Next Plan for AOO 4.0 Testing

[Shenfeng Liu]

Hi, all,
  I just want to update on our next plan for AOO 4.0 Testing. Since sidebar
FVT already finished, we are currently preparing for a full regression
which will cover the following areas:
(1) Basic Function Verification
(2) MS Interoperability Test
(3) 2nd phase of sidebar testing
(4) Defect verification

So following works are on going:
- Yi Xuan and Yu Zhen are inputting test cases in Testlink.
- Yu Zhen and I are working on are test guidance for the Full Regression
Test, and plan to publish it on our planning wiki for reference.
- Then we wait for the next snapshot build from Juergen which contains the
most recent fixes.

  I saw many people joined and volunteered for QA work. I will keep a list
and contact you all when the Regression Testing is kicked off. Thanks very
much for your supporting to AOO QA work!


- Shenfeng (Simon)

[RELEASE]: new SNAPSHOT build

[Jürgen Schmidt]

Hi,

I would like to propose a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag
which I have moved to revision 1478430

I will keep you informed when the builds for MacOS and Windows are
available.

@Ariel, I hope again it's ok for you

Juergen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Possible broken link: other

[michael . buchser]

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-SDK_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download


Michael Buchser

PwC | Workstation Engineer
Office: +41 058 792 6161 | Main: +41 058 792 6100
Email: michael.buch...@ch.pwc.com
PricewaterhouseCoopers AG
Bleichemattstrasse 43, CH-5000 Aarau, Switzerland
LiveMeeting Lobby
WebEx Meeting Center

__


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

Re: [RELEASE]: new SNAPSHOT build

[Shenfeng Liu]

Juergen,
  Thanks for your leading on the snapshot build!
  I plan to kick off the full regression test as soon as this build come
out.

- Shenfeng (Simon)



2013/5/3 Jürgen Schmidt 

> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag
> which I have moved to revision 1478430
>
> I will keep you informed when the builds for MacOS and Windows are
> available.
>
> @Ariel, I hope again it's ok for you
>
> Juergen
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [sidebar]Bug 122049: Text displayed on Properties deck when no object is selected

[Jürgen Schmidt]

On 4/30/13 8:55 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 29.04.2013 17:46, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>> Am Montag, 29. April 2013 um 09:20 schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>> On 24.04.2013 13:12, Armin Le Grand wrote:
 Hi List,

 I agree that the conent (no content) is not good. What we want the
 user to do is to select an object or create/insert one, so it would be
 nice to offer just that. It is a suggestion, but offering insertin of
 objects may be best. Possibilities for this:

 (1) Gallery
 (2) Panel which offers to start DrawObject construction, like in the
 drawing toolbar

 We have a panel for (1), but the context switch would need to change
 the TabBar (instead of reacting on context switch and changing the
 panels dependent of content).

 We have no panel for (2), but it may be not too difficult to crreate
 one. Wouldn't it be nice to have/show that panel for other apps, too?
 It could show the draw object creators as ToolBars with useful groups,
 but some of this vertically, thus offering a much more direct
 selection which object creation to start than the current Draw toolbar
 offers...

 Maybe too much for 4.0, but...

 Sincerely,
 Armin

>>>
>>> We still need the replacement text when there is no panel. I agree
>>> that we should show a property panel for Draw. But there are situations
>>> where there is no panel defined. It can even happen as a result of a
>>> configuration error.
>>>
>>> So, does anybody has a better idea than
>>>
>>> "Please, select an object to access its properties"
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> "Properties for the task that you are performing are not available for
>>> the current selection"
>>>
>> We should keep in mind that this kind of changes means some extra work
>> to update the translation sources.
>>
>> It's possible but if at all we will probably update the files only
>> ones. This means we have to define a deadline for this kind of changes.
> 
> Would the end of the week be OK?

yes, I think that would be ok. I will update at the beginning of next
week the translation sources.

