Re: gnome-applet-netspeed

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 09.02.2010 01:30, Michael Schwendt pisze:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:39:07 +0100, Julian wrote:
> 
>> I orphaned gnome-applet-netspeed a few days ago due to bugs being
>> reported and dead upstream. I did not have the skills necessary to fix
>> this myself. The initial plan was to retire the package, but since Erik
>> van Pienbroek said he'll have a look, I decided to orphan the package
>> instead.
>> All in all, the person picking this up should probably assume the role
>> of the upstream maintainer as well. If no one steps up, I think this
>> package should get retired properly.
> 
> I've had a brief look at the open tickets, squashed one duplicate.
> 
> At least two show symptoms of memory corruption. They crashed in
> g_object_unref with a saved icon reference that isn't modified by the
> applet (because it must not be modified except for unref'ing it).
> 
> One crash is deep in Pango layout, with no call trace from within the
> netspeed applet. With memory corruption somewhere, that backtrace
> doesn't tell much else. Unless one is intimately familiar with Pango
> and can rule out a problem in Pango. The netspeed applet only calls
> a very few layout functions. Noticably, the reporter also had Firefox
> crash at the same time (!).
> 
> A third crash is deep in gtkiconcache code with no obvious error in the
> related netspeed applet code. Could also be a side-effect of memory
> corruption.
> 
> Btw, at least one reporter had the applet display wireless network speed
> and signal quality.

I just realised that upstream rolled out a new release, 0.16. Several
bugs seems to have been fixed, so maybe it's worth bringing the package
back from the dead?

Julian

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gnome-applet-netspeed

[Michael Schwendt]

On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:26:10 +0200, Julian wrote:

> I just realised that upstream rolled out a new release, 0.16. Several
> bugs seems to have been fixed, so maybe it's worth bringing the package
> back from the dead?

About that, I notified the current pkg owner on Saturday. :-)
Also have added a comment in bz and updated the patch status in F-12 cvs.
If you'd like to join as a (co-)maintainer again, feel free to do so.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: New gnome-color-manager release in rawhide

[Bastien Nocera]

On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 15:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 5 June 2010 14:43, Frank Murphy  wrote:
> > This mailing list?
> 
> Sorry, I should have been more clear:
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-color-manager-list
> 
> > I can give a link, "valgrind gnome-color-manager"
> > as abrt didn't kick in. Can also do a gdb
> > with any specified switches.
> 
> That looks like a GSettings / dconf bug.

That's probably the crasher I got last week in gnome-bluetooth. If the
dconf DB is empty, then you'd get a crasher. The fix is unfortunately
not easily backportable, so I didn't pull the fix into dconf in rawhide.

Will have to wait for the next release.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620376

>  I would appreciate it if you
> could try rebuilding the rpms here for glib2 and dconf (if they are
> newer than what you have in rawhide):
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/13/SRPMS/

Cheers

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20100607 changes

[Rawhide Report]

Compose started at Mon Jun  7 08:15:21 UTC 2010

Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
cpanspec-1.78-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
deskbar-applet-2.30.0-1.1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
esperanza-0.4.0-6.fc13.i686 requires libxmmsclient++.so.3
esperanza-0.4.0-6.fc13.i686 requires libxmmsclient.so.5
gbrainy-1.1-6.fc13.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
gbrainy-1.1-6.fc13.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0
gbrainy-1.1-6.fc13.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0
giggle-0.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
gkrellxmms2-0.7.0-6.20090811git.fc13.i686 requires libxmmsclient.so.5
gnome-do-0.8.3.1-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 
0:0.4.0.0
gnome-do-0.8.3.1-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
gnome-launch-box-0.4-17.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
gnome-phone-manager-0.65-5.fc12.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
gnome-phone-manager-telepathy-0.65-5.fc12.i686 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.11
gnome-python2-evolution-2.30.0-5.fc14.i686 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.12
gxmms2-0.7.0-6.20090811git.fc13.i686 requires libxmmsclient.so.5
kobby-1.0-0.3.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinfinity-0.3.so.0
kobby-1.0-0.3.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinftext-0.3.so.0
kphotoalbum-4.1.1-5.fc13.i686 requires libexiv2.so.6
libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinfinity-0.3.so.0
libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b4.fc13.i686 requires libinftext-0.3.so.0
merkaartor-0.15.3-1.fc13.i686 requires libexiv2.so.6
perl-Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0-6.fc13.noarch requires 
perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)

