Re: [I] 3.0 archetype does not exist (README Instructions) [incubator-stormcrawler]

[via GitHub]

jnioche commented on issue #1205:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1205#issuecomment-2089783517

   thanks @joshfischer1108 
   The instructions on the README will be correct once we publish our first 
release at Apache which hopefully will be soon.
   Using the old digitalpebble releases is problematic.
   What could be done though is to modify the README to add a comment about 
installing SC with `mvn clean install` then generate from the 3.0-SNAPSHOT 
archetype. Does that make sense?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@stormcrawler.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: Release?

[Richard Zowalla]

Ok so anything else?
We have release docs available ;-)
Anyone want to act as Release Manager for our first ASF release?

Think we are ready issue-wise.

Gruß
Richard 


Am 29. April 2024 16:48:42 MESZ schrieb Julien Nioche 
:
>Thanks Ayush
>
>I have fixed the license headers in
>https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/pull/1201
>
>Julien
>
>On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:18, Ayush Saxena  wrote:
>
>> Should be great.
>> Was looking around the code & see if there are any potential issues which
>> can block the vote.
>> Little bit curious around some files having "Licensed to DigitalPebble Ltd
>> under one or more" [1]
>>
>> Should we ditch such LICENSE headers, not sure if it is allowed or not, [2]
>> just mentions the standard License header
>>
>> There are some files here in this directory [3] referring to DigitalPebble,
>> if not required we can consider dropping before the release
>>
>> Some files tend to have different header as compared to one mentioned in
>> the official doc [4], it mentions reading the NOTICE file & stuff
>>
>> Just reading the incubator vote checklist [4], if everything is good as per
>> this doc, We should be good to go.
>>
>> Thanx Richard for initiating the discussion!!!
>>
>> -Ayush
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/blob/main/core/src/test/java/org/apache/stormcrawler/indexer/BasicIndexingTest.java
>> [2] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers#headers
>> [3]
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/tree/main/core/src/test/resources
>> [4]
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 19:16, Richard Zowalla  wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > what do we need to do to run our first ASF release?
>> > Personally, I would love to see [1] in 3.0.
>> >
>> > Don't think we have any other formal blockers?
>> >
>> > Gruß
>> > Richard
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/pull/1199
>> >
>>