Juergen


> 
> -Andre
> 
>>
>> Juergen
>>> ?
>>> -Andre
>>>
 On 24.04.2013 09:37, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 23.04.2013 21:43, RGB ES wrote:
>>  From enhancement request 122049
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122049
>>
>> With the sidebar enabled, on a Draw document with no object selected
>> the
>> Properties deck shows no controls and only displays the following
>> text
>>
>> "Properties for the task that you are performing are not available
>> in the
>> sidebar at this time"
>>
>> This text is a bit misleading, because it is not clear that you only
>> need
>> to select an object to see something there.
>>
>> I'm no native English speaker so I'm not able to provide a good
>> alternative
>> for that text. Something like
>>
>> "Please, select an object to access its properties"
>>
>> comes to my mind, but for sure there is a better wording.
>> Suggestions?
>>
>> Regards
>> Ricardo
>>
> Thanks for starting this discussion. What about this:
>
> "Properties for the task that you are performing are not available
> for the current selection"
>
> -Andre
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
 -- 
 ALG

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [build] source of epm source package no longer available

[Herbert Dürr]

On 2013/05/02 9:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Andrew Rist wrote:

On 5/2/2013 12:22 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:

There is also the version that we use at the moment:
http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz

changes made and linux 64 build kicked off...


I've just updated the Building Guide accordingly:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO#Configuration_and_bootstrapping


Thanks!


The only thing that has to be changed is configure.in, where there is
a suggestion for the download (line 132 where the --with-epm-url
option is defined).
But copying it to apache extras would probably be better.
Any volunteers to make the necessary changes?


Done [1]. I also added an alternative location [2] that seems to be more 
generic. It also has the matching MD5.


[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1478665
[2] http://epm.sourcearchive.com/downloads/3.7-1/epm_3.7.orig.tar.gz


Both proposed changes make sense too, of course. In general, we should
consolidate build dependencies (libraries, dictionaries) on as few
servers as possible, to avoid problems like this one.


+1
We already have [3] as backup to upstream locations for the category-B 
stuff. Can we put category-X stuff up there too?


[3] https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/downloads/list

Herbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [sidebar] issue 122065 needs UX input

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann]

Hi,

On 26.04.2013 10:35, Xin Li wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to share my thought on these two issues :
> 
> 122065：For user, control Z means undo last action. If he click the up arrow
> of the spinner control 4 times:0.02,0.04,0.06,0.08. The result of his
> mental model by clicking Control Z should be 0.06,0.04,0.02,0.00. Just back
> to last status.
> If the focus move to other controls, Control Z should not work. But if the
> focus move to editor working space, Control Z should work.
> 

Sorry for the late feedback.
Thanks for your input.

As far as I can see the spin box control do not have an implementation
for an Undo stack. Currently, it remembers the value before the first
editing took place and on Undo this value is restored. There are no
intermediate steps possible, now - if my knowledge about this control is
correct.

Thus, if we really want to have such an Undo stack in our spin box
controls we should focus on it for one of our next releases.

Best regards, Oliver.


> 122062:  It‘s ok that put the unit in spin box. User can easily change the
> unit they want.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 2013/4/24 Armin Le Grand 
> 
>>  Hi Oliver,
>>
>> 122062 [1] has the same background...
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122062
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>  Armin
>>
>>
>> On 24.04.2013 10:40, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had a look at issue 122065 [1], submitted regarding the behavior of
>>> edit controls in the sidebar panel.
>>> It describes a more general problem of edit controls in OpenOffice -
>>> already observable in the existing UI.
>>>
>>> For a general improved UI behavior of the edit controls in the sidebar
>>> panel one of the UX experts should have a look.
>>> Please, can someone from UX take action on this issue.
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122065
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>>
>>> --**--**-
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>   --
>> ALG
>>
>>
>> --**--**-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll

[Kadal Amutham]

The 37th Logo looks great, signaling a shift from traditional blue to red.
Red signifies, hot, go ahead. (Our traffic signals have wrong  color
scheme. Red should be for Go and green should be for cool down and stay)

