F21 Self Contained Change: CUPS Journal Logging
= Proposed Self Contained Change: CUPS Journal Logging = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CupsJournalLogging Change owner(s): Tim Waugh By default, CUPS will send log output to the system journal rather than /var/log/cups/error_log. == Detailed Description == CUPS has traditionally sent log output to the /var/log/cups/error_log file. In Fedora 20, CUPS was enhanced to be able to send log output to the system journal, including useful information such as the corresponding job ID. I've written more about this [1] elsewhere. == Scope == The work involved is a simple one-line change in /etc/cups/cups-files.conf to change the ErrorLog line to read "ErrorLog journal", and potentially a note in /var/log/cups/error_log (in log format) describing a journalctl command to retrieve the CUPS logs. Proposal owners: The change noted above is all that is required. [1] http://cyberelk.net/tim/2013/10/25/cups-adding-support-for-system-journal/ ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Kazim Sarikaya
On 03/12/2014 02:00 PM, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 21:00 +0200, Kazım SARIKAYA wrote: >Hi I am Kazim, Hi I'm Igor, Thanks to meet you Igor. >I am research asistant at computer engineering department. I especially >work on it security. Also I work on my cs deparment's it center. We have >several physical and virtual servers which works with CentOS and user >computers which works with fedora. > >Some times I need simple codes for managing my servers and lab >computers. Sometimes I can find what I need. However I need to write my >codes frequently. Some of them may be important. > >I manage my git repo athttps://git.sanaldiyar.com a rpm repo >http://repo.sanaldiyar.com and srcrpm repo at >http://srcrepo.sanaldiyar.com my rpms at repos are not mine. If there is >a source tar ball and no rpm package I add it to my repo. > >For java I havehttp://maven2.sanaldiyar.com maven2 repository. > >If my projects are opensource I mirror them at >https://github.com/kazimsarikaya > >It is my small introduction. I apoligize if I annoy you. You're welcome;) >I want to add my pam_ldap2krb project to fedora distro. Also for my >future packages I want to add them into Fedora. That's cool! >Hence I also need a sponsor. We have many good sponsors:) Take a look for wiki page[0] and feel free to ask any questions here. I am stepping through the wiki. Now I am at the request review step. Here my bugzilla link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075218 From the wiki, finding a sponsor is a manual process. Hence I need to contact people. However I do not understand that. Do I ask a lot of people that "be my sponsor?". Hence I find it very annoying. >Thanks for all. >Kazim. [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- -Igor Gnatenko -- -Kazim. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-11)
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 09:53:28AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > or run: > date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC' *cough* O, in useful form, date -d '2014-03-12 18:00 UTC' -- Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project-- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Kazim Sarikaya
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 14:38 +0200, Kazım SARIKAYA wrote: > On 03/12/2014 02:00 PM, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 21:00 +0200, Kazım SARIKAYA wrote: > >> >Hi I am Kazim, > > Hi I'm Igor, > Thanks to meet you Igor. > >> >I am research asistant at computer engineering department. I especially > >> >work on it security. Also I work on my cs deparment's it center. We have > >> >several physical and virtual servers which works with CentOS and user > >> >computers which works with fedora. > >> > > >> >Some times I need simple codes for managing my servers and lab > >> >computers. Sometimes I can find what I need. However I need to write my > >> >codes frequently. Some of them may be important. > >> > > >> >I manage my git repo athttps://git.sanaldiyar.com a rpm repo > >> >http://repo.sanaldiyar.com and srcrpm repo at > >> >http://srcrepo.sanaldiyar.com my rpms at repos are not mine. If there is > >> >a source tar ball and no rpm package I add it to my repo. > >> > > >> >For java I havehttp://maven2.sanaldiyar.com maven2 repository. > >> > > >> >If my projects are opensource I mirror them at > >> >https://github.com/kazimsarikaya > >> > > >> >It is my small introduction. I apoligize if I annoy you. > > You're welcome;) > >> >I want to add my pam_ldap2krb project to fedora distro. Also for my > >> >future packages I want to add them into Fedora. > > That's cool! > >> >Hence I also need a sponsor. > > We have many good sponsors:) > > Take a look for wiki page[0] and feel free to ask any questions here. > I am stepping through the wiki. Now I am at the request review step. > Here my bugzilla link: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075218 Did some notes.. > From the wiki, finding a sponsor is a manual process. Hence I need to > contact people. However I do not understand that. Do I ask a lot of > people that "be my sponsor?". Hence I find it very annoying. You can get list of sponsors here[0]. But my personal recommendation is Jon Ciesla (limb). Try to contact with one of sponsors by email :) > >> >Thanks for all. > >> >Kazim. > > [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > > -- -Igor Gnatenko > -- > -Kazim. [0]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager/*/sponsor -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Adrien Vergé
