Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

[Sidney Amani]

Hi,

Thanks for the patches, I wonder why does pertag patch is not included in the
mainstream, IMO using dwm without is not handy.

To fix the warning you are better changing the "lts" variable type:

-  Layout *lts[LENGTH(tags) + 1];
+  const Layout *lts[LENGTH(tags) + 1];

It works fine for me as well.

Regards
-- 
Sidney Amani

[dev] dwm with top and bottom bar

[Sidney Amani]

Hi list,

I would like to share my conf which is optimized for laptops or
single screen users.

As I like to keep my top bar with the window title and tag
descriptions, I couldn't display enough information in the
top-right corner.
So I just quickly patched dwm to add a empty bottom border
and I use conky to display information at the bottom.

My bottom bar is only 10 pix but anyway if you miss some
space you can use MODKEY+B to get the full screen available.

I let you take a look at the screenshot :
http://yfrog.com/b8screenshotconf1p

If you want to do the same just launch conky like this :
conky -d -y 2

This is the patch, you just have to define an "int marginbottom"
in your config.h with the size in pixel of the bottom margin.

diff -r bcce736c1de3 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Tue Jul 14 19:07:53 2009 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Mon Jul 20 22:43:09 2009 +0200
@@ -1674,6 +1674,9 @@
m->wh = m->mh;
if(m->showbar) {
m->wh -= bh;
+m->wh -= marginbottom;
+if(!m->topbar)
+  m->wy += marginbottom;
m->by = m->topbar ? m->wy : m->wy + m->wh;
m->wy = m->topbar ? m->wy + bh : m->wy;
}

Enjoy

-- 
Sidney Amani

Re: [dev] dwm pertag_5.7

[Sidney Amani]

I pushed it last night should work with the 5.7.2

I forgot to let ml users know sorry for that.

-- 
Sidney Amani

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and struct Monitor issues

[Sidney Amani]

2009/9/29 Tadeusz Sośnierz :
> And so I run out of ideas. Is there any
> other way than moving this struct to config.h?

I guess you can include gaplessgrid.h in dwm.c right after Monitor
structure declaration.

-- 
Sidney Amani

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and struct Monitor issues

[Sidney Amani]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Mate Nagy  wrote:
>> Would it make sense to add a
>>
>> void *aux;
>>
>> to Monitor, that patches don't need to screw around with dwm.c?
>  IMHO this would be really ugly and patches mucking up dwm.c would be
> preferable to this.
>

I agree, and it wouldn't work when mixing patches.

-- 
Sidney Amani