Re: Findings after running a W3C Check on your site ..

[FR web forum]

I see that you are a web developper.
If you want to help us, the best way is to edit these pages and to send back 
fix.
You can find website source on 
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/
If you enjoy this project, you should involved too.

- Mail original -
> De: "David G. Stapleton" 
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 9 Septembre 2018 10:08:52
> Objet: Findings after running a W3C Check on your site ..
> 
> I believe you are interested in the findings automatically located
> and documented this morning as I was clicking around your site @
> https://www.openoffice.org/documentation/index.html. All I did to be
> the almost instantaneous recipient of the enumerating documentation
> of coding errors / misnomers on the subject page was click the [ W3C
> XHTML 1.0 ] icon button in the lower left corner of this particular
> page.
> 
> Please review and at least consider making W3C’s recommended edits to
> your pages codings following their examples found in the attached
> PDF I included with this my 1st email to your WebDev team. It would
> reflect well on your team of developers if you’d run this test
> completely on your site. This would give your open source software a
> good shot in the arm so to speak.
> 
> I hope this helps your OS project I’ve enjoyed using from time to
> time since a couple of previous versions ago.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David G Stapleton, AASD
> Web Developer, Retired
> Author, Singer-Songwriter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: App icons for Windows

[Jim Jagielski]

+1

> On Sep 9, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Marcus  wrote:
> 
> Am 08.09.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Is there a specific reason why we use old icons (OOo2 ?) for our Windows
>> executables?
>> All other platforms use Galaxy icons (OOo3 ?).
>> Not only do these icons look "old" but they do not contain higher
>> resolutions (256x256), whereas the Galaxy icons do.
>> Everything is already available here (Thanks to Pedro Lino to find this
>> out!):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/OOo30_final_mimetype/icos/
>> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base
>> and Math.
>> Opinions?
> 
> sounds good, do it.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 10.09.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> +1

I think I will do it later this evening...

BTW, these icons would be great for macOS:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125994

Regards,
   Matthias

>
>> On Sep 9, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Marcus  wrote:
>>
>> Am 08.09.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Is there a specific reason why we use old icons (OOo2 ?) for our Windows
>>> executables?
>>> All other platforms use Galaxy icons (OOo3 ?).
>>> Not only do these icons look "old" but they do not contain higher
>>> resolutions (256x256), whereas the Galaxy icons do.
>>> Everything is already available here (Thanks to Pedro Lino to find this
>>> out!):
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/ui/VisualDesign/gifs/Icons/OOo30_final_mimetype/icos/
>>> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base
>>> and Math.
>>> Opinions?
>> sounds good, do it.
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

4.1.6_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127768] Add script referenced from Issue #121930 to the standard profile

[bugzilla]

Keith N. McKenna  has asked  for 4.1.6_release_blocker:
Issue 127768: Add script referenced from Issue #121930 to the standard profile
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127768



--- Comment #1 from Keith N. McKenna  ---
Asking for this as a release blocker to have a way to have an integrated way to
solve a common and frustrating user experience problem.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: App icons for Windows

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 10.09.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> +1
> 
> I think I will do it later this evening...
> 
> BTW, these icons would be great for macOS:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125994 
> 
> 

Agreed.

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Kay,

Am 03.09.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 12:39 Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kay,
>>
>> Am 03.09.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> Hello Matthias--
>>>
>>> I should have replied to this ages ago. The last build I did was against
>> Rev: 1838339 so this would have included your changes. I don't see any
>> difference in the printer icons, but...I typicall install the Freedesktop
>> desktop interface on rpm build, AND, I don't normally do this during test
>> builds, just starting from the binary instead.The reason is I don't want my
>> production version to get accidentally trampled.
>>> At this point, I seem to have the old icons available because I did't do
>> a new desktop installation. Sorry...
>>
>> I am not sure if it would be visible on Freedesktop, but on Gnome
>> (Ubuntu 18.04) and Unity (Ubuntu 16.04) it makes quite a difference...
>>
>> Regards,
>>Matthias
>>
> It looks like the new icons are installed in the right area. If I had run
> the desktop-integration, I'm sure I would have seen them.