plexus-containers-component-annotations-javadoc-1.0-0.1.a34.7.fc12.noarch 
requires jakarta-commons-logging-javadoc
qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.i686 requires libgps.so.18
rubygem-right_aws-1.10.0-3.fc14.noarch requires 
rubygem(right-http_connection) >= 0:1.2.4
sblim-gather-provider-2.2.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libOSBase_MetricUtil.so
syncevolution-1.0beta3-2.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
tasks-0.16-3.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.3-6.fc14.i686 requires mono(qt-dotnet) = 
0:4.5.0.0
themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.3-6.fc14.i686 requires libqyotoshared.so.1
tomboy-1.2.1-1.fc14.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0
tomboy-1.2.1-1.fc14.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
tomboy-1.2.1-1.fc14.i686 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0
tracker-evolution-plugin-0.8.5-1.fc14.i686 requires 
libcamel-provider-1.2.so.15
tracker-evolution-plugin-0.8.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libcamel-1.2.so.15
tracker-evolution-plugin-0.8.5-1.fc14.i686 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.12
vfrnav-0.4-1.fc13.i686 requires libgps.so.18
vifir-0.4-2.fc14.i686 requires libgps.so.18
viking-0.9.91-3.fc13.i686 requires libgps.so.18



Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit)
cpanspec-1.78-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(IO::Uncompress::Bunzip2)
dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
deskbar-applet-2.30.0-1.1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
esperanza-0.4.0-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libxmmsclient++.so.3()(64bit)
esperanza-0.4.0-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libxmmsclient.so.5()(64bit)
gbrainy-1.1-6.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
gbrainy-1.1-6.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0
gbrainy-1.1-6.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0
giggle-0.5-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12
giggle-0.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
gkrellxmms2-0.7.0-6.20090811git.fc13.x86_64 requires 
libxmmsclient.so.5()(64bit)
gnome-do-0.8.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 
0:0.4.0.0
gnome-do-0.8.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0
gnome-launch-box-0.4-17.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.12()(64bit)
gnome-phone-manager-0.65-5.fc12.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
gnome-phone-manager-telepathy-0.65-5.fc12.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
gnome-python2-evolution-2.30.0-5.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libedataserv

unrtf 0.21.1 switched from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hi

Just a heads up.  I am building the new version for Rawhide.

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Orphaning diveintopython

[Julian Aloofi]

I have taken over diveintopython a couple of weeks ago, expecting it to
be pretty easily-maintainable as the book changes very rarely.
Well, looks like I was wrong.
The build process has recently been patched to use xalan-j because saxon
dropped XSLT 1.0 support as far as I understand, and it involves quite a
bit of ant and XML magic.
I don't have much experience in these fields, so I thought I'd better
orphan the package right away before trying to mess with it too much.
It currently FTBFS in Rawhide.

So, I've released ownership of it in pkgdb, feel free to take it if you
think you can fix the build process.


Julian


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13 update not installable

[Bill Nottingham]

Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com) said: 
> The update conflicts with NetworkManager; there is a NetworkManager
> build for F13 from a few days after initscripts was build that, for
> some reason, was never pushed as an update:
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172856
> 
> Are these two updates supposed to go together? I downloaded all of
> them and rpm --test seems to suggest they would install just fine.

They're both in the final release, which is why it's not in updates.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: new upstream tracker (linuxtesting.org)

[Andrey Ponomarenko]

Hello,

On 06/04/2010 08:59 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>   
>> Taken into account, thanks. Some automatic way to add libraries may be
>> very useful. At the moment all the libraries can be only manually added
>> to the system by the administrator. If you want to add some library to
>> the system than send a request to me or
>> upstream-trac...@linuxtesting.org
>> 
>> 
> There are some false positives in your checks. In particular, some 
> (actually, most, if not all) of the "new" virtual functions you flag for 
> kdelibs are just added reimplementations of virtual functions in a base 
> class. Those don't change the layout of the vtable at all, they just replace 
> an entry pointing to the function inherited from the base class with an 
> entry pointing to the new reimplemented function.
>   

Thank you very much for this report. I've fixed a serious bug in the
checker's code relative to this issue.