Good effort by our team

With Warm Regards

V.Kadal Amutham
919444360480
914422396480


On 3 May 2013 15:41, Kadal Amutham  wrote:

> Amazing!
>
> With Warm Regards
>
> V.Kadal Amutham
> 919444360480
> 914422396480
>
>
> On 3 May 2013 05:19, Albino B Neto  wrote:
>
>> 2013/5/2 Rob Weir :
>> > The survey ran for a week,and received over 5000 responses.  I wrote
>> > up the results, along with some charts, and put them here:
>> >
>> > http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/
>>
>> Good. :-)
>>
>> The Brazil ranked second in country, cool.
>>
>> --
>> Albino B Neto
>> Debian GNU/Linux | FSFLA | Free Software
>> fsfla.orgtux-es.orgfsf.orggnu.org
>> < binoanb [at] gmail [dot] com >
>> Chave GPG: 5ED34354
>> Key fingerprint = 0DFF 4640 44CD 5935 D0F5  E3DF 4E0F A597 5ED3 4354
>> @binoanb   gplus.to/binoanb
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll

[Kadal Amutham]

Amazing!

With Warm Regards

V.Kadal Amutham
919444360480
914422396480


On 3 May 2013 05:19, Albino B Neto  wrote:

> 2013/5/2 Rob Weir :
> > The survey ran for a week,and received over 5000 responses.  I wrote
> > up the results, along with some charts, and put them here:
> >
> > http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/
>
> Good. :-)
>
> The Brazil ranked second in country, cool.
>
> --
> Albino B Neto
> Debian GNU/Linux | FSFLA | Free Software
> fsfla.orgtux-es.orgfsf.orggnu.org
> < binoanb [at] gmail [dot] com >
> Chave GPG: 5ED34354
> Key fingerprint = 0DFF 4640 44CD 5935 D0F5  E3DF 4E0F A597 5ED3 4354
> @binoanb   gplus.to/binoanb
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: #122115 Base: Record mixup/repetition when loading chunks from SQL-DB

[Jean-Louis 'Hans' Fuchs]

Hello

We were able to isolate the problem further. It happend in "paging" in 
the Database (Base) application. Connections to SQL-type DBs will 
mixup/repeat records when loading the next chunk and the scrolling up. 
It's not only a display problem. The data then is acutally there and 
further actions will act upon these records.


https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122115

Our strategy at the moment: Find somebody who worked on this part of 
AOO and ask him for help. Is someone willing to help us or knows who to 
ask?


Best,
Jean-Louis Fuchs



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[Sidebar] Win / Linux: layout difference of the color picker?

[Hagar Delest]

Hi,

I face a display glitch on the AOO dev build, see this bug report: 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122198

Armin kindly proposed a workaround (thanks!) but I'm wondering if there isn't 
some difference of behavior between Windows and GNU/Linux (it works fine by 
default on the Win version from Armin).

Could someone with AOO 4 under GNU/Linux check if the color picker (for font 
color for example) gives the same display when called from the main toolbar and 
from the sidebar? On my system row,col are inverted.

Thanks
Hagar

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

A2S redefined

[Pavel Janík]

Hi,

curent trunk:

[ build CXX ] svx/source/sidebar/insert/InsertPropertyPanel
/Users/pavel/BUILD/BuildDir/ooo_trunk_src/svx/source/sidebar/insert/InsertPropertyPanel.cxx:49:1:
 error: "A2S" redefined
In file included from 
/Users/pavel/BUILD/BuildDir/ooo_trunk_src/svx/source/sidebar/insert/InsertPropertyPanel.cxx:30:
/Users/pavel/BUILD/BuildDir/ooo_trunk_src/solver/400/unxmacxi.pro/inc/sfx2/sidebar/Tools.hxx:37:1:
 error: this is the location of the previous definition
make: *** 
[/Users/pavel/BUILD/BuildDir/ooo_trunk_src/solver/400/unxmacxi.pro/workdir/CxxObject/svx/source/sidebar/insert/InsertPropertyPanel.o]
 Error 1
dmake:  Error code 2, while making 'all'

-- 
Pavel Janík




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Sidebar] Win / Linux: layout difference of the color picker?

