Re: Clean-up of Release Notes for 4.1.5
Hi Keith, Am 25.12.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release > Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues. > > 1. Does macOS still need the legacy Apple Java 6 to recognize Java 9 Jim? > 2. Does the source package of 4.1.5 still have problems building on 32 > bit Ubuntu 14.04 and similar? Our buildbots run on Ubuntu 14.04 and they produce weekly builds of branch 4.1.5. We removed that part already from the 4.1.4 release notes. > 3 Does the SDK still not build with Java 8? This is still valid. The fixes for Java 8 are in trunk but have not been backported to 4.1.5. Regards, Matthias > > Thanks in advance for your help > Keith > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Clean-up of Release Notes for 4.1.5
> On Dec 25, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release > Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues. > > 1. Does macOS still need the legacy Apple Java 6 to recognize Java 9 Not as per my testing, no. > 2. Does the source package of 4.1.5 still have problems building on 32 > bit Ubuntu 14.04 and similar? Not tested. > 3 Does the SDK still not build with Java 8? Not known. I am *guessing* that there are no changes in these issues between 4.1.4 and 4.1.5 though. > > Thanks in advance for your help > Keith > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Clean-up of Release Notes for 4.1.5
On 12/26/2017 9:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> On Dec 25, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna >> wrote: >> >> I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release >> Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues. >> >> 1. Does macOS still need the legacy Apple Java 6 to recognize Java 9 > Not as per my testing, no. > >> 2. Does the source package of 4.1.5 still have problems building on 32 >> bit Ubuntu 14.04 and similar? > Not tested. > >> 3 Does the SDK still not build with Java 8? > Not known. > > I am *guessing* that there are no changes in these issues between > 4.1.4 and 4.1.5 though. > >> Thanks in advance for your help >> Keith >> >> Thank you both. I will clean up the Release Notes and the template accordingly. Regards Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Filenames for bundled dictionaries
See https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127637 for context. In short: when we bundle a dictionary in OpenOffice, it is downloaded during bootstrap and then bundled using the filename we use at bootstrap phase. This filename does not follow any conventions at the moment, and a change like dict-en-20170901.oxt -> dict-en-20171101.oxt was responsible for an RPM warning during my local upgrade (in that case it was my fault, as I had removed the old files before the upgrade). In general we should stick to the same names; this was discussed a long time ago when we had experimental support for incremental patches for example. I'm thus going to reopen the issue above (where so far I've fixed the English dictionary only) and apply the fix to all dictionaries. I won't be able to test all cases since I don't build all languages, but it should be quite straightforward. This is one of many clean-up operations that are best done on trunk. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