Salut ! You can join #fedora-fr and #fedora-devel-fr on freenode if you want to meet other French contributors :) Dridi On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Adrien Vergé wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm a French Fedora user and I'm trying to become a package maintainer for the > system I have been using for years! Usually I write C and Python for personal > stuff, I am also involved in projects (currently, tracing on Linux with > LTTng) and contributed to the Linux kernel. > > I would like to be a package maintainer for PhotoCollage [1], which I also > develop upstream. I submitted the package for review [2], can someone look > at it? :) > > Thanks! > > [1]: https://github.com/adrienverge/PhotoCollage > [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978 > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Kazim Sarikaya
Hi On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Kazım SARIKAYA < kazimsarik...@sanaldiyar.com> wrote: > I am stepping through the wiki. Now I am at the request review step. Here > my bugzilla link: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075218 > > From the wiki, finding a sponsor is a manual process. Hence I need to > contact people. However I do not understand that. Do I ask a lot of people > that "be my sponsor?". Hence I find it very annoying. > The process is explained in detail at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Hope that helps Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module
Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on updating python-rdflib to 4.1.1, but currently having trouble with a new dependency on python-html5lib. The problem is that running a mock build fails as a few tests claim they were unable to import html5lib; this is perfectly consistent with what I see when I run nosetests in a local rdflib source tree and python-html5lib has not been installed. When I then install python-html5lib and run nosetests locally, those tests pass. The puzzling part is that the mock log shows that python-html5lib _is_ getting installed, so the html5lib module should be available to the tests. Does anyone have an idea of why the installed html5lib module isn't being found in the mock environment? Thanks, Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-03-13 17:00 UTC) (one hour later for US)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2014-03-13 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. NOTE: US DST happened last weekend. Local time information (via. rktime): 2014-03-13 10:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2014-03-13 13:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2014-03-13 17:00 Thu UTC <- 2014-03-13 17:00 Thu Europe/London <- 2014-03-13 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris CET 2014-03-13 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CET 2014-03-13 22:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST --new day-- 2014-03-14 01:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT 2014-03-14 01:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT 2014-03-14 02:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST 2014-03-14 03:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 = Followups = (approval and retirement sections already passed, /opt exception passed) #topic #339 software collections in Fedora .fpc 339 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339 #topic #382 Go Packaging Guidelines Draft .fpc 382 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382 (just votes on latest clarifications?) #topic #385 workarounds for rpm symlink <-> directory issue .fpc 385 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/385 #topic #391 Exception for bundled libraries in icecat .fpc 391 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/391 (no response) #topic #396 Reserve static UID/GID for OpenStack ironic daemon .fpc 396 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/396 #topic #397 Please, choose an ID number for a new group called "input" .fpc 397 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/397 (remaining votes needed) #topic #398 Tilde in version .fpc 398 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/398 (remaining votes needed) #topic #399 request for bundled library exception - clustal omega .fpc 399 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/399 = New business = #topic #400 Exception for bundled library FoX in exciting .fpc 400 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/400 #topic #402 Promote /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d over /etc/rpm .fpc 402 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/402 #topic #403 Resolve conflict between libeio and eio (enlightenment library) .fpc 403 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/403 #topic #404 Update python packaging guidelines .fpc 404 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/404 #topic #405 Downstream versioning of shared libraries. .fpc 405 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/405 #topic #406 How to handle Doxygen documentation with new jQuery no-bundling rules? .fpc 406 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/406 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module
