Re: Missing font information at wiki
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:05:10PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote: > >> On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >> wrote: > >> [...] > >> > I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating > >> > wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better mechanisms to > >> > advertise stuff to users that didn't exist a few years ago. Apart from > >> > the manual effort, the problem with wiki pages is that they tend to > >> > get out of date pretty quickly enough to be out-of-date to often to be > >> > really trustworthy. Instead, I think it'd be better to spend the > >> > effort on making gnome software support fonts even better and to improve > >> > the appdata files for fonts to make them "shine" in gnome-software. > >> > This would be > >> > > >> > a) less effort (a few minutes to create an appdata file when initially > >> > packaging the font, very little ongoing effort, metadata is automatically > >> > updated on package updates), > >> > > >> > b) actually more useful for users (you get a live list, click "install" > >> > on the font you like, instead of going from a wiki page to the command > >> > line). > >> > >> There are still some dinosaurs who don't use GNOME. > >> > >> Maybe some mechanisms that aren't dependent on that would be good? > > > > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into > > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. That doesn't even seem > > like that much work, to write such a script and have it run once a > > week and update the html for all updated packages and push it out to > > a server somewhere. > > > > It'd be nice to integrate this into our package/software search > system[1]. That way the information returned is richer and more > useful... > > Also, I wonder why packages.fedoraproject.org doesn't already point to > this...? Yeah, that'd be absolutely great. It seems that this would require two steps: first a service which exports the appdata information on the web somewhere in standarized format, and then code in fedora-packages to display that information. (The reason why fedora-packages cannot do this directly is that appdata information can only be reliably extracted from the final rpm, and that's a slow operation). I cc'd recent fedora-packages contributors, maybe they can provide more info. Zbyszek > [1]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20171123.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 90/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 174001 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174001 ID: 174002 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174002 ID: 174004 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174004 ID: 174005 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174005 ID: 174011 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174011 ID: 174016 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174016 ID: 174018 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174018 ID: 174023 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174023 ID: 174024 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174024 ID: 174025 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174025 ID: 174026 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174026 ID: 174027 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174027 ID: 174029 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174029 ID: 174038 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174038 ID: 174039 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174039 ID: 174040 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174040 ID: 174041 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174041 ID: 174042 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174042 ID: 174043 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174043 ID: 174044 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174044 ID: 174046 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174046 ID: 174055 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174055 ID: 174057 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174057 ID: 174058 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174058 ID: 174060 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174060 ID: 174061 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174061 ID: 174062 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174062 ID: 174063 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174063 ID: 174064 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174064 ID: 174065 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174065 ID: 174066 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174066 ID: 174067 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174067 ID: 174068 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174068 ID: 174069 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174069 ID: 174070 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174070 ID: 174073 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174073 ID: 174074 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174074 ID: 174075 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174075 ID: 174076 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174076 ID: 174077 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174077 ID: 174078 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedor
Missing libwebm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, is there any reason we don't have libwebm[0] packaged? I'm packaging libopenglrecorder[1] which appears to bundle some parts of it. [0]https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libwebm [1]https://github.com/Benau/libopenglrecorder - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAloX55EACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0w46Q//W9BTdLKPs0S1GcWdGQLIimV/gqszs/rTWynFn/Y3FO7PZSCGYgadiwcX ICwn5zJdhcIZxemHiqMPE5PSQgBGbHTo4b6fp1bN6PGHwDceVnVIFkZCvD1UBjcA px5p/z+LxGQdvG3k3+UigwOWCikQ4fz6qAWjBl8GgiQV7u77dnuDPuI+kNoR4tPO /N/5PoDbbf6y3C2Ck2biJRt0Qny5XpKev64DHmylRkIJsWepf2Svx5uq4nlR/sqU GPBaw3KL8TzffsqdlGKuzpW3N9obxIvCsz89b05CpDPuqXLj28I2ezXIuhL721GK mz/mgaY/ExsBdTsNRq5f/RXTYbst8dHqPt1ad+Gs4Qvc2crDHUwCleo9BqH5qGN4 ZmYI966vJb6Q3vNZRDV0QxfxZdEzzcltsK0OXwXtpfn8J9LphdUnpCfft18S6EOe hkQFChaR4lbjfuNzfgnwOToOiqMzeNzZOn5GwRF4Da4yW2euU74O0HBgWGYLDRyV JMj5u/gb45Kfw7ssJ+h2vvBt2r1C/D3bnauHfLRuUQiV/Khx+C1UPqpLomubKXe7 CkX6+MhiDDHga/OJ92WpAFHqVf2+BpvqJCWJOfoga9tcRtqPiVLd9jzGv9YG5OWx nR2+SHVbskXifFMTwmrodyLGIBTtPULNnV6FVJWVblkU3GIdMpI= =uQL9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing font information at wiki