[Mechtilde]

Hello

Under Debian 7.0 I can't see that problem. the display is the same.

Regards

Mechtilde

Am 03.05.2013 20:35, schrieb Hagar Delest:
> Hi,
> 
> I face a display glitch on the AOO dev build, see this bug report:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122198
> 
> Armin kindly proposed a workaround (thanks!) but I'm wondering if there
> isn't some difference of behavior between Windows and GNU/Linux (it
> works fine by default on the Win version from Armin).
> 
> Could someone with AOO 4 under GNU/Linux check if the color picker (for
> font color for example) gives the same display when called from the main
> toolbar and from the sidebar? On my system row,col are inverted.
> 
> Thanks
> Hagar
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Possible broken link: other

[Marcus (OOo)]

Hi Michael,

I don't see a problem with downloading the SDK file.

But maybe it is working better for you when choosing a different mirror 
by clicking on the link in the sentence: "Problems with the download? 
Please use this direct link, or try another mirror."


HTH

Marcus



Am 05/03/2013 10:05 AM, schrieb michael.buch...@ch.pwc.com:



http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-SDK_3.4.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download


Michael Buchser


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1475768 - /openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/index.html

[Marcus (OOo)]

Am 04/29/2013 12:58 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:

Am 04/26/2013 02:51 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:


Hi Rob,

it's great that you keep our download counter up-to-date.

Because it's showing the numbers an a few webpages, IMHO it makes sense
to
centralize the core number, so that only one location has to be updated
and
no every webpage for itself.

I could give you this little present. ;-)



The thought has entered my mind.  But I haven't come up with a great
solution so far.

The "master" value is whatever is in the 3rd column of the last row of
this data file:

http://www.openoffice.org/stats/aoo34-downloads.txt

We'd need to extract that, divide by 1 million and truncate to get a
value like "47".



Yes, but this would be the master solution. I hadn't this in mind but more a
intermediate solution like caching the number in one file and all respective
webpages showing this.

Would this be acceptable? To get this out of "aoo34-downloads.txt" is one
step further I don't know how to do it yet.



It doesn't simple very simple to me.  If it was just text in  on
the page, then making that dynamic is easy.  But the interaction with
Facebook is trickier.

For example, look at this OpenGraph metadata from the the download/index.html:




Do we reallly need to state an exact number here?

IMHO it is sufficiant to state that we have "... millions over millions 
trusted downloads ..." or a similar text without numbers.


Marcus




This is in the, so Javascript is not running yet.  And, it is
fetched by Facebook for creating posts when someone shares, and I
doubt they are interpreting Javascript.

So I like the idea of simplifying this, but I think it would need to
be done servers-side.


-Rob





Ideally ideally the aoo34-downloads.txt would also be updated
automatically based on calling the SourceForge REST API.



Sure ;-)


Marcus




Am 04/25/2013 03:47 PM, schrieb robw...@apache.org:


Author: robweir
Date: Thu Apr 25 13:47:34 2013
New Revision: 1475768

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1475768
Log:
update download count

Modified:
   openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/index.html

Modified: openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/index.html
URL:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/index.html?rev=1475768&r1=1475767&r2=1475768&view=diff


==
--- openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/index.html (original)
+++ openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/index.html Thu Apr 25 13:47:34
2013
@@ -136,9 +136,9 @@


 
-Over 44 million downloads of AOO 3.4
+Over 47 million downloads of AOO 3.4

-31 March 2013:Apache OpenOffice 3.4 was released in
May. Downloads now exceed 44 million. We invite you to take a look at
+20 April 2013:Apache OpenOffice 3.4 was released in
May. Downloads now exceed 47 million. We invite you to take a look at
http://stats.openoffice.org/";>our interactive charts
of daily and cumulative downloads.
  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll

[Rob Weir]

I've updated the report to include links to the comments received for
the top scoring logos.