> Another problem is that e.g. for GTK+, you have a linear sequence including 
> development versions, but ABI guarantees are never from one development 
> version to the next, but only from one stable version to the next. 
> Development versions are only required to be backwards-compatible with the 
> previous stable version, as is the next stable version. So the previous 
> version in linear sequence is not always the correct reference. (The same 
> holds for kdelibs, by the way, but there your table doesn't include 
> development versions, making this a non-issue.) A lot of the "breakage" 
> reported for GTK+ is actually APIs added in a development branch and 
> adjusted before the official release. This is perfectly within the scope of 
> GTK+'s API/ABI guarantees.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
>   


-- 
Andrey Ponomarenko

Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
 web:http://www.linuxtesting.org

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Can anyone contact torque/perl-PBS maintainer.

[Steve Traylen]

Dear member of Fesco,

I believe I have now followed the non-responsive maintainer process for
packages torque and perl-PBS.

Please can some one check this over and assign them over to me if
everything is in
order.

Many Thanks,

  Steve Traylen  (fedid = stevetraylen)

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Steve Traylen  wrote:
> Following the process
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Is someone able to get in touch with maintainer of torque and perl-PBS.
>
> Fedora id = garrick
>
> Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590487 details the
> previous attempts made over the last couple of weeks.
>
> Steve Traylen.
>
>
> --
> Steve Traylen
>



-- 
Steve Traylen
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora 12 was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora 11 was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Can anyone contact torque/perl-PBS maintainer.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:19:01 +0200
Steve Traylen  wrote:

> Dear member of Fesco,
> 
> I believe I have now followed the non-responsive maintainer process
> for packages torque and perl-PBS.
> 
> Please can some one check this over and assign them over to me if
> everything is in
> order.

Yep. Everything seems to be ok here. 
I have released ownership in pkgdb. Please take them. 

I'll note that garrick has 2 other packages: 

aalib 
perl-Curses

Perhaps some folks would also like to take those over since garrick is
away?

kevin
--
>   Steve Traylen  (fedid = stevetraylen)
> 
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Steve Traylen
>  wrote:
> > Following the process
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> >
> > Is someone able to get in touch with maintainer of torque and
> > perl-PBS.
> >
> > Fedora id = garrick
> >
> > Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590487 details the
> > previous attempts made over the last couple of weeks.
> >
> > Steve Traylen.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steve Traylen
> >
> 
> 
> 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora devel was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Can anyone contact torque/perl-PBS maintainer.

[Steve Traylen]

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:19:01 +0200
> Steve Traylen  wrote:
>
>> Dear member of Fesco,
>>
>> I believe I have now followed the non-responsive maintainer process
>> for packages torque and perl-PBS.
>>
>> Please can some one check this over and assign them over to me if
>> everything is in
>> order.
>
> Yep. Everything seems to be ok here.
> I have released ownership in pkgdb. Please take them.
>
> I'll note that garrick has 2 other packages:
>
> aalib
> perl-Curses

perl-Curses I'll take definitely as it's a dependency, just forgot when I doing
this email.

aalib I'm not interested in, nothing seems to require it.
Steve.
>
> Perhaps some folks would also like to take those over since garrick is
> away?
>
> kevin
> --
>>   Steve Traylen  (fedid = stevetraylen)
>>
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Steve Traylen
>>  wrote:
>> > Following the process
>> >
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>> >
>> > Is someone able to get in touch with maintainer of torque and
>> > perl-PBS.
>> >
>> > Fedora id = garrick
>> >
>> > Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590487 details the
>> > previous attempts made over the last couple of weeks.
>> >
>> > Steve Traylen.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve Traylen
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Steve Traylen
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora devel is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora 13 is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora 12 is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-PBS ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-PBS in Fedora 11 is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-PBS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora devel was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora 13 was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora 11 was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora 12 was orphaned by kevin

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora devel is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora 13 is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora 12 is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[pkgdb] perl-Curses ownership changed

[Fedora PackageDB]

Package perl-Curses in Fedora 11 is now owned by stevetraylen

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Curses
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

orphaning tpb

[Kevin Fenzi]

Greetings. 

