Re: Unretire rubygem-logging
On 10/4/22 02:05, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:13:25 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: I have set up copr repos for test-kitchen and kitchen-salt.[1][2] I am also in the process of opening up bzs for review. I have a few questions regarding embedded fonts in rdoc... Every rubygem seems to have this... Should I be removing the font files from my specs now? See this thread[3]. I can move discussion to the ruby-sig if that is a more appropriate place to have the embedded font discussion. There is a related thread on the ruby-sig list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2O3RID4LX6I53WD3TRUNYE2O54RXDKBX/ [1] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/test-kitchen/ [2] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/kitchen-salt/ [3] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ALHIJVZ5MP5Y46UWAQUNGNRDFBJUA5BL/ Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unretire rubygem-logging
Dne 04. 10. 22 v 10:01 Benson Muite napsal(a): On 10/4/22 02:05, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:13:25 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: I have set up copr repos for test-kitchen and kitchen-salt.[1][2] I am also in the process of opening up bzs for review. I have a few questions regarding embedded fonts in rdoc... Every rubygem seems to have this... Should I be removing the font files from my specs now? See this thread[3]. I can move discussion to the ruby-sig if that is a more appropriate place to have the embedded font discussion. There is a related thread on the ruby-sig list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2O3RID4LX6I53WD3TRUNYE2O54RXDKBX/ I don't think this is worth of removing at this stage. This needs systematic solution and it would not help to solve it package by package. Not mentioning that removing fonts might break the assumption that the documentation might be freely copied on other places and still keep working. Vít [1] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/test-kitchen/ [2] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/kitchen-salt/ [3] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ALHIJVZ5MP5Y46UWAQUNGNRDFBJUA5BL/ Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unretire rubygem-logging
Dne 04. 10. 22 v 1:05 Robby Callicotte via devel napsal(a): On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:13:25 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: Do you by a chance have repository, e.g. in Copr, of all the things you eventually want import into Fedora? Or bugzilla tracker for kitchen-salt / test-kitchen which all the reviews would be blocked against? I am asking, because introducing bigger component into Fedora might be quite challenging and it is not actually visible for other contributors what is your goal. I have set up copr repos for test-kitchen and kitchen-salt.[1][2] Great. Just quickly looking over the packages, the rubygem-unicode_utils cought my attention. I would be surprised if this is useful for anything with modern Ruby. I suggest to investigate this dependency. Vít I am also in the process of opening up bzs for review. I have a few questions regarding embedded fonts in rdoc... Every rubygem seems to have this... Should I be removing the font files from my specs now? See this thread[3]. I can move discussion to the ruby-sig if that is a more appropriate place to have the embedded font discussion. [1] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/test-kitchen/ [2] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/kitchen-salt/ [3] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ALHIJVZ5MP5Y46UWAQUNGNRDFBJUA5BL/ Cheers! OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221004.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221003.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221004.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:10 Upgraded packages: 70 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 129.38 KiB Size of dropped packages:66.99 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 7.42 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 187.53 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: arch-test-0.19-1.fc38 Summary: Tools to detect architectures runnable by your machine+kernel RPMs:arch-test Size:32.59 KiB Package: golang-github-muesli-combinator-0.3.0-1.fc38 Summary: Generates a slice of all possible value combinations for any given struct and a set of its potential member values RPMs:golang-github-muesli-combinator-devel Size:12.31 KiB Package: golang-howett-plist-1.0.0-2.fc38 Summary: A pure Go Apple Property List transcoder RPMs:golang-howett-plist-devel Size:55.84 KiB Package: perl-Alien-Build-Plugin-Download-GitLab-0.01-1.fc38 Summary: Alien::Build plugin to download from GitLab RPMs:perl-Alien-Build-Plugin-Download-GitLab perl-Alien-Build-Plugin-Download-GitLab-tests Size:28.64 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: libicu69-69.1-1.fc37 Summary: Compat package with icu libraries RPMs:libicu69 Size:48.82 MiB Package: mailman3-3.3.4-6.fc36 Summary: The GNU mailing list manager RPMs:mailman3 Size:1.91 MiB Package: py4j-0.10.9-9.fc36 Summary: Dynamically access in Python programs to arbitrary Java objects RPMs:py4j-doc py4j-java py4j-javadoc python3-py4j Size:808.74 KiB Package: python-django-mailman3-1.3.7-2.fc36 Summary: Django library to help interaction with Mailman RPMs:python3-django-mailman3 Size:526.03 KiB Package: python-googletrans-4.0.0~rc1-9.fc37 Summary: Google Translate API for Python RPMs:python3-googletrans Size:46.62 KiB Package: python-hyperkitty-1.3.5-1.fc36 Summary: A web interface to access GNU Mailman v3 archives RPMs:hyperkitty hyperkitty-doc Size:2.06 MiB Package: python-javabridge-1.0.19-7.20211221git61942d2.fc36 Summary: Python wrapper for the Java Native Interface RPMs:python3-javabridge Size:1.60 MiB Package: python-postorius-1.3.6-2.fc36 Summary: Web UI for GNU Mailman RPMs:postorius Size:1.48 MiB Package: renderdoc-1.17-2.fc36 Summary: A stand-alone graphics debugging tool RPMs:renderdoc renderdoc-devel Size:9.50 MiB Package: tcpjunk-2.9.03-25.fc35 Summary: TCP protocols testing tool RPMs:tcpjunk Size:266.09 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: FlightGear-2020.3.14-1.fc38 Old package: FlightGear-2020.3.13-2.fc37 Summary: The FlightGear Flight Simulator RPMs: FlightGear Size: 28.71 MiB Size change: 196.20 KiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 03 2022 Fabrice Bellet - 2020.3.14-1 - new upstream release Package: FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.78.cvs20141002.fc38 Old package: FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.77.cvs20141002.fc37 Summary: Flightgear map tools RPMs: FlightGear-Atlas Size: 2.87 MiB Size change: 3.92 KiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 03 2022 Fabrice Bellet - 0.5.0-0.78.cvs20141002 - rebuild with newer SimGear Package: FlightGear-data-2020.3.14-1.fc38 Old package: FlightGear-data-2020.3.13-2.fc37 Summary: FlightGear base scenery and data files RPMs: FlightGear-data Size: 1.68 GiB Size change: 71.40 KiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 03 2022 Fabrice Bellet - 2020.3.14-1 - new upstream release Package: SimGear-2020.3.14-1.fc38 Old package: SimGear-2020.3.13-2.fc37 Summary: Simulation library components RPMs: SimGear SimGear-devel Size: 10.57 MiB Size change: 28.88 KiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 03 2022 Fabrice Bellet - 2020.3.14-1 - new upstream release Package: buildah-1.28.0-1.fc38 Old package: buildah-1.27.2-1.fc38 Summary: A command line tool used for creating OCI Images RPMs: buildah buildah-tests Size: 125.92 MiB Size change: -1.42 MiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 03 2022 RH Container Bot 1.28.0-1 - auto bump to v1.28.0 Package: butt-0.1.36-1.fc38 Old package: butt-0.1.34-3.fc38 Summary: Broadcast using this tool RPMs: butt Size: 1.17 MiB Size change: 27.70 KiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 03 2022 Carl George - 0.1.36-1 - Latest upstream, resolves rhbz#2098461 Package: copy-jdk-configs-4.1-1.fc38 Old package: copy-jdk-configs-4.1-0.fc38 Summary: JDKs configuration files copier RPMs: copy-jdk-configs Size: 27.64 KiB Size change: 118 B Changelog: * Thu Sep 29 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.1-1 - update to attempt to solve bug which could delete empty dirs in /etc Package: crypto-policies-20221003-1.gitcb1ad32.fc38 Old package: crypto-policies-20220824-2.git2187e9c.fc38 Summary
Re: limiting the (systemd) journal size
On Di, 27.09.22 10:12, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: 65;6800;1c > The obvious bike-shedding questions are: Is 4G is too much or too > little? If so what amount it should be? Is size still the correct > approach? Or should we consider a max retention time? And if so, > what would it be and how granular should it be? > > Also, what's the scope? Is a change needed Fedora-wide, in a manner > that's upstreamable? That could prove difficult because any change > will negatively impact other use cases, not least of which is what > the upgrade behavior should be if it'll involve trimming > journals. Are the current defaults optimal for most use cases most > of the time? There will be a higher burden of persuasion to get a > Fedora-wide change, rather than optimizing for just desktops. > > But that isn't intended to limit the discussion to just the desktop > case. Just to be aware that the broader and grander the change, the > more consideration of the consequences there needs to be, i.e. less > bike shedding. > > More background and discussion upstream and Workstation working > group issues. [1] BTW, if you can make a good case for this, consider submitting this change upstream instead of keeping this specific to Fedora. The values we default to are just some values I came up with which 10y or so and made rough sense to me, but the idea was always to tweak them as we learn how things behave in real life. So, if there's good case to be made to tweak them in some way we can certainly consider making that upstream. (i.e. if you compiled a good list of pros/cons and have some specific values to propose please submit a github issue upstream about this, and we can look into this.) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-10-04)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-10-04 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda = Followups = #2877 Change: SWIG 4.1.0 https://www.pagure.io/fesco/issue/2877 #2870 Change proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 https://www.pagure.io/fesco/issue/2870 #2865 Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 2/2 https://www.pagure.io/fesco/issue/2865 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- Major Hayden OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unretire rubygem-logging
