date:20201011

My initial guess is that you are right... will look a bit deeper

> On Oct 10, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hagar (and Pedro),
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
> Looks like:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315
> 
> has come up again, now on 4.1.x
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> Am 10.10.20 um 16:50 schrieb Hagar Delest:
>> Same for me with your files.
>> I tried with some of my own files, same issue (.ods and .odt). It
>> seems to apply to many of my files, maybe all of them.
>> When I try to save as, I get an Error saving the document... But seems
>> to save anyway. If I open that new file, I still get the general error
>> message but loads fine. Then it saves OK but still gives the error
>> message when loaded.
>> On my xubuntu 20.04 64bit system.
>> .odg and .odp open file.
>> 
>> Hagar
>> 
>> Le 10/10/2020 à 16:30, Matthias Seidel a écrit :
>>> One correction:
>>> 
>>> The spreadsheet shows "Not all attributes could be read" on opening.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>> Am 10.10.20 um 12:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
 Hi all,
 
 With AOO418-RC2 I get "General Error" messages when opening some files
 on Ubuntu 16.04 (64-bit).
 After dismissing the error message the files open correctly.
 
 One of them is digitally signed and the other is a simple spreadsheet.
 You can download them from here:
 
 https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vnvlqyw25hh9v85/AABCWjCaTpGIvB9H074hraB7a?dl=0
 
 
 Can anyone confirm?
 
 Regards,
 
 Matthias
 
 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

Hi Jim,

Since the issue was closed because it "suddenly" disappeared it could
have been a change in the build system?

Am 10.10.20 um 19:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> My initial guess is that you are right... will look a bit deeper
>
>> On Oct 10, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hagar (and Pedro),
>>
>> Thanks for testing!
>>
>> Looks like:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315
>>
>> has come up again, now on 4.1.x
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>Matthias
>>
>> Am 10.10.20 um 16:50 schrieb Hagar Delest:
>>> Same for me with your files.
>>> I tried with some of my own files, same issue (.ods and .odt). It
>>> seems to apply to many of my files, maybe all of them.
>>> When I try to save as, I get an Error saving the document... But seems
>>> to save anyway. If I open that new file, I still get the general error
>>> message but loads fine. Then it saves OK but still gives the error
>>> message when loaded.
>>> On my xubuntu 20.04 64bit system.
>>> .odg and .odp open file.
>>>
>>> Hagar
>>>
>>> Le 10/10/2020 à 16:30, Matthias Seidel a écrit :
 One correction:

 The spreadsheet shows "Not all attributes could be read" on opening.

 Regards,

 Matthias

 Am 10.10.20 um 12:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> With AOO418-RC2 I get "General Error" messages when opening some files
> on Ubuntu 16.04 (64-bit).
> After dismissing the error message the files open correctly.
>
> One of them is digitally signed and the other is a simple spreadsheet.
> You can download them from here:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vnvlqyw25hh9v85/AABCWjCaTpGIvB9H074hraB7a?dl=0
>
>
> Can anyone confirm?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

There's been no change in the AOO4.1.x build system for Linux.

> On Oct 11, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Since the issue was closed because it "suddenly" disappeared it could
> have been a change in the build system?
> 
> Am 10.10.20 um 19:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> My initial guess is that you are right... will look a bit deeper
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Hagar (and Pedro),
>>> 
>>> Thanks for testing!
>>> 
>>> Looks like:
>>> 
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315
>>> 
>>> has come up again, now on 4.1.x
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>>   Matthias
>>> 
>>> Am 10.10.20 um 16:50 schrieb Hagar Delest:
 Same for me with your files.
 I tried with some of my own files, same issue (.ods and .odt). It
 seems to apply to many of my files, maybe all of them.
 When I try to save as, I get an Error saving the document... But seems
 to save anyway. If I open that new file, I still get the general error
 message but loads fine. Then it saves OK but still gives the error
 message when loaded.
 On my xubuntu 20.04 64bit system.
 .odg and .odp open file.
 