Just to give an example, I changed the icon for Writer manually to
128x128 on my Ubuntu 16.04 and this is how it looks in Ubuntu Software
compared to the others:

https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO%20Icons%2048x48%20vs%20128x128.png

Regards,
   Matthias

>
>
>>> On 2018/08/08 21:49:23, Matthias Seidel 
>> wrote:
 Hi all,

 With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
 for Linux.
 I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.

 Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)

 Regards,

Matthias



>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Kay Schenk]

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 15:43 Keith N. McKenna 
> wrote:
>
>> 
>> >
>> > I had been constructing release blocker queries for some of the other
>> > releases.
>> >
>> > I just put together a query for the release block requests for 4.1.6 --
>> >
>> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
>> list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
>> > (I didn't do this for 4.1.5 but for many of the previous releases.)
>> >
>> > Hopefully this will work once you are logged in to
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo
>> > AND hopefully the same ones Peter has referenced. Of course someone can
>> > always modify the query.
>> >
>> > HTH.
>> Kay;
>>
>> I just tried tried your query and it came back as "The search named
>> 4.1.6_blocker_requested does not exist." It does not appear that you
>> have set it as shared.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>>
>
> Dang! I was sure I'd done that but maybe I didn't save it correctly. I'll
> fix tomorrow and notify the list.
>

>
>> >
>>
>>
HI. Please try the search link again, hopefully it will work now. You need
to be a registered BZ user to view it.

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run


-- 
--
MzK

"Less is MORE."

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:00:19 +0200
Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> Hi Kay,
> 
> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 12:39 Matthias Seidel 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Kay,
> >>
> >> Am 03.09.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> >>> Hello Matthias--
> >>>
> >>> I should have replied to this ages ago. The last build I did was against
> >> Rev: 1838339 so this would have included your changes. I don't see any
> >> difference in the printer icons, but...I typicall install the Freedesktop
> >> desktop interface on rpm build, AND, I don't normally do this during test
> >> builds, just starting from the binary instead.The reason is I don't want my
> >> production version to get accidentally trampled.
> >>> At this point, I seem to have the old icons available because I did't do
> >> a new desktop installation. Sorry...
> >>
> >> I am not sure if it would be visible on Freedesktop, but on Gnome
> >> (Ubuntu 18.04) and Unity (Ubuntu 16.04) it makes quite a difference...
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>Matthias
> >>
> > It looks like the new icons are installed in the right area. If I had run
> > the desktop-integration, I'm sure I would have seen them.
> 
> Just to give an example, I changed the icon for Writer manually to
> 128x128 on my Ubuntu 16.04 and this is how it looks in Ubuntu Software
> compared to the others:
> 
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO%20Icons%2048x48%20vs%20128x128.png
> 
> Regards,
>    Matthias

Is there a download URL for a linux 64 (deb) 4.1.6 build? I'm using OO every 
day for writing/editing and would willingly give it a road test. 

Rory

> 
> >
> >
> >>> On 2018/08/08 21:49:23, Matthias Seidel 
> >> wrote:
>  Hi all,
> 
>  With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
>  for Linux.
>  I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.
> 
>  Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)
> 
>  Regards,
> 
> Matthias
> 
> 
> 
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 


-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Jim Jagielski]

Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...

Lang pref?

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 12:25 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:00:19 +0200
> Matthias Seidel  > wrote:
> 
>> Hi Kay,
>> 
>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 12:39 Matthias Seidel 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Kay,
 
 Am 03.09.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Hello Matthias--
> 
> I should have replied to this ages ago. The last build I did was against
 Rev: 1838339 so this would have included your changes. I don't see any
 difference in the printer icons, but...I typicall install the Freedesktop
 desktop interface on rpm build, AND, I don't normally do this during test
 builds, just starting from the binary instead.The reason is I don't want my
 production version to get accidentally trampled.
> At this point, I seem to have the old icons available because I did't do
 a new desktop installation. Sorry...
 
 I am not sure if it would be visible on Freedesktop, but on Gnome
 (Ubuntu 18.04) and Unity (Ubuntu 16.04) it makes quite a difference...
 
 Regards,
   Matthias
 
>>> It looks like the new icons are installed in the right area. If I had run
>>> the desktop-integration, I'm sure I would have seen them.
>> 
>> Just to give an example, I changed the icon for Writer manually to
>> 128x128 on my Ubuntu 16.04 and this is how it looks in Ubuntu Software
>> compared to the others:
>> 
>> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO%20Icons%2048x48%20vs%20128x128.png
>> 
>> Regards,
>>Matthias
> 
> Is there a download URL for a linux 64 (deb) 4.1.6 build? I'm using OO every 
> day for writing/editing and would willingly give it a road test. 
> 
> Rory
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> On 2018/08/08 21:49:23, Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
>> for Linux.
>> I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.
>> 
>> Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>   Matthias
>> 
>> 
>> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 
 
 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rory O'Farrell mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Keith N. McKenna]

On 9/10/2018 12:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 15:43 Keith N. McKenna 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 

 I had been constructing release blocker queries for some of the other
 releases.

 I just put together a query for the release block requests for 4.1.6 --

 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
>>> list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
 (I didn't do this for 4.1.5 but for many of the previous releases.)

 Hopefully this will work once you are logged in to
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo
 AND hopefully the same ones Peter has referenced. Of course someone can
 always modify the query.

 HTH.
>>> Kay;
>>>
>>> I just tried tried your query and it came back as "The search named
>>> 4.1.6_blocker_requested does not exist." It does not appear that you
>>> have set it as shared.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>
>>
>> Dang! I was sure I'd done that but maybe I didn't save it correctly. I'll
>> fix tomorrow and notify the list.
>>
> 
>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
> HI. Please try the search link again, hopefully it will work now. You need
> to be a registered BZ user to view it.
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
> list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
> 
> 
Kay;

The new link is truncated in your message and gives a list that is
limited to 500 entries. However the search know shows in the preferences
as being there and usable and works perfectly.

Keith




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

4.1.6_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127887] update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal

[bugzilla]

Don Lewis  has asked  for 4.1.6_release_blocker:
Issue 127887: update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887



--- Description ---
These trunk commits should be merged to AOO416 to upgrade the bundled versions
of:
  redland 1.0.8 -> 1.0.17
  raptor 1.4.18 -> 2.0.15
  rasqal 0.9.16 -> 0.9.33

  https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1701344
  https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1757789
  https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
  https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1818098

svn merge -c 1701344 '^/openoffice/trunk/main/redland' main/redland
svn merge -c 1757789 '^/openoffice/trunk' .
svn merge -c 1805089 '^/openoffice/trunk' .
 and apply configure.ac changes to configure.in
svn merge -c 1818098 '^/openoffice/trunk' .

Tested in 4.1.6 on 32-bit Windows 7 and CentOS 6 x86_64.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...
> 
> Lang pref?

English (GB) or English (US) - not important.

