Re: OpenOffice
On 10.05.2017 16:13, esh1907 wrote: On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: We are openly decleared dead. Peter Why not keep the Open Office rights (so the TDF can not use them), but rename the project - perhaps a new name will resurrect the project? Nah. That will not attract people. Releases and interesting stuff going on will. Names are sound and smoke... Old truth in IT. Big Data Buzzword has been invented in 1990... All the Best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
An open office version of OneNote?
Good morning, I recently discovered the microsoft app OneNote and i really love the idea of being able to write a document and separate it in sections and pages but there’s huge inconveniences in their app (like the fact users are forced to use the cloud and they can’t save the document on their laptop) and i don’t like Microsoft in general. So i would like to know if you have something similar to their app OneNote or if you ever plan to develop something similar? Thank you so much, Have a great day Marie P. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: An open office version of OneNote?
Hello Marie, I am not aware that we offer something like this. But would be cool feature. I keep this in mind. I would, if a standalone Application is okay for you a good non-cloud Notetaking app is tomboy https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Tomboy Also popular choice is evernote, but this is again cloud based (works on your smartphone too) and closed source. So propable not to interesting for you. All the best Peter On 14.05.2017 20:09, Marie Peron wrote: Good morning, I recently discovered the microsoft app OneNote and i really love the idea of being able to write a document and separate it in sections and pages but there’s huge inconveniences in their app (like the fact users are forced to use the cloud and they can’t save the document on their laptop) and i don’t like Microsoft in general. So i would like to know if you have something similar to their app OneNote or if you ever plan to develop something similar? Thank you so much, Have a great day Marie P. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Strange error while building OO for windows
Hi Pavel, Did you update the wiki accordingly? If you don't have a MediaWiki (MWiki) account, you can request one... Regards, Matthias Am 03.05.2017 um 00:47 schrieb Pavel Belski: > I tried to build OpenOffice from svn's AOO413 tag today, this time > successful. > > Still i have to say that the wiki page with step-by-step guide has some > errors that i had to deal with(or it's outdated a bit). > > Things that I encountered so far: > 1. Suggested ./configure option list in the wiki is missing a compulsory > "--disable-directx" option(in case you are not building with DirectX of > course). This is a minor complaint, as the ./configure script will inform > you about missing options. > 2. AOO413 build process will terminate with an error when running javadoc > on some Java sources - most likely due to this breaking change in JDK8: > http://blog.joda.org/2014/02/turning-off-doclint-in-jdk-8-javadoc.html. As > result, building AOO413 with jdk8 seems impossible if there isn't an easy > way to forward -Xdoclint:none option to javadoc. JDK 7 works. > 3. It could be helpful to write somewhere in build instructions that dmake > doesn't try to rebuild failed modules automatically if they aren't > recognised as "changed". I only noticed this while reading > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Debug_Build_Problems, and AFAIK every > other build system behaves differently(nmake, cmake/qmake, make ...) > > Building with symbols/debug mode enabled right now, should finish by > tomorrow morning. Then i'll do something with it. > > 2017-05-01 13:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Belski : > >> Hi all, >> >> currently i'm trying to build Open Office from svn sources, closely >> following the guide in https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/ >> Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10. >> The trunk revision i currently have is >> >> Pavel@Pavel-PC /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk >> $ svn info >> Pfad: . >> Wurzelpfad der Arbeitskopie: /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk >> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk >> Relative URL: ^/openoffice/trunk >> Basis des Projektarchivs: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf >> UUID des Projektarchivs: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >> Revision: 1793265 >> Knotentyp: Verzeichnis >> Plan: normal >> Letzter Autor: mseidel >> Letzte geänderte Rev: 1793216 >> Letztes Änderungsdatum: 2017-04-29 18:32:21 +0200 (Sa, 29. Apr 2017) >> >> Steps that are marked as "optional" on the Wiki page i skipped except for >> usage of dbghelp.dll(i configured with --enable-dbgutil). While trying to >> build with "build --all" everything goes fine until this: >> >> = >> Building module gtest >> = >> >> Entering /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk/ext_libraries/gtest >> >> mkdir: cannot create directory './wntmsci12/misc/build/gtest-1.7.0/': >> File exists >> C:/oosources/aoo-trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/Package.mk:28: *** >> gb_Deliver_deliver: file does not exist in solver, and cannot b. Stop.red: >> /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo-trunk/main/solver/420/ >> wntmsci12/inc/gtest/gtest.h >> dmake: Error code 2, while making './wntmsci12/misc/build/so_ >> built_oo_gtest' >> >> 1 module(s): >> gtest >> need(s) to be rebuilt >> >> Reason(s): >> >> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /cygdrive/c/oosources/aoo- >> trunk/ext_libraries/gtest >> >> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by >> running: >> >> build --all:gtest >> >> As i understand it couldn't build some module and so doesn't find it on >> the "deliver" step. The thing is, i don't see any compiler/linker error >> messages and so have no idea what's up with this and where do i even start >> trying to figure it out i also have no clue. Is this even something wrong >> on my end or perhaps the svn trunk i have is unbuildable. What is OO dev >> policy on acceptable build status of svn trunk revisions? >> >> Any ideas on what i should do next? >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: License status of code from forum.openoffice.org without headers
Until the link is fixed I activated the redirection. I would also like to see the ASF logo updated in the forums... Regards, Matthias Am 10.05.2017 um 17:20 schrieb Hagar Delest: > Le 10/05/2017 à 14:52, Matthias Seidel a écrit : >> Until someone fixes the link in the forum I can enable a redirection... >> But maybe it should better be https://www.openoffice.org/license.html ? >> >> There is already a redirection from 2012 >> https://www.openoffice.org/terms_of_use.html but it is not working, >> because the forum links to "/terms_of_use" instead to >> "/terms_of_use.html". > Good catch, I remember it was discussed a while ago but had missed > that there was a glitch in the link. > Of course, it would be better if the link could be updated to the good > one directly (https://www.openoffice.org/license.html). > > Let's wait for someone who can do that (Andrea?). > > Thanks, > Hagar > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
OPEN OFFICE DRAW - PLEASE CONTACT \ME ASAP
Why is there not a toll free number to call for technical Support? Why aren't all the proper tools provided which are needed for rulers? at the top of Draw and on the left hand side of Draw? Where are the normal measure scale(s) for all rulers provided which measures 01-25, 01-50, 01-75 0r 01-100 from the left to the right, for millimeters, centimeters, inches, etc..?! Why does it seem the ruler correction(s) are so impossible to make? Do you want to discourage user(s) so each no longer uses Open Office? Why are *6* *options* grayed out and made unusable in *Edit*? Why is it that in* View*-*Input* *Method* *Status* grayed out and made unusable? Why is *Special* *Character* grayed out and made unusable in *Insert*? *Tools*- Why aren't all *proper* *tools* *provided* to be used, that are *needed* to *correct* any *error*(*s*)? This *needs* to become a *priority* to be *corrected* *immediately*. *Format* - Why is *Default Formatting* grayed out and not made available to be used? Why is *Position* and *Size* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Crop* *Picture* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? *Insert* - Why is Formatting Mark grayed out and made unavailable to be used? *Modify* - Why is *Convert* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Arrange* options grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Distribution* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Name* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Group* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Enter* *Group* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Exit* *Group* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Combine* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Split* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? Why is *Connect* grayed out and made unavailable to be used? These need to be made a priority to be made available to all user(s) to use. Why isn't there a *download* *bar* on every *Open* *Office* *download* to let you know when the download(s) have *started*, *downloading* and when *finished*? This would be greatly *appreciated* by all Open Office users, I'm sure. One feature I am appreciative of is the document recovery. Time to make a lot of improvements to Open Office so it is much more effective and simple to use, as well as meeting professional standards. Do you have a remote screen capability? Patti C. 902-989-5582 Call Me Please.
