Package: dnstwist-20230918-1.fc40 Old package: dnstwist-20230509-2.fc39 Summary: Domain name permutation engine RPMs: dnstwist Size: 36.35 KiB Size change: 1.29 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 18 2023 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki - 20230918-1 - Update to v20230918 Package: dovecot-1:2.3.21-1.fc40 Old package: dovecot-1:2.3.20-6.fc39 Summary: Secure imap and pop3 server RPMs: dovecot dovecot-devel dovecot-mysql dovecot-pgsql dovecot-pigeonhole Size: 30.24 MiB Size change: 85.79 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 18 2023 Michal Hlavinka - 1:2.3.21-1 - updated to 2.3.21(2239134) Package: electrum-4.3.4-2.fc40 Old package: electrum-4.3.4-1.fc39 Summary: A lightweight Bitcoin Client RPMs: electrum Size: 8.02 MiB Size change: -47.07 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Re
Fedora 39 compose report: 20230919.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-39-20230918.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230919.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 10 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 701.12 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 10.90 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 203.51 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-39-20230918.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: rust-linux-raw-sys0.3-0.3.8-1.fc39 Summary: Generated bindings for Linux's userspace API RPMs:rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+default-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+errno-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+general-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+ioctl-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+netlink-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+no_std-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3+std-devel rust-linux-raw-sys0.3-devel Size:186.33 KiB Package: rust-rustix0.37-0.37.23-1.fc39 Summary: Safe Rust bindings to POSIX/Unix/Linux/Winsock2-like syscalls RPMs:rust-rustix0.37+all-apis-devel rust-rustix0.37+all-impls-devel rust-rustix0.37+cc-devel rust-rustix0.37+default-devel rust-rustix0.37+fs-devel rust-rustix0.37+fs-err-devel rust-rustix0.37+io-lifetimes-devel rust-rustix0.37+io_uring-devel rust-rustix0.37+itoa-devel rust-rustix0.37+libc-devel rust-rustix0.37+libc_errno-devel rust-rustix0.37+linux_4_11-devel rust-rustix0.37+linux_latest-devel rust-rustix0.37+mm-devel rust-rustix0.37+net-devel rust-rustix0.37+once_cell-devel rust-rustix0.37+os_pipe-devel rust-rustix0.37+param-devel rust-rustix0.37+process-devel rust-rustix0.37+procfs-devel rust-rustix0.37+pty-devel rust-rustix0.37+rand-devel rust-rustix0.37+runtime-devel rust-rustix0.37+std-devel rust-rustix0.37+termios-devel rust-rustix0.37+thread-devel rust-rustix0.37+time-devel rust-rustix0.37+use-libc-auxv-devel rust-rustix0.37+use-libc-devel rust-rustix0.37-devel Size:514.80 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: dbus-1:1.14.10-1.fc39 Old package: dbus-1:1.14.8-2.fc39 Summary: D-BUS message bus RPMs: dbus dbus-common dbus-daemon dbus-devel dbus-doc dbus-libs dbus-tests dbus-tools dbus-x11 Size: 5.67 MiB Size change: 21.89 KiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 01 2023 David King - 1:1.14.10-1 - Update to 1.14.10 Package: gnome-session-44.0-4.fc39 Old package: gnome-session-44.0-2.fc39 Summary: GNOME session manager RPMs: gnome-session gnome-session-wayland-session gnome-session-xsession Size: 1.70 MiB Size change: 5.14 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 06 2023 Ray Strode - 44.0-3 - Fix crash is gnome-session is started nested and inner instance is killed * Sun Sep 17 2023 Jan Grulich - 44.0-4 - Add gnome-portals.conf Package: rust-is-terminal-0.4.9-1.fc39 Old package: rust-is-terminal-0.4.7-2.fc39 Summary: Test whether a given stream is a terminal RPMs: rust-is-terminal+default-devel rust-is-terminal-devel Size: 22.35 KiB Size change: 177 B Changelog: * Sun Sep 17 2023 Fabio Valentini - 0.4.9-1 - Update to version 0.4.9; Fixes RHBZ#2218702 Package: rust-linux-raw-sys-0.4.7-1.fc39 Old package: rust-linux-raw-sys-0.3.8-2.fc39 Summary: Generated bindings for Linux's userspace API RPMs: rust-linux-raw-sys+default-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+elf-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+errno-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+general-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+if_ether-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+io_uring-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+ioctl-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+net-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+netlink-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+no_std-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+prctl-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+std-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+system-devel rust-linux-raw-sys-devel Added RPMs: rust-linux-raw-sys+elf-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+if_ether-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+io_uring-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+net-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+prctl-devel rust-linux-raw-sys+system-devel Size: 286.35 KiB Size change: 88.89 KiB Changelog: * Sun Sep 17 2023 Fabio Valentini - 0.4.7-1 - Update to version 0.4.7 Package: rust-rustix-0.38.13-1.fc39 Old package: rust-rustix-0.37.23-2.fc39 Summary: Safe Rust bindings to POSIX/Unix/Linux/Winsock2-like syscalls RPMs: rust-rustix+all-apis-devel rust-rustix+alloc-devel rust-rustix+cc-devel rust-rustix+default-devel rust-rustix+event-devel rust-rustix+fs-devel rust-rustix+io_uring-devel rust-rustix+itoa-devel rust-rustix+libc-devel rust-rustix+libc_errno-devel rust-rustix+linux_4_11-devel rust-rustix+linux_latest-devel rust-rustix+mm-devel rust-rustix+mount-devel rust-rustix+net-devel rust-rustix+once_cell-devel rust-rustix+param-devel rust-rustix+pipe-devel rust-rustix+process-devel rust-rustix+procfs-devel rust-rustix+pty-devel rust-rustix+rand-devel rust-rustix+runtime-devel rust-rustix+std-devel r
Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:26 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> GNOME 45.0 upstream tarball date is this weekend and I'm coordinating
> the downstream builds for F39 and rawhide.
>
> A quick note where we are in the release schedule:
>
> Fedora 39 Beta was declared GO yesterday and is going to ship with GNOME
> 45.beta. We have the 45.rc mega-update in Bodhi
> (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d422824191) and it
> is queued to stable and hopefully gets pushed to stable later tonight
> once the floodgates open again after the F39 Beta freeze.
>
> My plan is to collect all F39 builds in the f39-gnome side tag, but for
> rawhide build directly for rawhide. Hopefully there are no soname bumps
> between 45.rc and 45.0 complicating things.
>
> If you are helping with builds, please do the following:
>
> For F39, use 'fedpkg build --target f39-gnome' and I'll take care to
> submit everything to bodhi as a single mega-update.
>
> For rawhide, if you are building just a single package, build directly
> in rawhide. If it's a soname bump or anything else that requires
> multiple packages built together, please use a koji self-service side
> tag ('fedpkg request-side-tag' while the rawhide branch is checked out)
> and build using this. We sadly don't have a good way to do named side
> tags (f40-gnome) for rawhide.
>
> openQA is active in rawhide and gating updates so hopefully it prevents
> any broken updates landing.
>
> I'm going to be following the above myself and kicking off builds as
> soon as they are released upstream.
>
> If you run into any issues (or if there are soname bumps or anything
> else that would complicate things), please let me know - I'm available
> for sorting things out.
>
> Thanks and looking forward to an exciting GNOME 45.0 release!
I just prepared updates for rust-glycin-utils, rust-glycin, and
glycin-loaders (from the current v0.1 pre-releases to the recently
published stable releases), and only just now remembered that you
might want to include them in the GNOME mega-update - I'm currently
building them in side tags for rawhide (f40-build-side-73970) and f39
(f39-build-side-73972), but if you want, we can of course move the f39
builds into the f39-gnome tag instead.