On 10/4/22 11:29, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 04. 10. 22 v 10:01 Benson Muite napsal(a): On 10/4/22 02:05, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:13:25 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: I have set up copr repos for test-kitchen and kitchen-salt.[1][2] I am also in the process of opening up bzs for review. I have a few questions regarding embedded fonts in rdoc... Every rubygem seems to have this... Should I be removing the font files from my specs now? See this thread[3]. I can move discussion to the ruby-sig if that is a more appropriate place to have the embedded font discussion. There is a related thread on the ruby-sig list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2O3RID4LX6I53WD3TRUNYE2O54RXDKBX/ I don't think this is worth of removing at this stage. This needs systematic solution and it would not help to solve it package by package. Not mentioning that removing fonts might break the assumption that the documentation might be freely copied on other places and still keep working. The assumption that the documentation can be freely copied elsewhere is incorrect, it is made to be used on the installed system. Bundling the fonts also means that the font licenses need to be included with the package license. Bundling the fonts increases package bloat. If documentation that can freely be copied elsewhere is needed, a better solution is to have an optional full-documentation sub package. This may also be useful for pdf documentation[4] [4] https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/18 Vít [1] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/test-kitchen/ [2] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rcallicotte/kitchen-salt/ [3] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ALHIJVZ5MP5Y46UWAQUNGNRDFBJUA5BL/ Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 37 compose report: 20221004.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-37-20221003.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221004.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 85 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.80 MiB Size of dropped packages:66.02 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 688.07 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 39.92 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: budgie-desktop-10.6.4-2.fc37 Summary: A feature-rich, modern desktop designed to keep out the way of the user RPMs:budgie-desktop budgie-desktop-devel budgie-desktop-docs Size:7.72 MiB Package: golang-github-logr-stdr-1.2.2-1.fc37 Summary: Logr implementation against the stdlib log package RPMs:golang-github-logr-stdr-devel Size:15.45 KiB Package: rust-cssparser-macros-0.6.0-7.fc37 Summary: Procedural macros for cssparser RPMs:rust-cssparser-macros+default-devel rust-cssparser-macros-devel Size:22.11 KiB Package: rust-dtoa-short-0.3.3-5.fc37 Summary: Serialize float number and truncate to certain precision RPMs:rust-dtoa-short+default-devel rust-dtoa-short-devel Size:23.66 KiB Package: rust-rctree-0.4.0-1.fc37 Summary: 'DOM-like' tree implemented using reference counting RPMs:rust-rctree+default-devel rust-rctree-devel Size:22.54 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: libicu69-69.1-1.fc37 Summary: Compat package with icu libraries RPMs:libicu69 Size:48.82 MiB Package: mailman3-3.3.4-6.fc36 Summary: The GNU mailing list manager RPMs:mailman3 Size:1.60 MiB Package: py4j-0.10.9-9.fc36 Summary: Dynamically access in Python programs to arbitrary Java objects RPMs:py4j-doc py4j-java py4j-javadoc python3-py4j Size:734.89 KiB Package: python-django-mailman3-1.3.7-2.fc36 Summary: Django library to help interaction with Mailman RPMs:python3-django-mailman3 Size:475.99 KiB Package: python-hyperkitty-1.3.5-1.fc36 Summary: A web interface to access GNU Mailman v3 archives RPMs:hyperkitty hyperkitty-doc Size:1.93 MiB Package: python-javabridge-1.0.19-7.20211221git61942d2.fc36 Summary: Python wrapper for the Java Native Interface RPMs:python3-javabridge Size:1.59 MiB Package: python-postorius-1.3.6-2.fc36 Summary: Web UI for GNU Mailman RPMs:postorius Size:1.40 MiB Package: renderdoc-1.17-2.fc36 Summary: A stand-alone graphics debugging tool RPMs:renderdoc renderdoc-devel Size:9.50 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: NetworkManager-sstp-1:1.3.1-1.fc37 Old package: NetworkManager-sstp-1:1.3.0-4.fc37 Summary: NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSTP RPMs: NetworkManager-sstp NetworkManager-sstp-gnome Size: 989.41 KiB Size change: 10.80 KiB Changelog: * Sun Sep 25 2022 Marcin Zajaczkowski - 1:1.3.1-1 - Update to 1.3.1 Package: baresip-2.8.1-1.fc37 Old package: baresip-2.7.0-1.fc37 Summary: Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support RPMs: baresip baresip-aac baresip-alsa baresip-av1 baresip-codec2 baresip-ctrl_dbus baresip-devel baresip-g722 baresip-g726 baresip-gst baresip-gtk baresip-jack baresip-mpa baresip-mqtt baresip-opus baresip-plc baresip-portaudio baresip-pulse baresip-sdl baresip-snapshot baresip-sndfile baresip-tools baresip-v4l2 baresip-vp8 baresip-vp9 baresip-x11 Added RPMs: baresip-devel Size: 6.34 MiB Size change: 1.07 MiB Changelog: * Sat Oct 01 2022 Robert Scheck 2.8.0-1 - Upgrade to 2.8.0 * Sat Oct 01 2022 Robert Scheck 2.8.1-1 - Upgrade to 2.8.1 (#2131453) Package: bpftrace-0.16.0-3.fc37 Old package: bpftrace-0.16.0-2.fc37 Summary: High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF RPMs: bpftrace Size: 14.11 MiB Size change: -4.74 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 26 2022 Kenneth Topp - 0.16.0-3 - Enable workaround for non OpaquePointers on LLVM-15 Package: dbus-parsec-0.4.0-1.fc37 Old package: dbus-parsec-0.3.1-4.fc35 Summary: DBus PARSEC interface RPMs: dbus-parsec Size: 1.68 MiB Size change: 396.44 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.1-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3.1-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Sep 28 2022 Peter Robinson - 0.4.0-1 - Update to 0.4.0 Package: ddnet-16.4-1.fc37 Old package: ddnet-16.3.2-1.fc37 Summary: DDraceNetwork, a cooperative racing mod of Teeworlds RPMs: ddnet ddnet-data ddnet-server Size: 32.83 MiB Size change: 59.08 KiB Changelog: * Sun Sep 25 2022 S??rgio Basto - 16.4-1 - Update ddnet to 16.4 (#2127583) Package: duplicity-1.0.0-1.fc37 Old package: duplicity-0.8.23-4.fc37 Summary: Encrypted bandwidth-efficient backup using rsync algo
Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0
Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of yours. QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014 And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review: libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 Thanks in advance! -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0
On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd > be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of > yours. > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014 I have taken indi and would appreciate a review for pageedit (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2131949), it should be pretty straightforward Dan > > And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review: > > libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 > > Thanks in advance! > > -- > Gwyn Ciesla > she/her/hers > > in your fear, seek only peace > in your fear, seek only love > -d. bowie > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0
Thank you, on it! -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 10:46 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + > Gwyn Ciesla via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If > > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more > > of yours. > > > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 > > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 > > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014 > > > I have taken indi and would appreciate a review for pageedit > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2131949), it > should be pretty straightforward > > > Dan > > > And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review: > > > > libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958 > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > -- > > Gwyn Ciesla > > she/her/hers > > > > in your fear, seek only peace > > in your fear, seek only love > > -d. bowie > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0
Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto: > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + > Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > >> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If >> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more >> of yours. >> >> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 >> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 >> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014 > I have taken indi INDI is already packaged, see "libindi". I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8). Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0
Thank you! -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 11:14 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto: > > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + > > Gwyn Ciesla via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > > > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If > > > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or > > > more of yours. > > > > > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 > > > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 > > > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014 > > > I have taken indi > > > INDI is already packaged, see "libindi". > > I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8). > > Mattia > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0