I have been meaning to orphan tpb for a long time, but today I am
finally going to do so. ;) 

It has 2 open bugs. 

It should really not be used much if any anymore as many DE's provide
it's functionality. 

There has not been an upstream release in about 5 years. 

I no longer have a thinkpad. ;) 

Interested parties feel free to take it...

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: orphaning tpb

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 12:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings. 
> 
> I have been meaning to orphan tpb for a long time, but today I am
> finally going to do so. ;) 
> 
> It has 2 open bugs. 
> 
> It should really not be used much if any anymore as many DE's provide
> it's functionality. 

Depends on your hardware. The volume 'buttons' on a Thinkpad X40 I had
recently don't work unless tpb is used; they don't pass standard
keysyms.

> There has not been an upstream release in about 5 years. 
> 
> I no longer have a thinkpad. ;) 
> 
> Interested parties feel free to take it...

Unfortunately I no longer have access to said Thinkpad =) I suspect at
least someone else @redhat.com must be in a similar situation, though.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: orphaning tpb

[Seth Vidal]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:

>
> Depends on your hardware. The volume 'buttons' on a Thinkpad X40 I had
> recently don't work unless tpb is used; they don't pass standard
> keysyms.

And seeing as the last of the x40 series was made almost what? 4? 5yrs 
ago? I doubt we're going to see more of those.

-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: orphaning tpb

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 15:07 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> >
> > Depends on your hardware. The volume 'buttons' on a Thinkpad X40 I had
> > recently don't work unless tpb is used; they don't pass standard
> > keysyms.
> 
> And seeing as the last of the x40 series was made almost what? 4? 5yrs 
> ago? I doubt we're going to see more of those.

But all the hundreds of thousands of x40s that were made...still exist.
Most of them, someone somewhere is still using. 

I do sometimes worry about the 'hey, that hardware is more than six
months old, so we don't have to care about it!' attitude. I'm sorry I
can't help more to fix this particular issue, but I didn't have access
to the hardware for long and wasn't able to track down anyone who cared
and could tell me what information to gather. :/
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: orphaning tpb

[Seth Vidal]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:

>
> But all the hundreds of thousands of x40s that were made...still exist.
> Most of them, someone somewhere is still using.
>
> I do sometimes worry about the 'hey, that hardware is more than six
> months old, so we don't have to care about it!' attitude. I'm sorry I
> can't help more to fix this particular issue, but I didn't have access
> to the hardware for long and wasn't able to track down anyone who cared
> and could tell me what information to gather. :/

I had an x40 for quite a number of years - I had 2 of them in fact -  and 
the buttons worked - they controlled the volume - but they didn't do any 
on screen display for me.

-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Lightspark and Fedora?

[mike cloaked]

Has anyone been tinkering with Lightspark in Fedora
(http://www.osnews.com/story/2/Lightspark_Reaches_Beta_Status
and http://lightspark.sourceforge.net/ )

Seems interesting even if there is a way to go yet before it is really usable!

-- 
mike c
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Lightspark and Fedora?

[Peter Robinson]

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:25 PM, mike cloaked  wrote:
> Has anyone been tinkering with Lightspark in Fedora
> (http://www.osnews.com/story/2/Lightspark_Reaches_Beta_Status
> and http://lightspark.sourceforge.net/ )
>
> Seems interesting even if there is a way to go yet before it is really usable!

I've been playing with it locally. It requires ffmpeg so in its
current state would never make it into Fedora. I'm looking at
rpmfusion as a possibility. But it doesn't currently compile on
F-13/F-14.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-06-08 19:30UTC)

[Kevin Fenzi]

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.