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)
Some apps that are not open source and we are required to use don't cooperate: see attached On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:58 AM Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 9/18/23 11:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:12 AM Steven A. Falco > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/17/23 05:48 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > >>> Ian Laurie wrote: > I didn't think the greeter used Wayland? So there may be something > else > going on. I cannot swear to it, but I don't think I've noticed > problems > in the greeter before. > > As Adam posted, the offset problem already has a bug for it. Wayland > is > certainly unusable in VirtualBox, but now even the greeter has issues, > and I think that's newish. > >>> > >>> SDDM was switched to Wayland for F38 and newer. If you want it to use > X11, > >>> you have to edit /etc/sddm.conf and set: > >>> > >>> [General] > >>> DisplayServer=x11 > >>> > >>> there. > >>> > >>> Kevin Kofler > >> > >> Yes - I had to do that because the Wayland version of the SDDM greeter > apparently doesn't honor xrandr. > >> > >> I have the following in my /etc/sddm/Xsetup file: > >> > >> #!/usr/bin/sh > >> # Xsetup - run as root before the login dialog appears > >> xrandr --output DisplayPort-0 --right-of DisplayPort-1 > >> > >> If I have the greeter set to x11 that works perfectly, but if I have > the greeter set to wayland it is ignored. > >> > >> I don't know if there is a way to tell wayland the desired screen > arrangement. If there is a way I'd like to hear about it. If there isn't > a way, then I guess that should be another bug. > >> > > > > kwin can be configured using kscreen-doctor, as long as the kwin > > wayland socket is up. > > Thanks, Neal. I'll give that a try at some point. > > Steve > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:49 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I just prepared updates for rust-glycin-utils, rust-glycin, and > glycin-loaders (from the current v0.1 pre-releases to the recently > published stable releases), and only just now remembered that you > might want to include them in the GNOME mega-update - I'm currently > building them in side tags for rawhide (f40-build-side-73970) and f39 > (f39-build-side-73972), but if you want, we can of course move the f39 > builds into the f39-gnome tag instead. > Yes, please, let me take care of these. Just out of curiosity, what prompted you to build the updates for glycin? Not that I'm complaining for the help :) -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:49 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> I just prepared updates for rust-glycin-utils, rust-glycin, and >> glycin-loaders (from the current v0.1 pre-releases to the recently >> published stable releases), and only just now remembered that you >> might want to include them in the GNOME mega-update - I'm currently >> building them in side tags for rawhide (f40-build-side-73970) and f39 >> (f39-build-side-73972), but if you want, we can of course move the f39 >> builds into the f39-gnome tag instead. > > > Yes, please, let me take care of these. Just out of curiosity, what prompted > you to build the updates for glycin? Not that I'm complaining for the help :) Ok, let me know if there's anything I need to do. Should I submit the rawhide update, and let you move the f39 builds into f39-gnome? As for why - I've been going through the pending Rust updates, and updating things from pre-releases to stable releases is always good in my experience ... and I thought I could help with something in return for your help with the gtk-rs updates :) Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 9:57 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > Some apps that are not open source and we are required to use don't > cooperate: see attached > According to this VMware forum post, the warning is annoying, but harmless? https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-for-Linux/Anyone-know-if-they-re-working-on-Wayland-support-for-the/td-p/2953800 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:09 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kalev Lember > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:49 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> > >> I just prepared updates for rust-glycin-utils, rust-glycin, and > >> glycin-loaders (from the current v0.1 pre-releases to the recently > >> published stable releases), and only just now remembered that you > >> might want to include them in the GNOME mega-update - I'm currently > >> building them in side tags for rawhide (f40-build-side-73970) and f39 > >> (f39-build-side-73972), but if you want, we can of course move the f39 > >> builds into the f39-gnome tag instead. > > > > > > Yes, please, let me take care of these. Just out of curiosity, what > prompted you to build the updates for glycin? Not that I'm complaining for > the help :) > > Ok, let me know if there's anything I need to do. Should I submit the > rawhide update, and let you move the f39 builds into f39-gnome? > Sounds like a good plan - let's do it like that. As for why - I've been going through the pending Rust updates, and > updating things from pre-releases to stable releases is always good in > my experience ... and I thought I could help with something in return > for your help with the gtk-rs updates :) > Ahh, I see. Thanks, I appreciate the help! :) -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:12 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 9:57 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > Some apps that are not open source and we are required to use don't > cooperate: see attached > > > > According to this VMware forum post, the warning is annoying, but > harmless? > https://communities.vmware.com/t5/Horizon-for-Linux/Anyone-know-if-they-re-working-on-Wayland-support-for-the/td-p/2953800 > > Thanks! That does work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released
