[apache/tvm] [RESULT][VOTE] Clarify Community Strategy Decision Process (Issue #15618)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
Thanks to everyone who voted. 

The results are

+1
Siyuan (binding)
Qiang
Sung
Chris
Cody (binding)
Josh (binding)
Yong
Wuwei (binding)
Junru (binding)
Prakalp
Lesheng
Farshid
Ruihang
Yaxing
Bohan
Zhi (binding)
Zhao
Ziheng (binding)
Anirudh 
Matthew
Zihao
xqdan
jiekechao
Xiyou Zhou
Henry Saputra (binding)
Lianmin Zheng(binding)

-0 Leandro (binding)
-1 None


Voting thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ywwsdfxqv0wvz3wz19w6nqgqx23kswql


The procedural vote gains majority support from the community and is passed. 



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/15618
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Clarify Community Strategy Decision Process (Issue #15521)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
thanks everyone who voted, link to the result thread 
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/15618

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/15521#issuecomment-1693491749
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Clarify Community Strategy Decision Process (PR #102)

2023-08-25 Thread Siyuan Feng
Merged #102 into main.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/102#event-10194018705
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Empowering New Scoped Module to the Project (PR #95)

2023-08-25 Thread Siyuan Feng
Closed #95.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95#event-10194035435
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Empowering New Scoped Module to the Project (PR #95)

2023-08-25 Thread Siyuan Feng
I withdraw this proposal in favor of the simpler and better process in #102

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/95#issuecomment-1693505583
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Clarify Community Strategy Decision Process (PR #102)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
Link to the voting result thread 

https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/15618

https://lists.apache.org/thread/bd0ph9j98r6sjm3wtp9174zgqqfhskt6



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/102#issuecomment-1693509875
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Establish TVM Unity Connection -- A Technical Strategy (PR #91)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
Thanks, everyone, for putting effort into making unity development happen. 

Today, we come to the one-year mark of the unity connection proposal. It is 
amazing to see how the landscape of AI/ML has changed and how some of the 
emerging needs fit into the strategy we bought one year ago. Because of the 
time delays. The strategy as it is no longer timely sense as it was one year 
ago. 

So we decided to withdraw the proposal

Standing at last year's point, it is obvious that if we took the default option 
of not pursuing or delaying the strategy, we would miss the opportunity to 
empower the community in the age of genAI. 

Luckily, we did not let that slip away and pushed the development of  [unity 
branch](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/establish-tvm-unity-branch/14244). 
Many of you may have seen the news lately on how they bear fruits in enabling 
real applications like bringing LLMs and other foundational models to various 
devices.

The good news is that we have clarified [strategy decision 
process](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/0102-clarify-strategy-decision-process.md)
 to empower strategic proposals. There are also new emerging opportunities in 
the age of genAI and foundational models, which [majority community 
support](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/discuss-tvm-community-strategy-for-foundational-models/15401).

Please follow the unity branch, continue participating in community 
discussions, and let us bring TVM to enable everyone. Thank you to many 
community members who supported the proposal and believed in what it can bring. 
Let us do our best pushing unity development. We will also collect inputs and 
come up with new versions of strategies that reflects the current inputs.




-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/91#issuecomment-1693532638
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Establish TVM Unity Connection -- A Technical Strategy (PR #91)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #91.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/91#event-10194226221
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Establish TVM Unity Connection Technical Strategy (Issue #12651)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
Closed #12651 as completed.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/12651#event-10194231607
You are receiving this because you commented.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Establish TVM Unity Connection Technical Strategy (Issue #12651)

2023-08-25 Thread Tianqi Chen
We decided to withdraw the proposal 
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/91#issuecomment-1693532638

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/12651#issuecomment-1693536158
You are receiving this because you commented.

Message ID: 

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Establish TVM Unity Connection -- A Technical Strategy (PR #91)

2023-08-25 Thread Junru Shao
Thanks everyone for the year-long discussion.

I'd love to note that, in respective, we would have already missed the boat of 
generative AI, and Apache TVM would have lost momentum of empowering the 
community on the up-to-date workloads they are interested in, if we decided to 
follow the default option not pursuing a real solution, and to stagnate with 
endless debates without concrete action taken.

I'm super glad to have a set of decisive PMC staff who care and a broad vibrant 
community who contribute and help. We work collaborative on Unity, this super 
valuable technical directions, and catch up and empower generative AI together!

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/91#issuecomment-1694009745
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: