Patch from r1554051 reverted
A massive commit from Herbert from a couple days ago http://svn.apache.org/r1560747 overrides (reverts) a short configure.in patch I had applied on 29 December: http://svn.apache.org/r1554051 I assume this was not intentional (simply, the small patch was probably invisible in the large commit set), so I'm going to apply it again. But first I'd like to check that it was not reverted for other reasons. Just let me know. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Presentation FOSDEM.
On 21/01/2014 Raphael Bircher wrote: Do we have a UPDATED Template? No, we don't. If you want to use the event logo on your slides, you can find it at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Conferences/FOSDEM/2014 (I didn't find specific usage terms for the logo, but I believe nobody will complain if we use it for the FOSDEM presentations). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Templates/Extensions] About end-users request to run sites under HTTPS
On 23/01/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote: Time by time we receive end-users' requests asking why extensions. and templates. don't run under HTTPS. If we want to, SourceForge would be happy to install such certificates. Thoughts? It would make sense to have HTTPS on both those sites. Infra managed all of this internally so I don't know any details, but we now have a certificate for *.openoffice.org that we are using on the wiki and forum. Of course, the difference is that wiki/forum are hosted internally, and I believe it's impossible, for security reasons, to make that same certificate available for extensions and templates, which are hosted externally. I suggest that we proceed as follows: if there is consensus that it is a good feature to have HTTPS on Extensions and Templates, we will contact Infra and ask what to do (maybe the project should create two separate certificates covering only extensions.openoffice.org and templates.openoffice.org and hand them over to SourceForge to apply them; but honestly I don't know). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Forwarding Andre's answer (below) to the original poster who is not subscribed. Sune: please read http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html to know more about our mailing lists. Andrea. On 23/01/2014 Andre Fischer wotre: On 23.01.2014 13:50, Sune Drougge wrote: My problem is with BASE. On opening a database BASE is indicating that I have 40 items and it indicate this as: 40* There are more items in the database and when pressing the button for last item ( >| ) the rest of the items are shown. Can you help me or direct me to anyone that can? This is a know bug or a known feature, depending on who you ask [1] ( I tend to see it as a bug). The * means that the total number of the table rows is not yet known. I am sorry that I can not be of more help. -Andre [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=22831 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Templates/Extensions] About end-users request to run sites under HTTPS
On 26 January 2014 16:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/01/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote: > >> Time by time we receive end-users' requests asking why extensions. and >> templates. don't run under HTTPS. >> If we want to, SourceForge would be happy to install such certificates. >> Thoughts? >> > > It would make sense to have HTTPS on both those sites. > > Infra managed all of this internally so I don't know any details, but we > now have a certificate for *.openoffice.org that we are using on the wiki > and forum. Of course, the difference is that wiki/forum are hosted > internally, and I believe it's impossible, for security reasons, to make > that same certificate available for extensions and templates, which are > hosted externally. > > I suggest that we proceed as follows: if there is consensus that it is a > good feature to have HTTPS on Extensions and Templates, we will contact > Infra and ask what to do (maybe the project should create two separate > certificates covering only extensions.openoffice.org and > templates.openoffice.org and hand them over to SourceForge to apply them; > but honestly I don't know). > > Wearing my infra hat: *.openoffice.org can only be used for services located on apache hosts, we cannot give the certificate to e.g. sourceforge. However it would be possible to make a https: page under www.openoffice.org located on apache servers, that list extensions from e.g. sourceforge, meaning the extensions themself can be located outside apache (download will be http:// but lookup is https://). I hope this helps in the discussion. rgds jan I. Regards, > Andrea. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: PDF Import filter issues on our bugtracker
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi at all > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=119357&; > order=bug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=&query_format= > advanced&resolution=---&short_desc=PDF%20import&short_desc_ > type=allwordssubstr > > The PDF Import Extension is anymore a part of our release. But we have > still same bugs about the PDF Import extension in our bugzilla. So what we > want to do with this bugs. For my point of view it makes no sense to keep > this bugs open in our bugtracker. Is the PDF Import extension still > maintaned by someone? If yes, is it possible to handower the Bugs to the > actual maintaner? What do you think about it? > > Greetings Raphael > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > I would say "no" as the actual maintainer of the latest pdf-import extension, Ariel, is capable of reviewing this list on his own. Thankfully most of them are tagged with product "extension". I don't know what the history was on using the OpenOffice issues tracking system to report problems with extensions however. Currently, "extensions" as a product category no longer exists in BZ due to cleanup last year. It might be a good idea to take a look at all bugs for product = "extension". -- - MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140124
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (1/18 - 1/24): Test execution: 1. New feature testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges - Ongoing Bug 124079 - The emphasis mark in comment/annotation text is at top text incorrectly when import .docx file to AOO(existed in AOO 3.4.0) 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 673(287 last week) test executions to about 28(last week 5) volunteers, and completed about 23%(last week 13.8%) in execution (250 test executions done, last week 150). Although we are still tight to finish feature FVT before Feb 13, we get 23 more test execution volunteers this week, we can speed up hopefully TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X209184169011.96 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit22220120109.46 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167137273017.96 Windows 7180896721350.56 Windows 8182150265117.58 Total108583519251723.0 Defect summary: 1. Summay of proposed high priority issues in Bugzilla, the creteria is: Priority =P1, P2 and Severity = blocker, critical https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=119849&namedcmd=AOO_Critical_P1P2_Need_Fix&remaction=run&sharer_id=249289 Issues & quality highlight: 1. We have execution gap in FVT test as lack Mac text execution volunteers in testing, have sent the call in forum for test execution volunteers on Mac and other platfroms(except Linux Redhat 64bit) 2. Build for Mac 64bit and Linux will be available in buildbot and dev snapshot next Monday (Jan 27), informed people to use snapshot build as it contains the lastest stuff for OS X 64bit and also a corresponding installation package for OS X. Volunteer status: 1. 23 new test execution volunteers(total 28 so far, 18 are for Linux Redhat 64bit) joined on FVT execution work 2. Need defect volunteers to confirm proposed high priority issues in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary) Plan for next week: 1. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows 2. Complete to do testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges 3. Complete to add test cases(BVT level) for IA2 testing in Testlink A tremendous thanks to you all for offering to assist with the AOO 4.1 FVT, especially John Walicki and other Linux platform testers as your help will fill the gap in testing on Linux Redhat 64bit! Thanks you all for effort this week, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: SOE (Arrow Styles) file submission mechanism
What would be the next step after a "patch" submission. Wouldn't that get it simply incorporated into the program? I'd like to see it downloadable by users, a la Templates. I'd also like, admittedly, credit for it, as it's a domain-specific thing for me. (In comparison, the Templates section is plastered with a bunch of posts of DVD label templates for Lulu.com, seemingly obviously an advertising ploy by them.) On Tue, 1/21/14, Rob Weir wrote: Subject: Re: SOE (Arrow Styles) file submission mechanism On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:29 PM, l wrote: > Hello... > > I've created numerous line ends (aka "Arrow Styles") that I'd like to contribute. However, there's no method on the website for submitting this file type (SOE). > . . . You can create an issue in Bugzilla, attach the files there, and then mark the issue type as a 'PATCH". That will allow the developers to review it. Thanks! -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Contribute code for OOXML export
Hi~ Jan, Thanks Jan for your help. I'll work on this branch. About my patches, I picked some, see 123909, 123910, 123816, 122927... Clarence 2014-01-24 jan i > On 24 January 2014 08:14, Clarence GUO wrote: > > > As although I contributed 10+ changes, I'm not committer yet, could > anybody > > help me to create a branch? > > Thanks, > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/ooxml created. Happy > programming. > > just write here on the list, whenever you want a merge from trunk. > > I cannot comment on how many changes is needed to become a committer, but I > must admit I have not seen your patches on this list ? > > rgds > jan I. > > > > Clarence > > > > > > 2014/1/23 Andrea Pescetti > > > > > On 22/01/2014 Clarence GUO wrote: > > > > > >> We have some pilot code for enabling OOXML export, developed > > >> by De Bin, Jian Yuan, Sun Ying, Jin Long... Although it still has some > > >> ways > > >> to go before ready for production, we'd like to contribute it first to > > AOO > > >> > > > > > > Very good news! Even if ODF remains the native and preferred format, > > users > > > regularly asked for better OOXML interoperability. I agree this should > > stay > > > in a branch and not integrated/released until it reaches the quality > > users > > > expect from OpenOffice. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Andrea. > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
Re: crash p1 bug, data loss - openoffice
Hi,Sam I try to reproduce your issue on AOO4.1 and AOO4.0 (AOO400m3(Build:9702) - Rev. 1503704)presentation and writer on Windows7 ，but fail to reproduce Can you provide which product : presentation or writer , AOO4.0.0 version build information ,which will be helpful for us to reproduce your issue Thanks On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 01/25/2014 04:45 AM, schrieb Sam Jennings: > > >> I have uncovered a bug in openoffice on windows 7, 64 pro >> Openoffice 4.0.0 >> >> To reproduce this bug, make a table with 3 rows and 3 columns (maybe >> other numbers would work as well) >> >> now merge the top row's cells >> now select a column beneath that merged row, and delete it. >> >> that should crash openoffice and lose all your data. >> >> workaround? nothing fast. >> >> sorry, it's easier to mail your dev than painstakingly drudge your >> website for the bug database and try to get past whatever prescreening it >> undoubtedly has. but great free software guys...but please fix that! it's >> a priorty 1...crash& data loss. >> > > Thanks for telling us the problem. However, it's better suited in our > bugtracker. So, please report it here: > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ > > Thanks > > Marcus > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Patch from r1554051 reverted
On 01/26/2014 10:41 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > A massive commit from Herbert from a couple days ago > http://svn.apache.org/r1560747 > overrides (reverts) a short configure.in patch I had applied on 29 > December: > http://svn.apache.org/r1554051 > > I assume this was not intentional (simply, the small patch was probably > invisible in the large commit set), so I'm going to apply it again. +1, sorry about that. > But first I'd like to check that it was not reverted for other reasons. Just > let me know. The accident happened when a merge conflict was wrongly resolved. Thanks for finding the problem. Herbert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