 Hagar
 
 Le 10/10/2020 à 16:30, Matthias Seidel a écrit :
> One correction:
> 
> The spreadsheet shows "Not all attributes could be read" on opening.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
> Am 10.10.20 um 12:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> With AOO418-RC2 I get "General Error" messages when opening some files
>> on Ubuntu 16.04 (64-bit).
>> After dismissing the error message the files open correctly.
>> 
>> One of them is digitally signed and the other is a simple spreadsheet.
>> You can download them from here:
>> 
>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vnvlqyw25hh9v85/AABCWjCaTpGIvB9H074hraB7a?dl=0
>> 
>> 
>> Can anyone confirm?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
>> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Build error on 4.1.8 on Linux Ubuntu 16.xx


Hello all,


I get a build error on my Ubuntu Machine:

Multi Platform Enabled Edition
dmake:  Error: -- `FormWizard_1.png' not found, and can't be made

1 module(s):
    extras
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/extras/source/templates/wizard/bitmap


When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build 
by running:


    build --all:extras


The file exist in trunk but not in 4.1.8.

git status does not give me any hint of a left over from trunk. I also 
copied a 4.18 zip download from Github in my working directory, and git 
shows no diffs.


Has anyone encountered this issue? Jim?

Thanks



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Build error on 4.1.8 on Linux Ubuntu 16.xx

Okay, sorry for the fuzz. It is a user layer 8 issue. Forgot to issue a 
dmake clean from my last build.


Am 11.10.20 um 18:51 schrieb Peter Kovacs:

Hello all,


I get a build error on my Ubuntu Machine:

Multi Platform Enabled Edition
dmake:  Error: -- `FormWizard_1.png' not found, and can't be made

1 module(s):
    extras
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/extras/source/templates/wizard/bitmap


When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build 
by running:


    build --all:extras


The file exist in trunk but not in 4.1.8.

git status does not give me any hint of a left over from trunk. I also 
copied a 4.18 zip download from Github in my working directory, and 
git shows no diffs.


Has anyone encountered this issue? Jim?

Thanks



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

2020-10-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti

I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and
DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.

All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I
didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news
on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the
relevant thread.

But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the
build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.

1) Jim's EPM installed as per
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
didn't work for me. I got

Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory

Configuring with

...
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz

did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki
instructions

$ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
$ # (extract the archive)
$ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install

had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?

2) Something seems wrong here:

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78

We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version
control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in
"unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
error message.

To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build,
but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone
and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone
builds from it.

Regards,
Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Forums outage

2020-10-11 Thread Dave Fisher

Hi Bidouille,

How are the Forums now?

Regards,
Dave

> On Oct 10, 2020, at 1:20 AM, Bidouille  wrote:
> 
> Well, forums are back now but very slow
> 
> 
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Bidouille" 
>> À: "devteam openoffice" 
>> Envoyé: Samedi 10 Octobre 2020 10:17:37
>> Objet: Forums outage
>> 
>> Hello team,
>> 
>> Forums returns an error
>> SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
>> Too many connections [1040]
>> 
>> Somebody with karma can reinit MySQL deamon?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO418-RC2: General Error on opening files on Ubuntu

2020-10-11 Thread Andrea Pescetti

I get the same on a (64-bit of course) Ubuntu 20.04 system that, for the
record, had OpenOffice 4.1.7 installed.

If I install Jim's RC2 binary from

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/binaries/it/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_it.tar.gz

and then install it

$ sudo apt install ./*.deb

and I open an old ODT file with File - Open, I get "General error" even
though the file opens just fine after I dismiss the dialog.

If I install my build of the very same code from

https://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.8-rc2/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_it.tar.gz

and then install it

$ sudo apt install ./*.deb

everything just works as usual.

If anyone wants to try with an English build, you'll find it at
https://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.8-rc2/
and I can provide further languages on request, even though this doesn't
seem to depend on languages.

Probably something went wrong with the build environment? I built on a
fresh CentOS 7 system so I can share any details if helpful.

My builds have "Rev." set to "abcde12345" in the About dialog, so you
can identify which ones you are running based on this detail.

Regards,
Andrea.

Il 11/10/2020 15:29, Jim Jagielski ha scritto:

There's been no change in the AOO4.1.x build system for Linux.