Rory

 
> > On Sep 10, 2018, at 12:25 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:00:19 +0200
> > Matthias Seidel  > > wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Kay,
> >> 
> >> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 12:39 Matthias Seidel 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
>  Hi Kay,
>  
>  Am 03.09.2018 um 00:16 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> > Hello Matthias--
> > 
> > I should have replied to this ages ago. The last build I did was against
>  Rev: 1838339 so this would have included your changes. I don't see any
>  difference in the printer icons, but...I typicall install the Freedesktop
>  desktop interface on rpm build, AND, I don't normally do this during test
>  builds, just starting from the binary instead.The reason is I don't want 
>  my
>  production version to get accidentally trampled.
> > At this point, I seem to have the old icons available because I did't do
>  a new desktop installation. Sorry...
>  
>  I am not sure if it would be visible on Freedesktop, but on Gnome
>  (Ubuntu 18.04) and Unity (Ubuntu 16.04) it makes quite a difference...
>  
>  Regards,
>    Matthias
>  
> >>> It looks like the new icons are installed in the right area. If I had run
> >>> the desktop-integration, I'm sure I would have seen them.
> >> 
> >> Just to give an example, I changed the icon for Writer manually to
> >> 128x128 on my Ubuntu 16.04 and this is how it looks in Ubuntu Software
> >> compared to the others:
> >> 
> >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO%20Icons%2048x48%20vs%20128x128.png
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >>Matthias
> > 
> > Is there a download URL for a linux 64 (deb) 4.1.6 build? I'm using OO 
> > every day for writing/editing and would willingly give it a road test. 
> > 
> > Rory
> > 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> > On 2018/08/08 21:49:23, Matthias Seidel 
>  wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> 
> >> With r1837621 I could finally enable higher resolution icons (128x128)
> >> for Linux.
> >> I can confirm they are visible on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04.
> >> 
> >> Please test on any Distribution you can. ;-)
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >>   Matthias
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> > 
>  
>  
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Rory O'Farrell mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie>>
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> > 


-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
> Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>> Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...
>> 
>> Lang pref?
> 
> English (GB) or English (US) - not important.
> 

They will be available in:

http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/

in ~1hr. Uploading as we speak.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:54:33 -0400
Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> 
> 
> > On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
> > Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> > 
> >> Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...
> >> 
> >> Lang pref?
> > 
> > English (GB) or English (US) - not important.
> > 
> 
> They will be available in:
> 
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/
> 
> in ~1hr. Uploading as we speak.
>
Thanks - will download after dinner.

Rory

> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 


-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Kay Schenk]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Keith N. McKenna <
keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 9/10/2018 12:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 15:43 Keith N. McKenna 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 
> 
>  I had been constructing release blocker queries for some of the other
>  releases.
> 
>  I just put together a query for the release block requests for 4.1.6
> --
> 
>  https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
> >>> list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
>  (I didn't do this for 4.1.5 but for many of the previous releases.)
> 
>  Hopefully this will work once you are logged in to
> >>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo
>  AND hopefully the same ones Peter has referenced. Of course someone
> can
>  always modify the query.
> 
>  HTH.
> >>> Kay;
> >>>
> >>> I just tried tried your query and it came back as "The search named
> >>> 4.1.6_blocker_requested does not exist." It does not appear that you
> >>> have set it as shared.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Keith
> >>>
> >>
> >> Dang! I was sure I'd done that but maybe I didn't save it correctly.
> I'll
> >> fix tomorrow and notify the list.
> >>
> >
> >>
> >>>  >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> > HI. Please try the search link again, hopefully it will work now. You
> need
> > to be a registered BZ user to view it.
> >
> > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
> > list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
> >
> >
> Kay;
>
> The new link is truncated in your message and gives a list that is
> limited to 500 entries. However the search know shows in the preferences
> as being there and usable and works perfectly.
>
> Keith
>

Keith --
When I look at the message I originally sent with the link, the line is not
wrapped. Could a setting with your email client be causing the
wrapping/truncation?

The query should only return 9 entries.



-- 
--
MzK

"Less is MORE."

Re: App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 10.09.2018 um 17:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 10.09.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> +1
>> I think I will do it later this evening...
>>
>> BTW, these icons would be great for macOS:
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125994 
>> 
>>
> Agreed.

I have no macOS but I could extract PNGs from these icon sets.
They look good and although they are missing higher resolutions they are
much better than what we have now.
Maybe you can test further? I would like to commit them to trunk...

BTW: The Windows app icons are updated in trunk with r1840487.

Regards,
   Matthias




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Hagar Delest]

I get that error:

You don't have permission to access 
/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gzon
 this server.

