review for scratch package?
There's been a lot of interested in Scratch recently (probably prompted by the great new book "Super Scratch Programming Adventure"), and several of us have put together an updated package we'd like to get into Rawhide. Review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856238 The big caveat is that sound is broken in Squeak, and therefore Scratch, but I'd like to get this in to Rawhide so we can all work together on it there. (Squeak sound bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856016) -- Matthew Miller Senior Systems Architect -- SEAS Computing Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
guayadeque package review and bundled libraries
I am working on a package preview for guayadeque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553#c9 Brandon told me that i have to alk the devel list regarding 'bundled libraries' It seems that the guayadeque sources contains some bundled libraries, wxsqlite and wxcurl (wxMD5?). has the code submitted as a separate package ? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: guayadeque package review and bundled libraries
On 09/15/2012 08:00 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: I am working on a package preview for guayadeque https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553#c9 Brandon told me that i have to alk the devel list regarding 'bundled libraries' It seems that the guayadeque sources contains some bundled libraries, wxsqlite and wxcurl (wxMD5?). has the code submitted as a separate package ? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries The packaging list is more appropriate, packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bundled/embedded data in a package
Ben Rosser wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Nicolas Mailhot < > nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > >> >> Adobe CMAP is used by lots of font, ps and pdf related apps and IIRC >> packaging it is currently on the wishlist. >> >> You should unbundle it and create a separate package. >> >> I don't think CMAP has security implications, but projects that bundle >> old versions of the Adobe datafiles will behave in non-optimal ways when >> they hit a font/text combination that requires a mapping Adobe introduced >> in a later version. >> > > That sounds like a good idea. > > How should it work though? I can grab all the .tar.z files from > http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cmap/home/Home/, extract them, and throw them > somewhere into /usr/share (/usr/share/cmap/)... then packages can grab > up-to-date copies of the cmap resources from there? that content should (loosely at least) match the content within the poppler- data package. -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: guayadeque package review and bundled libraries
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Martin Gansser wrote: > I am working on a package preview for guayadeque > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553#c9 > > Brandon told me that i have to alk the devel list regarding 'bundled > libraries' > It seems that the guayadeque sources contains some bundled libraries, > wxsqlite and wxcurl (wxMD5?). > has the code submitted as a separate package ? > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > The question isn't whether the code has already been submitted as a separate package but whether it should be. Unless there's some reason that the libraries cannot be shipped separately, they should be unbundled. If you do decide there's reasons that the libraries cannot be shipped separately, you need to ask for an exception with your reasoning for the FPC to examine. Ides for that are on the page that you pointed to. Specifically, in this section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Standard_questions -Toshio pgp5AUPtoSsoq.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Announcing OLPC OS 12.1.0 for XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:12:22 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 12.1.0 for XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75. Details of new features, known issues, and how to download/install/upgrade can all be found in the release notes: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0 I tried out 12.1.0 on my new XO 1.75 (thanks Fedora!). I have run across a bug with playing Wesnoth in full screen. The screen turned mostly grey. Where would I file a bug for this? How likely are the 13.*.* builds to work? Do the published builds get smoke testing before they are made available for downloading? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: guayadeque package review and bundled libraries
Martin Gansser píše v So 15. 09. 2012 v 20:00 +0200: > I am working on a package preview for guayadeque > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553#c9 > > Brandon told me that i have to alk the devel list regarding 'bundled > libraries' > It seems that the guayadeque sources contains some bundled libraries, > wxsqlite and wxcurl (wxMD5?). > has the code submitted as a separate package ? you can find rpms for wxsqlite and wxcurl at http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/letter_w.group.html The problem with wxsqlite is that it doesn't maintain any API/ABI compatibility across releases. Seems I haven't updated or rebuilt wxcurl for a long time ... Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