On Oct 11, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi Jim,

Since the issue was closed because it "suddenly" disappeared it could
have been a change in the build system?

Am 10.10.20 um 19:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

My initial guess is that you are right... will look a bit deeper

On Oct 10, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Matthias Seidel
wrote:

Hi Hagar (and Pedro),

Thanks for testing!

Looks like:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315

has come up again, now on 4.1.x

Regards,

Matthias

Am 10.10.20 um 16:50 schrieb Hagar Delest:

Same for me with your files.
I tried with some of my own files, same issue (.ods and .odt). It
seems to apply to many of my files, maybe all of them.
When I try to save as, I get an Error saving the document... But seems
to save anyway. If I open that new file, I still get the general error
message but loads fine. Then it saves OK but still gives the error
message when loaded.
On my xubuntu 20.04 64bit system.
.odg and .odp open file.

Hagar

Le 10/10/2020 à 16:30, Matthias Seidel a écrit :

One correction:

The spreadsheet shows "Not all attributes could be read" on opening.

Regards,

Matthias

Am 10.10.20 um 12:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Hi all,

With AOO418-RC2 I get "General Error" messages when opening some files
on Ubuntu 16.04 (64-bit).
After dismissing the error message the files open correctly.

One of them is digitally signed and the other is a simple spreadsheet.
You can download them from here:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vnvlqyw25hh9v85/AABCWjCaTpGIvB9H074hraB7a?dl=0

Can anyone confirm?

Regards,

Matthias

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

error in instsetoo_native module

I have an error on my build. I have no idea what to do. It seems like 
the issue turns up at the packaging side.


All info are appreciated. Maybe it is something with my build environment.

For reference my config looks like:

./configure \
    --with-dmake-path=/home/legine/workspace/dmake/bin/bin/dmake \
 --with-epm=/home/legine/workspace/epm/bin/bin/epm \
    --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
    --with-jdk-home=${jdkhome} \
    --with-package-format="installed" \
    --with-vendor="Petko Testbuild"\
    --with-build-version="aoo4ever-$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname 
-sm`\n ${GitHash}" \

    --with-system-stdlibs \
    --enable-crashdump=yes \
    --enable-category-b \
    --enable-beanshell \
    --enable-wiki-publisher \
    --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
    --enable-opengl  \
    --enable-dbus  \
    --without-junit \
    --without-stlport \
    --disable-odk \
    --without-fonts \

my error output in the Log:

build -- version: 275224


=
Building module instsetoo_native
=

Entering 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi_languages



Entering 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/unix



Entering /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util

... checking environment variables ...


make_installer.pl, version 1.0
Product list file: ../util/openoffice.lst
Taking setup script from solver
Unpackpath: 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro

Compiler: unxlngx6
Product: Apache_OpenOffice
BuildID: 9802
Build: AOO418
No minor set
Product version
Using default installpath
Package format: installed
msi templatepath: 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro/misc/openoffice/msi_templates

msi template path will be ignored for non Windows builds!
msi languagepath: 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro/misc/win_ulffiles

msi language path will be ignored for non Windows builds!
Calling epm
Stripping files
Unzip ARCHIVE files
Languages: en-US

... checking required files ...
.. searching zip ...
    Found: /usr/bin/zip
... analyzing ../util/openoffice.lst ...
... reading include pathes ...
... analyzing script: 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/bin/setup_osl.ins 
...
... analyzing script: 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/bin/setup_osl.ins 
...

... analyzing directories ...
... analyzing files ...
... analyzing scpactions ...
... analyzing shortcuts ...
... analyzing unix links ...
... analyzing profile ...
... analyzing profileitems ...
... analyzing modules ...

... languages en-US ...
... analyzing files ...
preparing 1 extension blob for language en-US:
    dict-en.oxt
preparing 0 bundled extensions for language en-US:
ERROR: The following files could not be found:
ERROR: File not found: fc_local.conf
... cleaning the output tree ...
... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_190831602449324 ...
Error: ERROR: Missing files

**
ERROR: ERROR: Missing files
in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory
**
in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectorystopping log at Sun Oct 
11 22:48:45 2020

dmake:  Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.installed'

1 module(s):
    instsetoo_native
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util


When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build 
by running:


    build --all:instsetoo_native


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: error in instsetoo_native module

Hi Peter,

**
ERROR: ERROR: Missing files
in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory
**

That looks like the problem Don is having on FreeBSD.

