Re: [dev] OT: fonts in screenshot #2?
2009/8/10 John Stewart : > The fonts in screenshot #2 at http://dwm.suckless.org/screenshots/ look > terrific. Could whoever set up the system depicted there help us idiots out > here improve the appearance of our displays? Do you mean the firefox fonts or the terminal font? terminal font is terminus, the firefox font is from ubuntu. Kind regards, Anselm
Re: [dev] wmii next release
Uriel wrote: There have been plans to cut out a new release in the near future for some years now... So is it because wmii not being stable enough or it's more of organizational problem? I really believe that it would be a good idea to cut off another release so various distributions can put it into their's packaging systems and therefore make life easier for end users (like me). Michal -- "A lot of secrets are hard to remember once you've heard them."
Re: [dev] OT: fonts in screenshot #2?
Thanks Anselm. That was my suspicion. It seems that the ubuntu people have applied ClearType patches (to libcairo perhaps?) that, imo, drastically improve the appearance of fonts on LCDs. I'm using dwm on a customized Debian stable setup, and I cannot get GTK apps to look good, whatever I do. Seems like the solution is to start with a Ubuntu base. jds From: Anselm R Garbe To: dev mail list Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:40:02 AM Subject: Re: [dev] OT: fonts in screenshot #2? 2009/8/10 John Stewart : > The fonts in screenshot #2 at http://dwm.suckless.org/screenshots/ look > terrific. Could whoever set up the system depicted there help us idiots out > here improve the appearance of our displays? Do you mean the firefox fonts or the terminal font? terminal font is terminus, the firefox font is from ubuntu. Kind regards, Anselm
[dev] small dist
I'm playing around with some set-top box. The catch is: it only has around 30mb of flash. So in order to load up the prism54 wireless drivers I think I need an extremely small dist. I haven't even tried to trim down my normally used debian base system (which is rather extremely bloated for it's functionality), but am already building a custom small linux kernel at this moment. Eventually I'll be running 9vx on it, so I will be trying to hide as much of linux as I can. And I hope it will be possible to use 9base instead of busybox, but I'm just dreaming, and uneducated so far. Any recommendations for a small and simple system? (Keep in mind my fastest machine is over 8 years old, so don't make me compile everything myself please) Thanks
Re: [dev] OT: fonts in screenshot #2?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, John Stewart wrote: > Seems like the solution is to start with a Ubuntu base. http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=38534 -- # Kurt H Maier
Re: [dev] OT: fonts in screenshot #2?
Looks horrible here, it's a little like an lsd trip.
RE: [dev] small dist
You want build router? If yes, take a look at OpenWRT (http://openwrt.org). This is embedded distribution especially for routers with very nice web interface. Sorry about my english. Greetings. -Original Message- From: hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> Sent: 10 sierpnia 2009 16:15 To: dev mail list Subject: [dev] small dist I'm playing around with some set-top box. The catch is: it only has around 30mb of flash. So in order to load up the prism54 wireless drivers I think I need an extremely small dist. I haven't even tried to trim down my normally used debian base system (which is rather extremely bloated for it's functionality), but am already building a custom small linux kernel at this moment. Eventually I'll be running 9vx on it, so I will be trying to hide as much of linux as I can. And I hope it will be possible to use 9base instead of busybox, but I'm just dreaming, and uneducated so far. Any recommendations for a small and simple system? (Keep in mind my fastest machine is over 8 years old, so don't make me compile everything myself please) Thanks
[dev] [surf] seg fault when opening iGoogle page
Hi, I'm using surf since 2 weeks and i really like it simplicity and efficiency. I found a bug today : * open iGoogle page * add the official google calendar widget => surf seg fault So i try to open directly the Google Calendar web page and i have the same bug. Maybe the bug come from webkit? My surf version : [$]-(j...@archbox)-(~)-> surf -v surf-0.0, © 2009 surf engineers, see LICENSE for details I installed surf via the aur PKGBUILD : aur/surf-hg 40-5. My webkit version is : extra/libwebkit 1.1.10-2. Oh i forgot i run archlinux x86_64. -- Julien Pecqueur (JPEC) Site: http://julienpecqueur.com Email: j...@julienpecqueur.com PGP:B1AA2389 (GNUPG) IRC:jpec (irc.freenode.net) Powered by Archlinux - Keep it simple stupid ! pgpZWdiSlfEom.pgp Description: PGP signature
[dev] [last] lastfm interface
a few days ago i tried out last[1]. i found out that it uses factotum and i managed to give factotum my lastfm-id but the sourcecode and/or the lastfm API is to complex for me to know how to use last[1]. i know inside last[1] there is the help command, but how do i set a station with the station command? i tried a few things but nothing worked out for me. regards, y0shi [1] http://hg.suckless.org/last/
Re: [dev] [surf] seg fault when opening iGoogle page
Le lundi 10 août 2009 à 09:30:28, Julien Pecqueur (JPEC) a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm using surf since 2 weeks and i really like it simplicity and > efficiency. I found a bug today : > * open iGoogle page > * add the official google calendar widget > => surf seg fault > > So i try to open directly the Google Calendar web page and i have the > same bug. > > Maybe the bug come from webkit? > > My surf version : > > [$]-(j...@archbox)-(~)-> surf -v > surf-0.0, © 2009 surf engineers, see LICENSE for details > > I installed surf via the aur PKGBUILD : aur/surf-hg 40-5. > > My webkit version is : extra/libwebkit 1.1.10-2. > > > Oh i forgot i run archlinux x86_64. Definitly the bug is inside libwebkit 1.1.10-2. I installed midori (a browser which use libwebkit too) and he closes when i open the igoogle page. I'll try to install a SVN version of libwebkit... -- Julien Pecqueur (JPEC) Site: http://julienpecqueur.com Email: j...@julienpecqueur.com PGP:B1AA2389 (GNUPG) IRC:jpec (irc.freenode.net) Powered by Archlinux - Keep it simple stupid ! pgpShDkmcEXeM.pgp Description: PGP signature