On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:14:08 + Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto: > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + > > Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > >> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If > >> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or > >> more of yours. > >> > >> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 > >> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842 > >> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014 > > I have taken indi > > INDI is already packaged, see "libindi". > > I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8). I have vaguely recalled that we have something like "indi", but I searched only for "indi", not for "*indi*" :-) Taking QXlsx then ... Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Request for help: Package downgrades on upgrade from F36 to F37
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 4:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Downgraded packages (only considering Version): (42) Thanks to everyone who fixed their own packages, the list has shrunk from 42 to 39. Yay. I now spent time to file bugs for botched updates / launch missing builds / file missing bodhi updates for the rest. I also plan to request Freeze Exceptions for all updates that get filed for this kind of problem. However, I skipped packages where the downgrade was caused by smaller Release values, otherwise the list would be too big. Many of these problems are ostensibly just caused by different rpmautospec commit counting, and should be harmless. If you see any actual problems in the list of "packages that are downgraded to the same Version but to a lower Release", please speak up. Fabio Fixed (obvious actions) = Built in koji but missing bodhi update: - osbuild v67 / osbuild-composer v64: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2235cd15cb - python-canonicaljson v1.6.2: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-57e2bbdef6 Updated in dist-git but no koji build / bodhi update: - exaile v4.1.2: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ef5d68bda8 - lutris v0.5.11: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7f5bcda691 - netdata v1.36.1: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-287bac1e03 - python-niaaml v1.1.11: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-09007d8d48 - srm-ifce v1.24.5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f046dda742 Filed bugs (non-obvious problems) == Missing F37 updates: - asciigraph v0.5.5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132089 - certbot v1.30.0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132092 - dkms v3.0.7: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132096 Only updated on stable branches (?): - devilspie2 v0.44: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132094 - erlang-luerl v1.0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132097 - hdparm v9.63: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132099 - python-pysword v0.2.8: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132107 Broken packit configuration for F37: - cockpit-composer v41: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132093 Wrong build tagged into f37 by mass-rebuild script: -php-doctrine-doctrine-bundle2 v2.7.0: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11069 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2022-10-04)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-10-04) === Meeting started by mhayden at 17:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-10-04/fesco.2022-10-04-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (mhayden, 17:00:17) * #2877 Change: SWIG 4.1.0 (mhayden, 17:04:04) * #2870 Change proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (mhayden, 17:05:27) * ACTION: mhayden to update #2870 with a request for phases/checkpoints (mhayden, 17:24:01) * #2865 Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 2/2 (mhayden, 17:25:33) * ACTION: mhayden to update 2865 with a summary from the meeting (mhayden, 17:39:02) * Next week's chair (mhayden, 17:40:35) * ACTION: mhroncok to chair next week's meeting 🪑 (mhayden, 17:43:10) * Open Floor (mhayden, 17:43:40) Meeting ended at 17:46:33 UTC. Action Items * mhayden to update #2870 with a request for phases/checkpoints * mhayden to update 2865 with a summary from the meeting * mhroncok to chair next week's meeting 🪑 Action Items, by person --- * mhayden * mhayden to update #2870 with a request for phases/checkpoints * mhayden to update 2865 with a summary from the meeting * mhroncok * mhroncok to chair next week's meeting 🪑 * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * mhayden (69) * zbyszek (29) * gotmax[m] (25) * zodbot (18) * mhroncok (18) * salimma (9) * nirik (8) * sgallagh (5) * davide (4) * music[m] (3) * bcotton (1) * decathorpe (0) * dcantrell (0) * music (0) * Conan_Kudo (0) * Pharaoh_Atem (0) * Son_Goku (0) * King_InuYasha (0) * Sir_Gallantmon (0) * Eighth_Doctor (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4 .. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)
Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 03. 10. 22 12:09, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> And how is this change related to: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/c/2beb19345e6644cb1b5ee8092b8533c8984cd21c?branch=rawhide > > I was unaware of this change at all. > > Tom, should rpmlint ditch that file instead and Require > rpmlint-fedora-license-data? I'm not Tom (and I have not been asked to play Tom on TV), but I think that sounds like a good plan. Maintaining this data in two places is at least one more place than we'd like to have to maintain it. Thanks for working on automatic generation of the license data in rpmlint format Miro! And thanks to Miroslav and everyone who has worked on fedora-license-data. Hooray for not having to screen scrape the wiki for license data! Mildly related, I've been working on getting rpmlint updated to 2.3.0 and now 2.4.0. I filed a PR to get comments from other rpmlint maintainers and (hopefully) catch any bugs I may have introduced: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/pull-request/27 -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal)
Hi Todd, > Mildly related, I've been working on getting rpmlint updated > to 2.3.0 and now 2.4.0. I filed a PR to get comments from > other rpmlint maintainers and (hopefully) catch any bugs I > may have introduced: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/pull-request/27 A bit off topic, but it would be nice to make rpmlint recognize `forgeautosetup` (a simple change of `autosetup_regex` in rpmlint/checks/SpecCheck.py). I doubt that this change would be accepted upstream as it is fedora-specific. What you would suggest to get it through. Sorry for that simple question, I am quite new here, so not familiar with all workflows yet. Regards, Sergey ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2022-10-05 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat > > More information available at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/prioritized_bugs/ > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10144/ We will evaluate the following nominated bugs: * [abrt] gnome-shell: clutter_actor_destroy_all_children(): gnome-shell killed by SIGABRT - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127826 * Systemd causes PC Speaker to emit a loud beep during reboot/poweroff, after suspend&resume - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129387 -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
rpmlint %forgeautosetup support (was: Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal))
Hi, Sergey Mende wrote: >> Mildly related, I've been working on getting rpmlint updated >> to 2.3.0 and now 2.4.0. I filed a PR to get comments from >> other rpmlint maintainers and (hopefully) catch any bugs I >> may have introduced: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/pull-request/27 > > A bit off topic, but it would be nice to make rpmlint > recognize `forgeautosetup` (a simple change of > `autosetup_regex` in rpmlint/checks/SpecCheck.py). I doubt > that this change would be accepted upstream as it is > fedora-specific. What you would suggest to get it through. > Sorry for that simple question, I am quite new here, so > not familiar with all workflows yet. Ahh, that affects spec files which use %forgeautosetup and have patches, right? They get `patch-not-applied` warnings. It may be worth asking upstream. Such a trivial adjustment¹ to the regex might be acceptable. If not, perhaps they'll have a good idea for how to best override that downstream. It appears that would require a patch at the moment, while it would be nicer if we could adjust the regex in a config file. ¹ The patch would look like this, for anyone curious: diff --git i/rpmlint/checks/SpecCheck.py w/rpmlint/checks/SpecCheck.py index 71d3ede6..95b4635e 100644 --- i/rpmlint/checks/SpecCheck.py +++ w/rpmlint/checks/SpecCheck.py @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ setup_regex = re.compile(r'%setup\b') # intentionally no whitespace before! setup_q_regex = re.compile(r' -[A-Za-z]*q') setup_t_regex = re.compile(r' -[A-Za-z]*T') setup_ab_regex = re.compile(r' -[A-Za-z]*[ab]') -autosetup_regex = re.compile(r'^\s*%autosetup(\s.*|$)') +autosetup_regex = re.compile(r'^\s*%(forge)?autosetup(\s.*|$)') autosetup_n_regex = re.compile(r' -[A-Za-z]*N') autopatch_regex = re.compile(r'^\s*%autopatch(?:\s|$)') -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: rpmlint %forgeautosetup support (was: Re: F38 Proposal: SPDX License Phase 1 (Self-Contained Change proposal))
Todd, > Sergey Mende wrote: > > Ahh, that affects spec files which use %forgeautosetup and > have patches, right? They get `patch-not-applied` warnings. > > It may be worth asking upstream. Such a trivial adjustment¹ > to the regex might be acceptable. If not, perhaps they'll > have a good idea for how to best override that downstream. Yes, exactly. Thanks for the hint with a config option: I hope upstream would accept such change as it does not affect over rpmlint users. I will prepare PR and submit. Let's see. Regards, Sergey ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
PHP version 8.2 mass rebuild
Hi, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php82 As the feature is approved by Fesco I start working on the mass rebuild Will use the f38-build-side-58889 side tag Please ping me on IRC or by mail if something special needed for one of your packages. Remi P.S.: dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'php(api)' mlt-php-0:7.8.0-2.fc37.x86_64 php-ast-0:1.1.0-1.fc38.x86_64 php-facedetect-0:1.2.0-0.27.20201021git2a8974b.fc37.x86_64 php-geos-0:1.0.0-24.fc37.x86_64 php-kolabformat-0:1.2.0-12.fc37.x86_64 php-libguestfs-1:1.49.4-1.fc37.x86_64 php-libvirt-0:0.5.6-2.fc37.x86_64 php-mapserver-0:8.0.0-1.fc38.x86_64 php-maxminddb-0:1.11.0-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-amqp-0:1.11.0-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-apcu-0:5.1.22-2.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-apfd-0:1.0.3-4.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-couchbase3-0:3.2.1-4.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-dio-0:0.2.0-8.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-ds-0:1.4.0-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-event-0:3.0.7-2.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-fann-0:1.2.0~RC1-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-gearman-0:2.1.0-7.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-geoip-0:1.1.1-19.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-gmagick-0:2.0.6~RC1-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-http-0:4.2.3-4.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-igbinary-0:3.2.7-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-imagick-0:3.7.0-4.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-inotify-0:3.0.0-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-ip2location-0:8.1.1-7.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-json-post-0:1.1.0-4.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-krb5-0:1.1.4-8.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-lzf-0:1.7.0-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-mailparse-0:3.1.4-1.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-mcrypt-0:1.0.5-2.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-memcache-0:8.0-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-memcached-0:3.2.0-2.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-mongodb-0:1.14.1-1.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-msgpack-0:2.2.0~RC1-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-oauth-0:2.0.7-8.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-pcov-0:1.0.11-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-pq-0:2.2.0-4.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-raphf-0:2.0.1-9.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-redis5-0:5.3.7-2.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-rpminfo-0:0.6.0-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-rrd-0:2.0.3-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-selinux-0:0.6.0-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-ssdeep-0:1.1.0-14.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-ssh2-0:1.3.1-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-uopz-0:7.1.1-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-uuid-0:1.2.0-7.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-var-representation-0:0.1.2-1.fc38.x86_64 php-pecl-xattr-0:1.4.0-8.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-xdebug3-0:3.1.5-2.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-xmldiff-0:1.1.3-5.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-xmlrpc-0:1.0.0~rc3-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-yac-0:2.3.1-3.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-yaml-0:2.2.2-4.fc37.x86_64 php-pecl-zip-0:1.21.1-1.fc38.x86_64 php-phpiredis-0:1.0.1-9.fc37.x86_64 php-smbclient-0:1.0.6-6.fc37.x86_64 php-zmq-0:1.1.3-22.fc37.x86_64 php-zstd-0:0.11.0-4.fc37.x86_64 remctl-php-0:3.18-2.fc37.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Explicit dependency on systemd-rpm-macros now required?
Hi, On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 10:51 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clamav/c/35d73944ae2fa9cee3df4729c53a66ba03595d7f > "Add missing dependency on systemd as it's the systemd package itself > that ships systemd.pc, not systemd-devel." > > because clamav runs `pkg-config --variable=systemdsystemunitdir > systemd` which needs /usr/share/pkgconfig/systemd.pc Note 1: It's better to BR: pkgconfig(systemd), as that way one doesn't have to care in which package the .pc file is. Note 2: You can pass --with-systemdsystemunitdir=%_unitdir to configure and avoid the additional dependency altogether. D. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