= Followups = 

#topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351

#topic #385 Zim / zim package issues.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/385

#topic #382 Implementing Stable Release Vision
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/382

= New business =

#topic #387 compile list of supported CPUs and reacto to recent loss of support 
for Geode LX on F13
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/387

#topic #388 request for e2fsprogs-libs-static
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/388

#topic #391 F14Feature: MultipathInstall 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MultipathInstall

#topic #390 F14Feature: LZMA_for_Live_Images 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LZMA_for_Live_Images

#topic #392 F14Feature: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo

= Fedora Engineering Services tickets = 

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/report/6

= Open Floor = 

For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket.  The
report of the agenda items can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13 update not installable

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
 wrote:
> Here are the x86_64 package versions:
>
> $ rpm -q NetworkManager initscripts
> NetworkManager-0.8.0-0.4.git20100211.fc13.x86_64
> initscripts-9.11-1.fc13.x86_64
>
> and on the netbook:
>
> $ rpm -q NetworkManager initscripts
> NetworkManager-0.8.1-0.1.git20100510.fc13.i686
> initscripts-9.12-1.fc13.i686
>
> I tried updating with the updates repo disabled, but for some reason
> NM-0.8.1 is not picked up despite it being in the mirrors:
>
> $ sudo yum --disablerepo=updates update initscripts NetworkManager
> ...
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package initscripts.x86_64 0:9.12-1.fc13 set to be updated
> --> Processing Conflict: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13.x86_64 conflicts
> NetworkManager < 1:0.8.0-12.git20100504
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: initscripts conflicts with NetworkManager
>  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>
> Any idea what could be causing this? If I try updating just
> NetworkManager, I get "No Packages marked for Update"
>
So I downloaded the F-13 0.8.1-0.1.git20100510 packages, and tried a
'yum localupdate' -- and surprisingly get a "Nothing to do" response
from yum. Both the 0.8.0-0.4 from the prerelease and the final
0.8.1-0.1 have epoch set to 1, but for some reason yum thinks 0.8.0 >
0.8.1.

Getting more puzzling than ever. rpm -Uvh --test agrees with yum in
this case, that there is nothing to upgrade.

yum downgrade NetworkManager-0.8.1-0.1.git20100510.fc13 claims the
package does not exist, and rpm -Uvh --oldpackage does not do anything
either. *Very* odd.

-- 
Michel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13 update not installable

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com) said:
>> The update conflicts with NetworkManager; there is a NetworkManager
>> build for F13 from a few days after initscripts was build that, for
>> some reason, was never pushed as an update:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172856
>>
>> Are these two updates supposed to go together? I downloaded all of
>> them and rpm --test seems to suggest they would install just fine.
>
> They're both in the final release, which is why it's not in updates.
>
Interesting -- on my x86_64 system, which is upgraded to F-13 final
from a beta install, I have the update problem described, while on a
fresh F-13 i686 install on my netbook, there's no problem.

Here are the x86_64 package versions:

$ rpm -q NetworkManager initscripts
NetworkManager-0.8.0-0.4.git20100211.fc13.x86_64
initscripts-9.11-1.fc13.x86_64

and on the netbook:

$ rpm -q NetworkManager initscripts
NetworkManager-0.8.1-0.1.git20100510.fc13.i686
initscripts-9.12-1.fc13.i686

I tried updating with the updates repo disabled, but for some reason
NM-0.8.1 is not picked up despite it being in the mirrors:

$ sudo yum --disablerepo=updates update initscripts NetworkManager
...
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package initscripts.x86_64 0:9.12-1.fc13 set to be updated
--> Processing Conflict: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13.x86_64 conflicts
NetworkManager < 1:0.8.0-12.git20100504
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: initscripts conflicts with NetworkManager
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem

Any idea what could be causing this? If I try updating just
NetworkManager, I get "No Packages marked for Update"

Thanks,

-- 
Michel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

fuse needs an update

[Michael Cronenworth]

Due to bug 493565[1], fuse needs to be updated. This bug has been around 
for a very long time, and no one can seem to reach the fuse maintainer. 
I see this bug daily on one system and I'm tired of it. Can anyone help?


Thanks,
Michael

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493565
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fuse needs an update

[Jeff Spaleta]

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> Due to bug 493565[1], fuse needs to be updated. This bug has been around for
> a very long time, and no one can seem to reach the fuse maintainer. I see
> this bug daily on one system and I'm tired of it. Can anyone help?


Has the AWOL maintainer process been started?

