Re: [VOTE] Add 'inherited' and 'namespaces' Fields to GetApplicablePolicies API Response
+1 It looks good to me, thanks ! Regards JB On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 2:21 PM Honah J. wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I'd like to raise a vote for adding `inhertied` and `namespaces` fields to > GetApplicablePolicies' response. These fields give users more information > about whether the effective policy is inherited from its parent and the > namespaces where the effective policy is located. You can find more details > in the discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2lh1cqjcznc1qvtwy46bq18p6psz5bn > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Merge https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1277 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not merge because...
[DISCUSS] Add Polaris Observe API
Hi folks, I would like to discuss a proposal that I have in mind: the "observe" API. The purpose of this API is to return some metrics and gauges from Polaris, like: - what's number of entities (number of tables, views; etc) in a Polaris catalog - what's the number of times a entity as been accessed on a period - optionaly, access to "polished" metrics from table (extracted++ from the metadata) - optionaly, provide extra details (from Parquet metrics for instance) In terms of use cases, this API could be helpful: - to have a policy "activated" depending of this metrics (something like policy A is only valid if a catalog has more than X tables, or policy B is activated when a view has been accessed more than Y times in the last hour, etc). We can have TMS service "fined triggered" with these policies. - to be leverage by a FGAC mechanism (e.g. governance depending of these metrics) - to be easily displayed by a UI or CLI I already have a few ideas in mind that I would be happy to share in a design document. But before that, I would like to get your feedback about this proposal. Thanks ! Regards JB
Re: [DISCUSS] Preparing 0.10.0 release including binary distributions
Hi Quick update about the release prep: 1. LICENSE/NOTICE are now included in the distributions (I will do a pass just before the release to check the versions) 2. I opened another PR to include "clean" LICENSE/NOTICE in our distributed artifacts (on Maven): https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1292 NB: these PRs are "one shoot" effort before the first release including distributed binary artifacts. When the second PR will be merged, I will move forward and prepare the release from main. Regards JB On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone > > I opened the PR to fix LICENSE/NOTICE in our polaris server and admin > distributions: > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1258 > > I'm now verifying LICENSE/NOTICE in our distributed artifacts (on > Maven). I will open a PR today. > > When these two PRs will be merged, I will move forward on the release. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > We are working on the 1.0.0 release, with a lot of new features and fixes. > > > > One important change between 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 is the publication of the > > binary distributions, with all related requirements (LICENSE/NOTICE, > > etc). > > I'm working on the LICENSE/NOTICE and binary distributions publication. > > Considering the time we needed to complete the 0.9.0 release, I think > > it would be great to "anticipate" a little before 1.0.0. It would > > allow us to "accelerate" on the 1.0.0 release and beyond. > > > > I would like to propose the 0.10.0 release, as an "intermediate" > > release. I would like to prepare this release by the end of next week, > > creating the 0.10.x branch (based on the main branch) on Saturday, > > March 22 and cutting the 0.10.0 release on Monday, March 24. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB
Re: [VOTE] Add 'inherited' and 'namespaces' Fields to GetApplicablePolicies API Response
+1, thanks! On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:12 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1. Thanks Jonas for the change! > Yufei > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 6:45 PM Honah J. wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > Thanks for the feedback and discussion so far. Based on our PR discussion > > about naming, we’ve simplified “namespace-path” to “namespace” for > clarity. > > > > Please continue to vote. > > > > Thanks, > > Honah (Jonas) > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 8:22 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the update Honah! > > > > > > Upgrading my vote to +1 > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 7:54 PM Honah J. wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you for your comment. Based on our discussion, I renamed the > new > > > > "namespaces" field to "namespace-path". This change better reflects > > that > > > > the field identifies a single namespace and differentiates it from > the > > > > namespace parameter, which is a single string. > > > > > > > > Please continue to vote. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Honah(Jonas) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +0 the PR looks ok to me, but I made a non-critical comment in GH. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:23 PM Honah J. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to raise a vote for adding `inhertied` and `namespaces` > > > fields > > > > > to > > > > > > GetApplicablePolicies' response. These fields give users more > > > > information > > > > > > about whether the effective policy is inherited from its parent > and > > > the > > > > > > namespaces where the effective policy is located. You can find > more > > > > > details > > > > > > in the discussion thread: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2lh1cqjcznc1qvtwy46bq18p6psz5bn > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Merge https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1277 > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not merge because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Add 'inherited' and 'namespaces' Fields to GetApplicablePolicies API Response
Thanks everyone for discussing and voting! The vote is passed with Results: +1: 3 (binding), 0 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Best regards, Honah (Jonas) On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:59 PM Dennis Huo wrote: > +1, thanks! > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:12 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > > > +1. Thanks Jonas for the change! > > Yufei > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 6:45 PM Honah J. wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback and discussion so far. Based on our PR > discussion > > > about naming, we’ve simplified “namespace-path” to “namespace” for > > clarity. > > > > > > Please continue to vote. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Honah (Jonas) > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 8:22 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the update Honah! > > > > > > > > Upgrading my vote to +1 > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 7:54 PM Honah J. wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your comment. Based on our discussion, I renamed the > > new > > > > > "namespaces" field to "namespace-path". This change better reflects > > > that > > > > > the field identifies a single namespace and differentiates it from > > the > > > > > namespace parameter, which is a single string. > > > > > > > > > > Please continue to vote. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Honah(Jonas) > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:42 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > di...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +0 the PR looks ok to me, but I made a non-critical comment in > GH. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:23 PM Honah J. > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to raise a vote for adding `inhertied` and > `namespaces` > > > > fields > > > > > > to > > > > > > > GetApplicablePolicies' response. These fields give users more > > > > > information > > > > > > > about whether the effective policy is inherited from its parent > > and > > > > the > > > > > > > namespaces where the effective policy is located. You can find > > more > > > > > > details > > > > > > > in the discussion thread: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2lh1cqjcznc1qvtwy46bq18p6psz5bn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Merge https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1277 > > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not merge because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