On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 04:01:59 PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Workstation: https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Server: https://getfedora.org/server/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta IoT: https://getfedora.org/iot/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta CoreOS: https://fedoraproject.org/coreos/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/cloud/download Uh-oh. I see we can download the beta version of Server and Cloud by toggling the "Show Beta Downloads" switch, but there doesn't appear to be any way to download the beta for Workstation or IoT. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:22 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:09 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kalev Lember wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:49 PM Fabio Valentini >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I just prepared updates for rust-glycin-utils, rust-glycin, and >> >> glycin-loaders (from the current v0.1 pre-releases to the recently >> >> published stable releases), and only just now remembered that you >> >> might want to include them in the GNOME mega-update - I'm currently >> >> building them in side tags for rawhide (f40-build-side-73970) and f39 >> >> (f39-build-side-73972), but if you want, we can of course move the f39 >> >> builds into the f39-gnome tag instead. >> > >> > >> > Yes, please, let me take care of these. Just out of curiosity, what >> > prompted you to build the updates for glycin? Not that I'm complaining for >> > the help :) >> >> Ok, let me know if there's anything I need to do. Should I submit the >> rawhide update, and let you move the f39 builds into f39-gnome? > > > Sounds like a good plan - let's do it like that. Rawhide update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f2c662d6d7 F39 builds: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=73972&order=-build_id&latest=1 Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora CoreOS next stream rebased to Fedora Linux 39
Fedora Linux 39 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next` stream has been migrated to Fedora Linux 39 content. Existing nodes on the `next` stream will update as normal over the following days. The Fedora Project accepted changes for Fedora 39 are at [2] and the Fedora CoreOS analysis of each change is documented in the tracker issue ticket #1491 [3]. The following changes require special attention: - The modularity effort in Fedora has been retired. As such, there are no more modular repos available. If you are currently using modules (e.g. `cri-o`), manual steps are required in order to avoid rebasing issues. See [4] for details. - To enhance security, the AWS AMI now has IMDSv1 disabled by default in favour of IMDSv2. If you have applications which still require access via IMDSv1, you may turn it back on when launching new instances. No change should occur to upgrading systems. For more information, see [5]. - The AWS AMI now uses the `gp3` volume type by default rather than `gp2` which provide more flexibility. Note that the minimum IOPS may be lower than `gp2` for smaller disk sizes. See [6] for a full comparison. - The AWS AMI now uses UEFI by default on x86_64 instance types that support it. This shouldn't have any noticeable effect on the host. - The `moby-engine` package has been updated from v20.10 to v24.0. This is an update that skips several major versions. Please test and report regressions in the Fedora bug tracker [7] and if possible link back to the Fedora CoreOS tracker issue [8]. Please test out the `next` stream over the coming month and report any issues in our issue tracker [9]. Thank you to everyone helping find issues by running the `next` stream! The Fedora CoreOS Team [1] https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-39-beta/ [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/39/ChangeSet [3] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1491 [4] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1513#issuecomment-1724299918 [5] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1502#issuecomment-1724336977 [6] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/general-purpose.html [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&component=moby-engine&version=39 [8] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1476 [9] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:57:35AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 04:01:59 PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka > wrote: > > Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Workstation: > > https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/ > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Server: > > https://getfedora.org/server/download/ > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta IoT: https://getfedora.org/iot/download/ > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta CoreOS: > > https://fedoraproject.org/coreos/download/ > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Cloud: > > https://fedoraproject.org/cloud/download > > Uh-oh. I see we can download the beta version of Server and Cloud by > toggling the "Show Beta Downloads" switch, but there doesn't appear to be > any way to download the beta for Workstation or IoT. Odd. It shows fine here. Caching issue? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released
On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 08:14:04 AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Caching issue? Nope, I've used Ctrl+F5 to "reload bypassing cache." I actually now notice that a toggle (presumably the "show beta releases" toggle) briefly appears when loading the page with Ctrl+F5, but then it immediately disappears. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released