On 03/12/2014 10:42 AM, Dan Scott wrote: > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on > updating python-rdflib to 4.1.1, but currently having trouble with a > new dependency on python-html5lib. > > The problem is that running a mock build fails as a few tests claim > they were unable to import html5lib; this is perfectly consistent with > what I see when I run nosetests in a local rdflib source tree and > python-html5lib has not been installed. When I then install > python-html5lib and run nosetests locally, those tests pass. > > The puzzling part is that the mock log shows that python-html5lib _is_ > getting installed, so the html5lib module should be available to the > tests. > > Does anyone have an idea of why the installed html5lib module isn't > being found in the mock environment? It doesn't help that rdflib is hiding the actual ImportError, but here's what I found using mock manually: $ mock init [...] $ mock install python-html5lib [...] $ mock shell pydoc html5lib [...] problem in html5lib - : No module named six Looks like python-html5lib should require python-six. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module
On Mar 12, 2014 2:28 PM, "Josh Stone" wrote: > > On 03/12/2014 10:42 AM, Dan Scott wrote: > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on > > updating python-rdflib to 4.1.1, but currently having trouble with a > > new dependency on python-html5lib. > > > > The problem is that running a mock build fails as a few tests claim > > they were unable to import html5lib; this is perfectly consistent with > > what I see when I run nosetests in a local rdflib source tree and > > python-html5lib has not been installed. When I then install > > python-html5lib and run nosetests locally, those tests pass. > > > > The puzzling part is that the mock log shows that python-html5lib _is_ > > getting installed, so the html5lib module should be available to the > > tests. > > > > Does anyone have an idea of why the installed html5lib module isn't > > being found in the mock environment? > > It doesn't help that rdflib is hiding the actual ImportError, but here's > what I found using mock manually: > > $ mock init > [...] > $ mock install python-html5lib > [...] > $ mock shell pydoc html5lib > [...] > problem in html5lib - : No module named six > > Looks like python-html5lib should require python-six. Awesome, thanks for providing a good tip for debugging problems like this in the future! I had tried running a few simple html5lib code examples without triggering any exceptions, but obviously didn't hit the problematic code. I'll dig back into python-html5lib and hopefully resolve this soon. First epoch, now this :) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47740 - Fix coverity issues (part 3)
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47740 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47740/0001-Ticket-47640-Fix-coverity-issues-part-3.patch -- Mark Reynolds 389 Development Team Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
python packages versus pydoc -k
Do we have any packaging requirements or guidelines for python modules to behave nicely with pydoc? I've seen this break a number of times, and sometimes the bugs I've filed have been fixed, sometimes ignored. Before I go through another round, I'd like to know if we have (or should have) some official policy on this. AIUI, pydoc works by importing the named module, then displaying its docstrings. Then "pydoc -k" does this for all modules in sys.path, looking for the specified keyword. A problem then arises if something in the path does protect itself with 'if __name__ == "__main__":' to know when it's acting as a module or a script. (And if some module really doesn't want to support normal importing, it should not be installed in the path!) For instance, right now I get: > $ pydoc -k xyzzy > lib2to3.fixes.fix_repr - Fixer that transforms `xyzzy` into repr(xyzzy). > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/pydoc", line 5, in > pydoc.cli() > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/pydoc.py", line 2292, in cli > apropos(val) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/pydoc.py", line 1992, in apropos > ModuleScanner().run(callback, key, onerror=onerror) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/pydoc.py", line 1973, in run > module = loader.load_module(modname) > AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'load_module' It's hard to track that down, but with "strace -e open" it looks like somewhere in site-packages/rpm/. I couldn't figure out exactly which subpackage is triggering this. > $ pydoc3 -k xyzzy > lib2to3.fixes.fix_repr - Fixer that transforms `xyzzy` into repr(xyzzy). > Usage: pydoc3 [options] > A simple dialog based tool for basic configuration of Speech Dispatcher > and problem diagnostics. > > pydoc3: error: no such option: -k This one is somewhere in site-packages/speechd, but again I'm not sure which subpackage. Of course, these are just the first exceptions I hit. Experience shows that fixing these will likely find more behind them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Dan Scott wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2014 2:28 PM, "Josh Stone" wrote: >> >> On 03/12/2014 10:42 AM, Dan Scott wrote: >> > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on >> > updating python-rdflib to 4.1.1, but currently having trouble with a >> > new dependency on python-html5lib. >> It doesn't help that rdflib is hiding the actual ImportError, but here's >> what I found using mock manually: >> Looks like python-html5lib should require python-six. > I'll dig back into python-html5lib and hopefully resolve this soon. First > epoch, now this :) Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075783 accordingly. Thanks again! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2014-03-12)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-03-12) === Meeting started by mattdm at 18:00:36 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-03-12/fesco.2014-03-12-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (mattdm, 18:00:50) * Followups (mattdm, 18:04:58) * #1178 Fedora 21 scheduling strategy (mattdm, 18:05:01) * AGREED: accept provisional schedule with "no earlier than" labels; will make firm after change submission deadline. (+8,0,0) (mattdm, 18:12:50) * proposed schedule does cut things close with expected new upstream kernel release (mattdm, 18:13:45) * FESCo is fine with shipping at-the-time current kernel, which will be then updated as normal (mattdm, 18:15:08) * #1243 Consider release blocking status of KDE spin(?) for Fedora 21 in .next decision-making (mattdm, 18:16:06) * LINK: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2014-02-19-18.00.log.html#l-234 <-- see again (pjones, 18:36:11) * AGREED: defer 1-2 weeks for KDE Product Proposal. If we don't approve that in two weeks we can revisit whether to make the KDE spin release-blocking. (+7,0,0) (mattdm, 18:43:35) * #1230 Requesting FESCo address Cherokee logo issue (mattdm, 18:45:13) * #1240 taking ownership of packages fityk and sundials (mattdm, 18:46:02) * AGREED: Packages will be reassigned (+6,0,0) (mattdm, 18:49:56) * New Business (mattdm, 18:51:15) * #1252 mesa 10.0.3 updates exemption for F20 (mattdm, 18:51:17) * when filing an update exception request with fesco, please make sure you turn off autokarma (mattdm, 19:09:00) * ACTION: mattdm to update policy with autokarma note (mattdm, 19:14:19) * AGREED: libxatracker soname bumps are considered an exception from the updates or a a case where the policy is not applicable, given the unique situation (a library with a single intended user) as long as the user of that library is updated in sync. (+6,0,0) (mattdm, 19:16:52) * #1244 F21 System Wide Change: cron to systemd time units (mattdm, 19:17:09) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cron-to-systemd-time-units (mattdm, 19:17:10) * AGREED: cron to systemd time units change accepted (+7,0,1) (mattdm, 19:21:24) * #1245 F21 System Wide Change: System-wide crypto policy (mattdm, 19:22:42) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy (mattdm, 19:22:45) * notting is +1, but strongly suggests rewriting the proposed security levels to something that does not require a t8m/sgrubb translator for the common sysadmin (mattdm, 19:29:02) * AGREED: system-wide crypto policy change accepted (+6,0,1) (mattdm, 19:31:45) * #1246 F21 System Wide Change: Access control in PCSC (mattdm, 19:31:54) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PcscAccessControl (mattdm, 19:31:57) * AGREED: access control in pcsc system-wide change accepted (+6,0,1) (mattdm, 19:33:57) * #1247 F21 System Wide Change: Remove python-setuptools-devel (mattdm, 19:34:09) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Python-setuptools-devel (mattdm, 19:34:13) * AGREED: remove python-setuptools-devel system-wide change is accepted (+7,0,0) (mattdm, 19:35:12) * #1248 F21 System Wide Change: Ruby 2.1 (mattdm, 19:35:24) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.1 (mattdm, 19:35:28) * this requires a mini-mass rebuild for native ruby extensions so schedule needs to account for that. (mattdm, 19:36:45) * AGREED: ruby 2.1 system-wide change is accepted (+7,0,0) (mattdm, 19:37:42) * #1249 F21 System Wide Change: Lohit Odia Gurmukhi font naming (mattdm, 19:37:50) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes//Lohit_Odia_Gurmukhi (mattdm, 19:37:53) * AGREED: Lohit Odia Gurmukhi font naming system-wide change is accepted (+8,0,0) (mattdm, 19:40:36) * #1250 F21 Self Contained Changes for week 11 (mattdm, 19:40:51) * Allwiner sunxi ARM SoC support (mattdm, 19:40:55) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AllwinnerSunxiSupport (mattdm, 19:40:57) * OpenCL (mattdm, 19:40:59) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenCL (mattdm, 19:41:01) * AGREED: OpenCL self-contained change accepted. Deferring another week on Allwinner ARM for status update. (+5,-2,0) (mattdm, 19:51:57) * Next week's chair (mattdm, 19:52:45) * nirik to chair next week (mattdm, 19:54:19) * Open Floor (mattdm, 19:54:27) Meeting ended at 20:02:02 UTC. Action Items * mattdm to update policy with autokarma note Action Items, by person --- * mattdm * mattdm to update policy with autokarma note * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * mattdm (188) * nirik (80) * abadger1999 (59) * mitr (58) * pjones (5
Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.