What happens if you build without --without-fonts?

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 11.10.20 um 23:02 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> I have an error on my build. I have no idea what to do. It seems like
> the issue turns up at the packaging side.
>
> All info are appreciated. Maybe it is something with my build
> environment.
>
> For reference my config looks like:
>
> ./configure \
>     --with-dmake-path=/home/legine/workspace/dmake/bin/bin/dmake \
>  --with-epm=/home/legine/workspace/epm/bin/bin/epm \
>     --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
>     --with-jdk-home=${jdkhome} \
>     --with-package-format="installed" \
>     --with-vendor="Petko Testbuild"\
>     --with-build-version="aoo4ever-$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname
> -sm`\n ${GitHash}" \
>     --with-system-stdlibs \
>     --enable-crashdump=yes \
>     --enable-category-b \
>     --enable-beanshell \
>     --enable-wiki-publisher \
>     --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
>     --enable-opengl  \
>     --enable-dbus  \
>     --without-junit \
>     --without-stlport \
>     --disable-odk \
>     --without-fonts \
>
> my error output in the Log:
>
> build -- version: 275224
>
>
> =
> Building module instsetoo_native
> =
>
> Entering
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi_languages
>
>
> Entering
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/unix
>
>
> Entering /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util
>
> ... checking environment variables ...
>
> 
> make_installer.pl, version 1.0
> Product list file: ../util/openoffice.lst
> Taking setup script from solver
> Unpackpath:
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro
> Compiler: unxlngx6
> Product: Apache_OpenOffice
> BuildID: 9802
> Build: AOO418
> No minor set
> Product version
> Using default installpath
> Package format: installed
> msi templatepath:
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro/misc/openoffice/msi_templates
> msi template path will be ignored for non Windows builds!
> msi languagepath:
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro/misc/win_ulffiles
> msi language path will be ignored for non Windows builds!
> Calling epm
> Stripping files
> Unzip ARCHIVE files
> Languages: en-US
> 
> ... checking required files ...
> .. searching zip ...
>     Found: /usr/bin/zip
> ... analyzing ../util/openoffice.lst ...
> ... reading include pathes ...
> ... analyzing script:
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/bin/setup_osl.ins
> ...
> ... analyzing script:
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/bin/setup_osl.ins
> ...
> ... analyzing directories ...
> ... analyzing files ...
> ... analyzing scpactions ...
> ... analyzing shortcuts ...
> ... analyzing unix links ...
> ... analyzing profile ...
> ... analyzing profileitems ...
> ... analyzing modules ...
> 
> ... languages en-US ...
> ... analyzing files ...
> preparing 1 extension blob for language en-US:
>     dict-en.oxt
> preparing 0 bundled extensions for language en-US:
> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
> ERROR: File not found: fc_local.conf
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_190831602449324 ...
> Error: ERROR: Missing files
>
> **
> ERROR: ERROR: Missing files
> in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory
> **
> in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectorystopping log at Sun
> Oct 11 22:48:45 2020
> dmake:  Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.installed'
>
> 1 module(s):
>     instsetoo_native
> need(s) to be rebuilt
>
> Reason(s):
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util
>
> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
> by running:
>
>     build --all:instsetoo_native
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and 
> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
> 
> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news 
> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
> relevant thread.
> 
> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the 
> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
> 
> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
> didn't work for me. I got
> 
> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
> 
> Configuring with
> 
> ... 
> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
> 
> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
> instructions
> 
> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
> $ # (extract the archive)
> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
> 
> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?
> 
> 2) Something seems wrong here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
> 
> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an 
> error message.
> 
> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build, 
> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone 
> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone 
> builds from it.