Hi, fedora-packages is already using the appdata to get the icons of the applications. The indexing of the search database is fetching an xml file [1] that contains the appdata but I am not sure how this file is actually produced. [1] : http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f27/fedora-27.xml.gz Clement ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing font information at wiki
> > > > > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into > > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. That doesn't even seem > > like that much work, to write such a script and have it run once a > > week and update the html for all updated packages and push it out to > > a server somewhere. > > > > It'd be nice to integrate this into our package/software search > system[1]. That way the information returned is richer and more > useful... > About 3 years ago, adding appstream data to fonts was done: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4MSSMGS2CWKDCIU2DZRPYUAXAZAWPEOU/ Does it not help showing the details in various software centres? -- Rajeesh ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing libwebm
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > is there any reason we don't have libwebm[0] packaged? I'm packaging > libopenglrecorder[1] which appears to bundle some parts of it. > > [0]https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libwebm > [1]https://github.com/Benau/libopenglrecorder If you're willing to package it I'll do the review. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing font information at wiki
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:36:44PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into > > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f27/status.html is > generated by appstream-glib -- I think fonts are explicitly filtered > out but it wouldn't be much work to take that and generate it for > fonts instead of apps... Thanks, I thought something like that existed, but I couldn't find it. Are the sources for the generator of that page available somewhere? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes
___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171124.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20171124.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: pungi - 20171117.n.0: pungi-4.1.20-1.fc28.src, 20171124.n.0: pungi-4.1.20-3.fc28.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/28 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Rawhide_20171124.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora-Modular 27 Branched 20171123.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-Modular 27 Branched 20171123.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/27modular You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_Modular_27_Branched_20171123.n.1_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_Modular_27_Branched_20171123.n.1_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_Modular_27_Branched_20171123.n.1_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_Modular_27_Branched_20171123.n.1_Server Thank you for testing! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20171124.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 26/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171121.n.0): ID: 174192 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174192 ID: 174194 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174194 ID: 174229 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174229 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171121.n.0): ID: 174201 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174201 ID: 174202 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174202 ID: 174204 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174204 ID: 174213 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174213 ID: 174216 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174216 ID: 174230 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174230 ID: 174262 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174262 ID: 174268 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174268 ID: 174270 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174270 ID: 174276 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174276 ID: 174277 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174277 ID: 174278 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174278 ID: 174279 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174279 ID: 174281 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174281 ID: 174282 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174282 ID: 174283 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174283 ID: 174289 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174289 ID: 174292 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174292 ID: 174293 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174293 ID: 174294 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174294 ID: 174298 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174298 ID: 174299 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174299 ID: 174300 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174300 ID: 174304 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174304 Passed openQA tests: 89/128 (x86_64) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20171121.n.0): ID: 174176 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174176 ID: 174177 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174177 ID: 174179 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174179 ID: 174180 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174180 ID: 174181 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174181 ID: 174182 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174182 ID: 174183 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_firewall_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174183 ID: 174184 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174184 ID: 174185 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174185 ID: 174186 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174186 ID: 174187 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174187 ID: 174188 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/174188 ID: 174189 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_system_