Hagar



Le 10/09/2018 à 19:54, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
>
>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
>> Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>>> Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...
>>>
>>> Lang pref?
>> English (GB) or English (US) - not important.
>>
> They will be available in:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/
>
> in ~1hr. Uploading as we speak.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[Marcus]

Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:

Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:

On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell  wrote:



It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S

will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to 
do so of which I am not aware.


inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release -a works
But the browser is not allowed to run terminal commands for obvious 
reasons ;)
I have not yet (not looked very hard) found any command that will 
disclose if the distro needs RPM or DEB files


We would have to create a table with such correspondence. But the 
problem remains: there is no way to get information on the Distro 
(except for Ubuntu's Firefox)


The only solution seems to be Andrea's suggestion about adding 
information when Linux is detected (this already happens when Android 
is detected so the mechanism is already there)


just an additional info instead of a (mandatory) choise is indeed worth 
to think twice. I'll do it on the weekend and play a bit with the 
download scripting.


as the CMS current not working I cannot commit something to show you for 
testing. Therefore a little dry test:


When choosing RPM or DEB a little text is show with the following content:

"RPM is used in:
CentOS, Fedora, Mageia, Mandriva, MeeGo, openSUSE, Oracle Linux, 
PCLinuxOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Sailfish OS, Scientific Linux, SUSE 
Linux Enterprise Server


DEB is used in:
Debian, Kanotix, Knoppix, Kubuntu, Linux Mint, Lubuntu, Ubuntu, Xubuntu"

Please have a look if something is wrong or could be added.

Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Jim Jagielski]

That should be fixed by now...

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Hagar Delest  wrote:
> 
> I get that error:
> 
> You don't have permission to access 
> /~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gzon
>  this server.
> 
> Hagar
> 
> 
> 
> Le 10/09/2018 à 19:54, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
>> 
>>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
>>> Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
 Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...
 
 Lang pref?
>>> English (GB) or English (US) - not important.
>>> 
>> They will be available in:
>> 
>>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/
>> 
>> in ~1hr. Uploading as we speak.
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[Marcus]

Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:

Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:

Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell  
wrote:



It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S

will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to
do so of which I am not aware.


inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release -a works
But the browser is not allowed to run terminal commands for obvious
reasons ;)

I have not yet (not looked very hard) found any command that will
disclose if the distro needs RPM or DEB files


We would have to create a table with such correspondence. But the
problem remains: there is no way to get information on the Distro
(except for Ubuntu's Firefox)

The only solution seems to be Andrea's suggestion about adding
information when Linux is detected (this already happens when Android
is detected so the mechanism is already there)


just an additional info instead of a (mandatory) choise is indeed
worth to think twice. I'll do it on the weekend and play a bit with
the download scripting.


When you are at it... ;-)

Did you have a chance to look at the needed changes for the updated
Release Policy?
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530


yes, I know.

However, this is more complex as we have a dependency with versions:

If version == 4.1.5 or older,
then offer a link with the MD5 file.

If version == 4.1.6 or newer,
then do not offer a link .

I've to check how and where to insert this version check.

But let's see ;-)

Thanks for the hint.


OK, also this is ready for testing. Let's wait for the CMS.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: App icons for Windows

[Jim Jagielski]

I pulled the icons from the BUGZ report and compared them with what we 
currently have/use and I agree that they are much better.

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 10.09.2018 um 17:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> 
>>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 10.09.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 +1
>>> I think I will do it later this evening...
>>> 
>>> BTW, these icons would be great for macOS:
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125994 
>>> 
>>> 
>> Agreed.
> 
> I have no macOS but I could extract PNGs from these icon sets.
> They look good and although they are missing higher resolutions they are
> much better than what we have now.
> Maybe you can test further? I would like to commit them to trunk...
> 
> BTW: The Windows app icons are updated in trunk with r1840487.
> 
> Regards,
>Matthias
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

[Keith N. McKenna]

On 9/10/2018 2:56 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/10/2018 12:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>>>


 On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 15:43 Keith N. McKenna 
 wrote:

> 
>>
>> I had been constructing release blocker queries for some of the other
>> releases.
>>
>> I just put together a query for the release block requests for 4.1.6
>> --
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
> list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
>> (I didn't do this for 4.1.5 but for many of the previous releases.)
>>
>> Hopefully this will work once you are logged in to
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo
>> AND hopefully the same ones Peter has referenced. Of course someone
>> can
>> always modify the query.
>>
>> HTH.
> Kay;
>
> I just tried tried your query and it came back as "The search named
> 4.1.6_blocker_requested does not exist." It does not appear that you
> have set it as shared.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>

 Dang! I was sure I'd done that but maybe I didn't save it correctly.
>> I'll
 fix tomorrow and notify the list.

>>>

> 
>
>
>>> HI. Please try the search link again, hopefully it will work now. You
>> need
>>> to be a registered BZ user to view it.
>>>
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&;
>>> list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run
>>>
>>>
>> Kay;
>>
>> The new link is truncated in your message and gives a list that is
>> limited to 500 entries. However the search know shows in the preferences
>> as being there and usable and works perfectly.
>>
>> Keith
>>
> 
> Keith --
> When I look at the message I originally sent with the link, the line is not
> wrapped. Could a setting with your email client be causing the
> wrapping/truncation?
> 
> The query should only return 9 entries.
> 
> 
> 
 I meant the link in the message that you had fixed it.

Keith



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Peter,

Am 08.09.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Peter kovacs:
> Can we fix this in 4.1.6 too?
> Seems a like small fix.

They are in trunk now.
Would you like to have them in 4.1.6?

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> Am 8. September 2018 14:20:39 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
> :
>> Hi Pedro,
>>
>> Am 08.09.2018 um 13:46 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> Hi Matthias, all
>>>
>>>
 I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw,
>> Base
 and Math.

 Opinions?

>>> According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3
>>>
>>> "On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10
>> years ago...
>>> So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to
>> the 3.x icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the
>> same on all platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly
>> since version 3.0)
>>
>> Especially since all other icons on Windows (MIME types, templates,
>> ...)
>> are from the Galaxy icon set.
>> Updating the remaining 6 icons would give a more consistent "look and
>> feel".
>>
>> If anyone wants to test how it looks on Windows, I made a special build
>> based on r1839722:
>> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Matthias
>>
>> P.S.: It would be easy to do this for 4.1.6 already...
>>
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents ;)
>>>
>>> Pedro
>>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Marcus,

Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
 Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell 
>> wrote:
>
>> It may be useful to know that the terminal command
>> inxi -S
>>
>> will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to
>> do so of which I am not aware.
>
> inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release -a works
> But the browser is not allowed to run terminal commands for obvious
> reasons ;)
>> I have not yet (not looked very hard) found any command that will
>> disclose if the distro needs RPM or DEB files
>
> We would have to create a table with such correspondence. But the
> problem remains: there is no way to get information on the Distro
> (except for Ubuntu's Firefox)
>
> The only solution seems to be Andrea's suggestion about adding
> information when Linux is detected (this already happens when Android
> is detected so the mechanism is already there)

 just an additional info instead of a (mandatory) choise is indeed
 worth to think twice. I'll do it on the weekend and play a bit with
 the download scripting.
>>>
>>> When you are at it... ;-)
>>>
>>> Did you have a chance to look at the needed changes for the updated
>>> Release Policy?
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530
>>
>> yes, I know.
>>
>> However, this is more complex as we have a dependency with versions:
>>
>> If version == 4.1.5 or older,
>> then offer a link with the MD5 file.
>>
>> If version == 4.1.6 or newer,
>> then do not offer a link .
>>
>> I've to check how and where to insert this version check.
>>
>> But let's see ;-)
>>
>> Thanks for the hint.
>
> OK, also this is ready for testing. Let's wait for the CMS.

Great!
How do you handle SHA? I understand that we should offer SHA512?

Matthias

>
> Marcus
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: App icons for Windows

[Peter Kovacs]

Yes for windows I would like to update so they are the same on all 
platforms.


On 9/10/18 10:56 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi Peter,

Am 08.09.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Peter kovacs:

Can we fix this in 4.1.6 too?
Seems a like small fix.

They are in trunk now.
Would you like to have them in 4.1.6?

Regards,
    Matthias


Am 8. September 2018 14:20:39 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
:

Hi Pedro,

Am 08.09.2018 um 13:46 schrieb Pedro Lino:

Hi Matthias, all



I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw,

Base

 and Math.

 Opinions?


According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3

"On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10

years ago...

So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to

the 3.x icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the
same on all platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly
since version 3.0)

Especially since all other icons on Windows (MIME types, templates,
...)
are from the Galaxy icon set.
Updating the remaining 6 icons would give a more consistent "look and
feel".

If anyone wants to test how it looks on Windows, I made a special build
based on r1839722:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/

Regards,
    Matthias

P.S.: It would be easy to do this for 4.1.6 already...


Just my 2 cents ;)

Pedro


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[Marcus]

Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:

Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:

Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:

Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:

On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell 
wrote:



It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S

will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to
do so of which I am not aware.


inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release -a works
But the browser is not allowed to run terminal commands for obvious
reasons ;)

I have not yet (not looked very hard) found any command that will
disclose if the distro needs RPM or DEB files


We would have to create a table with such correspondence. But the
problem remains: there is no way to get information on the Distro
(except for Ubuntu's Firefox)

The only solution seems to be Andrea's suggestion about adding
information when Linux is detected (this already happens when Android
is detected so the mechanism is already there)


just an additional info instead of a (mandatory) choise is indeed
worth to think twice. I'll do it on the weekend and play a bit with
the download scripting.


When you are at it... ;-)

Did you have a chance to look at the needed changes for the updated
Release Policy?
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530


yes, I know.

However, this is more complex as we have a dependency with versions:

If version == 4.1.5 or older,
then offer a link with the MD5 file.

If version == 4.1.6 or newer,
then do not offer a link .

I've to check how and where to insert this version check.

But let's see ;-)

Thanks for the hint.


OK, also this is ready for testing. Let's wait for the CMS.


Great!
How do you handle SHA? I understand that we should offer SHA512?


SHA256 is unchanged and shown as before.

Is the SHA512 hash data meanwhile integrated into the build process? As 
long as it is not I cannot add this to the download site. But if so, 
it's very easy to add it.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:31:12 -0400
Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> That should be fixed by now...


Downloading now for me.  Try again, Hagar.

Rory
> 
> > On Sep 10, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Hagar Delest  wrote:
> > 
> > I get that error:
> > 
> > You don't have permission to access 
> > /~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gzon
> >  this server.
> > 
> > Hagar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Le 10/09/2018 à 19:54, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> >> 
> >>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:13 -0400
> >>> Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>> 
>  Give me until the end-of-the day and I'll provide one...
>  
>  Lang pref?
> >>> English (GB) or English (US) - not important.
> >>> 
> >> They will be available in:
> >> 
> >>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.6-dev-r1840476/
> >> 
> >> in ~1hr. Uploading as we speak.
> >> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 


-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 10.09.2018 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:
 Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:
 On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell 
 wrote:
>>>
 It may be useful to know that the terminal command
 inxi -S

 will display the distro name. I am sure there are other
 commands to
 do so of which I am not aware.
>>>
>>> inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release -a works
>>> But the browser is not allowed to run terminal commands for obvious
>>> reasons ;)
 I have not yet (not looked very hard) found any command that will
 disclose if the distro needs RPM or DEB files
>>>
>>> We would have to create a table with such correspondence. But the
>>> problem remains: there is no way to get information on the Distro
>>> (except for Ubuntu's Firefox)
>>>
>>> The only solution seems to be Andrea's suggestion about adding
>>> information when Linux is detected (this already happens when
>>> Android
>>> is detected so the mechanism is already there)
>>
>> just an additional info instead of a (mandatory) choise is indeed
>> worth to think twice. I'll do it on the weekend and play a bit with
>> the download scripting.
>
> When you are at it... ;-)
>
> Did you have a chance to look at the needed changes for the updated
> Release Policy?
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530

 yes, I know.

 However, this is more complex as we have a dependency with versions:

 If version == 4.1.5 or older,
 then offer a link with the MD5 file.

 If version == 4.1.6 or newer,
 then do not offer a link .

 I've to check how and where to insert this version check.

 But let's see ;-)

 Thanks for the hint.
>>>
>>> OK, also this is ready for testing. Let's wait for the CMS.
>>
>> Great!
>> How do you handle SHA? I understand that we should offer SHA512?
>
> SHA256 is unchanged and shown as before.
>
> Is the SHA512 hash data meanwhile integrated into the build process?
> As long as it is not I cannot add this to the download site. But if
> so, it's very easy to add it.

Generating hash data is done manually after the build process, but we
have a scripts for it:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/release-scripts/

Matthias

>
> Marcus
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: App icons for Windows

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 10.09.2018 um 23:17 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Yes for windows I would like to update so they are the same on all
> platforms.

Committed with r1840498.

Matthias

>
> On 9/10/18 10:56 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am 08.09.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>>> Can we fix this in 4.1.6 too?
>>> Seems a like small fix.
>> They are in trunk now.
>> Would you like to have them in 4.1.6?
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Matthias
>>
>>> Am 8. September 2018 14:20:39 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
>>> :
 Hi Pedro,

 Am 08.09.2018 um 13:46 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
>
>> I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw,
 Base
>>  and Math.
>>
>>  Opinions?
>>
> According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3
>
> "On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released". That was almost 10
 years ago...
> So I would say that it makes sense to update the Windows builds to
 the 3.x icons (since there are no 4.x icons) so that the icons are the
 same on all platforms (Linux and Mac already use these icons possibly
 since version 3.0)

 Especially since all other icons on Windows (MIME types, templates,
 ...)
 are from the Galaxy icon set.
 Updating the remaining 6 icons would give a more consistent "look and
 feel".

 If anyone wants to test how it looks on Windows, I made a special
 build
 based on r1839722:
 https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/

 Regards,
     Matthias

 P.S.: It would be easy to do this for 4.1.6 already...

> Just my 2 cents ;)
>
> Pedro
>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Wrong distro detected?

[Marcus]

Am 10.09.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.09.2018 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus:

Am 10.09.2018 um 23:10 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 10.09.2018 um 22:32 schrieb Marcus:

Am 06.09.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Marcus:

Am 06.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 05.09.2018 um 21:37 schrieb Marcus:

Am 02.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino:

On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell 
wrote:



It may be useful to know that the terminal command
inxi -S

will display the distro name. I am sure there are other
commands to
do so of which I am not aware.


inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu. lsb_release -a works
But the browser is not allowed to run terminal commands for obvious
reasons ;)

I have not yet (not looked very hard) found any command that will
disclose if the distro needs RPM or DEB files


We would have to create a table with such correspondence. But the
problem remains: there is no way to get information on the Distro
(except for Ubuntu's Firefox)

The only solution seems to be Andrea's suggestion about adding
information when Linux is detected (this already happens when
Android
is detected so the mechanism is already there)


just an additional info instead of a (mandatory) choise is indeed
worth to think twice. I'll do it on the weekend and play a bit with
the download scripting.


When you are at it... ;-)

Did you have a chance to look at the needed changes for the updated
Release Policy?
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127530


yes, I know.

However, this is more complex as we have a dependency with versions:

If version == 4.1.5 or older,
then offer a link with the MD5 file.

If version == 4.1.6 or newer,
then do not offer a link .

I've to check how and where to insert this version check.

But let's see ;-)

Thanks for the hint.


OK, also this is ready for testing. Let's wait for the CMS.


Great!
How do you handle SHA? I understand that we should offer SHA512?


SHA256 is unchanged and shown as before.

Is the SHA512 hash data meanwhile integrated into the build process?
As long as it is not I cannot add this to the download site. But if
so, it's very easy to add it.


Generating hash data is done manually after the build process, but we
have a scripts for it:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/release-scripts/


great, then the download scripting is awaiting the new hash data.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org