Re: AOO418 cherry picks

[Jim Jagielski]

Let's commit and work after pushed.

> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> 
>>> Hi Don,
>>> 
>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
 I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
 There are two categories:
  * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
port of 4.1.7.
 
  * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies.  These have been
updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
AOO418.  The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
 
 I'd like to revisit:
 
  commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
  Author: Matthias Seidel 
  Date:   Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +
 
  Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
 
  git-svn-id: 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 
 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
 
 I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port.  Without it, a build
 with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer.  I don't see how it
 would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
 that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK.  When this was
 backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
 of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
 So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
 have the changes.
>>> 
>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>> 
>>>  - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>  - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>> all objects get visited
>>>  - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>> 
>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>> 
>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>> 
>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
> 
> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software.  I should
> be able to create a pull request in a day or so.  127887 will be
> included.  I'll test it on Linux and Windows.  I'll take a stab at the
> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>Matthias
>> 
>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
> 
> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
> affect detection.  Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
> build with Java 8?
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

OpenOffice 20 years event

[Projet OpenOffice]

Hello,

A french volunteer has submited some logo items:
https://www.cjoint.com/doc/20_08/JHCuJh7ZFcY_20YearsOO-Affiche.png
https://www.cjoint.com/doc/20_08/JHCuKc4qS1Y_20YearsOO.png

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org