-jef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning diveintopython

[Chris Jones]

Yeah I considered taking it over myself when it was first put up for offer.
But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it could be quite
hands-on considering the constant evolution of the python code. At least you
realized this early and was able to offer it up to someone who may be able
to take care of it better than yourself. Good move.

Regards



-- 
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240

Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations
Web: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
Email: 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fuse needs an update

[Eric Sandeen]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
>> Due to bug 493565[1], fuse needs to be updated. This bug has been around for
>> a very long time, and no one can seem to reach the fuse maintainer. I see
>> this bug daily on one system and I'm tired of it. Can anyone help?
> 
> 
> Has the AWOL maintainer process been started?
> 
> -jef

I nominate Josef to take his place or co-maintain if needed ;)

-Eric
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fuse needs an update

[Josef Bacik]

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jeff Spaleta  wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
>> Due to bug 493565[1], fuse needs to be updated. This bug has been around for
>> a very long time, and no one can seem to reach the fuse maintainer. I see
>> this bug daily on one system and I'm tired of it. Can anyone help?
>
>
> Has the AWOL maintainer process been started?
>

No, but if somebody does start it I can take over.  I maintain FUSE
for RHEL anyway so it's not any trouble to do it for Fedora.  Thanks,

Josef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13 update not installable

[James Antill]

On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 00:42 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
>  wrote:
> > Here are the x86_64 package versions:
> >
> > $ rpm -q NetworkManager initscripts
> > NetworkManager-0.8.0-0.4.git20100211.fc13.x86_64
> > initscripts-9.11-1.fc13.x86_64
> >
> > and on the netbook:
> >
> > $ rpm -q NetworkManager initscripts
> > NetworkManager-0.8.1-0.1.git20100510.fc13.i686
> > initscripts-9.12-1.fc13.i686
> >
> > I tried updating with the updates repo disabled, but for some reason
> > NM-0.8.1 is not picked up despite it being in the mirrors:
> >
> > $ sudo yum --disablerepo=updates update initscripts NetworkManager
> > ...
> > Setting up Update Process
> > Resolving Dependencies
> > --> Running transaction check
> > ---> Package initscripts.x86_64 0:9.12-1.fc13 set to be updated
> > --> Processing Conflict: initscripts-9.12-1.fc13.x86_64 conflicts
> > NetworkManager < 1:0.8.0-12.git20100504
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > Error: initscripts conflicts with NetworkManager
> >  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> >
> > Any idea what could be causing this? If I try updating just
> > NetworkManager, I get "No Packages marked for Update"
> >
> So I downloaded the F-13 0.8.1-0.1.git20100510 packages, and tried a
> 'yum localupdate' -- and surprisingly get a "Nothing to do" response
> from yum. Both the 0.8.0-0.4 from the prerelease and the final
> 0.8.1-0.1 have epoch set to 1, but for some reason yum thinks 0.8.0 >
> 0.8.1.

 What does: "yum list NetworkManager" say?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fuse needs an update

[Peter Lemenkov]

2010/6/8 Michael Cronenworth :
> Due to bug 493565[1], fuse needs to be updated. This bug has been around for
> a very long time, and no one can seem to reach the fuse maintainer. I see
> this bug daily on one system and I'm tired of it. Can anyone help?

I am the FUSE userspace utilities maintainer, but neither anybody
tried to reach me nor I was aware of this ticket (since it was opened
against gvfs, kernel and fuse-utils, but not fuse).


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: fuse needs an update

[Peter Lemenkov]

2010/6/8 Michael Cronenworth :
> Due to bug 493565[1], fuse needs to be updated. This bug has been around for
> a very long time, and no one can seem to reach the fuse maintainer. I see
> this bug daily on one system and I'm tired of it. Can anyone help?

Updated to 2.8.4


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] Bugzappers Meeting Agenda for 2010-06-08

[Adam Williamson]

Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting
Date: 2010-06-08
Time: 15:00 UTC
Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net

It's meeting time again, everybody! If anyone has an additional topic
they'd like to discuss, please reply to this email to flag it up.

= Agenda =

* follow ups
* triage metrics
* open floor

Please do come out for the meeting - it'd be great to see more faces,
and we don't bite, we promise! It's a great opportunity to raise any
issues you've come across while bugzapping, or ask any questions you
might have. See you there!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel