[DISSCUSS] PIP-298: Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Hi, all This PR contributed to pip 298: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 This pip is to implement Read Committed and Read Uncommitted isolation levels for Pulsar transactions, allow consumers to configure isolation levels during the building process. For more details, please refer to pip-298.md I hope everyone can help review and discuss this pip and enter the discuss stage. Thanks Zhangheng Huang
Re: [VOTE] PIP-286: Make the TopicCompactionService to support find entry based on publishTime or index
+1 (binding) Thanks, Penghui On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:23 AM Cong Zhao wrote: > Hi, all > > Since there are no other concerns in the discussion, I'm delighted to > start the voting process for the PIP-286. > > Here is the link to the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20867 > > Thanks, > Cong Zhao >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-286: Make the TopicCompactionService to support find entry based on publishTime or index
+1 (binding) Best, Mattison On 18 Sep 2023 at 09:19 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:23 AM Cong Zhao wrote: > > > Hi, all > > > > Since there are no other concerns in the discussion, I'm delighted to > > start the voting process for the PIP-286. > > > > Here is the link to the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20867 > > > > Thanks, > > Cong Zhao > >
Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-300: Add custom dynamic configuration for plugins
HI, Zixuan Thanks for your discussion. It's a great feature. But I've got several questions I want to discuss here. 1. When you want to cherry-pick a PR, it should be cherry-picked for all branches after the target branch. Isn't it? 2. I've got a slight concern about cherry-picking. Do you have any issue or feature request in the community that can demonstrate this feature is required to cherry-pick? Best, Mattison On 12 Sep 2023 at 11:25 +0800, Zixuan Liu , wrote: > BTW, I think we can cherry-pick this feature to the Pulsar 2.10. As > far as I know, the Pulsar 2.10 is a stable/main version, because many > users are using it. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Zixuan Liu 于2023年9月5日周二 17:09写道： > > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > Discuss for PIP-300: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21127 > > > > Thanks, > > Zixuan
Re: [DISSCUSS] PIP-298: Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
My concern is that this pip allows consumers to change the processing rules for transactions in ways that a producer might find unexpected. I think if this proceeds then the scope needs to be expanded to producers/admins needing to proactively allow transactions to be consumed uncommitted. I am also interested in the use case that motivates this change. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 17, 2023, at 8:50 AM, hzh0425 wrote: > > Hi, all > > This PR contributed to pip 298: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 > > > > > This pip is to implement Read Committed and Read Uncommitted isolation levels > for Pulsar transactions, allow consumers to configure isolation levels during > the building process. > > For more details, please refer to pip-298.md > > > > > I hope everyone can help review and discuss this pip and enter the discuss > stage. > > Thanks > Zhangheng Huang
Re: [VOTE] PIP-286: Make the TopicCompactionService to support find entry based on publishTime or index
+1 (non-binding) BR, Zike Yang On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:35 AM mattison chao wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Mattison > On 18 Sep 2023 at 09:19 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Penghui > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:23 AM Cong Zhao wrote: > > > > > Hi, all > > > > > > Since there are no other concerns in the discussion, I'm delighted to > > > start the voting process for the PIP-286. > > > > > > Here is the link to the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20867 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Cong Zhao > > >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-286: Make the TopicCompactionService to support find entry based on publishTime or index
+1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:01 AM Zike Yang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:35 AM mattison chao > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Mattison > > On 18 Sep 2023 at 09:19 +0800, PengHui Li , wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Penghui > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:23 AM Cong Zhao > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, all > > > > > > > > Since there are no other concerns in the discussion, I'm delighted to > > > > start the voting process for the PIP-286. > > > > > > > > Here is the link to the PIP: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20867 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Cong Zhao > > > > >
[DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.1.1
Hi all, I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar 3.1.1. It's over one month since the release of 3.1.0 and there are 56 new commits in branch-3.1: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v3.1.0...branch-3.1 We need to cut a new release. Please let me know if you have any important fixes that need to be included in Pulsar 3.1.1. Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