Hi, I am looking for someone to walk me through the Anaconda source as I need to understand it and cannot find where its 'main' is and how it launches X Windows as I need to work out why the main installer is not working on my HP D140 G3's with MCA video controllers. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/anaconda.git/tree/?h=f20-branch Hope someone kind person has time to help me. Regards, Aaron -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: packages which require the kernel package
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:22:02PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > I think quemu-sanity-check may be the only one that actually really wants a > kernel. Possibly libguestfs too -- I didn't dig too deepy. I can confirm that both qemu-sanity-check and libguestfs really require a kernel, ie. they need and use /boot/vmlinuz-* and (in the libguestfs case) /lib/modules/* Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.
Okay think I have got a handle on it now, the main python file in the root does not have a .py extension. Very helpful ! Another interesting thing is there is no ARM support which I will be needing at some point. Aaron On 12 March 2014 20:07, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for someone to walk me through the Anaconda source as I need to > understand it and cannot find where its 'main' is and how it launches X > Windows as I need to work out why the main installer is not working on my HP > D140 G3's with MCA video controllers. > > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/anaconda.git/tree/?h=f20-branch > > Hope someone kind person has time to help me. > > Regards, > > Aaron > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1074721] CVE-2014-2277 perltidy: insecure temporary file creation [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074721 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perltidy-20130922-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perltidy-20130922-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2MYrQTRq0z&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Help understanding Anaconda source - walk through needed.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > Okay think I have got a handle on it now, the main python file in the > root does not have a .py extension. Very helpful ! > > Another interesting thing is there is no ARM support which I will be > needing at some point. > > Aaron > > On 12 March 2014 20:07, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am looking for someone to walk me through the Anaconda source as I need to >> understand it and cannot find where its 'main' is and how it launches X >> Windows as I need to work out why the main installer is not working on my HP >> D140 G3's with MCA video controllers. >> >> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/anaconda.git/tree/?h=f20-branch >> >> Hope someone kind person has time to help me. >> >> Regards, >> >> Aaron >> What kind of ARM support will you be looking to have? -Jon Disnard fas: parasense irc: masta -- -Jon -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: python packages versus pydoc -k
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:18:17PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > Do we have any packaging requirements or guidelines for python modules > to behave nicely with pydoc? I've seen this break a number of times, > and sometimes the bugs I've filed have been fixed, sometimes ignored. > Before I go through another round, I'd like to know if we have (or > should have) some official policy on this. > We don't currently have any official guidelines on this. I know that pydoc can be broken. Because of how it works I'm not certain that we can fix it and keep it fixed. > AIUI, pydoc works by importing the named module, then displaying its > docstrings. Then "pydoc -k" does this for all modules in sys.path, > looking for the specified keyword. A problem then arises if something > in the path does protect itself with 'if __name__ == "__main__":' to > know when it's acting as a module or a script. (And if some module > really doesn't want to support normal importing, it should not be > installed in the path!) > There's also packages that need a non-default version of a dependency in order to work. We've worked out ways to do this so that the module can be imported when we use them in an application but it will probably break with the way pydoc -k works. setuptools entrypoints can break unrelated code. It's probably another way that pydoc -k could be broken. [..] > > Of course, these are just the first exceptions I hit. Experience shows > that fixing these will likely find more behind them. > Yeah, I think there's a never ending treadmill here. pgprsxW9r6Dwn.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