I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
containing the git revision info.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: error in instsetoo_native module

On 11 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> **
> ERROR: ERROR: Missing files
> in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory
> **
> 
> That looks like the problem Don is having on FreeBSD.
> 
> What happens if you build without --without-fonts?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Matthias
> 
> 
> Am 11.10.20 um 23:02 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> I have an error on my build. I have no idea what to do. It seems like
>> the issue turns up at the packaging side.
>>
>> All info are appreciated. Maybe it is something with my build
>> environment.
>>
>> For reference my config looks like:
>>
>> ./configure \
>>     --with-dmake-path=/home/legine/workspace/dmake/bin/bin/dmake \
>>  --with-epm=/home/legine/workspace/epm/bin/bin/epm \
>>     --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
>>     --with-jdk-home=${jdkhome} \
>>     --with-package-format="installed" \
>>     --with-vendor="Petko Testbuild"\
>>     --with-build-version="aoo4ever-$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname
>> -sm`\n ${GitHash}" \
>>     --with-system-stdlibs \
>>     --enable-crashdump=yes \
>>     --enable-category-b \
>>     --enable-beanshell \
>>     --enable-wiki-publisher \
>>     --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
>>     --enable-opengl  \
>>     --enable-dbus  \
>>     --without-junit \
>>     --without-stlport \
>>     --disable-odk \
>>     --without-fonts \
>>
>> my error output in the Log:
>>
>> build -- version: 275224
>>
>>
>> =
>> Building module instsetoo_native
>> =
>>
>> Entering
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi_languages
>>
>>
>> Entering
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/unix
>>
>>
>> Entering /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util
>>
>> ... checking environment variables ...
>>
>> 
>> make_installer.pl, version 1.0
>> Product list file: ../util/openoffice.lst
>> Taking setup script from solver
>> Unpackpath:
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro
>> Compiler: unxlngx6
>> Product: Apache_OpenOffice
>> BuildID: 9802
>> Build: AOO418
>> No minor set
>> Product version
>> Using default installpath
>> Package format: installed
>> msi templatepath:
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro/misc/openoffice/msi_templates
>> msi template path will be ignored for non Windows builds!
>> msi languagepath:
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util/../unxlngx6.pro/misc/win_ulffiles
>> msi language path will be ignored for non Windows builds!
>> Calling epm
>> Stripping files
>> Unzip ARCHIVE files
>> Languages: en-US
>> 
>> ... checking required files ...
>> .. searching zip ...
>>     Found: /usr/bin/zip
>> ... analyzing ../util/openoffice.lst ...
>> ... reading include pathes ...
>> ... analyzing script:
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/bin/setup_osl.ins
>> ...
>> ... analyzing script:
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/bin/setup_osl.ins
>> ...
>> ... analyzing directories ...
>> ... analyzing files ...
>> ... analyzing scpactions ...
>> ... analyzing shortcuts ...
>> ... analyzing unix links ...
>> ... analyzing profile ...
>> ... analyzing profileitems ...
>> ... analyzing modules ...
>> 
>> ... languages en-US ...
>> ... analyzing files ...
>> preparing 1 extension blob for language en-US:
>>     dict-en.oxt
>> preparing 0 bundled extensions for language en-US:
>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>> ERROR: File not found: fc_local.conf
>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>> ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_190831602449324 ...
>> Error: ERROR: Missing files
>>
>> **
>> ERROR: ERROR: Missing files
>> in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory
>> **
>> in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectorystopping log at Sun
>> Oct 11 22:48:45 2020
>> dmake:  Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.installed'
>>
>> 1 module(s):
>>     instsetoo_native
>> need(s) to be rebuilt
>>
>> Reason(s):
>>
>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
>> /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/instsetoo_native/util
>>
>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
>> by running:
>>
>>     build --all:instsetoo_native

Yes sounds like the same problem.  I've got a patch and will put
together a pull request shortly.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a 
svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
It is a script called svnrevision I think. 

Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
>> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
>and 
>> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>> 
>> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
>> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
>news 
>> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
>> relevant thread.
>> 
>> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
>the 
>> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
>> 
>> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
>>
>https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
>> didn't work for me. I got
>> 
>> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
>> 
>> Configuring with
>> 
>> ... 
>>
>--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
>> 
>> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
>> instructions
>> 
>> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
>> $ # (extract the archive)
>> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
>> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
>> 
>> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
>only?
>> 
>> 2) Something seems wrong here:
>> 
>>
>https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
>> 
>> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
>> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
>> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
>
>> error message.
>> 
>> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
>build, 
>> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git
>clone 
>> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if
>someone 
>> builds from it.
>
>I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
>containing the git revision info.
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

Hi Peter,

Am 11.10.20 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a 
> svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
> It is a script called svnrevision I think. 

Andrea is talking about the source tarball here.

Formerly if you built from it there was no revision at all in the About
dialog.
Jim changed the creation of the tarball to include a file
"reporevision.lst" that contains the Git hash now.

I don't know why Andreas build did not pick up the file...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>> On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
>>> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
>> and 
>>> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>>>
>>> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
>>> didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
>> news 
>>> on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
>>> relevant thread.
>>>
>>> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
>> the 
>>> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
>>>
>>> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
>>>
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
>>> didn't work for me. I got
>>>
>>> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
>>>
>>> Configuring with
>>>
>>> ... 
>>>
>> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
>>> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
>>> instructions
>>>
>>> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
>>> $ # (extract the archive)
>>> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
>>> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
>>>
>>> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
>> only?
>>> 2) Something seems wrong here:
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
>>> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
>>> control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
>>> "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
>>> error message.
>>>
>>> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
>> build, 
>>> but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git
>> clone 
>>> and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if
>> someone 
>>> builds from it.
>> I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
>> containing the git revision info.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Forums outage

2020-10-11 Thread David Robley


Performance for me is now normal.

On 12/10/20 6:19 am, Dave Fisher wrote:

Hi Bidouille,

How are the Forums now?

Regards,
Dave


On Oct 10, 2020, at 1:20 AM, Bidouille  wrote:

Well, forums are back now but very slow


- Mail original -

De: "Bidouille" 
À: "devteam openoffice" 
Envoyé: Samedi 10 Octobre 2020 10:17:37
Objet: Forums outage

Hello team,

Forums returns an error
SQL ERROR [ mysqli ]
Too many connections [1040]

Somebody with karma can reinit MySQL deamon?

Thanks

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Cheers
--
David Robley

The worst day fishing is better than the best day working.
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues

I do know that there were some changes in the official EPM (the project is now 
"dead") which may have caused this, but I'm not sure.

FTR: I have used the old, old 3.7 version for the Linux builds. I consider it a 
build system variable that I did not want to modify... :)

> On Oct 11, 2020, at 3:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and DEB 
> builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
> 
> All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I didn't 
> test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have news on the 
> "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the relevant thread.
> 
> But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of the 
> build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
> 
> 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
> didn't work for me. I got
> 
> Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
> 
> Configuring with
> 
> ... 
> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
> 
> did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki instructions
> 
> $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz
> $ # (extract the archive)
> $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
> 
> had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds only?
> 
> 2) Something seems wrong here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
> 
> We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version control, 
> so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in "unknown-rev"; but it 
> doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an error message.
> 
> To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the build, but 
> it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git clone and this 
> will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if someone builds from 
> it.
> 
> Regards,
>  Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Building 4.1.8-RC2 - packaging issues



> On Oct 11, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Am 11.10.20 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> The code checks if it is a git repo and falls back to the assumption it is a 
>> svn repo. I am not sure if there is a default.
>> It is a script called svnrevision I think. 
> Andrea is talking about the source tarball here.
> 
> Formerly if you built from it there was no revision at all in the About 
> dialog.
> Jim changed the creation of the tarball to include a file "reporevision.lst" 
> that contains the Git hash now.
> 
> I don't know why Andreas build did not pick up the file...
> 

Yeah, that is weird... we do specifically tuck that value away.

> Regards,
> 
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> Am 11. Oktober 2020 23:25:44 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis  
>> :
>>> On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/ 
 
 on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM
>>> and 
 DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
 
 All good, for the most part. I'm still catching up with e-mails so I 
 didn't test anything specific to 4.1.8, just general usage. I have
>>> news 
 on the "General error" on Ubuntu too, but I'll expand on this in the 
 relevant thread.
 
 But I'd like to highlight two issues occurring in the last stage of
>>> the 
 build, i.e., when we produce the RPM/DEB packages.
 
 1) Jim's EPM installed as per
 
>>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_7_for_AOO_4.2.x_and_later
>>>  
>>> 
 didn't work for me. I got
 
 Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
 
 Configuring with
 
 ... 
 
>>> --with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
>>>  
 did work instead, so I'd like to know if people who used the wiki 
 instructions
 
 $ wget https://github.com/jimjag/epm/archive/epm-4.4.2.tar.gz 
 
 $ # (extract the archive)
 $ cd epm-epm-4.4.2
 $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-aoo; make install
 
 had better luck. Or maybe the new EPM is to be used for 4.2.x builds
>>> only?
 2) Something seems wrong here:
 
 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/AOO418/main/solenv/bin/modules/RepoRevision.pm#L78
>>>  
>>> 
 We populate the "Rev." section of the About dialog based on version 
 control, so for a tarball (no Git, no SVN) this should result in 
 "unknown-rev"; but it doesn't and Git is called instead, returning an
 error message.
 
 To my purpose I simply used a hardcoded string and completed the
>>> build, 
 but it should be checked better: the official tarball is not a git
>>> clone 
 and this will always result in a (non-blocking) error message if
>>> someone 
 builds from it.
>>> I thought that the source tarball was supposed to include an artifact
>>> containing the git revision info.
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

On 10 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>> 
>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Hi Don,

 Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On  9 Oct, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> It’s a guess, but which Java are you using?
> OpenJDK 1.8.0_252
 What happens if you build with Java 7?
>> Some of those look like java doc errors.
> Yes, this looks a lot like the --enable-odk problem with Java 8, but
> those fixes were merged to AOO418 and I am not using --enable-odk.
 I don't think there is --enable-odk. What we have is --disable-odk.
>>> I suspect that --enable-odk is accepted and doesn't change the default.
>>> Regardless, I just checked and I'm passing --disable-odk to configure.
>> 
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>> 
>> In that case Javadoc should not be involved at all?
> 
> One would think, but the errors are being flagged in comments, which is
> what javadoc looks at.
> 
> 4.1.7 builds fine with the same version of java as long as I configure
> with --disable-odk.

Digging into the logs, I see javadoc stuff happening whether or not
--disable-odk is specified, but the errors seem to get ignored.

I do see another error with my FreeBSD build of 4.1.8:

: && LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.
8/main/solver/418/unxfbsdx.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}} ../../
../unxfbsdx.pro/bin/gencoll_rule dz_charset.txt ../../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/colla
tor_dz_charset.cxx dz_charset
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/i18npool/unxfbsdx.
pro/bin/gencoll_rule: Undefined symbol "_ZN7icu_4_013UnicodeStringC1EPKt"
dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/collator_dz_chars
et.cxx'

Hmn ... it looks like gencoll_rule rule is picking up the system icu
libraries rather than the bundled icu libraries.  Earlier I see some
linking errors that seem to get ignored:

c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-export-dynamic -Wl,--noinhibit-exec 
-Wl,-rpath-link,../.
./unxfbsdx.pro/lib:/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/solver/418/unxfbsdx.pro/lib:/lib:/usr/lib
 -L../../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/wr
kdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/solver/418/unxfbsdx
.pro/lib 
-L/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib
 -L/usr/local/openjdk8/lib -L/usr/local/openjdk8/jre/lib/amd64 -L/usr/
local/openjdk8/jre/lib/amd64/server 
-L/usr/local/openjdk8/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads -L/usr/local/lib 
../../unxfbsdx.pro/obj/gencoll_rule.o \
-Wl,--whole-archive -lsalcpprt -Wl,--no-whole-archive -luno_sal -licui18n 
-licuuc -licudata -Wl,--as-needed -pthread -lm -Wl,--no-as-needed  -o 
../../unxfbsdx.pro
/bin/gencoll_rule
../../unxfbsdx.pro/obj/gencoll_rule.o: In function `main':
gencoll_rule.cxx:(.text+0x355): undefined reference to 
`icu_4_0::UnicodeString::UnicodeString(unsigned short const*)'
gencoll_rule.cxx:(.text+0x36b): undefined reference to 
`icu_4_0::RuleBasedCollator::RuleBasedCollator(icu_4_0::UnicodeString const&, 
UErrorCode&)'
gencoll_rule.cxx:(.text+0x377): undefined reference to 
`icu_4_0::UnicodeString::~UnicodeString()'
gencoll_rule.cxx:(.text+0x3ac): undefined reference to 
`icu_4_0::RuleBasedCollator::cloneRuleData(int&, UErrorCode&)'
gencoll_rule.cxx:(.text+0x3f8): undefined reference to `uprv_free_4_0'
gencoll_rule.cxx:(.text+0x48e): undefined reference to 
`icu_4_0::UnicodeString::~UnicodeString()'
-rwxr-xr-x  1 nobody  wheel  18342 Oct 11 19:33 
../../unxfbsdx.pro/bin/gencoll_rule