You can find links at the end of the report:

http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/

Or here:

http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/34.txt
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/36.txt
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/5.txt
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/28.txt
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/12.txt
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/13.txt
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/31.txt

Next steps?  As far as the survey goes, I think I'm done.  We have a
heap of data.  I tried to make some sense of it.  But it now is for
the designers to take all this feedback and create one or more revised
designs.  Of the top scoring logos, two were from Kevin Grignon, one
from Samer Mansour, two from Michael Acevedo and one from someone I
haven't seen on the mailing list, but whose entry on the wiki was from
"Chris R."

Maybe it makes sense in the next round to aim for one design per
designer?  If so, we can probably narrow it down to 3 or 4 choices,
which we can either poll users again for, or just have a vote of
project participants.

There isn't much time yet, so could I suggest we aim for having the
revisions done for next Friday, May 10th?  Aim for 400 pixels wide,
PNG with white or transparent background.

Regards,

-Rob

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:
> The survey ran for a week,and received over 5000 responses.  I wrote
> up the results, along with some charts, and put them here:
>
> http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/
>
> It is rather long and detailed, so I'll take a subset of that content
> and spin it into a blog post over the next week or two.
>
> If there is an approach to analysis that I missed, let me know.  It is
> easy for me to create additional tables or charts.
>
> If any designer wants to receive the user comments on their logo let
> me know the logo number and I'll send them to you.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Lang pack of pt-BR for tests

[Claudio Filho]

Hi

I finished the translation of UI for pt-BR to aoo 4.0. Is possible to build
a lang pack to see how is it and to start our revision?

Best,
Claudio

Re: [Sidebar] Win / Linux: layout difference of the color picker?

[Andrea Pescetti]

Mechtilde wrote:

Under Debian 7.0 I can't see that problem. the display is the same.


Same for me, with a brand new AOO400m1(Build:9700) build, downloaded 
from the snapshot URL.


Palettes are identical in both places and match Armin's screenshot in 
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=80620 (not his most 
recent screenshot, but his commit was revision 1478676 while the latest 
SNAPSHOT tag seems set to r1478430 and thus earlier than that).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: new SNAPSHOT build

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:13:46AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose a new snapshot build based on the SNAPSHOT tag
> which I have moved to revision 1478430
> 
> I will keep you informed when the builds for MacOS and Windows are
> available.
> 
> @Ariel, I hope again it's ok for you

Linux builds are available.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpkUHCkiVZsk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [RELEASE]: new SNAPSHOT build

[Albino B Neto]

2013/5/3 Ariel Constenla-Haile :
> Linux builds are available.

Good. ;-)

-- 
Albino B Neto
Debian GNU/Linux | FSFLA | Free Software
fsfla.orgtux-es.orgfsf.orggnu.org
< binoanb [at] gmail [dot] com >
Chave GPG: 5ED34354
Key fingerprint = 0DFF 4640 44CD 5935 D0F5  E3DF 4E0F A597 5ED3 4354
@binoanb   gplus.to/binoanb

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

XHTML filter extensions

[H. Louafi]

Hello,

Recently and as part of my doctoral research project, I have extended
the OpenOffice
XHTML export filter by fixing numerous bugs and adding new features, such
as adding the possibility to export images and shapes (line, circle,..)
into traditional Web pages.

In addition, I added the possibility to export images and text using a
scaling parameter and quality factor (for JPEG images). In the future,
these extensions can help people using OpenOffice documents via their
web-enabled mobile devices (by mean of Web browsers).

Now, I need you help to incorporate these extensions into OpenOffice and
give the community a better experience with the XHTML filter. Actually, I
don't khow what the process is. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Habib

Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll

[Alphonso Whitfield III]

I can set up a page to compile the voting stats etc. If I had been able to 
participate more actively earlier I could had provided one for the larger logo 
voting and assessment. 

I can have it ready by 10 pm EDT USA if you like Rob? Please advise. 

You are the ringleader of this effort please provide some guidance and I can 
knock it out. 


Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan 
with The Vital Portal 

Alphonso Whitfield 
i...@thevitalportal.com 
Vital 
912-816-2595 
Skype: vital.i.net 

Visit us at: 
The Vital Portal 

The Vital Portal On facebook 

Visit our Google Community 

Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: 
The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . 






- Original Message -

From: "Rob Weir"  
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, market...@openoffice.apache.org 
Cc: "Samer Mansour" , "Michael Acevedo" 
, "Kevin Grignon"  
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 3:46:33 PM 
Subject: Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll 

I've updated the report to include links to the comments received for 
the top scoring logos. 

You can find links at the end of the report: 

http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/ 

Or here: 

http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/34.txt 
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/36.txt 
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/5.txt 
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/28.txt 
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/12.txt 
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/13.txt 
http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/31.txt 

Next steps? As far as the survey goes, I think I'm done. We have a 
heap of data. I tried to make some sense of it. But it now is for 
the designers to take all this feedback and create one or more revised 
designs. Of the top scoring logos, two were from Kevin Grignon, one 
from Samer Mansour, two from Michael Acevedo and one from someone I 
haven't seen on the mailing list, but whose entry on the wiki was from 
"Chris R." 

Maybe it makes sense in the next round to aim for one design per 
designer? If so, we can probably narrow it down to 3 or 4 choices, 
which we can either poll users again for, or just have a vote of 
project participants. 

There isn't much time yet, so could I suggest we aim for having the 
revisions done for next Friday, May 10th? Aim for 400 pixels wide, 
PNG with white or transparent background. 

Regards, 

-Rob 

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rob Weir  wrote: 
> The survey ran for a week,and received over 5000 responses. I wrote 
> up the results, along with some charts, and put them here: 
> 
> http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/ 
> 
> It is rather long and detailed, so I'll take a subset of that content 
> and spin it into a blog post over the next week or two. 
> 
> If there is an approach to analysis that I missed, let me know. It is 
> easy for me to create additional tables or charts. 
> 
> If any designer wants to receive the user comments on their logo let 
> me know the logo number and I'll send them to you. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> -Rob 

- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org 

Problems, with suggested fixes, & questions

[Dr YaLeah]

Problems:
 
1)In an OpenOffice text document that has information lined up in columns 
(such as a price list or menu):   When changing the size of the font the size 
of "tabs" and "spaces" does not remain consistant, which makes the columns no 
longer line up as before. About 1/3 of the entries will have to have the tabs 
&/or spaces edited to bring them back into alignment. This is very time 
consuming and should be unnessary. Tabs & spaces need to be one constant size, 
never variable, within each font size. Being able to lock the position of a 
column (not as a table) would also work.
 
2)In an OpenOffice spreadsheet:   Within a cell it is common to want to 
split wrap-around text at the the author's point of preference (such as with an 
address). The placement of multiple "spaces" to push the text into position is 
time consuming, sloppy, and unpredictable at best. Then, if the size of the 
cell or the font changes, the entire document has to be searched to repair the 
unwanted auto-adjustments. Please provide a way to use commands like "enter" 
and "tab" inside the cells.
 
3)When pasting information copied from any internet source into an 
OpenOffice text document, OpenOffice will consistantly crash at least 20% of 
the time. Worse, I've experienced days when it was 98% of the time. The method 
I've used is to "block" the desired information on the website, "control + C" 
to copy, then "control + V" to paste the information into my OpenOffice 
document. Photos cause the most trouble but text is in no way immune.
 
 
Questions:
 
1)In an OpenOffice spreadsheet:     I don't want to have to reorganize an 
entire spreadsheet to accomodate a single unusual entry so is there a way to 
split one cell into multiple cells?    I'd like the choice of vertical, 
horizontal, or multiple splits and also need to be able to adjust the size of 
the resultant cells.
 
2)In an OpenOffice text document  please tell me how to switch between 
"manual" and "auto-placement" of outline numbering. Also, how do I set "manual" 
as my default?