On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 08:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:57:35AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 04:01:59 PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka > > wrote: > > > Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: > > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Workstation: > > > https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/ > > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Server: > > > https://getfedora.org/server/download/ > > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta IoT: https://getfedora.org/iot/download/ > > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta CoreOS: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/coreos/download/ > > > * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Cloud: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/cloud/download > > > > Uh-oh. I see we can download the beta version of Server and Cloud by > > toggling the "Show Beta Downloads" switch, but there doesn't appear to be > > any way to download the beta for Workstation or IoT. > > Odd. It shows fine here. > > Caching issue? Workstation is fine, IoT is not. I kept trying to ping people to ensure IoT was prepared for Beta, but nobody really replied. If 'informal chat pinging for a week' isn't going to get things done, we need a better process here. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released
Um, sorry, actually yes it is a cache control issue. My browser's shortcut to "reload bypassing cache" is actually Shift+F5, not Ctrl+F5. Well, drat, that would have been good to know a long time ago. Now after trying the correct shortcut I see the beta downloads toggle. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib
Will this be posted soon? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Automate your Fedora package maintenance using Packit
Good point, Michael https://github.com/packit/packit/pull/2089..;) (Will be in production next week.) There are multiple ways to tweak the format: * https://packit.dev/docs/configuration#copy_upstream_release_description * https://packit.dev/docs/configuration#sync_changelog * Or a custom `changelog-entry` action: https://packit.dev/docs/configuration/actions#syncing-the-release If you are not happy with any wording, suggestions and ideally pull requests are always more than welcome! František On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:33 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Am Di., 19. Sept. 2023 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Frantisek Lachman > : > > > > Thank you everyone for your responses! > > > > I have a few updates for you that made it to production this morning > > as part of our weekly release cycle: > > > > * Thanks to Ankur Sinha, the pull requests created by Packit now have > > a clear list of tasks/reminders to check in the description. (E.g. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ogr/pull-request/479) > > Thanks! > > Maybe add: "check the autogenerated changelog" ;-) > > (I know 479 was not merged, but the diff looks funny.) > Michael > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > Hello, > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960 > Long story short: > RPM has moved to sequoia, > sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies, > Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit DSA key, > Google Chrome was not installable => F38 blocker. > Back at the time, it's been hastily "resolved" > by relaxing RPM security through crypto-policies > just enough to tolerate that Google signature: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878 > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/merge_requests/129 > > Since then it has been brought to my attention that > Google has now added a 4096 bit RSA key > https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/ > (EB4C 1BFD 4F04 2F6D DDCC EC91 7721 F63B D38B 4796) > > Because of that, I'd like to revert that RPM policy relaxation > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/commit/a12f7b20638be8f872ad1995c7d2edce41c227b5 > in (f39) rawhide and align RPM security with the rest of the policy. > > Thoughts / feedback? It might be good to go through all the ones that were hit by this (it wasn't just chrome) and indicate if they are now fixed. You can see a partial list in the common bug: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/70498 and in the discussion off it. The list from there: Google Chrome (RPM signature rejected, repo key rejected) Microsoft Edge (repo key rejected) Dropbox (repo key rejected) Skype (repo key rejected) Visual Studio Code (repo key rejected) Sublime Text (repo key rejected) Microsoft Teams (repo key rejected) TeamViewer (repo key rejected) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] [IoT] Announcing Fedora IoT Test Week | Sept 24-30
Hello testers! The Fedora 39 IoT test week starts this Sunday, September 24th and ends the following Saturday, September 30th. You can find more info and how to test on the wiki page [0]. Your testing is much appreciated and helps us ensure the quality of Fedora IoT. See you at the test week! Geoff Marr IRC: coremodule [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-09-24_Fedora_39_IoT_Edition ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released
Fedora Linux 39 Beta Released -- The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora Linux 39 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora Linux 39 release at the end of October. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Workstation: https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Server: https://getfedora.org/server/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta IoT: https://getfedora.org/iot/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta CoreOS: https://fedoraproject.org/coreos/download/ * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/cloud/download Or, check out one of our popular variants, including KDE Plasma, Xfce, and other desktop environments: * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Spins: https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease * Get Fedora Linux 39 Beta Labs: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/prerelease For more details about the release, read the full announcement at * https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-39-beta/ or look for the prerelease pages in the download sections at * https://getfedora.org/ Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the t...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Libera Chat or the #qa:fedoraproject.org Matrix room. Regards, Tomas Hrcka Fedora Release Engineering -- Tomas Hrcka fas: humaton libera.CHAT: jednorozec ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