There are differences in the compiler command line.  The working 4.1.7
version:
c++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector-strong 
-Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-export-dynamic -Wl,--noinhibit-exec 
-Wl,-rpath-link,../../unxfbsdx.pro/li
b:/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.7/main/solver/417/unxfbsdx.pro/lib:/lib:/usr/lib
 -L../../unxfbsdx.pro/lib -L../lib -L/wrkdirs/usr/ports/edi
tors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.7/main/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.7/main/solver/417/unxfbsdx.pro/lib
 -L/wrkdirs/usr
/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.7/main/solenv/unxfbsdx/lib 
-L/usr/local/openjdk8/lib -L/usr/local/openjdk8/jre/lib/amd64 
-L/usr/local/openjdk8/jre/lib/am
d64/server -L/usr/local/openjdk8/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads -L/usr/local/lib 
../../unxfbsdx.pro/obj/gencoll_rule.o \
-Wl,--whole-archive -lsalcpprt -Wl,--no-whole-archive -luno_sal -licui18n 
-licuuc -licudata -Wl,--as-needed -pthread -lm -Wl,--no-as-needed  -o 
../../unxfbsdx.pro
/bin/gencoll_rule

The position change of -L/usr/local/lib looks like the problem.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts

Hi Don,

Am 12.10.20 um 00:49 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 10 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
 On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On  9 Oct, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> It’s a guess, but which Java are you using?
>> OpenJDK 1.8.0_252
> What happens if you build with Java 7?
>>> Some of those look like java doc errors.
>> Yes, this looks a lot like the --enable-odk problem with Java 8, but
>> those fixes were merged to AOO418 and I am not using --enable-odk.
> I don't think there is --enable-odk. What we have is --disable-odk.
 I suspect that --enable-odk is accepted and doesn't change the default.
 Regardless, I just checked and I'm passing --disable-odk to configure.
>>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>>
>>> In that case Javadoc should not be involved at all?
>> One would think, but the errors are being flagged in comments, which is
>> what javadoc looks at.
>>
>> 4.1.7 builds fine with the same version of java as long as I configure
>> with --disable-odk.
> Digging into the logs, I see javadoc stuff happening whether or not
> --disable-odk is specified, but the errors seem to get ignored.
>
> I do see another error with my FreeBSD build of 4.1.8:
>
> : && 
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.
> 8/main/solver/418/unxfbsdx.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}} 
> ../../
> ../unxfbsdx.pro/bin/gencoll_rule dz_charset.txt 
> ../../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/colla
> tor_dz_charset.cxx dz_charset
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-418/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/i18npool/unxfbsdx.
> pro/bin/gencoll_rule: Undefined symbol "_ZN7icu_4_013UnicodeStringC1EPKt"
> dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
> '../../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/collator_dz_chars
> et.cxx'
>
> Hmn ... it looks like gencoll_rule rule is picking up the system icu
> libraries rather than the bundled icu libraries.  Earlier I see some
> linking errors that seem to get ignored:

A quick guess:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125371

Regards,

   Matthias




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: 4.1.8 RC2 build broken when configured with --without-fonts